Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd

draft-ietf-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd







Network Working Group                                       S. Sivabalan
Internet-Draft                                                S. Boutros
Intended status: Standards Track                     Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: January 2, 2015                                         H. Shah
                                                             Ciena Corp.
                                                               S. Aldrin
                                                    Huawei Technologies.
                                                           M. Venkatesan
                                                                Comcast.
                                                           July 01, 2014


             MAC Address Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire
                 draft-ietf-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00.txt

Abstract

   This document specifies a mechanism to signal MAC address withdrawal
   notification using PW Associated Channel (ACH).  Such notification is
   useful when statically provisioned PWs are deployed in VPLS/H-VPLS
   environment.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 2, 2015.







Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  MAC Withdraw OAM Message  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.1.  Operation of Sender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.2.  Operation of Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   An LDP-based MAC Address Withdrawal Mechanism is specified in
   [RFC4762] to remove dynamically learned MAC addresses when the source
   of those addresses can no longer forward traffic.  This is
   accomplished by sending an LDP Address Withdraw Message with a MAC
   List TLV containing the MAC addressed to be removed to all other PEs
   over LDP sessions.  When the number of MAC addresses to be removed is
   large, empty MAC List TLV may be used.  [MAC-OPT] describes an
   optimized MAC withdrawal mechanism which can be used to remove only
   the set of MAC addresses that need to be re-learned in H-VPLS
   networks.  The solution also provides optimized MAC Withdrawal
   operations in PBB-VPLS networks.

   A PW can be signaled via LDP or can be statically provisioned.  In
   the case of static PW, LDP based MAC withdrawal mechanism cannot be
   used.  This is analogous to the problem and solution described in
   [RFC4762]  where PW OAM message has been introduced to carry PW
   status TLV using in-band PW Associated Channel.  In this document, we



Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


   propose to use PW OAM message to withdraw MAC address(es) learned via
   static PW.

2.  Terminology

   The following terminologies are used in this document:

   ACK:  Acknowledgement for MAC withdraw message.

   LDP:  Label Distribution Protocol.

   MAC:  Media Access Control.

   PE:  Provide Edge Node.

   MPLS:  Multi Protocol Label Switching.

   PW:  PseudoWire.

   PW OAM:  PW Operations, Administration and Maintenance.

   TLV:  Type, Length, and Value.

   VPLS:  Virtual Private LAN Services.

3.  MAC Withdraw OAM Message

   LDP provides a reliable packet transport for control plackets for
   dynamic PWs.  This can be contrasted with static PWs which rely on
   re-transmission and acknowledgments (ACK) for reliable OAM packet
   delivery as described in [RFC6478].  The proposed solution for MAC
   withdrawal over static PW also relies on re-transmissions and ACKs.
   However, ACK is mandatory.  A given MAC withdrawal notification is
   sent as a PW OAM message, and the sender keeps re-transmitting the
   message until it receives an ACK for that message.  Once a receiver
   successfully remove MAC address(es) in response to a MAC address
   withdraw OAM message, it should not unnecessarily remove MAC
   address(es) upon getting refresh message(s).  To facilitate this, the
   proposed mechanism uses sequence number, and defines a new TLV to
   carry the sequence number.

   The format of the MAC address withdraw OAM message is shown in
   Figure 1.  The PW OAM message header is exactly the same as what is
   defined in [RFC6478].  Since the MAC withdrawal PW OAM message is not
   refreshed forever.  A MAC address withdraw OAM message MUST contain a
   "Sequence Number TLV" otherwise the entire message is dropped.  It
   MAY contain MAC Flush Parameter TLVs defined in [MAC-OPT]  when
   static PWs are deployed in H-VPLS and PBB-VPLS scenarios.  The first



Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 3]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


   2 bits of the sequence number TLV are reserved and MUST be set to 0
   on transmit and ignored on receipt.






       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |0 0 0 1|Version|   Reserved    |0xZZ MAC Withdraw OAM Message  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |            Reserved           |  TLV Length   |A|R| Flags     |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |Res| Sequence Number TLV (TBD) |  Sequence Number TLV Length   |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        Sequence Number                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      |                         MAC List TLV                          |
      ~                MAC Flush Parameter TLV (optional)             ~
      |                                                               |
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


            Figure 1: MAC Address Withdraw PW OAM Packet Format

   In this section, MAC List TLV and MAC Flush Parameter TLV are
   collectively referred to as "MAC TLV(s)".  The processing rules of
   MAC List TLV are governed by [RFC4762], and the corresponding rules
   of MAC Flush Parameter TLV are governed by [MAC-OPT].

   "TLV Length" is the total length of all TLVs in the message, and
   "Sequence Number TLV Length" is the length of the sequence number
   field.

   A single bit (called A-bit) is set to indicate if a MAC withdraw
   message is for ACK.  Also, ACK does not include MAC TLV(s).

   Only half of the sequence number space is used.  Modular arithmetic
   is used to detect wrapping of sequence number.  When sequence number
   wraps, all MAC addresses are flushed and the sequence number is
   reset.

   A single bit (called R-bit) is set to indicate if the sender is
   requesting reset of the sequence numbers.  The sender sets this bit



Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 4]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


   when the Pseudowire is restarted and has no local record of send and
   expected receive sequence number.

4.  Operation

   This section describes how the initial MAC withdraw OAM messages are
   sent and retransmitted, as well as how the messages are processed and
   retransmitted messages are identified.

4.1.  Operation of Sender

   Each PW is associated with a counter to keep track of the sequence
   number of the transmitted MAC withdrawal messages.  Whenever a node
   sends a new set of MAC TLVs, it increments the transmitted sequence
   number counter, and include the new sequence number in the message.
   The transmit sequence number is initialized to 1 at the onset.

   The sender expects an ACK from the receiver within a time interval
   which we call "Retransmit Time" which can be either a default (1
   second) or configured value.  If the ACK does not arrive within the
   Retransmit Time, the sender retransmits the message with the same
   sequence number as the original message.  The retransmission is
   ceased anytime when ACK is received or after three retries.  This
   avoids unended retransmissions in the absence of acknowledgements.
   In addition, if during the period of retransmission, if a need to
   send a new MAC withdraw message with updated sequence number arises
   then retransmission of the older unacknowledged withdraw message is
   suspended and retransmit time for the new sequence number is
   initiated.  In essence, sender engages in retrasmission logic only
   for the latest send withdraw message for a given PW.

   In the event that a Pseudowire was deleted and re-added or the router
   is restarted with configuration, the local node may lose information
   about the send sequence number of previous incarnation.  This becomes
   problematic for the remote peer as it will continue to ignore the
   received MAC withdraw messages with lower sequence numbers.  In such
   cases, it is desirable to reset the sequence numbers at both ends of
   the Pseudowire.  The 'R' reset bit is set in the first MAC withdraw
   to notify the remote peer to reset the send and receive sequence
   numbers.  The 'R' bit must be cleared in subsequent MAC withdraw
   messages after the acknowledgement is received

4.2.  Operation of Receiver

   Each PW is associated with a register to keep track of the sequence
   number of the MAC withdrawal message received last.  Whenever a MAC
   withdrawal message is received, and if the sequence number on the
   message is greater than the value in the register, the MAC



Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 5]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


   address(es) contained in the MAC TLV(s) is/are removed, and the
   register is updated with the received sequence number.  The receiver
   sends an ACK whose sequence number is the same as that in the
   received message.

   If the sequence number in the received message is smaller than or
   equal to the value in the register, the MAC TLV(s) is/are not
   processed.  However, an ACK with the received sequence number MUST be
   sent as a response.  The receiver processes the ACK message as an
   acknowledgement for all the MAC withdraw messages sent up to the
   sequence number present in the ACK message and terminates
   retransmission.

   As mentioned above, since only half of the sequence number space is
   used, the receiver MUST use modular arithmetic to detect wrapping of
   the sequence number.

   A MAC withdraw message with 'R' bit set MUST be processed by
   resetting the send and receive sequence number first.  The rest of
   MAC withdraw message processing is performed as described above.  The
   acknowledgement is sent with 'R' bit cleared.

5.  IANA Considerations

   The proposed mechanism requests IANA to a assign new channel type
   (recommended value 0x0028) from the registry named "Pseudowire
   Associated Channel Types".  The description of the new channel type
   is "Pseudowire MAC Withdraw OAM Channel".

   IANA needs to create a new registry for Pseudowire Associated Channel
   TLVs, and create an entry for "Sequence Number TLV".  The recommended
   value is 0x0001.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [MAC-OPT]  Dutta, P., Balus, F., Stokes, O., and G. Calvinac, "LDP
              Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in
              H-VPLS", draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-08.txt (work in
              progress), February 2013.

   [RFC4762]  Lasserre, M. and V. Kompella, "Virtual Private LAN Service
              (VPLS) Using Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Signaling",
              RFC 4762, January 2007.






Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 6]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


   [RFC6478]  Martini, L., Swallow, G., Heron, G., and M. Bocci,
              "Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires", RFC 6478, May
              2012.

6.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

Authors' Addresses

   Siva Sivabalan
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   2000 Innovation Drive
   Kanata, Ontario  K2K 3E8
   Canada

   Email: msiva@cisco.com


   Sami Boutros
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   170 West Tasman Dr.
   San Jose, CA  95134
   US

   Email: sboutros@cisco.com


   Himanshu Shah
   Ciena Corp.
   3939 North First Street
   San Jose, CA  95134
   US

   Email: hshah@ciena.com


   Sam Aldrin
   Huawei Technologies.
   2330 Central Express Way
   Santa Clara, CA  95051
   US

   Email: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com






Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 7]

Internet-Draft    MAC Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire        July 2014


   Mannan Venkatesan
   Comcast.
   1800 Bishop Gate Blvd
   Mount Laurel, NJ  08075
   US

   Email: mannan_venkatesan@cable.comcast.com












































Sivabalan, et al.        Expires January 2, 2015                [Page 8]