Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls
TEAS Working Group T. Saad
Internet-Draft R. Gandhi
Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems Inc
Expires: 27 November 2023 X. Liu
IBM Corporation
V. P. Beeram
Juniper Networks
I. Bryskin
Individual
26 May 2023
A YANG Data Model for MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls-04
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for the configuration and
management of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic
Engineering (TE) tunnels, Label Switched Paths (LSPs) and interfaces.
The model augments the TE generic YANG model for MPLS packet
dataplane technology.
This model covers data for configuration, operational state, remote
procedural calls, and event notifications.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 November 2023.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. MPLS TE YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Module(s) Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Model Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. MPLS TE YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction
YANG [RFC6020] and [RFC7950] is a data modeling language used to
define the contents of a conceptual data store that allows networked
devices to be managed using NETCONF [RFC6241]. YANG has proved
relevant beyond its initial confines, as bindings to other interfaces
(e.g. RESTCONF [RFC8040]) and encoding other than XML (e.g. JSON)
are being defined. Furthermore, YANG data models can be used as the
basis of implementation for other interfaces, such as CLI and
programmatic APIs.
This document describes the YANG data model for configuration and
management of MPLS TE tunnels, LSPs, and interfaces. Other YANG
module(s) that model the establishment of MPLS LSP(s) via signaling
protocols such as RSVP-TE ([RFC3209], [RFC3473]) are described in
separate document(s).
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
[RFC7950].
1.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects
are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in Table 1.
+==========+====================+=========================+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+==========+====================+=========================+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------+
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------+
| rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------+
| te | ietf-te | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------+
| te-mpls | ietf-te-mpls | This document |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------+
| te-types | ietf-te-types | [RFC8776] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------+
Table 1: Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules
1.3. Acronyms and Abbreviations
MPLS: Multiprotocol Label Switching LSP: Label Switched Path LSR:
Label Switching Router LER: Label Edge Router TE: Traffic
Engineering
2. MPLS TE YANG Model
The MPLS TE YANG model covers the configuration, state, RPC and
notifications data pertaining to MPLS TE interfaces, tunnels and LSPs
parameters. The data specific to the signaling protocol used to
establish MPLS LSP(s) is outside the scope of this document and is
covered in other documents.
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
2.1. Module(s) Relationship
The MPLS TE YANG module "ietf-te-mpls" imports the following modules:
* ietf-te defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
* ietf-te-types and ietf-te-packet-types defined in [RFC8776]
* ietf-routing-types defined in [RFC8294]
* ietf-mpls-static defined in [I-D.ietf-mpls-static-yang]
This module references the following documents: [RFC8233], [RFC4710],
[RFC8570], and [RFC4124].
+---------+ o: augment
| ietf-te |
+---------+
o o
| |
+-----+ +-----+
| |
+---------------+ +--------------+
| ietf-rsvp-te^ |--o| ietf-te-mpls |
+---------------+ +--------------+
X---oY indicates that module X augments module Y
^ indicates a module defined in other documents
Figure 1: Relationship of MPLS TE module with TE generic and
RSVP-TE YANG modules
The MPLS TE YANG module "ietf-te-mpls" augments the "ietf-te" TE
generic YANG module as shown in Figure 1.
2.2. Model Tree Diagram
Figure 2 shows the tree diagram of the MPLS TE YANG model that is
defined in ietf-te-mpls.yang.
module: ietf-te-mpls
augment /te:te/te-dev:performance-thresholds:
+--rw throttle
+--rw one-way-delay-offset? uint32
+--rw measure-interval? uint32
+--rw advertisement-interval? uint32
+--rw suppression-interval? uint32
+--rw threshold-out
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
| +--rw one-way-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-residual-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--rw one-way-available-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--rw one-way-utilized-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--rw two-way-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-min-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-max-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-delay-variation? uint32
| +--rw one-way-packet-loss? decimal64
| +--rw two-way-min-delay? uint32
| +--rw two-way-max-delay? uint32
| +--rw two-way-delay-variation? uint32
| +--rw two-way-packet-loss? decimal64
+--rw threshold-in
| +--rw one-way-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-residual-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--rw one-way-available-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--rw one-way-utilized-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--rw two-way-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-min-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-max-delay? uint32
| +--rw one-way-delay-variation? uint32
| +--rw one-way-packet-loss? decimal64
| +--rw two-way-min-delay? uint32
| +--rw two-way-max-delay? uint32
| +--rw two-way-delay-variation? uint32
| +--rw two-way-packet-loss? decimal64
+--rw threshold-accelerated-advertisement
+--rw one-way-delay? uint32
+--rw one-way-residual-bandwidth?
| rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
+--rw one-way-available-bandwidth?
| rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
+--rw one-way-utilized-bandwidth?
| rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
+--rw two-way-delay? uint32
+--rw one-way-min-delay? uint32
+--rw one-way-max-delay? uint32
+--rw one-way-delay-variation? uint32
+--rw one-way-packet-loss? decimal64
+--rw two-way-min-delay? uint32
+--rw two-way-max-delay? uint32
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
+--rw two-way-delay-variation? uint32
+--rw two-way-packet-loss? decimal64
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel:
+--rw tunnel-igp-shortcut
| +--rw shortcut-eligible? boolean
| +--rw metric-type? identityref
| +--rw metric? int32
| +--rw routing-afs* inet:ip-version
+--rw forwarding
| +--rw binding-label? rt-types:mpls-label
| +--rw load-share? uint32
| +--rw policy-class? uint8
+--rw bandwidth-mpls
+--rw specification-type?
| te-packet-types:te-bandwidth-requested-type
+--rw set-bandwidth? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
+--rw class-type? te-types:te-ds-class
+--ro state
| +--ro signaled-bandwidth? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
+--rw auto-bandwidth
+--rw enabled? boolean
+--rw min-bw? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
+--rw max-bw? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
+--rw adjust-interval? uint32
+--rw adjust-threshold? rt-types:percentage
+--rw overflow
| +--rw enabled? boolean
| +--rw overflow-threshold? rt-types:percentage
| +--rw trigger-event-count? uint16
+--rw underflow
+--rw enabled? boolean
+--rw underflow-threshold? rt-types:percentage
+--rw trigger-event-count? uint16
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path:
+--rw static-lsp-name? mpls-static:static-lsp-ref
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths
/te:secondary-path:
+--rw static-lsp-name? mpls-static:static-lsp-ref
augment /te:te/te:globals/te:named-path-constraints
/te:named-path-constraint:
+--rw bandwidth
+--rw specification-type?
| te-packet-types:te-bandwidth-requested-type
+--rw set-bandwidth? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
+--rw class-type? te-types:te-ds-class
+--ro state
+--ro signaled-bandwidth? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
/te:lsps/te:lsp:
+--ro performance-metrics-one-way
| +--ro one-way-delay? uint32
| +--ro one-way-delay-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-residual-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--ro one-way-residual-bandwidth-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-available-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--ro one-way-available-bandwidth-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-utilized-bandwidth?
| | rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--ro one-way-utilized-bandwidth-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-min-delay? uint32
| +--ro one-way-min-delay-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-max-delay? uint32
| +--ro one-way-max-delay-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-delay-variation? uint32
| +--ro one-way-delay-variation-normality?
| | te-types:performance-metrics-normality
| +--ro one-way-packet-loss? decimal64
| +--ro one-way-packet-loss-normality?
| te-types:performance-metrics-normality
+--ro performance-metrics-two-way
+--ro two-way-delay? uint32
+--ro two-way-delay-normality?
| te-types:performance-metrics-normality
+--ro two-way-min-delay? uint32
+--ro two-way-min-delay-normality?
| te-types:performance-metrics-normality
+--ro two-way-max-delay? uint32
+--ro two-way-max-delay-normality?
| te-types:performance-metrics-normality
+--ro two-way-delay-variation? uint32
+--ro two-way-delay-variation-normality?
| te-types:performance-metrics-normality
+--ro two-way-packet-loss? decimal64
+--ro two-way-packet-loss-normality?
te-types:performance-metrics-normality
Figure 2: MPLS TE model configuration and state tree
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
2.3. MPLS TE YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-te-mpls@2023-05-25.yang"
module ietf-te-mpls {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-mpls";
/* Replace with IANA when assigned */
prefix "te-mpls";
/* Import TE base model */
import ietf-te {
prefix te;
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te: A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels and Interfaces";
}
/* Import TE MPLS types */
import ietf-te-packet-types {
prefix "te-packet-types";
reference "RFC8776: A YANG Data Model for
Common Traffic Engineering Types";
}
/* Import TE generic types */
import ietf-te-types {
prefix te-types;
reference "RFC8776: A YANG Data Model for
Common Traffic Engineering Types";
}
/* Import routing types */
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix rt-types;
reference "RFC8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
import ietf-mpls-static {
prefix mpls-static;
reference "draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang: A YANG Data Model
for MPLS Static LSPs";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
reference "RFC6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
organization
"IETF Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Editor: Tarek Saad
<mailto:tsaad@cisco.com>
Editor: Rakesh Gandhi
<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:i_bryskin@yahoo.com>";
description
"YANG data module for MPLS TE configurations,
state, RPC and notifications. The model fully conforms to
the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note.
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and remove this note.
revision "2023-05-25" {
description "Latest update to MPLS TE YANG module.";
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
reference
"RFCXXXX: A YANG Data Model for MPLS-TE Tunnels and LSP(s)";
}
/* MPLS TE Identities */
identity tunnel-action-resetup {
base te-types:tunnel-action-type;
description "Resetup tunnel action type";
}
identity path-metric-loss {
base te-types:path-metric-type;
description
"The path loss metric type (as a packet percentage) that
encodes a function of the unidirectional loss metrics of all
links traversed by a P2P path. The basic unit is 0.000003%,
where (2^24 - 2) or 50.331642% is the highest packet-loss
percentage that can be expressed.";
reference "RFC8233, RFC4710, and RFC8570";
}
/* MPLS TE tunnel properties*/
grouping tunnel-igp-shortcut-config {
description "TE tunnel IGP shortcut configs";
leaf shortcut-eligible {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"Whether this LSP is considered to be eligible for us as a
shortcut in the IGP. In the case that this leaf is set to
true, the IGP SPF calculation uses the metric specified to
determine whether traffic should be carried over this LSP";
}
leaf metric-type {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-metric-type;
}
default te-types:lsp-metric-inherited;
description
"The type of metric specification that should be used to set
the LSP(s) metric";
}
leaf metric {
type int32;
description
"The value of the metric that should be specified. The value
supplied in this leaf is used in conjunction with the metric
type to determine the value of the metric used by the system.
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
Where the metric-type is set to lsp-metric-absolute - the
value of this leaf is used directly; where it is set to
lsp-metric-relative, the relevant (positive or negative)
offset is used to formulate the metric; where metric-type
is lsp-metric-inherited, the value of this leaf is not
utilized";
}
leaf-list routing-afs {
type inet:ip-version;
description
"Address families";
}
}
grouping tunnel-igp-shortcuts {
description
"TE tunnel IGP shortcut grouping";
container tunnel-igp-shortcut {
description
"Tunnel IGP shortcut properties";
uses tunnel-igp-shortcut-config;
}
}
grouping tunnel-forwarding-adjacency-configs {
description "Tunnel forwarding adjacency grouping";
leaf binding-label {
type rt-types:mpls-label;
description "MPLS tunnel binding label";
}
leaf load-share {
type uint32 {
range "1..4294967295";
}
description "ECMP tunnel forwarding
load-share factor.";
}
leaf policy-class {
type uint8 {
range "1..7";
}
description
"The class associated with this tunnel";
}
}
grouping tunnel-forwarding-adjacency {
description "Properties for using tunnel in forwarding.";
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
container forwarding {
description
"Tunnel forwarding properties container";
uses tunnel-forwarding-adjacency-configs;
}
}
/*** End of MPLS TE tunnel configuration/state */
grouping te-lsp-auto-bandwidth-config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to autobandwidth";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"Enables MPLS auto-bandwidth on the
LSP";
}
leaf min-bw {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"set the minimum bandwidth in Kbps for an
auto-bandwidth LSP";
}
leaf max-bw {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"set the maximum bandwidth in Kbps for an
auto-bandwidth LSP";
}
leaf adjust-interval {
type uint32;
description
"time in seconds between adjustments to
LSP bandwidth";
}
leaf adjust-threshold {
type rt-types:percentage;
description
"percentage difference between the LSP's
specified bandwidth and its current bandwidth
allocation -- if the difference is greater than the
specified percentage, auto-bandwidth adjustment is
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
triggered";
}
}
grouping te-lsp-overflow-config {
description
"configuration for MPLS LSP bandwidth
overflow adjustment";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"Enables MPLS LSP bandwidth overflow
adjustment on the LSP";
}
leaf overflow-threshold {
type rt-types:percentage;
description
"bandwidth percentage change to trigger
an overflow event";
}
leaf trigger-event-count {
type uint16;
description
"number of consecutive overflow sample
events needed to trigger an overflow adjustment";
}
}
grouping te-lsp-underflow-config {
description
"configuration for MPLS LSP bandwidth
underflow adjustment";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"enables bandwidth underflow
adjustment on the LSP";
}
leaf underflow-threshold {
type rt-types:percentage;
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
description
"bandwidth percentage change to trigger
and underflow event";
}
leaf trigger-event-count {
type uint16;
description
"number of consecutive underflow sample
events needed to trigger an underflow adjustment";
}
}
grouping te-tunnel-bandwidth-config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to bandwidth for a tunnel";
leaf specification-type {
type te-packet-types:te-bandwidth-requested-type;
default specified;
description
"The method used for setting the bandwidth, either explicitly
specified or configured";
}
leaf set-bandwidth {
when "../specification-type = 'specified'" {
description
"The bandwidth value when bandwidth is explicitly
specified";
}
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"set bandwidth explicitly, e.g., using
offline calculation";
}
leaf class-type {
type te-types:te-ds-class;
description
"The Class-Type of traffic transported by the LSP.";
reference "RFC4124: section-4.3.1";
}
}
grouping te-tunnel-bandwidth-state {
description
"Operational state parameters relating to bandwidth for
a tunnel";
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
leaf signaled-bandwidth {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"The currently signaled bandwidth of the LSP. In the case
where the bandwidth is specified explicitly, then this will
match the value of the set-bandwidth leaf; in cases where
the bandwidth is dynamically computed by the system, the
current value of the bandwidth should be reflected.";
}
}
grouping tunnel-bandwidth_top {
description
"Top level grouping for specifying bandwidth for a tunnel";
container bandwidth-mpls {
description
"Bandwidth configuration for TE LSPs";
uses te-tunnel-bandwidth-config;
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters related to bandwidth
configuration of TE tunnels";
uses te-tunnel-bandwidth-state;
}
container auto-bandwidth {
when "../specification-type = 'auto'" {
description
"Include this container for auto bandwidth
specific configuration";
}
description
"Parameters related to auto-bandwidth";
uses te-lsp-auto-bandwidth-config;
container overflow {
description
"configuration of MPLS overflow bandwidth
adjustment for the LSP";
uses te-lsp-overflow-config;
}
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
container underflow {
description
"configuration of MPLS underflow bandwidth
adjustment for the LSP";
uses te-lsp-underflow-config;
}
}
}
}
grouping te-path-bandwidth_top {
description
"Top level grouping for specifying bandwidth for a TE path";
container bandwidth {
description
"Bandwidth configuration for TE LSPs";
uses te-tunnel-bandwidth-config;
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters related to bandwidth
configuration of TE tunnels";
uses te-tunnel-bandwidth-state;
}
}
}
/**
* MPLS TE augmentations
*/
augment "/te:te" {
container performance-thresholds {
uses "te-packet-types:" +
"performance-metrics-throttle-container-packet";
description
"Performance parameters configurable thresholds";
}
description
"Performance parameters configurable thresholds";
}
/* MPLS TE interface augmentations */
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
/* MPLS TE tunnel augmentations */
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" {
description "MPLS TE tunnel config augmentations";
uses tunnel-igp-shortcuts;
uses tunnel-forwarding-adjacency;
uses tunnel-bandwidth_top;
}
/* MPLS TE LSPs augmentations */
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/" +
"te:primary-paths/te:primary-path" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" +
"/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-static'" {
description
"When the path is statically provisioned";
}
description "MPLS TE LSP augmentation";
leaf static-lsp-name {
type mpls-static:static-lsp-ref;
description "Static LSP name";
}
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/" +
"te:secondary-paths/te:secondary-path" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" +
"/te:secondary-paths/te:secondary-path/" +
"te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-static'" {
description
"When the path is statically provisioned";
}
description "MPLS TE LSP augmentation";
leaf static-lsp-name {
type mpls-static:static-lsp-ref;
description "Static LSP name";
}
}
augment "/te:te/te:globals/te:named-path-constraints/" +
"te:named-path-constraint" {
description "foo";
uses te-path-bandwidth_top;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" {
description
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
"MPLS TE generic data augmentation pertaining to specific TE
LSP";
uses te-packet-types:performance-metrics-attributes-packet;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 3: TE generic YANG module
3. IANA Considerations
This document registers the following URIs in the IETF XML registry
[RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following
registration is requested to be made.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-mpls
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-te-mpls
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-mpls
prefix: ietf-te-mpls
reference: RFC3209
4. Security Considerations
The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via
the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the
secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is SSH [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model
[RFC8341] provides means to restrict access for particular NETCONF
users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol
operations and content.
A number of data nodes defined in this YANG module are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., <edit-config>)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on MPLS network operations. Following are the subtrees and
data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
"/te/tunnels": The augmentation to this list specifies configuration
to TE tunnels on a device. Unauthorized access to this list could
cause the device to ignore packets it should receive and process.
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
"/te/globals": The augmentation to this target specifies
configuration applicable to the to all or one TE device.
Unauthorized access to this list could cause the device to ignore
packets it should receive and process.
5. Contributors
Himanshu Shah
Ciena
Email: hshah@ciena.com
6. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-mpls-static-yang]
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V. P., and I.
Bryskin, "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Static LSPs", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-13,
27 July 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-13>.
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V. P., Bryskin, I.,
and O. G. de Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels, Label Switched Paths and Interfaces",
Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-
32, 12 March 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-32>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V.,
and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
Tunnels", RFC 3209, DOI 10.17487/RFC3209, December 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>.
[RFC3473] Berger, L., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-
Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", RFC 3473,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3473, January 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3473>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
[RFC4124] Le Faucheur, F., Ed., "Protocol Extensions for Support of
Diffserv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering", RFC 4124,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4124, June 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4124>.
[RFC4710] Siddiqui, A., Romascanu, D., and E. Golovinsky, "Real-time
Application Quality-of-Service Monitoring (RAQMON)
Framework", RFC 4710, DOI 10.17487/RFC4710, October 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4710>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8233] Dhody, D., Wu, Q., Manral, V., Ali, Z., and K. Kumaki,
"Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication
Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label Switched
Paths (LSPs)", RFC 8233, DOI 10.17487/RFC8233, September
2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8233>.
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft MPLS TE Tunnels YANG Data Model May 2023
[RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger,
"Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8570] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Giacalone, S., Ward,
D., Drake, J., and Q. Wu, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE)
Metric Extensions", RFC 8570, DOI 10.17487/RFC8570, March
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8570>.
[RFC8776] Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin,
"Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering",
RFC 8776, DOI 10.17487/RFC8776, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8776>.
Authors' Addresses
Tarek Saad
Cisco Systems Inc
Email: tsaad@cisco.com
Rakesh Gandhi
Cisco Systems Inc
Email: rgandhi@cisco.com
Xufeng Liu
IBM Corporation
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Juniper Networks
Email: vbeeram@juniper.net
Igor Bryskin
Individual
Email: i_bryskin@yahoo.com
Saad, et al. Expires 27 November 2023 [Page 21]
