NETMOD Working Group Q. Wu Internet-Draft Huawei Intended status: Standards Track B. Claise Expires: January 9, 2021 Cisco L. Geng Z. Du China Mobile July 8, 2020 Telemetry Data Self Explanation Tags draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-03 Abstract This document defines a method to tag data node associated with telemetry data in YANG Modules. This YANG data node tagging method can be used to provide input, instruction, indication to selection filter and filter queries of operational state on a server during a "pub/sub" service for YANG datastore updates and provide multiple dimensional network visibility analysis when the state of all subscriptions of a particular Subscriber to be fetched is huge, so that the amount of data to be streamed out to the destination can be greatly reduced and only targeted to the characteristics data. An extension statement to be used to indicate YANG data node self explanation tags that SHOULD be added by the module implementation automatically (i.e., outside of configuration). A YANG module [RFC7950] is defined, which augments Module tag model and provides a list of data node entries to allow for adding or removing of data node self explanation tags as well as viewing the set of self explanation tags associated with a YANG module. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 This Internet-Draft will expire on January 9, 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Data Node tags Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1.1. Multiple Dimensional Performance Measurement Information Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1.2. Correlated Information Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2. Data Node Tag Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1. IETF Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.2. Vendor Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3. User Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.4. Reserved Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3. Data Node Tag Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.1. Module Design Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2. Implementation Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3. User Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4. Tags Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1. Tags Module Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6. Guidelines to Model Writers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 6.1. Define Standard Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 7.1. YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes Registry . . . . . . . . . . 19 7.2. IETF YANG Data Node Tags Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7.3. Updates to the IETF XML Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.4. Updates to the YANG Module Names Registry . . . . . . . . 25 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Appendix A. Targeted data object subscription example . . . . . 27 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 1. Introduction As described [I.D-ietf-netmod-module-tags], the use of tags for classification and organization is fairly ubiquitous not only within IETF protocols, but in the internet itself (e.g., "#hashtags"). A module tag defined in [I.D-ietf-netmod-module-tags] is a string associated only with a module name at module level. At the time of writing this document (2020), there are many data models that have been specified or are being specified by various different SDOs and Open Souce community. They cover many of the networking protocols and techniques. However data objects defined by these technology specific data models might represent a portion of fault, configuration, accounting, performance, security management categories information (e.g., performance metric specific data object type) in various different ways, lack consistent classification criteria and representation granularity,e.g., sensor data in hardware model is defined with fine granularity with value scale and value precision while interface model only provides statistics data for specific interface type. This document defines data node self explanation tags and associates them with data nodes within YANG module, which o Provide dictionary meaning for specific targeted data nodes; o Indicate relationship between data nodes within the same YANG module or from different YANG modules; o Identify key performance metric scale, precision, statistics operation; o Identify specific service or feature, data source. The data node self explanation tags can be used by the client to provide input, instruction, indication to selection filter and filter queries of configuration or operational state on a server based on these data node tags,.e.g.,return specific object type of operational state related to system-management. NETCONF clients can discover data objects with data node self explanation tags supported by a NETCONF server via operation. The data node self explanation tag capability can also be advertised via capability notification Model [I-D.netconf-notification-capabilities] by the NETCONF server or some place where offline document are kept. These Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 self explanation tags may be registered as well as assigned during the module definition; assigned by implementations; or dynamically defined and set by users. This document defines a YANG module [RFC7950] which augments module tag model and provides a list of data node entries to allow for adding or removing of self explanation tags as well as viewing the set of self explanation tags associated with a data node within YANG modules. This document defines an extension statement to be used to indicate self explanation tags that SHOULD be added by the module implementation automatically (i.e., outside of configuration). The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in [RFC8342]. 1.1. Data Node tags Use Cases The following is a list of already implemented and potential use cases. 1.1.1. Multiple Dimensional Performance Measurement Information Tagging Data node tags can be used to express multiple dimensional performance metric and properties associated with YANG data nodes or data objects modelled with YANG (See Figure 1). ----- ----- // \\ // \\ | Property+------+ +-------+ Property| \\ A // | | \\ B // -----+ +--V----------------V---+ ----- | YANG Data Node | | /Data Object | /---\ +--^----------------^---+ /---\ / \ | | / \ |Metric +-------+ +--------|Metric | \ A / +-------------+ \ B / \-+-/ | | \-+-/ | | Metric Group| | -------------| |--------------- +-------------+ Figure 1 The use of data node tags would be to help filter different discrete categories of YANG data nodes across YANG modules supported by a Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 device. If data nodes across YANG modules are suitably tagged and learnt by the client from a live server, then an XPath query can be used by the client to list all related data nodes supported by a device with the same characteristics. Data node tags can also be used to help coordination when clients are interacting with various different devices with the same categories of YANG data node across different YANG modules. For example, one management client could mark some specific data node across modules implemented in various different devices with the same metric group tag, so consistent representation and reporting can be provided for YANG data nodes belonging to the same metric group (see Figure 2). Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 +-----------+---------------+-----------+-----------------------+ | Object | Property | Metric | Metric Module | | Name | Name | Group | Name | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | name | - | - tunnel | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | create-time | - | - tunnel | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | modified-time | - | - | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| avg-latency tunnel-pm| | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| packet-loss tunnel-pm| | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| min-latency tunnel-pm| | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| max-latency tunnel-pm| | | | |transmitted | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| -packet tunnel-pm| +-----------+---------------+-----------+-----------------------+ +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Metric Metric Metric Metric Metric | | Group Name Precision Scale Unit | | | | lsp-ping-pm avg- 1 1 ms | | latency | | | | lsp-ping-pm packet- 1 1 percentile | | loss | | | | | | lsp-ping-pm min- 1 1 ms | | latency | | | | | | lsp-ping-pm max- 1 1 ms | | latency | | | | | | lsp-ping-pm transmitted 1 1 | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Figure 2 Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 1.1.2. Correlated Information Tagging Another example is the management client could mark some data node across different level of YANG modules implemented in the device, the management system with the same service tag (e.g., L3VPN Service), so root cause can be identified efficiently during service-level agreements and performance monitoring or network failure troubleshooting. +--------------+ | Parent object| +-------^------+ | ----- +-----+-----+ ----- // \\ |Service Tag| // \\ | Property+------+ ++--------+-+ +-------+ Property| \\ A // | | | | \\ B // -----+ +--V---V-+ +-V---V--+ ----- | Child | | Child | |ObjectA | |ObjectB | /---\ +--^-----+ +-----^--+ /---\ / \ | | / \ |Metric +-------+ +--------|Metric | \ A / \ B / \---/ \---/ +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Service Metric Metric Module Level | | Tag Group Name | | | | L3VPN L3VPN maximum L3VPN Service | | -routes | | | | L3VPN OSPF-Process total-active OSPF Device | | routes | | | | total-active | | L3VPN RIP-Process routes RIP Device | | | | total-active | | L3VPN BGP-Process routes BGP Device | | | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 1.2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 2. Data Node Tag Values All data node tags SHOULD begin with a prefix indicating who owns their definition. An IANA registry (Section 7.1) is used to support registering data node tag prefixes. Currently 3 prefixes are defined. No further structure is imposed by this document on the value following the registered prefix, and the value can contain any YANG type 'string' characters except carriage-returns, newlines and tabs. Therefore, designers, implementers, and users are free to add or not add any structure they may require to their own tag values. 2.1. IETF Tags Prefix An IETF tag is a data node tag that has the prefix "ietf:". All IETF data node tags are registered with IANA in a registry defined later in this document (Section 7.2). 2.2. Vendor Tags Prefix A vendor tag is a tag that has the prefix "vendor:". These tags are defined by the vendor that implements the module, and are not registered; however, it is RECOMMENDED that the vendor include extra identification in the tag to avoid collisions such as using the enterpise or organization name following the "vendor:" prefix (e.g., vendor:vendor-defined-classifier). 2.3. User Tags Prefix A user tag is any tag that has the prefix "user:". These tags are defined by the user/administrator and are not meant to be registered. Users are not required to use the "user:" prefix; however, doing so is RECOMMENDED as it helps avoid prefix collisions. 2.4. Reserved Tags Prefix Any tag not starting with the prefix "ietf:", "vendor:" or "user:" is reserved for future use. These tag values are not invalid, but simply reserved in the context of specifications (e.g., RFCs). Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 3. Data Node Tag Management Tags can become associated with a data node within YANG module in a number of ways. Tags may be defined and associated at module design time, at implementation time without the need of live server, or via user administrative control . As the main consumer of data node tags are users, users may also remove any tag from a live server, no matter how the tag became associated with a data node within a YANG module. 3.1. Module Design Tagging A data node definition MAY indicate a set of data node tags to be added by the module implementer. These design time tags are indicated using the node-tag extension statement. If the data node is defined in an IETF standards track document, the data node tags MUST be IETF Tags (2.1). Thus, new data node can drive the addition of new IETF tags to the IANA registry defined in Section 7.2, and the IANA registry can serve as a check against duplication. 3.2. Implementation Tagging An implementation MAY include additional tags associated with data node within a YANG module. These tags SHOULD be IETF Tags (i.e., registered) or vendor specific tags. 3.3. User Tagging Data node tags of any kind, with or without a prefix, can be assigned and removed by the user from a live server using normal configuration mechanisms. In order to remove a data node tag from the operational datastore, the user adds a matching "masked-tag" entry for a given data node within the ietf-data-node-tags Module. 4. Tags Module Structure 4.1. Tags Module Tree The tree associated with the "ietf-data-node-tags" module follows. The meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340]. Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 module: ietf-data-node-tags augment /tags:module-tags/tags:module: +--rw self-explanation-node-tags +--rw self-explanation-node* [node-name] +--rw node-name nacm:node-instance-identifier +--rw opm-tag tags:tag +--rw metric-precision tags:tag +--rw metric-scale tags:tag +--rw operation-type tags:tag +--rw service-tag* tags:tag +--rw task-tag* tags:tag +--rw multi-source-tag tags:tag +--rw data-source tags:tag 5. YANG Module file "ietf-self-explanation-node-tags@2019-05-03.yang" module ietf-self-explanation-node-tags { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-self-explanation-node-tags"; prefix ntags; import ietf-netconf-acm { prefix nacm; } import ietf-module-tags { prefix tags; } organization "IETF NetMod Working Group (NetMod)"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editor: Qin Wu Editor: Benoit Claise Editor: Liang Geng Editor: Zongpeng Du "; // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and // remove this note. description "This module describes a mechanism associating self-explanation tags with YANG data node within YANG modules. Tags may be IANA assigned or privately defined. Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; // RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication // and RFC number and remove this note. revision 2019-05-03 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: YANG Data Node Tags"; } typedef tag { type string { length "1..max"; pattern '[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9\-_]*:[\S ]+'; } description "A tag value is composed of a standard prefix followed by any type 'string' value that does not include carriage return, newline or tab characters."; } typedef metric-precision { type int8 { range "-8 .. 9"; } description "A node using this data type represents a sensor value precision range. A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of type measurement-units and type measurement-scale. Together, associated nodes of these three types are used to identify the semantics of a node of type sensor-value. If a node of this type contains a value in the range 1 to 9, it represents the number of decimal places in the fractional part of an associated sensor-value fixed-point number. If a node of this type contains a value in the range -8 to -1, it represents the number of accurate digits in the associated sensor-value fixed-point number. The value zero indicates the associated sensor-value node is not a fixed-point number. Server implementers must choose a value for the associated Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 sensor-value-precision node so that the precision and accuracy of the associated sensor-value node is correctly indicated. For example, a component representing a temperature sensor that can measure 0 to 100 degrees C in 0.1 degree increments, +/- 0.05 degrees, would have a sensor-value-precision value of '1', a sensor-value-scale value of 'units', and a sensor-value ranging from '0' to '1000'. The sensor-value would be interpreted as 'degrees C * 10'."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorPrecision"; } typedef metric-scale { type enumeration { enum yocto { value 1; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-24."; } enum zepto { value 2; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-21."; } enum atto { value 3; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-18."; } enum femto { value 4; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-15."; } enum pico { value 5; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-12."; } enum nano { value 6; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-9."; } enum micro { Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 value 7; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-6."; } enum milli { value 8; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^-3."; } enum units { value 9; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^0."; } enum kilo { value 10; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^3."; } enum mega { value 11; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^6."; } enum giga { value 12; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^9."; } enum tera { value 13; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^12."; } enum peta { value 14; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^15."; } enum exa { value 15; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^18."; } enum zetta { value 16; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^21."; Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 } enum yotta { value 17; description "Measurement scaling factor of 10^24."; } } description "A node using this data type represents a data scaling factor, represented with an International System of Units (SI) prefix. The actual data units are determined by examining a node of this type together with the associated sensor-value-type. A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of type sensor-value-type and type sensor-value-precision. Together, associated nodes of these three types are used to identify the semantics of a node of type sensor-value."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorDataScale"; } identity metric-unit { description "Base identity for measurement unit."; } identity ac-volts { base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of electric potential (alternating current)."; } identity dc-volts { base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of electric potential (direct current)."; } identity amperes { base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of electric current."; } identity power { base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of power."; } identity hertz { Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of frequency."; } identity celsius { base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of temperature."; } identity rpm { base metric-unit; description "Identity for a measure of shaft revolutions per minute."; } extension opm-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. This extension statement is used by module authors to indicate the opm tags that SHOULD be added automatically by the system. As such the origin of the value for the pre-defined tags should be set to 'system' [RFC8342]."; } extension metric-scale{ argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The metric-scale can be used to provide an additional metric scale (e.g., Measurement scaling factor of 10^0, 10^-3,10^3) information associated with the performance metric data node tag."; } extension metric-precision { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The metric-precision can be used to provide an additional metric precision (e.g., the range -8 to -1, 0, the range 1 to 9) information associated with the performance metric data node tag."; } extension statistics-operation { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The statistics-operation can be used to provide an additional statistics operation type(e.g., sum, min, max,last) information associated with the performance metric data node tag."; } Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 extension service-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The service-tag can be used to provide a service classification information (e.g., tunnel, l3vpn,l2vpn) information associated with YANG data node."; } extension task-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The task-tag can be used to provide a task classification information (e.g., fault management, performance measurement) information associated with YANG data node."; } extension data-source { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The data-source-type can be used to provide an additional data source type (e.g., connectivity, resource, hardware,qos,policy) information associated with the performance metric data node tag."; } extension multi-source-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The multi-source-tag can be used to provide an additional multiple source aggregation information associated with the performance metric data node or interface related data node."; } augment "/tags:module-tags/tags:module" { description "Augment the Tags module with data node tag attributes"; container self-explanation-node-tags { description "Contains the list of data nodes and their associated tags"; list self-explanation-node { key "node-name"; description "A list of self-explanation nodes and their associated tags"; leaf node-name { type nacm:node-instance-identifier; mandatory true; description "The YANG data node name."; } Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 leaf opm-tag { type tags:tag; description "Tags associated with the data node within YANG module. See the IANA 'YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes' registry for reserved prefixes and the IANA'IETF YANG Data Node Tags' registry for IETF tags. The 'operational' state [RFC8342] view of this list is constructed using the following steps: 1) System tags (i.e., tags of 'system' origin) are added. 2) User configured tags (i.e., tags of 'intended' origin) are added. 3) Any tag that is equal to a masked-tag is removed."; } leaf metric-precision { type tags:tag; description "The numeric expression precision of performance metric related data node."; } leaf metric-scale { type tags:tag; description "The measurement scale of performance metric related data node."; } leaf operation-type{ type tags:tag; description "Statistics operation of performance metric related data node, e.g., average,min, max,sum, threshold. If the operation type is threshold type, the corresponding data object support threshold handling,e.g.,scan all interfaces for a certain type every 5 seconds and check the counters or status to cross threshold, return an array of interface entries that match the search.If the operation type is average,min,max, sum, it indicate the data object supports statistics operation, e.g., scan all interfaces for a certain type every 5 seconds up to 60 seconds, only return min, average, max, sum value of specific data object rather than the values that are current at the end of 60 seconds."; } leaf service-tag { type tags:tag; description "The node-service-tag can be used to provide a service classification information (e.g., tunnel, l3vpn,l2vpn) Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 information associated with YANG data node."; } leaf task-tag { type tags:tag; description "The node-task-tag can be used to provide a task classification information (e.g., fault management, performance measurement) information associated with YANG data node."; } leaf multi-source-tag { type tags:tag; description "The mulitple source tag can be used to identify multiple source aggregation tye(e.g., line card,member link in an aggregated Ethernet interface) related to performance metric related data node or interface related to data node). Two source aggregation source types are supported, one is aggregation which groups data from two or multiple different data objects, the other is membership which identitfy each data object(e.g., linecard, member link from multiple source aggregation."; } leaf data-source { type tags:tag; description "The data source type (e.g., connectivity,resource, hardware ,qos,policy) associated with the performance metric data node within YANG module."; } } } } } 6. Guidelines to Model Writers This section updates [RFC8407]. 6.1. Define Standard Tags A module MAY indicate, using node-tag extension statements, a set of tags that are to be automatically associated with it (i.e., not added through configuration). Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 module example-module-A { //... import ietf-data-node-tags { prefix ntags; } container top { ntags:opm-tag "ietf:object-type"; list X { leaf foo { ntags:opm-tag "ietf:property"; } } container Y { ntags:opm-tag "ietf:metric"; leaf bar { ntags:statistics-operation "ietf:avg"; ntags:metric-scale "ietf:milli"; } } } // ... } The module writer can use existing standard tags, or use new tags defined in the model definition, as appropriate. For IETF standardized modules new data node tags MUST be assigned in the IANA registry defined below, see Section Section 7.2. 7. IANA Considerations 7.1. YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes Registry IANA is asked to create a new registry "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes" grouped under a new "Protocol" category named "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes". This registry allocates tag prefixes. All YANG data node tags SHOULD begin with one of the prefixes in this registry. Prefix entries in this registry should be short strings consisting of lowercase ASCII alpha-numeric characters and a final ":" character. The allocation policy for this registry is Specification Required [RFC8126]. The Reference and Assignee values should be sufficient to identify and contact the organization that has been allocated the prefix. The initial values for this registry are as follows. Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ | Prefix | Description | Reference | Assignee | +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ | ietf: | IETF Tags allocated in the IANA | [This | IETF | | | IETF YANG Data Node Tags registry| document] | | | | | | | |vendor: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF | | | the module implementer. | document] | | | | | | | | user: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF | | | and for the user. | document] | | +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ Other standards organizations (SDOs) wishing to allocate their own set of tags should allocate a prefix from this registry. 7.2. IETF YANG Data Node Tags Registry IANA is asked to create four new registries "IETF YANG Data Node Tags","IETF Metric Precision Tags","IETF Statistics Operation Tags","Node Service Tag" grouped under a new "Protocol" category "IETF YANG Data Node Tags". These four registries should be included below "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes" when listed on the same page. Four registries allocate tags that have the registered prefix "ietf:". New values should be well considered and not achievable through a combination of already existing IETF tags. The allocation policy for these four registries is IETF Review [RFC8126]. The initial values for these eight registries are as follows. +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Data Node Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | | | | | ietf:object-type | Relates to object type | [This | | | (e.g., interfaces). | document] | | | | | | ietf:metric | Relates to performance | [This | | | metric info | document] | | | (e.g., ifstatistics). | | | | | | | ietf:metric-group | Represent metric group | [This | | | (e.g., flow statistics). | document] | | | | | | ietf:property | Represents a object | [This | Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 | | property | document] | | | (e.g.,ifindex). | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Metric Precision | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:minus-eight |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-seven |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-sixe |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-five |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-four |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-three |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-two |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-one |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:zero |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:one |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:two |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:three |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:four | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:five | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 |ietf:six | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:seven | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:eight | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:nine | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Metric scale | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:yocto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:zepto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:atto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: femto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: pico | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: nano | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: micro | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: milli | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: units | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: kilo | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: mega | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 |ietf: giga | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: tera | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: peta | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: exa | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: zetta | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: yotta | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Operation Type Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:avg | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:sum | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:min | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:max | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:threshold | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, threshold,etc) | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Parent Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:member |Relates to multiple source| [This | | |aggregation type(e.g., | document] | | |lag, linecard, sub inf) | | | | | | |ietf:agg |Relates to multiple source| [This | | |aggregation type(e.g.,agg)| document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 | Data Source | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | | | | | ietf:service-flow | Relates to data source | [This | | | type(e.g., microburst). | document] | | | | | | ietf:topo | Relates to data source | [This | | | type(e.g., topology). | document] | | | | | | ietf:resource | Relates to data source | [This | | | type info | document] | | | (e.g., interface,queue). | | | | | | | ietf:policy | Relates to data source | [This | | | type info | document] | | |(e.g., acl, routing policy| | | | | | | ietf:hardware | Relates to data source | [This | | | type | document] | | | (e.g.,optical module). | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Service Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:l3vpn | Relates to service | [This | | | offering(e.g.,l3vpn | document] | | | l2vpn,tunnel,etc) | | |ietf:l2vpn | Relates to service | [This | | | offering(e.g.,l3vpn | document] | | | l2vpn,tunnel,etc) | | |ietf:te-tunnel | Relates to service | [This | | | offering(e.g.,l3vpn | document] | | | l2vpn,tunnel,etc) | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Task Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:vpn-diag | Relates to vpn serivce | [This | | | diagonostic function | document] | | | | | |ietf:vpn-fullfilment | Relates to vpn service | [This | | | fullfillment function | document] | | | | | |ietf:vpn-assurance | Relates to vpn service | [This | | | assurance function | document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 7.3. Updates to the IETF XML Registry This document registers a URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration has been made: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-self-explaination-node-tags Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. 7.4. Updates to the YANG Module Names Registry This document registers one YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020]. Following the format in [RFC6020], the following registration has been made: name: ietf-self-explaination-node-tags namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-self-explaination-node-tags prefix: ntags reference: RFC XXXX (RFC Ed.: replace XXX with actual RFC number and remove this note.) 8. Security Considerations The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is SSH [RFC6242]. This document adds the ability to associate data node tag meta-data with YANG modules. This document does not define any actions based on these associations, and none are yet defined, and therefore it does not by itself introduce any new security considerations. Users of the data node tag-meta data may define various actions to be taken based on the data node tag meta-data. These actions and their definitions are outside the scope of this document. Users will need to consider the security implications of any actions they choose to define. Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 9. Contributors The authors would like to thank Ran Tao for his major contributions to the initial modeling and use cases. 10. References 10.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, . [RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407, DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018, . 10.2. Informative References [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . Appendix A. Targeted data object subscription example The following subsections provides targeted data object subscription example.The subscription "id" values of 22 used below is just an example. In production, the actual values of "id" might not be small integers. +-----------+ +-----------+ | Subscriber| | Publisher | +------+----+ +-----+-----+ | | | | |Telemery data Tagging Advertisement | (node-selector, opm-tag = metric) |<---------------------------------| | | | establish-subscription | | (datasore,node-selector) | |--------------------------------->| | | | | | | | RPC Reply: OK, id = 22 | |<---------------------------------| | | | | | | | Notification Message (for 22) | | <--------------------------------| | | | | | | The publisher advertise telemetry data node capability to the subscriber to instruct the receiver to subscribe targeted data object Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 with specific characteristics (e.g., performance metric related data object) and specific data path corresponding to the targeted data object. The following XML example [W3C.REC-xml-20081126] illustrates the advertisment of the list of available target objects: acme-router-notification-capabilities ietf-system-capabilities@2020-03-23 ietf-notification-capabilities@2020-03-23 ietf-data-export-capabilities@2020-03-23 Defines the notification capabilities of an acme-router. The router only has running, and operational datastores. Every change can be reported on-change from running, but only config=true nodes and some config=false data from operational. Statistics are not reported based on timer based trigger and counter threshold based trigger. ds:operational \ /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:statistics/if:in-errors\ bandwith metric With telemetry data tagging information carried in the Telemetry data Tagging Advertisement, the subscriber identifies targeted data object Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 and associated data path to the datastore node and sends a establish- subscription RPC to subscribe specific data objects that are interests to the client application from the publisher. ds:operational /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:statistics/if:in-errors 500 The publisher returns specific object type of operational state related to the subscriber. Authors' Addresses Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 China Email: bill.wu@huawei.com Benoit Claise Cisco De Kleetlaan 6a b1 Diegem 1831 Belgium Email: bclaise@cisco.com Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags July 2020 Liang Geng China Mobile 32 Xuanwumen West St, Xicheng District Beijing 10053 Email: gengliang@chinamobile.com Zongpeng Du China Mobile 32 Xuanwumen West St, Xicheng District Beijing 10053 Email: duzongpeng@chinamobile.com Wu, et al. Expires January 9, 2021 [Page 30]