Network Working Group T. Graf Internet-Draft Swisscom Intended status: Standards Track September 12, 2020 Expires: March 16, 2021 Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-05 Abstract This document introduces additional code points in the mplsTopLabelType Information Element for IS-IS, OSPFv2, OSPFv3 and BGP MPLS Segment Routing (SR) extensions to enable Segment Routing label protocol type information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX). Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on March 16, 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of Graf Expires March 16, 2021 [Page 1] Internet-Draft IPFIX MPLS Segment Routing Information September 2020 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. MPLS Segment Routing Top Label Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. Introduction Besides BGP-4 [RFC8277], LDP [RFC5036] and BGP VPN [RFC4364], four new routing-protocols, OSPFv2 Extensions [RFC8665], OSPFv3 Extensions [RFC8666], IS-IS Extensions [RFC8667] and BGP Prefix-SID [RFC8669] have been added to the list of routing-protocols able to propagate Segment Routing labels for the MPLS dataplane [RFC8660]. Traffic Accounting in Segment Routing Networks [I-D.ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting] describes how IPFIX can be leveraged to account traffic to MPLS Segment Routing label dimensions within a Segment Routing domain. In the Information Model for IP Flow Information Export IPFIX [RFC7012], the information element #46 mplsTopLabelType describes which MPLS control plane protocol allocated the top-of-stack label in the MPLS label stack. RFC 7012 section 7.2 [RFC7012] describes the IANA Information Element #46 SubRegistry [IANA-IPFIX-IE46] where new code points should be added. 2. MPLS Segment Routing Top Label Type By introducing four new code points to information element #46 mplsTopLabelType for IS-IS, OSPFv2, OSPFv3 and BGP Prefix-SID, when Segment Routing with one of these four routing protocols is deployed, we get insight into which traffic is being forwarded based on which MPLS control plane protocol. A typical use case scenario is to monitor MPLS control plane migrations from LDP to IS-IS or OSPF Segment Routing. Such a migration can be done node by node as described in RFC8661 [RFC8661] Another use case is the monitoring of a migration to a Seamless MPLS SR [I-D.hegde-spring-mpls-seamless-sr] architecture. Where prefixes are propagated with dynamic BGP labels according to RFC8277 Graf Expires March 16, 2021 [Page 2] Internet-Draft IPFIX MPLS Segment Routing Information September 2020 [RFC8277], BGP Prefix-SID according to RFC8669 [RFC8669] and used for the forwarding between IGP domains. Adding an additional layer into the MPLS dataplane to above discribed use case. Both use cases can be verified by looking at IE46, mplsTopLabelType, IE47, mplsTopLabelIPv4Address, IE70, mplsTopLabelStackSection and IE89 forwardingStatus dimensions. Giving insights into the MPLS dataplane for which MPLS provider edge loopback address, which label protocol has been used and how many packets are forwarded or dropped and when dropped why they have been dropped. By looking at the MPLS label value itself, it is not always clear as to which label protocol it belongs, since they could potentially share the same label allocation range. This is the case for IGP- Adjacency SID's, LDP and dynamic BGP labels as an example. 3. IANA Considerations This document specifies four additional code points for IS-IS, OSPFv2, OSPFv3 and BGP Prefix-SID Segment Routing extension in the existing sub-registry "IPFIX MPLS label type (Value 46)" of the "IPFIX Information Elements" and one new "IPFIX Information Element" with a new sub-registry in the "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" name space. ----------------------------------------------------- | Value| Description | Reference | |---------------------------------------------------| | TBD1 | OSPFv2 Segment Routing | RFC8665 | |---------------------------------------------------| | TBD2 | OSPFv3 Segment Routing | RFC8666 | |---------------------------------------------------| | TBD3 | IS-IS Segment Routing | RFC8667 | |---------------------------------------------------| | TBD4 | BGP Segment Routing Prefix-SID | RFC8669 | ----------------------------------------------------- Figure 1: Updates to "IPFIX Information Element #46" SubRegistry 4. Security Considerations The same security considerations apply as for the IPFIX Protocol RFC7012 [RFC7012]. Graf Expires March 16, 2021 [Page 3] Internet-Draft IPFIX MPLS Segment Routing Information September 2020 5. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Paul Aitken, Loa Andersson, Tianran Zhou, Pierre Francois, Bruno Decreane, Paolo Lucente, Hannes Gredler, Ketan Talaulikar, Sabrina Tanamal, Erik Auerswald and Sergey Fomin for their review and valuable comments. 6. References 6.1. Normative References [RFC7012] Claise, B., Ed. and B. Trammell, Ed., "Information Model for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)", RFC 7012, DOI 10.17487/RFC7012, September 2013, . 6.2. Informative References [I-D.ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting] Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Sivabalan, S., Horneffer, M., Raszuk, R., Litkowski, S., Voyer, D., and R. Morton, "Traffic Accounting in Segment Routing Networks", draft- ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting-04 (work in progress), February 2020. [I-D.hegde-spring-mpls-seamless-sr] Hegde, S., Bowers, C., Xu, X., Gulko, A., Bogdanov, A., and J. Uttaro, "Seamless Segment Routing", draft-hegde- spring-mpls-seamless-sr-01 (work in progress), July 2020. [IANA-IPFIX-IE46] "IANA IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Element #46 SubRegistry", . [RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, . [RFC5036] Andersson, L., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., and B. Thomas, Ed., "LDP Specification", RFC 5036, DOI 10.17487/RFC5036, October 2007, . [RFC8277] Rosen, E., "Using BGP to Bind MPLS Labels to Address Prefixes", RFC 8277, DOI 10.17487/RFC8277, October 2017, . Graf Expires March 16, 2021 [Page 4] Internet-Draft IPFIX MPLS Segment Routing Information September 2020 [RFC8660] Bashandy, A., Ed., Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with the MPLS Data Plane", RFC 8660, DOI 10.17487/RFC8660, December 2019, . [RFC8661] Bashandy, A., Ed., Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., and S. Litkowski, "Segment Routing MPLS Interworking with LDP", RFC 8661, DOI 10.17487/RFC8661, December 2019, . [RFC8665] Psenak, P., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 8665, DOI 10.17487/RFC8665, December 2019, . [RFC8666] Psenak, P., Ed. and S. Previdi, Ed., "OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 8666, DOI 10.17487/RFC8666, December 2019, . [RFC8667] Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L., Ed., Filsfils, C., Bashandy, A., Gredler, H., and B. Decraene, "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 8667, DOI 10.17487/RFC8667, December 2019, . [RFC8669] Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Lindem, A., Ed., Sreekantiah, A., and H. Gredler, "Segment Routing Prefix Segment Identifier Extensions for BGP", RFC 8669, DOI 10.17487/RFC8669, December 2019, . Author's Address Thomas Graf Swisscom Binzring 17 Zurich 8045 Switzerland Email: thomas.graf@swisscom.com Graf Expires March 16, 2021 [Page 5]