Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-jmap-smime

draft-ietf-jmap-smime







Network Working Group                                        A. Melnikov
Internet-Draft                                                 Isode Ltd
Intended status: Standards Track                          6 January 2022
Expires: 10 July 2022


            S/MIME signature verification extension to JMAP
                        draft-ietf-jmap-smime-12

Abstract

   This document specifies an extension to JMAP for Mail (RFC 8621) for
   returning S/MIME signature verification status.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 10 July 2022.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.







Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 1]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Addition to the capabilities object . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Extension for S/MIME signature verification . . . . . . . . .   3
     4.1.  Extension to Email/get  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
       4.1.1.  "smimeStatus" response property extensibility . . . .   7
     4.2.  Extension to Email/query  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     4.3.  Interaction with Email/changes  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     5.1.  JMAP capability registration for "smimeverify"  . . . . .   9
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   Appendix A.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10

1.  Introduction

   JMAP for Mail [RFC8621] is a JSON-based application protocol for
   synchronising email data between a client and a server.

   This document describes an extension to JMAP for returning S/MIME
   [RFC8551] signature verification status, without requiring a JMAP
   client to download the signature body part and all signed body parts
   (when the multipart/signed media type [RFC1847] is used) or to
   download and decode CMS (when the application/pkcs7-mime media type
   (Section 3.2 of [RFC8551]) is used).  The use of the extension
   implies the client trusts the JMAP server's S/MIME signature
   verification code and configuration.  This extension is suitable for
   cases where reduction in network bandwidth and client-side code
   complexity outweigh security concerns about trusting the JMAP server
   to perform S/MIME signature verifications.  One possible use case is
   when the same organization controls both the JMAP server and the JMAP
   client.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.






Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 2]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


   Type signatures, examples, and property descriptions in this document
   follow the conventions established in Section 1.1 of [RFC8620].  Data
   types defined in the core specification are also used in this
   document.

3.  Addition to the capabilities object

   The capabilities object is returned as part of the standard JMAP
   Session object; see Section 2 of [RFC8620].  Servers supporting
   _this_ specification MUST add a property called
   "urn:ietf:params:jmap:smimeverify" to the capabilities object.

   The value of this property is an empty object in both the JMAP
   session _capabilities_ property and an account's
   _accountCapabilities_ property.

4.  Extension for S/MIME signature verification

4.1.  Extension to Email/get

   [RFC8621] defines the Email/get method for retrieving message
   specific information.  This document defines the following pseudo
   values in the _properties_ argument:

   *  *smimeStatus*: If "smimeStatus" is included in the list of
      requested properties, it MUST be interpreted by the server as a
      request to return the "smimeStatus" response property.

   *  *smimeStatusAtDelivery*: If "smimeStatusAtDelivery" is included in
      the list of requested properties, it MUST be interpreted by the
      server as a request to return the "smimeStatusAtDelivery" response
      property.  (It is effectively the same as the "smimeStatus" value
      calculated at the date/time of delivery, as specified by
      "receivedAt".)

   *  *smimeErrors*: If "smimeErrors" is included in the list of
      requested properties, it MUST be interpreted by the server as a
      request to return the "smimeErrors" response property.

   *  *smimeVerifiedAt*: If "smimeVerifiedAt" is included in the list of
      requested properties, it MUST be interpreted by the server as a
      request to return the "smimeVerifiedAt" response property.

   The "smimeStatus" response property is defined as follows:

   smimeStatus: "String|null" (server-set). null signifies that the
   message doesn't contain any signature.  Otherwise, this property
   contains the S/MIME signature and certificate verification status



Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 3]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


   calculated according to [RFC8551] and [RFC8550].  Possible string
   values of the property are listed below.  Servers MAY return other
   values not defined below, as defined in extensions to this document.
   Clients MUST treat unrecognized values as "unknown" or "signed/
   failed".  Note that the value of this property might change over
   time.

   unknown:  S/MIME message, but it was neither signed nor encrypted.
      This can also be returned for a multipart/signed message which
      contains an unrecognized signing protocol (for example OpenPGP).

   signed:  S/MIME signed message, but the signature was not yet
      verified.  Some servers might not attempt to verify a signature
      until a particular message is requested by the client.  (This is a
      useful optimization for a JMAP server to avoid doing work until
      exact information is needed.  A JMAP client that only needs to
      display an icon that signifies presence of an S/MIME signature can
      still use this value.)  JMAP servers compliant with this document
      SHOULD attempt signature verification and return "signed/verified"
      or "signed/failed" instead of this signature status.

   signed/verified:  S/MIME signed message and the sender's signature
      was successfully verified according to [RFC8551] and [RFC8550].
      Additionally the signer email address extracted from the S/MIME
      certificate matches the From header field value, and the signer
      certificate SHOULD be checked for revocation.

   signed/failed:  S/MIME signed message, but the signature failed to
      verify according to [RFC8551] and [RFC8550].  This might be a
      policy related decision (e.g. the message signer email address
      doesn't match the From header field value), message was modified,
      the signer's certificate has expired or was revoked, etc.

   encrypted+signed/verified:  This value is reserved for future use.
      It is typically handled in the same way as "signed/verified".

   encrypted+signed/failed:  This value is reserved for future use.  It
      is typically handled in the same way as "signed/failed".

   The "smimeStatusAtDelivery" response property has the same syntax as
   "smimeStatus" but is calculated in relationship to the "receivedAt"
   date/time.  Unlike "smimeStatus", the "smimeStatusAtDelivery"
   response property value doesn't change, unless Trust Anchors are
   added.  (For example, addition of a Trust Anchor can change the value
   of a message "smimeStatusAtDelivery" property from "signed/failed" to
   "signed/verified".  Note that Trust Anchor removal doesn't affect
   this response property.)  The "smimeStatusAtDelivery" allows clients
   to compare the S/MIME signature verification status at delivery with



Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 4]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


   the current status as returned by "smimeStatus", for example to help
   to answer questions like "was the signature valid at the time of
   delivery?".

   Note that the "smimeStatusAtDelivery" response property value doesn't
   have to be calculated at delivery time.  A JMAP server can defer its
   calculation until it is explicitly requested, but once calculated its
   value is remembered for later use.

   The "smimeErrors" response property is defined as follows:

   smimeErrors: "String[]|null" (server-set). null signifies that the
   message doesn't contain any signature or that there were no errors
   when verifying the S/MIME signature.  (I.e., this property is non
   null only when the corresponding "smimeStatus" response property
   value is "signed/failed" or "encrypted+signed/failed".  Note that
   future extensions to this document can specify other smimeStatus
   values that can be used with smimeErrors.)  Each string in the array
   is a human readable description (in the language specified in the
   Content-Language header field, if any) of a problem with the
   signature, the signing certificate or the signing certificate chain.
   (See Section 3.8 of [RFC8620] in regards to how this is affected by
   the language selection.)  In one example, the signing certificate
   might be expired and the message From email address might not
   correspond to any of the email addresses in the signing certificate.
   In another example the certificate might be expired and the JMAP
   server might be unable to retrieve a CRL for the certificate.  In
   both of these cases there would be 2 elements in the array.

   The "smimeVerifiedAt" response property is defined as follows:

   smimeVerifiedAt: "UTCDate|null" (server-set). null signifies that the
   message doesn't contain any S/MIME signature or that there is a
   signature, but there was no attempt to verify it.  (Retrieval of the
   smimeStatus value can be used to distinguish these 2 cases).  In all
   other cases it is set to the date and time of when the S/MIME
   signature was most recently verified.  Note that a request to fetch
   "smimeStatus", "smimeStatusAtDelivery" and/or "smimeErrors" would
   force this response property to be set to a non null value, if an S/
   MIME signature exists.











Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 5]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


   "smimeStatus" and "smimeErrors" values are calculated at the time the
   corresponding JMAP request was processed (but see below about the
   effect of result caching), not at the time when the message was
   generated (according to its Date header field value).  In all cases
   "smimeVerifiedAt" is set to the time when "smimeStatus" and
   "smimeErrors" were last updated.  As recalculating these values is
   expensive for the server, they MAY be cached for up to 24 hours from
   the moment when they were calculated.

   Example 1: Retrieval of minimal information about a message,
   including its From, Subject and Date header fields, as well as S/MIME
   signature verification status at delivery and date/time when the
   message was received.

      ["Email/get", {
      "ids": [ "fe123u457" ],
      "properties": [ "mailboxIds", "from", "subject", "date",
       "smimeStatusAtDelivery", "receivedAt" ]
      }, "#1"]

This might result in the following response:

      [["Email/get", {
         "accountId": "abc",
         "state": "51234123231",
         "list": [
           {
             "id": "fe123u457",
             "mailboxIds": { "f123": true },
             "from": [{"name": "Joe Bloggs", "email": "joe@bloggs.example.net"}],
             "subject": "Dinner tonight?",
             "date": "2020-07-07T14:12:00Z",
             "smimeStatusAtDelivery": "signed/verified",
             "receivedAt": "2020-07-07T14:15:18Z"
           }
         ]
      }, "#1"]]


   Example 2: Retrieval of minimal information about a message,
   including its From, Subject and Date header fields, as well as the
   latest S/MIME signature verification status, S/MIME verification
   errors (if any) and when was the S/MIME signature status last
   verified.  The response contains 2 S/MIME errors related to S/MIME
   signature verification.






Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 6]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


         ["Email/get", {
         "ids": [ "ag123u123" ],
         "properties": [ "mailboxIds", "from", "subject", "date",
          "smimeStatus", "smimeErrors", "smimeVerifiedAt" ]
         }, "#1"]

   This might result in the following response:

         [["Email/get", {
            "accountId": "abc",
            "state": "47234123231",
            "list": [
              {
                "id": "ag123u123",
                "mailboxIds": { "f123": true },
                "from": [{"name": "Jane Doe",
                        "email": "jdoe@example.com"}],
                "subject": "Company takeover",
                "date": "2020-01-31T23:00:00Z",
                "smimeStatus": "signed/failed",
                "smimeErrors": [
                  "From email address doesn't match the certificate",
                  "Can't retrieve CRL from the CRL URL"],
                "smimeVerifiedAt": "2020-03-01T12:11:19Z"
              }
            ]
         }, "#1"]]


4.1.1.  "smimeStatus" response property extensibility

   Future extensions to this document can specify extra allowed values
   for the smimeStatus response property.  All values (defined in this
   document or in extensions to this document) MUST be in ASCII.  (Note
   that this response property contains tokens, thus it is not subject
   to Internationalization or Localization).

   New smimeStatus response property values defined in extensions may
   affect behaviour of properties such as smimeErrors response property
   of Email/get (see Section 4.1) or hasVerifiedSmime property of Email/
   query (see Section 4.2).  In particular the new values can be treated
   similar to values defined in this document.

   For example a putative JMAP extension for automatically decrypting S/
   MIME messages can specify two additional values, one specifying that
   a message is both encrypted and signed with a valid S/MIME signature
   and another one specifying that a message is both encrypted and
   signed with an invalid S/MIME signature.  The former value can be



Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 7]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


   treated as "signed/verified" (and would thus affect hasVerifiedSmime)
   and the latter can be treated as "signed/failed" (and thus can be
   used with smimeErrors).

4.2.  Extension to Email/query

   [RFC8621] defines the Email/query method for searching for messages
   with specific properties.  This document defines the following
   properties of the *FilterCondition* object:

   *  *hasSmime*: "Boolean".  If "hasSmime" has the value true, only
      messages with "smimeStatus" other than null match the condition.
      If "hasSmime" has the value false, only messages with
      "smimeStatus" equal to null match the condition.

   *  *hasVerifiedSmime*: "Boolean".  If "hasVerifiedSmime" has the
      value true, only messages with "smimeStatus" equal to "signed/
      verified" or "encrypted+signed/verified" (*), match the condition.
      If "hasVerifiedSmime" has the value false, only messages with
      "smimeStatus" not equal to "signed/verified" and not equal to
      "encrypted+signed/verified" (*) (including the value null) match
      the condition.  Note that use of this attribute is potentially
      expensive for a JMAP server, as it forces calculation of
      smimeStatus property value for each message.  However caching of
      smimeStatus values should ameliorate this cost somewhat.

      (*) as well as "smimeStatus" values added by future extensions to
      this document that are explicitly specified as having similar
      effect to "signed/verified" as far as "hasVerifiedSmime"
      calculation is concerned.

   *  *hasVerifiedSmimeAtDelivery*: "Boolean".  The
      "hasVerifiedSmimeAtDelivery" property is handled similar to
      "hasVerifiedSmime" property, but the value of
      "smimeStatusAtDelivery" is used instead of "smimeStatus" to assess
      whether a particular message matches the condition.

4.3.  Interaction with Email/changes

   Changes to "smimeVerifiedAt" response property value MUST NOT cause
   the message to be included in the "updated" argument of Email/changes
   response.  However changes to "smimeStatus", "smimeStatusAtDelivery"
   and/or "smimeErrors" response properties MUST result in message
   inclusion in the "updated" argument of Email/changes response.







Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 8]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


5.  IANA Considerations

5.1.  JMAP capability registration for "smimeverify"

   IANA is requested to register the "smimeverify" JMAP Capability as
   follows:

   Capability Name: "urn:ietf:params:jmap:smimeverify"

   Specification document: this document

   Intended use: common

   Change Controller: IETF

   Security and privacy considerations: this document, Section 6

6.  Security Considerations

   Use of the server-side S/MIME signature verification JMAP extension
   requires the client to trust the server signature verification code,
   server configuration and its operational practices to perform S/MIME
   signature verification, as well as to trust that the channel between
   the client and the server is integrity protected.  (For example, if
   the server is not configured with some Trust Anchors, some messages
   will have "signed/failed" status instead of "signed/verified".)  A
   malicious or compromised server could return false verification
   status to a client.  A successful verification could be conveyed to a
   client for a forged or altered message.  A properly signed message
   could be signaled as having a failed signature verification or no
   signature at all.  In the case of the latter attack, no new attack
   surface is presented with this extension above what malicious or
   compromised server could already do by stripping or tampering with
   the S/MIME information in the message.  In the case of the former
   attack, client software capable of performing S/MIME signature
   verification could detect this attack.  Local configuration of the
   client should determine if this client-side verification should
   occur.  For clients without local verification capabilities, such an
   attack would be difficult to detect.

   Integrity protection of the channel between the client and the server
   is provided by use of TLS, as required by JMAP specification (see
   Section 8.1 of [RFC8620]).

   Constant recalculation of S/MIME signature status can result in a
   Denial-of-Service condition.  For that reason, it is RECOMMENDED that
   servers cache results of signature verification for up to 24 hours.




Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                  [Page 9]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8550]  Schaad, J., Ramsdell, B., and S. Turner, "Secure/
              Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 4.0
              Certificate Handling", RFC 8550, DOI 10.17487/RFC8550,
              April 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8550>.

   [RFC8551]  Schaad, J., Ramsdell, B., and S. Turner, "Secure/
              Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 4.0
              Message Specification", RFC 8551, DOI 10.17487/RFC8551,
              April 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8551>.

   [RFC8620]  Jenkins, N. and C. Newman, "The JSON Meta Application
              Protocol (JMAP)", RFC 8620, DOI 10.17487/RFC8620, July
              2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8620>.

   [RFC8621]  Jenkins, N. and C. Newman, "The JSON Meta Application
              Protocol (JMAP) for Mail", RFC 8621, DOI 10.17487/RFC8621,
              August 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8621>.

7.2.  Informative References

   [RFC1847]  Galvin, J., Murphy, S., Crocker, S., and N. Freed,
              "Security Multiparts for MIME: Multipart/Signed and
              Multipart/Encrypted", RFC 1847, DOI 10.17487/RFC1847,
              October 1995, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1847>.

Appendix A.  Acknowledgements

   This document is a product of the JMAP Working Group.  Special thank
   you to Bron Gondwana, Neil Jenkins, Murray Kucherawy, Kirsty Paine,
   Benjamin Kaduk, Roman Danyliw, Peter Yee, Robert Wilton, Erik Kline
   and Menachem Dodge for suggestions, comments and corrections to this
   document.

Author's Address




Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                 [Page 10]

Internet-Draft          JMAP extension for S/MIME           January 2022


   Alexey Melnikov
   Isode Ltd
   14 Castle Mews
   Hampton
   TW12 2NP
   United Kingdom

   Email: Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com











































Melnikov                  Expires 10 July 2022                 [Page 11]