Internet DRAFT - draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic

draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic






Network Working Group                                          A. Newton
Internet-Draft                                            VeriSign, Inc.
Expires: February 21, 2006                                       M. Sanz
                                                                DENIC eG
                                                         August 20, 2005


              Request to Move RFC 1032 to Historic Status
                   draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 21, 2006.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

   This is a request to move the RFC 1032 from status UNKNOWN to status
   HISTORIC.








Newton & Sanz           Expires February 21, 2006               [Page 1]

Internet-Draft            RFC 1032 to Historic               August 2005


1.  Details

   The Network Information Center (NIC) does not provide domain
   registration services anymore for the Defense Data Network (DDN) or
   the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), nor is the
   administrator of the root domain name servers or of the "ARPA,"
   "COM," "EDU," "ORG," "GOV," and "MIL" top level domains.  The entity
   SRI-NIC no longer exists, and many of these functions have been taken
   over by ICANN, ccTLDs and gTLDs.  The vague DNS concepts (zone,
   domain server...) defined in RFC 1032 are best left to the
   authoritative sources.  The description of the Nicname/Whois service
   made there has been obsoleted by RFC 3912.  In the light of this all,
   this document requests to move the RFC 1032 from status UNKNOWN to
   status HISTORIC.





































Newton & Sanz           Expires February 21, 2006               [Page 2]

Internet-Draft            RFC 1032 to Historic               August 2005


2.  Security Considerations

   Moving RFC 1032 to HISTORIC has no known effect on the security of
   the internet.

3.  References

   [RFC1032]  Stahl, M., "Domain administrators guide", RFC 1032,
              November 1987.

   [RFC3912]  Daigle, L., "WHOIS Protocol Specification", RFC 3912,
              September 2004.







































Newton & Sanz           Expires February 21, 2006               [Page 3]

Internet-Draft            RFC 1032 to Historic               August 2005


Authors' Addresses

   Andrew L. Newton
   VeriSign, Inc.
   21345 Ridgetop Circle
   Sterling, VA  20166
   USA

   Phone: +1 703 948 3382
   Email: anewton@verisignlabs.com; andy@hxr.us
   URI:   http://www.verisignlabs.com/


   Marcos Sanz
   DENIC eG
   Wiesenhuettenplatz 26
   Frankfurt  D-60329
   DE

   Email: sanz@denic.de
   URI:   http://www.denic.de






























Newton & Sanz           Expires February 21, 2006               [Page 4]

Internet-Draft            RFC 1032 to Historic               August 2005


Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.




Newton & Sanz           Expires February 21, 2006               [Page 5]