Internet DRAFT - draft-hares-bgp-path-select-bib

draft-hares-bgp-path-select-bib




     Network                                                                 
     Internet Draft                                                          
     Intended status: Information Track                                      
     Expires: April 2012                                                     
                                                                              
                                                                                
                                                            October 24, 2011   
                                                                              
                                           
                       Bibliography for the BGP Path Selection 
                       draft-hares-bgp-path-select-bib-00.txt   
                                            


     Status of this Memo 

        This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the 
        provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.        

        Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
        Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that 
        other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
        Drafts. 

        Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 
        and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 
        time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 
        material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 

        The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
        http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt 

        The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
        http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 

        This Internet-Draft will expire on April 24, 2011. 

     Copyright Notice 

        Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the 
        document authors. All rights reserved. 

        This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal 
        Provisions Relating to IETF Documents 
        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of 
        publication of this document.  Please review these documents 
        carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect 
        to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must 
        include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of 
      
      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 1] 
      






     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as 
        described in the BSD License.     

     Abstract 

        BGP-v4?s [RFC4271]path selection rule has been enforce since the 
        1990s. The Inter-Domain Working Group [IDR] will be considering 
        additions to the path selection [add-path][add-path-guidelines][path-
        select-criteria] in 2011-2012. 

        This document provides a bibliography of publications (research and 
        public) regarding the bgp path selection.  

     Conventions used in this document 

        The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 
        document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 0. 

     Table of Contents 

         
        1. Introduction...................................................3 
        2. Terminology....................................................3 
        3. Review of Contributing Algorithms..............................4 
        4. Review of BGP algorithms.......................................6 
        4.1 BGP 2 and BGP-3 protocol specifications (IETF standards)......6 
        4.2 BGP-4 protocol specifications (IETF standards)................6 
        5. Requirements for IDR................Error! Bookmark not defined. 
        6. General Algorithm Papers............Error! Bookmark not defined. 
        7. Bibliography for Convergence/Stability........................11 
        8. BGP policy documents..........................................12 
        9. Conclusion and Recommendation.................................12 
        10. Manageability Considerations.................................12 
        11. Security Considerations......................................12 
        12. IANA Considerations..........................................12 
        13. Acknowledgments..............................................12 
        14. References...................................................12 
        Authors' Addresses...............................................13 
        Intellectual Property Statement..................................13 
        Disclaimer of Validity...........................................14 
         
         




      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 2] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

     1. Introduction 

        The IDR working group [IDR-WG] has several suggestion alternations to 
        the BGP route selection process [add-paths][add-path-guidlines][best-
        path-select][aigp] 

        BGP-4?s current path selection has been encoded in routers for 20+ 
        years and incorporates bgp update reception, bgp policy, and 
        convergence characteristics.  

        Any BGP-4?s current path selection requires careful consideration of 
        all the accumulated wisdom from academic research, industry research, 
        deployment investigations, and algorithm examinations. This document 
        seeks to provide a bibliography of this work that examines BGP basic 
        functions, performance, and suggested solutions.   

        Version-00 of this document is only a beginning of collecting these 
        resources.  

     2. Terminology 

        Atomized Routing ? modifying routing based on aggregate prefixes  
                 into equivalence classes (policy atoms) based on common AS 
                 path? from a topological perspectives [CAIDA-AR](section 
                 3.8) 

        BGP-v4 [RFC 4721] ? Border Gateway Protocol version 4.     

        BGP Error reporting ? Errors reported within the BGP protocol.  

        BGP Flap Damping ? Damping of BGP route oscillations  

        BGP Monitoring messages ? Monitoring messages passed in the BGP 
                 protocol  

        BGP Flap Damping ? Damping of BGP route oscillations  

        L3VPN ?Layer 3 MPLS VPN [RF 

        L2VPN ? Layer 2 MPLS VPN  

        L2VPN BGP Auto-discovery ? BGP distribution of L2 VPN endpoints  

        BGP Route Refresh ? Route Refresh Exchange in BGP to refresh the BGP 
                 routes received from Peer.  
      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 3] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        Graceful Restart ? BGP Graceful Restart  

     3. Review of Contributing Algorithms 

        This section describes research into contributing algorithms for BGP.  

        3.1 Distance Vector  

        [MRR80] McQuillan, J.M., Richer, I., Rosen, E.C. (1980). The New 
           Routing Algorithm for the ARPANET. IEEE Transactions on 
           Communications, 28(5),711-719. May 1980. 

        [BRE95] Breslau, L.M. (1995). Adaptive Source Routing of Real-Time 
           Traffic in Integrated Services Networks. PhD Thesis, University of 
           Southern California, Department of Computer Science, December 
           1995.  

        Hop Count  

        [Khanna88]Khanna, A. and Zinky, J. (1988). The Revised ARPANET 
           Routing Metric. In Proceediongs of the ACM SIGCOMM ?88, 45-56. 
           Palo Alto, CA, August 1988.  

        [Rosen82] Rosen, E. (1982) Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), RFC827, 
           [online: www.ietf.org/rfc/RFC827].  

        3.2 Path Vector Algorithms  

        [Jaggard-xxx] Jaggard, A. Jaggard (xxxx) ?Formal Models for Path-
           Vector Protocols,online: 
           ?http://www.math.tulane.edu/~adj/Research/index.html#net  

        3.3 Link State 

        (to be done)  

        3.4 Hybrid Link State  

        (to be done)  

        3.5 Name versus Address 

        [Chiappa-1999] Chiappa, N. (1999) Endpoints and Endpoint Names: A 
        Proposed Enhancement to the Architecture.  

        [Carpentar-2007] Carpenter, B. (2007) General Identifier-Locator 
           Mapping Consideration, Work-in-Progress, draft-carpenter-idloc-
      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 4] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

           map-cons-01.txt, online: [http:/tools/ietf.org/id/draft-carpenter-
           idloc-map-cons-01.txt]  

        [Quoitin-2007] B. Quoitin, L. Iannone, C. de Launois and O. 
           Bonaventure. Evaluating the Benefits of the Locator/Identifier 
           Separation, Proceedings of MobiArch (ACM SIGCOMM Workshop), Kyoto, 
           Japan, August 2007 

        3.6 TCP Congestion and traffic flow dynamics  

        [Matthis97] Mathis, M., Semke, J., Mahdavi, J., (1997). The 
           Macroscopic behavior of TCP Congestion Avoidance Algorithm.  ACM 
           Computer Communication, Review, 27(3): 67-82, July 1997.  

        [PAXSON96] Paxson, V. (1996). End-to-End Routing Behavior in the 
           Internet. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM ?96, 25-38, Stanford, 
           Ca, August 1996.  

        [PAXSON97a] Paxson, V. (1997a). End-to-end Internet Packet Dynamics. 
           In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM ?97, 139-152, Cannes, France, 
           September 1997.  

        [PAXSON97b] Paxson, V., (1997b). Measurements and Analysis of End-to-
           End Internet Dynamics. PhD Thesis, University of California at 
           Berkley, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer 
           Science, April 1997.  

        [Thompson97] Thompson, K., Miller, G.J., and Wilder, R. (1997). Wide-
           Area Internet Traffic Patterns and Characteristics. IEEE Network 
           Managine, 11(6):10-23, November 1997.  

        [Varadhan98] Varadhan, K., Estrin, D., Floyd, S. (1998). Impact of 
           Network Dynamics on End-to-End Protocols: Case Studies in TCP and 
           Reliable Multicast. Technical Report USC-CS-TR 98-672, University 
           of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, April 
           1998.  

        3.7 End-to-End effects of Internet Path Selection 

        [Savage-1999] Savage, S., Collins, A., Hoffman, E., Snell, J., 
           Anderson, T. (1999).  The End-to-End Effects of Internet Path 
           Selection   

        [McManus] McManus, P.R. (1999). A Passive System for Server Selection 
           within Mirrored Resource Environments Using AS Path Length 
           Heuristics.  

      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 5] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

          (to be done)  

        3.8 Atomized Routing  

        (to be done)  

        3.9 Compact Routing  

        (to be done)  

        3.10 Fast Reroute    

        (to be done)  

        3.11 Micro-Loop avoidance   

        (to be done)  

     4. Review of BGP Papers 

        This section considers the BGP specifications (sections 4.1-4.2), the 
        extensions for IBGP scaling, the   

        4.1 BGP 2 and BGP-3 protocol specifications (IETF standards) 

        Lougheed, K., and Rekhter, Y. (1989).  A Border Gateway Protocol 
           (BGP), RFC1105, online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC1105. [obsoleted by 
           RFC1105].  

        Lougheed, K., and Rekhter, Y. (1990).  A Border Gateway Protocol 
           (BGP), RFC1163, online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC1163. [obsoleted by 
           RFC1171].  

        Lougheed, K., and Rekhter, Y. (1991).  A Border Gateway Protocol 
           (BGP), RFC1267, online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC1267. [obsoleted by 
           RFC1771] 

        Haskins, D. (1993). Default Route Advertisement in BGP2 and BGP3 
           Versions of the Border Gateway Protocol, RFC1397, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/RFC1397].   

        4.2 BGP-4 protocol specifications (IETF standards) 

        Rekhter, Y. and Li, T. (1994). A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), 
           RFC1665, online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC1665. [obsoleted by RFC1771] 


      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 6] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        Rekhter, Y. and Li, T. (1985). A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), 
           RFC1771, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC1771. [obsoleted by RFC4771] 

        Villiamizar, C., Chandra, R., Govindan, R. (1998) BGP Route Flap 
           Damping. RFC2439, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC2439].   

        Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and Hares, S. (eds.) (2006). A Border Gateway 
           Protocol 4 (BGP-4), RFC 4271. [online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC4771].  

        4.3 BGP RFC Extensions for IBGP Scaling  

         [RFC1965] Traina, P. (1996). Autonomous Systems Confederations for 
           BGP. RFC1965, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC1965]. 

        [RFC1966] Bates, T., Chandra, R., and Chen, E. (1996). BGP Route 
           Reflections - An Alternative to Full Mesh IBGP, RFC1966, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1966].  

        [RFC2796] Bates, T., Chandra, R., and Chen, E. (2000). BGP Route 
           Reflections - An Alternative to Full Mesh IBGP, RFC2796, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2796]. 

        [RFC3065] Traina, P., McPherson, D., Scudder, J. (2001). Autonomous 
           Confederations for BGP, RFC3065, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC3065]. 

        [RFC4456] Bates, T., Chandra, R., and Chen, E. (2006). BGP Route 
           Reflections - An Alternative to Full Mesh IBGP, RFC4456, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4456]. 

        [RFC5065] Traina, P., McPherson, D., Scudder, J. (2007). Autonomous 
           Confederations for BGP, RFC5065, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/RFC/RFC5065]. 

        4.4 BGP Protocol Analysis and Experiences with BGP   

        1990-1995  

        [Bolot-1993] Bolot, J-C, (1993). End-to-end Packet Delay and Loss 
        Behavior in the Internet. In Proceedigns of ACM SIGCOMM ?94, 289-298, 
        San Francisco, CA, Sept. 1993.  

        [Chinoy 1994] Chinoy, B. (1994). Dynamics of Internet Routing 
        Information. In Proceedigns of ACM SIGCOMM ?94, 45-52. San Francisco, 
        CA, Sept. 1993. 


      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 7] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        [Rekhter 1991a] Rekhter, Y., ed. (1991). BGP Protocol Analysis, 
           RFC1265, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC1265] 

        [Rekhter 1991b] Rekhter, Y., ed.(1991). Experience with BGP Protocol, 
           RFC1266, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC1266] 

        [Rekhter, 1991c] Rekhter, Y., eds (1991). Application of the Border 
           Gateway Protocols, RFC1268, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC1268] 

        [Varadhan, 1992] Varadhan, K. (1992).  BGP OSPF Interactions, 
           RFC1365, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC1365] 

        [Varadhan, 1993] Varadhan, K. (1993).  BGP OSPF Interactions, 
           RFC1403, [online: www.ietf.org/RFC1403] 

        [Varadhan, 1994] Varadhan, K., Hares, S., Rekhter, Y. (1994). 
           BGP4/IDRP for IP --- OSPF interactions. RFC1745, [online: 
           www.ietf.org/RFC1745] 

        1995-2000 

        [AGT-1998] Apostolopoulos, G., Guerin, R., and Tripathi, S.K.S 
           (1998). Quality of Service Routing: A Performance Perspective. In 
           Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM ?98, pages 17-28, Vancouver, BC, 
           September, 1998. 

        [Breslau-1999] Breslau, L.M. (1995) Adaptive Source Routing of Real-
           Time Traffic in Integrated Service Networks. PhD thesis, 
           University of Southern California, Department of Computer Science, 
           December 1995.  

        [BSSK-1997]Balakrishnan, H., Seshan, S., Stemm, M., and Katz, R.H. 
           (1997). Analyzing Stability in Wide-Area Network Performance. In 
           Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMETRICS Conference, Seattle, WA, 
           June 1997.  

        [Dube-1999] Dube, R. (1999). A Comparison of scaling techniques for 
           BGP. ACM Computer Communications Review 29, 3 (July 1999), 44-46. 

        [DubeScudder-1998] Dube, R. and Scudder, J.G. (1998). Route 
           Reflection Considered Harmful. Work-in-Progress, [online: 
           http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-
           00.txt]. 

        [Francis-1999] Francis, P., Jamin, S., Paxon, V., Zhang, L., 
           Gryniewicz, D., Jin, Y. (1999). An Architecture for a Global 

      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 8] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

           Internet Host Distance Estimation Service. In Proceedings of the 
           IEEE INFOCOM ?99, New York, NY, March 1999.  

        [Freedman-1998] Freedman, A. (1998). Optimal External Route 
           Selection: Tips and Techniques for ISPs. Tutorial at North 
           American Operators Group (NANOG), November 1998.  

        [Labovitz97] Labovitz, C., Malan, G.R., Jahanian, F. (1997). In 
           Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM ?97, 115-126, Cannes, France, 
           September 1997.  

        [Labovitz99] Labovitz, C., Malan, G.R., Jahanian, F., (1999). Origins 
           of Internet Routing Instability. In Proceedings of the IEEE 
           INFOCOM ?99, New York, NY, March 1999.  

        2000-2005 

        [Basu-2002] Basu, A., Ong, C.-H.L., RAsala, A., Shepherd, and 
           Wilfong, G.(2002). Route Oscillations in IBGP with Route 
           Reflections, Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, August 2002.   

        [Ceasar-2003] Ceasar, M., Subramanian, L., and Katz, R.H. (2003). 
           Toward localizing root causes of BGP Dynamics. Tech. Rep. CSD-03-
           1202, UC Berkley, November, 2003.  

        [Chandrashekar-2004] Chandrashekar, J., Duan, Z., Zhang, A.-l, and 
           Krasky, J. (2004). Limiting Path Explaorationin Path Vector 
           Protocols. Tech. rep. University of Minnesota, 2004.  

        [Chang-2001] Chang, D-F, Govindan, R., Heidemann, J. (2001). An 
           Empirical Router Response to Large Routing Tables, Technical 
           Report No. 552, USC/Information Sciences Institute, CA, Nov. 2001. 
           [online: http://www.isi.edu/~johnh/PAPERS/Chang02a.pdf] 

        [Feamster-2003] Feamster, N. and Balakrishnan, H. (2003). Toward a 
           logic for wide-area Internet routing. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on 
           Future Directions in Network Architecture (August 2003).  

        [Feamster-2004a] Feamster, N. and Balakrishnan, H. (2004). Verifying 
           the correctness of wide-area Internet Routing. Tech. Rep. MIT-LCS-
           TR-948. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 2004.  

        [Feamster-2004b] Feamster, N. Winick, J., and Rexford, J. (2004). A 
           model of BGP routing for network engineering. In Proceedings of 
           ACM SIGMETRICS (June 2004).  


      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                 [Page 9] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        [Feldman-2004] Feldmann, A., Mannel, O., Mao, Z.M., Berger, A., and 
           Maggs, B. (2004). Locating Internet routing instabilities. In 
           Proceedings of ACM SIGCOM (Portland, OR, September 2004). 

        [Gao-2001a] Gao, L. (2001) On inferring autonomous systems 
           relationships in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 
           9, 6 (December 2001).  

        [Gao-2001b] Gao, L., Griffin, T.G., and Rexford, J. (2001), 
           Inherently safe bckup routing with BGP. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 
           (Anchorage, AK, April 2001).  

        [Gao-2001c] Gao, L. and Rexford, J. (2001) Stable Internet routing 
           without global coordination. IEEE/ACM Transaction Networking 9, 6 
           (December 2001), 681-692.  

        Goodell, G., Aiello, W., Griffin, T., Ioannidis, J., McDaniel, P., 
           and Rubin, A., (2003) Working around BGP: An incremental approach 
           to improving security and accuracy of interdomain routing. In 
           Proc. Networking and Distributed Systems, Internet Society 
           (February 2003).   

        [to be completed]  

        2006-2011 

        [to be completed]  

         

        3.5 Requirements for BGP  

        Davies, E. and Doria, A. (2006), An Analysis of Inter-Domain Routing  
           Requirements and History. RFC5773, [online: 
           http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc5773.pdf]  

        Davies, E., Doria, A., and Kastenholz, F. (2006) A Set of Possible 
           Requirements for a Future Routing Architecture. RFC5772. [online: 
           http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4772.pdf]  

        Feamster, N., Balakrishna, H., Rexford, J. (2005?)  

        Feamster, N, Balakrishnan, H., Rexford, J., Shaikh, A., and Van Der 
           Merwe, J. (2004). The case for separating routing from routers. In 
           ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future Directions in Network Architecture 
           (Portland, OR, August 2004).  \ 

      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                [Page 10] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        Li, T. (2011). Design Goals for Scalable Internet Routing. RFC6227, 
           [online: www.ietf.org/rfc/RFC6227]. 

        [Bonaventure-xxx] O. Bonaventure et al, Beyond Inter-domain 
           Reachability?, [online: http://www.net.informatik.tu-
           muenchen.de/wired/position/bonaventure-wired.pdf]  

        4.6  Descriptions of BGP Routing protocols in implementations.  

        [Cisco-1997] Halabi, B.(1997) Internet Routing, Cisco Press. 
            
         

     5. Impact of Reconfiguration on BGP  

        5.1 Problem of Network Configurations 

        [to be done] 

        5.2 Route Refresh and OrfS 

        [to be done] 

        5.3 Graceful Restart and ORFS 

        [to be done] 

         
         
     6. Bibliography for Convergence/Stability  

        6.1 Benchmarking of BGP  

        [to be completed]  

        6.2 Stability  

        [Govindan-1999] Govindan,R., Alaettinoglu, Eddy, G., Kessens, D., 
           Kumar, S., and Lee, W.S..  (1999) An Architecture for stable, 
           analyzable internet routing.  IEEE Network, 13(1):29-35, 1999.  
         
        [Gao-2000], Gao, L., and Rexford, J. (2000). Stable Internet Routing 
           without Global Coordination. Proc. Of ACM SIGMETRICS, June 2000.  
         
        6.3 Policy and Stability  
         
        [to be done]  
      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                [Page 11] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

         
     7. BGP policy documents 

        Alaettinoglu,A., Bates, T., Eric, E., Karenberg,D., Terpstra, M. and 
           Villamizar, C. (1998) Routing Policy (RPSL). RFC 2280. 
           [www.ietf.org/RFC2280] 
         

     8. Conclusion and Recommendation 

        The literature on BGP points toward the complexity of many of these 
        solutions, and the far ranging impact. The considerations of these 
        new BGP algorithms   

     9. Manageability Considerations 

        This document does not add additional manageability considerations.  

     10. Security Considerations 

        This document as a document review has no security considerations. 
        Perhaps because BGP algorithms have little security considerations.  

     11. IANA Considerations 

        This document provides a bibliography of BGP documents and  

     12. Acknowledgments 

        I want to acknowledge all the authors listed in the bibliography for 
        their insight which has provided valuable inputs to the revision of 
        Gated     

        This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.  

     13. References 

        [RFC4363]   Rosen, E. and Rekhter, Y. ?BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private 
                    Networks (VPNs)?, February 2006.   

      

        [add-paths] Walton,D., Chen, E., Retana, A., Scudder, J. 
                  ?Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP?, draft-ietf-idr-
                  add-patyhs-06.txt, September 15, 2011.  


      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                [Page 12] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        [add-paths-guidelines] Uttarro, J., Van den Schrieck, V., Franciois, 
                  P., Fraggassi, R., Simpson, A., Mohaptra, P., ?Best 
                  Practices for Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP?, 
                  draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-guidelines-01.txt.  

        [aigp] Mohapatra, P., Fernado, R., Rosen, E.C., Uttaro, J., 
                  ?Accumulated IGP Metric for BGP?, draft-ietf-idr-aigp-
                  06.txt.  

        [dyn-caps] Chen, E. and Sangli, S. ?Dynamic Capability for BGP-4?, 
                  draft-ietf-idr-dynamic-cap-13.txt, June 2011. 

        [frs-OPS] Freedman, D., Raszuk, R., Shakir, R. ?BGP OPERATIONAL 
                  Message?, draft-frs-bgp-opertoinal-message-00, June 2011.  

         

      
     Authors' Addresses 

        Susan Hares 
        Huawei Technologies (USA) 
        2330 Central Expressway 
        Santa Clara, CA 95050 
        Phone: +408-330-4581 
        Cell:  +1-734-604-0332 
        Email shares@huawei.com 
         
         
     Intellectual Property Statement 

        The IETF Trust takes no position regarding the validity or scope of 
        any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be 
        claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology 
        described in any IETF Document or the extent to which any license 
        under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it 
        represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any 
        such rights.  

        Copies of Intellectual Property disclosures made to the IETF 
        Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or 
        the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or 
        permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or 
        users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR 
        repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr 


      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                [Page 13] 
         


     Internet-Draft     BGP Path Selection Bibliography           2011-10-23 
         

        The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any 
        copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary 
        rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement 
        any standard or specification contained in an IETF Document. Please 
        address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. 

     Disclaimer of Validity 

        All IETF Documents and the information contained therein are provided 
        on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE 
        REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE 
        IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL 
        WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY 
        WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION THEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE 
        ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS 
        FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 

     Acknowledgment 

        Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the 
        Internet Society. 

         
























      
      
     Hares                   Expires April 24, 2012                [Page 14]