INTERNET-DRAFT Mykyta Yevstifeyev Intended Status: Standards Track December 4, 2010 Expires: June 7, 2011 'Headers-Not-Recognized' HTTP Header Field Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html Copyright and License Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Mykyta Yevstifeyev Expires June 7, 2011 [Page 1] INTERNET DRAFT Headers Not Recognized for HTTP December 4, 2010 Abstract This document defines mechanism which allows HTTP servers to notify clients about not recognized or not proceed headers. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2.1. Conformance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2.2. Syntax Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2.3. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Technical Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1 Model of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Author's Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Mykyta Yevstifeyev Expires June 7, 2011 [Page 2] INTERNET DRAFT Headers Not Recognized for HTTP December 4, 2010 1. Introduction 1.1. Motivation HTTP is one of the most widely-used protocols in the Internet. One of the things which made it so popular is extensibility. One can easily add any header to the HTTP message. However, servers are not able to support all the HTTP headers. Generally, if a server does not recognize the header, it simply ignores it. The client is not notified about not processed headers. This document proposes mechanism which allows servers to notify clients about not processes or not recognized headers. The proposal is to send a response with definite header field to the client if one or more headers of request were not processed. This document defines 'Headers-Not-Recognized' header field to be used in such occasion. 1.2. Conventions 1.2.1. Conformance Criteria The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. 1.2.2. Syntax Notation This specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation of [RFC5234]. The following core rules are included by reference, as defined in [RFC5234], Appendix B.1: ALPHA (letters), CR (carriage return), CRLF (CR LF), CTL (controls), DIGIT (decimal 0-9), DQUOTE (double quote), HEXDIG (hexadecimal 0-9/A-F/a-f), LF (line feed), OCTET (any 8-bit sequence of data), SP (space), HTAB (horizontal tab), CHAR (any US- ASCII character), VCHAR (any visible US-ASCII character), and WSP (whitespace). 1.2.3. Terminology The terms user agent, client, server, proxy, and origin server have the same meaning as in the HTTP/1.1 specification ([RFC2616], Section 1.3). Mykyta Yevstifeyev Expires June 7, 2011 [Page 3] INTERNET DRAFT Headers Not Recognized for HTTP December 4, 2010 2. Technical Overview 2.1. Model of Work If a server receives request with unknown (for it) headers, it SHOULD send a response with 'Headers-Not-Recognized' headers field. Information about what headers were not recognized MUST be put into this header. If a client receives such a response, it is RECOMMENDED that it avoids sending requests with headers mentioned in the 'Headers-Not-Recognized' header field or tries to change them so that the server recognize them. 2.2 Syntax 'Headers-Not-Recognized' header field has the following format: headers_not_recognized = 1#header_name header_name = token ;the name of not recognized header Mykyta Yevstifeyev Expires June 7, 2011 [Page 4] INTERNET DRAFT Headers Not Recognized for HTTP December 4, 2010 3. IANA Considerations The permanent message header field registry should be updated with the following registration: Header field name: Headers-Not-Recognized Applicable protocol: http Status: standard Specification document: this document Note: This registration should take place at http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm- headers.html This note MUST be deleted upon publication. 4. Security Considerations Security considerations are not discussed by this document. 5. Normative References [RFC2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999. [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. Author's Addresses Mykyta Yevstifeyev 8 Kuzovkov St., flat 25 Kotovsk, Ukraine EMail: evnikita2@gmail.com Mykyta Yevstifeyev Expires June 7, 2011 [Page 5]