Internet DRAFT - draft-aviram-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex
draft-aviram-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex
Network Working Group C. Bartle
Internet-Draft Apple, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track N. Aviram
Expires: 29 August 2022 25 February 2022
Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in TLS
draft-aviram-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex-01
Abstract
This document makes several prescriptions regarding the following key
exchange methods in TLS, most of which have been superseded by better
options:
1. This document deprecates the use of RSA key exchange in TLS.
2. It limits the use of Diffie Hellman key exchange over a finite
field to avoid known vulnerabilities and improper security
properties.
3. It discourages the use of static elliptic curve Diffie Hellman
cipher suites.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 29 August 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Non-Ephemeral Diffie Hellman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Ephemeral Finite Field Diffie Hellman . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. RSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Appendix A. DH Cipher Suites Deprecated by This Document . . . . 10
Appendix B. ECDH Cipher Suites Whose Use Is Discouraged by This
Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Appendix C. DHE Cipher Suites Refered to by This Document . . . 15
Appendix D. RSA Cipher Suites Deprecated by This Document . . . 18
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1. Introduction
TLS supports a variety of key exchange algorithms, including RSA,
Diffie Hellman over a finite field, and elliptic curve Diffie Hellman
(ECDH).
Diffie Hellman key exchange, over any group, comes in ephemeral and
non-ephemeral varieties. Non-ephemeral DH algorithms use static DH
public keys included in the authenticating peer's certificate; see
[RFC4492] for discussion. In contrast, ephemeral DH algorithms use
ephemeral DH public keys sent in the handshake and authenticated by
the peer's certificate. Ephemeral and non-ephemeral finite field DH
algorithms are called DHE and DH (or FFDHE and FFDH), respectively,
and ephemeral and non-ephemeral elliptic curve DH algorithms are
called ECDHE and ECDH, respectively [RFC4492].
In general, non-ephemeral cipher suites are not recommended due to
their lack of forward secrecy. However, as demonstrated by the
[Raccoon] attack on finite-field DH, public key reuse, either via
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
non-ephemeral cipher suites or reused keys with ephemeral cipher
suites, can lead to timing side channels that may leak connection
secrets. For elliptic curve DH, invalid curve attacks similarly
exploit secret reuse in order to break security [ICA], further
demonstrating the risk of reusing public keys. While both side
channels can be avoided in implementations, experience shows that in
practice, implementations may fail to thwart such attacks due to the
complexity and number of the required mitigations.
Additionally, RSA key exchange suffers from security problems that
are independent of implementation choices as well as problems that
stem purely from the difficulty of implementing security
countermeasures correctly.
At a rough glance, the problems affecting FFDHE are as follows:
1. FFDHE suffers from interoperability problems because there is no
mechanism for negotiating the group size, and some
implementations only support small group sizes (see [RFC7919],
Section 1).
2. In practice, some operators use 1024-bit FFDHE groups since this
is the maximum size that ensures wide support (see [RFC7919],
Section 1). This size leaves only a small security margin vs.
the current discrete log record, which stands at 795 bits
[DLOG795].
3. Expanding on the previous point, just a handful of very large
computations allow an attacker to cheaply decrypt a relatively
large fraction of FFDHE traffic (namely, traffic encrypted using
particular standardized groups) [weak-dh].
4. When secrets are not fully ephemeral, FFDHE suffers from the
[Raccoon] side channel attack. (Note that FFDH is inherently
vulnerable to the Raccoon attack unless constant-time mitigations
are employed.)
5. FFDHE groups may have small subgroups, which enables several
attacks [subgroups].
The problems affecting RSA key exchange are as follows:
1. RSA key exchange offers no forward secrecy, by construction.
2. RSA key exchange may be vulnerable to Bleichenbacher's attack
[BLEI]. Experience shows that variants of this attack arise
every few years because implementing the relevant countermeasure
correctly is difficult (see [ROBOT], [NEW-BLEI], [DROWN]).
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
3. In addition to the above point, there is no convenient mechanism
in TLS for the domain separation of keys. Therefore, a single
endpoint that is vulnerable to Bleichenbacher's attack would
affect all endpoints sharing the same RSA key (see [XPROT],
[DROWN]).
Given these problems, this document updates [RFC4346], [RFC5246],
[RFC4162], [RFC6347], [RFC5932], [RFC5288], [RFC6209], [RFC6367],
[RFC8422], [RFC5289], and [RFC5469] to deprecate cipher suites with
key reuse.
1.1. Requirements
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. Non-Ephemeral Diffie Hellman
Clients MUST NOT offer non-ephemeral FFDH cipher suites in TLS 1.2
connections. (Note that TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are deprecated by [RFC8996]
and TLS 1.3 does not support FFDH [RFC8446].) This includes all
cipher suites listed in the table in Appendix A.
Clients SHOULD NOT offer non-ephemeral ECDH cipher suites in TLS 1.2
connections. (Note that TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are deprecated by [RFC8996]
and TLS 1.3 does not support ECDH [RFC8446].) This includes all
cipher suites listed in the table in Appendix B.
3. Ephemeral Finite Field Diffie Hellman
Clients and servers MAY offer fully ephemeral FFDHE cipher suites in
TLS 1.2 connections under the following conditions:
1. Clients and servers MUST NOT reuse ephemeral DHE public keys
across TLS connections for all existing (and future) TLS
versions. Doing so invalidates forward secrecy properties of
these connections. For DHE, such reuse may also lead to
vulnerabilities such as those used in the [Raccoon] attack. See
Section 6 for related discussion.
2. The group is one of the following well-known groups described in
[RFC7919]: ffdhe2048, ffdhe3072, ffdhe4096, ffdhe6144, ffdhe8192.
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
(Note that TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are deprecated by [RFC8996]. TLS 1.3
satisfies the second point above [RFC8446] and is not vulnerable to
the [Raccoon] Attack.)
We note that, previously, supporting the broadest range of clients
would have required supporting either RSA key exchange or 1024-bit
FFDHE. This is no longer the case, and it is possible to support
most clients released since circa 2015 using 2048-bit FFDHE or more
modern key exchange methods, and without RSA key exchange
[server_side_tls].
All the cipher suites that do not meet the above requirements are
listed in the table in Appendix C.
4. RSA
Clients and servers MUST NOT offer RSA cipher suites in TLS 1.2
connections. (Note that TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are deprecated by [RFC8996],
and TLS 1.3 does not support static RSA [RFC8446].) This includes
all cipher suites listed in the table in Appendix D. Note that these
cipher suites are already marked as not recommended in the "TLS
Cipher Suites" registry.
5. IANA Considerations
This document makes no requests to IANA. Note that all cipher suites
listed in Section 4 and in Section 2 are already marked as not
recommended in the "TLS Cipher Suites" registry.
6. Security Considerations
Non-ephemeral finite field DH cipher suites (TLS_DH_*), as well as
ephemeral key reuse for finite field DH cipher suites, are prohibited
due to the [Raccoon] attack. Both are already considered bad
practice since they do not provide forward secrecy. However, Raccoon
revealed that timing side channels in processing TLS premaster
secrets may be exploited to reveal the encrypted premaster secret.
As for non-ephemeral elliptic curve DH cipher suites, forgoing
forward secrecy not only allows retroactive decryption in the event
of key compromise but may also enable a broad category of attacks
where the attacker exploits key reuse to repeatedly query a
cryptographic secret.
This category includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the
following examples:
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
1. Invalid curve attacks, where the attacker exploits key reuse to
repeatedly query and eventually learn the key itself. These
attacks have been shown to be practical against real-world TLS
implementations [ICA].
2. Side channel attacks, where the attacker exploits key reuse and
an additional side channel to learn a cryptographic secret. As
one example of such attacks, refer to [MAY4].
3. Fault attacks, where the attacker exploits key reuse and
incorrect calculations to learn a cryptographic secret. As one
example of such attacks, see [PARIS256].
Such attacks are often implementation-dependent, including the above
examples. However, these examples demonstrate that building a system
that reuses keys and avoids this category of attacks is difficult in
practice. In contrast, avoiding key reuse not only prevents
decryption in the event of key compromise, but also precludes this
category of attacks altogether. Therefore, this document discourages
the reuse of elliptic curve DH public keys.
7. Acknowledgments
This document was inspired by discussions on the TLS WG mailing list
and a suggestion by Filippo Valsorda following the release of the
[Raccoon] attack. Thanks to Christopher A. Wood for writing up the
initial draft of this document.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4162] Lee, H.J., Yoon, J.H., and J.I. Lee, "Addition of SEED
Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 4162, DOI 10.17487/RFC4162, August 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4162>.
[RFC4279] Eronen, P., Ed. and H. Tschofenig, Ed., "Pre-Shared Key
Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 4279, DOI 10.17487/RFC4279, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4279>.
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
[RFC4346] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.1", RFC 4346,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4346, April 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4346>.
[RFC4785] Blumenthal, U. and P. Goel, "Pre-Shared Key (PSK)
Ciphersuites with NULL Encryption for Transport Layer
Security (TLS)", RFC 4785, DOI 10.17487/RFC4785, January
2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4785>.
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.
[RFC5288] Salowey, J., Choudhury, A., and D. McGrew, "AES Galois
Counter Mode (GCM) Cipher Suites for TLS", RFC 5288,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5288, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5288>.
[RFC5289] Rescorla, E., "TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-
256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM)", RFC 5289,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5289, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5289>.
[RFC5469] Eronen, P., Ed., "DES and IDEA Cipher Suites for Transport
Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 5469, DOI 10.17487/RFC5469,
February 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5469>.
[RFC5487] Badra, M., "Pre-Shared Key Cipher Suites for TLS with SHA-
256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode", RFC 5487,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5487, March 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5487>.
[RFC5932] Kato, A., Kanda, M., and S. Kanno, "Camellia Cipher Suites
for TLS", RFC 5932, DOI 10.17487/RFC5932, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5932>.
[RFC6209] Kim, W., Lee, J., Park, J., and D. Kwon, "Addition of the
ARIA Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 6209, DOI 10.17487/RFC6209, April 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6209>.
[RFC6347] Rescorla, E. and N. Modadugu, "Datagram Transport Layer
Security Version 1.2", RFC 6347, DOI 10.17487/RFC6347,
January 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6347>.
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
[RFC6367] Kanno, S. and M. Kanda, "Addition of the Camellia Cipher
Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 6367,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6367, September 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6367>.
[RFC6655] McGrew, D. and D. Bailey, "AES-CCM Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 6655,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6655, July 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6655>.
[RFC7905] Langley, A., Chang, W., Mavrogiannopoulos, N.,
Strombergson, J., and S. Josefsson, "ChaCha20-Poly1305
Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 7905, DOI 10.17487/RFC7905, June 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7905>.
[RFC7919] Gillmor, D., "Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman
Ephemeral Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
RFC 7919, DOI 10.17487/RFC7919, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7919>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8422] Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie-Gonnard, "Elliptic
Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer
Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8422, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8996] Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS
1.1", BCP 195, RFC 8996, DOI 10.17487/RFC8996, March 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8996>.
8.2. Informative References
[BLEI] Bleichenbacher, D., "Chosen Ciphertext Attacks against
Protocols Based on RSA Encryption Standard PKCS #1",
Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO'98, LNCS vol. 1462,
pages: 1-12 , 1998.
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
[DLOG795] Boudot, F., Gaudry, P., Guillevic, A., Heninger, N.,
Thomé, E., and P. Zimmermann, "Comparing the difficulty of
factorization and discrete logarithm: a 240-digit
experiment", 17 August 2020,
<https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/697>.
[DROWN] Aviram, N., Schinzel, S., Somorovsky, J., Heninger, N.,
Dankel, M., Steube, J., Valenta, L., Adrian, D.,
Halderman, J. A., Dukhovni, V., Käsper, E., Cohney, S.,
Engels, S., Paar, C., and Y. Shavitt, "DROWN: Breaking TLS
using SSLv2", August 2016,
<https://drownattack.com/drown-attack-paper.pdf>.
[ICA] Jager, T., Schwenk, J., and J. Somorovsky, "Practical
invalid curve attacks on TLS-ECDH", 21 September 2015,
<https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/
download?doi=10.1.1.704.7932&rep=rep1&type=pdf>.
[MAY4] Genkin, D., Valenta, L., and Y. Yarom, "May the fourth be
with you: A microarchitectural side channel attack on
several real-world applications of curve25519", n.d.,
<https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3133956.3134029>.
[NEW-BLEI] Meyer, C., Somorovsky, J., Weiss, E., Schwenk, J.,
Schinzel, S., and E. Tews, "Revisiting SSL/TLS
Implementations: New Bleichenbacher Side Channels and
Attacks", August 2014,
<https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/
usenixsecurity14/sec14-paper-meyer.pdf>.
[PARIS256] Devlin, S. and F. Valsorda, "The PARIS256 Attack", n.d.,
<https://i.blackhat.com/us-18/Wed-August-8/us-18-Valsorda-
Squeezing-A-Key-Through-A-Carry-Bit-wp.pdf>.
[Raccoon] Merget, R., Brinkmann, M., Aviram, N., Somorovsky, J.,
Mittmann, J., and J. Schwenk, "Raccoon Attack: Finding and
Exploiting Most-Significant-Bit-Oracles in TLS-DH(E)", 9
September 2020,
<https://raccoon-attack.com/RacoonAttack.pdf>.
[RFC4492] Blake-Wilson, S., Bolyard, N., Gupta, V., Hawk, C., and B.
Moeller, "Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 4492,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4492, May 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4492>.
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
[ROBOT] Boeck, H., Somorovsky, J., and C. Young, "Return Of
Bleichenbacher's Oracle Threat (ROBOT)", 27th USENIX
Security Symposium , 2018.
[SC-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic]
"Moving single-DES and IDEA TLS ciphersuites to Historic",
25 January 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-
change-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic/>.
[server_side_tls]
King, A., "Server Side TLS", July 2020,
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS>.
[subgroups]
Valenta, L., Adrian, D., Sanso, A., Cohney, S., Fried, J.,
Hastings, M., Halderman, J. A., and N. Heninger,
"Measuring small subgroup attacks against Diffie-Hellman",
15 October 2016,
<https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/995/20161017:193515>.
[weak-dh] Adrian, D., Bhargavan, K., Durumeric, Z., Gaudry, P.,
Green, M., Halderman, J. A., Heninger, N., Springall, D.,
Thomé, E., Valenta, L., VanderSloot, B., Wustrow, E.,
Zanella-Béguelin, S., and P. Zimmermann, "Weak Diffie-
Hellman and the Logjam Attack", October 2015,
<https://weakdh.org/>.
[XPROT] Jager, T., Schwenk, J., and J. Somorovsky, "On the
Security of TLS 1.3 and QUIC Against Weaknesses in PKCS#1
v1.5 Encryption", Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC
Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2015.
Appendix A. DH Cipher Suites Deprecated by This Document
+==========================================+====================+
| Ciphersuite | Reference |
+==========================================+====================+
| TLS_DH_DSS_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | [RFC4346] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | [RFC5469] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | [RFC4346] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | [RFC5469] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 | [RFC4346][RFC6347] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 | [RFC5246][RFC6347] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | [RFC4346] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | [RFC5469] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5246] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA | [RFC4162] |
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA | [RFC4162] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA | [RFC4162] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC5288] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC5288] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC5288] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC5288] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC5288] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC5288] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5932] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+------------------------------------------+--------------------+
Table 1
Appendix B. ECDH Cipher Suites Whose Use Is Discouraged by This
Document
+=============================================+====================+
| Ciphersuite | Reference |
+=============================================+====================+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | [RFC8422][RFC6347] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | [RFC8422][RFC6347] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_NULL_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | [RFC8422][RFC6347] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | [RFC8422] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC5289] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6209] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | [RFC6367] |
+---------------------------------------------+--------------------+
Table 2
Appendix C. DHE Cipher Suites Refered to by This Document
+=========================================+==============================================+
|Ciphersuite |Reference |
+=========================================+==============================================+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA |[RFC4346] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA |[RFC5469][SC-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic]|
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA |[RFC4346] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA |[RFC5469][SC-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic]|
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA |[RFC4785] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_RC4_128_SHA |[RFC4279][RFC6347] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA |[RFC4279] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC4279] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC4279] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA |[RFC4162] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA |[RFC4162] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC5288] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC5288] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC5288] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC5288] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CCM |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM_8 |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CCM_8 |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CCM |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_256_CCM |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256|[RFC7905] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256|[RFC7905] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Table 3
Appendix D. RSA Cipher Suites Deprecated by This Document
+=========================================+==============================================+
|Ciphersuite |Reference |
+=========================================+==============================================+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_MD5 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 |[RFC4346][RFC6347] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 |[RFC5246][RFC6347] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA |[RFC5246][RFC6347] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5 |[RFC4346] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_IDEA_CBC_SHA |[RFC5469][SC-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic]|
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA |[RFC4346] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA |[RFC5469][SC-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic]|
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA |[RFC4785] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5246] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
|TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_RC4_128_SHA |[RFC4279][RFC6347] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA |[RFC4279] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA |[RFC4279] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA |[RFC4279] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA |[RFC4162] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC5288] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC5288] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 |[RFC5487] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC5932] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6209] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Deprecating RSA and FFDH(E) February 2022
|TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA384 |[RFC6367] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CCM |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM_8 |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CCM_8 |[RFC6655] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256|[RFC7905] |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Table 4
Authors' Addresses
Carrick Bartle
Apple, Inc.
Email: cbartle@apple.com
Nimrod Aviram
Email: nimrod.aviram@gmail.com
Bartle & Aviram Expires 29 August 2022 [Page 20]
