Internet Engineering Task Force W. Tan Internet-Draft Cloud Registry Intended status: Standards Track G. Brown Expires: September 13, 2013 CentralNic Ltd J. Gould VeriSign, Inc. March 12, 2013 Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) draft-tan-epp-launchphase-07 Abstract This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension mapping for the provisioning and management of domain name applications during the launch of a domain name registry. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on September 13, 2013. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Application Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. Launch Phases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3. Status Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3.1. State Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.4. Poll Messaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.5. Mark Validation Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.5.1. element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.6. Mark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.7. Digital Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.7.1. element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.7.2. element . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.1. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.3. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3.1. Sunrise Create Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3.2. Claims Create Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.4. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.5. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.6. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.7. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 4.1. Launch Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 6. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 6.1. Change from 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 6.2. Change from 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 6.3. Change from 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.4. Change from 03 to 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.5. Change from 04 to 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.6. Change from 05 to 06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.7. Change from 06 to 07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 1. Introduction This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5730]. This EPP mapping specifies a flexible schema that can be used to implement several common use cases related to the provisioning and management of domain name applications during the launch of a domain name registry. It is typical for domain registries to operate in special modes during their initial launch to facilitate allocation of domain names, often according to special rules. This document uses the term "launch phase" and the shorter form "launch" to refer to such a period. The EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731] is designed for the steady- state operation of a registry. During a launch period, the model in place may be different from what is defined in EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. For example, registries often accept multiple applications for the same domain name during the "Sunrise" launch phase, referred to as a Launch Application. A Launch Registration refers to a registration made during a launch phase when the server uses a "first-come, first-served" model. Even in a "first-come, first-served" model, additional steps and information might be required to support an application, such as trademark information. In addition, the Proposed Trademark Claims Model [1] defines a registry interface for the Trademark Claims or "claims" launch phase that includes support for presenting a Trademark Claims Notice to the Registrant. This document proposes an extension to the domain name extension in order to unambiguously manage the various launch phases known. 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the character case presented in order to develop a conforming implementation. "launch-1.0" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launch-1.0". The XML namespace prefix "launch" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 "signedMark-1.0" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:signedMark-1.0" that is defined in [draft-lozano-smd]. The XML namespace prefix "smd" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents. "mark-1.0" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:mark-1.0" that is defined in [draft-lozano-smd]. The XML namespace prefix "mark" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents. 2. Object Attributes This extension adds additional elements to the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. Only those new elements are described here. 2.1. Application Identifier Servers MAY allow multiple applications, referred to as a Launch Application, of the same domain name during its launch phase operations. Upon receiving a valid request to create a Launch Application, the server MUST create an application object corresponding to the request, assign an application identifier for the Launch Application, set the [RFC5731] pendingCreate status, and return the application identifier to the client with the element. In order to facilitate correlation, all subsequent launch operations on the Launch Application MUST be qualified by the previously assigned application identifier using the element. 2.2. Launch Phases The server MAY support multiple launch phases sequentially or simultaneously. The element MUST be included by the client to define the target launch phase of the command. The following launch phase values are defined: sunrise The phase during which trademark holders can submit registrations or applications with trademark information that can be validated by the server. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 landrush A post-Sunrise phase when non-trademark holders are allowed to register domain names with steps taken to address a large volume of initial registrations. claims1 The Trademark Claims Phase 1, as defined by Trademark Clearinghouse model, in which a full, detailed Claims Notice must be displayed to prospective registrants of domain names that match trademarks. claims2 The Trademark Claims Phase 2, as defined by Trademark Clearinghouse model, in which a short, educational Claims Notice must be displayed to prospective registrants of domain names that match trademarks that have opted in. open A post-launch phase that is also referred to as "steady state". Servers MAY require additional trademark protection during this phase. custom A custom server launch phase that is defined using the "name" attribute. For extensibility, the element includes an OPTIONAL "name" attribute that can define a sub-phase or the full name of the phase when the element has the "custom" value. For example, the "claims1" launch phase could have two sub-phases that include "landrush" and "open". 2.3. Status Values A Launch Application object MAY have a status value. The element is used to convey extended status pertaining to the application object, beyond what is specified in the object mapping for this application object. The following status values are defined using the required "s" attribute: pendingValidation: The initial state of a newly-created application object. The application requires validation, but the validation process has not yet completed. validated: The application meets relevant registry rules. invalid: The application does not validate according to registry rules. pendingAllocation: The allocation of the application is pending based on the results of some out-of-band process (for example, an auction). allocated: One of two possible end states of an application object; the object corresponding to the application has been provisioned. rejected: The other possible end state; the object was not provisioned. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 custom: A custom status that is defined using the "name" attribute. Each status value MAY be accompanied by a string of human-readable text that describes the rationale for the status applied to the object. The OPTIONAL "lang" attribute MAY be present to identify the language if the negotiated value is something other than the default value of "en" (English). For extensibility the element includes an OPTIONAL "name" attribute that can define a sub-status or the full name of the status when the status value is "custom". The server SHOULD NOT use the "custom" status value. Certain status values MAY be combined. For example, an application may be both invalid and rejected. Additionally, certain statuses MAY be skipped. For example, an application MAY immediately start at the "allocated" status or an application MAY skip the "pendingAllocation" status if the server uses a "first-come, first served" model. If the launch phase does not require validation of a request, an application MAY immediately skip to "pendingAllocation". If the command processes a request synchronously without the use of an intermediate application, then an Application Identifier (Section 2.1) is not needed along with the application status. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 2.3.1. State Transition | request | v +-------------------+ | | | pendingValidation | | | +---------+---------+ | | +-----------+-----------+ | | | | v v +-----------+ +---------+ | | | | | validated | | invalid | | | | | +-----+-----+ +----+----+ | | | | v | +-------------------+ | | | | | pendingAllocation | | | | | +-------------------+ | | | | | +-----------------------+ | | | | v v +---------+ +--------+ / \ / \ | allocated | | rejected | \ / \ / +---------+ +--------+ Figure 1 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 2.4. Poll Messaging A Launch Application is handled as a domain name of [RFC5731] in "pendingCreate" status, with the Launch Application status values defined in Section 2.3. As a Launch Application transitions between the status values defined in Section 2.3, the server SHOULD insert poll messages, per [RFC5730], for the applicable intermediate statuses, including the "pendingValidation", "validated", "pendingAllocation, and "invalid" statuses, using the element with the extension. The server MUST insert a poll message, per [RFC5731], with the extension for the final statuses, including the "allocated" and "rejected" statuses. The following is an example poll message for a Launch Application that has transitioned to the "pendingAllocation" state. Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue 2013-04-04T22:01:00.0Z Application pendingAllocation. example.tld ... sunrise abc123 ABC-12345 54322-XYZ Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The following is an example poll message for an "allocated" Launch Application. Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue 2013-04-04T22:01:00.0Z Application successfully allocated. example.tld ABC-12345 54321-XYZ 2013-04-04T22:00:00.0Z sunrise abc123 BCD-23456 65432-WXY 2.5. Mark Validation Models A server MUST support at least one of the following models for validating trademark information: Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 code Use of a mark code by itself to validate that the mark matches the domain name. This model is supported using the element with just the element. mark The mark information is passed without any other validation element. The server will use some custom form of validation to validate that the mark information is authentic. This model is supported using the element with just the (Section 2.6) element. code with mark: A code is used along with the mark information by the server to validate the mark utilizing an external party. The code represents some form of secret that matches the mark information passed. This model is supported using the element that contains both the and the (Section 2.6) elements. signed mark: The mark information is digitally signed as described in the Digital Signature (Section 2.7) section. The digital signature can be directly validated by the server using the public key of the external party that created the signed mark using its private key. This model is supported using the (Section 2.7.1) and (Section 2.7.2) elements. More than one , (Section 2.7.1), or (Section 2.7.2) element MAY be specified. The maximum number of marks per domain name is up to server policy. 2.5.1. element The element that is used by the "code", "mark", and "code with mark" validation models, has the following child elements: : OPTIONAL mark code used to validate the (Section 2.6) information. The mark code is be a mark-specific secret that the server can verify against a third party. : OPTIONAL mark information with child elements defined in the Mark (Section 2.6) section. The following is an example element with both a and (Section 2.6) element. 49FD46E6C4B45C55D4AC ... Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 2.6. Mark A element describes an applicant's prior right to a given domain name that is used with the "mark", "mark with code", and the "signed mark" validation models. The element is defined in [draft-lozano-smd]. A new mark format can be supported by creating a new XML schema for the mark that has an element that substitutes for the element from [draft-lozano-smd]. 2.7. Digital Signature Digital signatures MAY be used by the server to validate either the mark information, when using the "signed mark" validation model with the (Section 2.7.1) element or the (Section 2.7.2) element. 2.7.1. element The element contains the digitally signed mark information. The element is defined in [draft-lozano-smd]. A new signed mark format can be supported by creating a new XML schema for the signed mark that has an element that substitutes for the element from [draft-lozano-smd]. 2.7.2. element The element contains an encoded form of the digitally signed (Section 2.7.1) element. The element is defined in [draft-lozano-smd]. A new encoded signed mark format can be supported by creating a new XML schema for the encoded signed mark that has an element that substitutes for the element from [draft-lozano-smd]. 3. EPP Command Mapping A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found in the EPP core protocol specification [RFC5730]. The command mappings described here are specifically for use in the Launch Phase Extension. This mapping is designed to be flexible, requiring only a minimum set of required elements. While it is meant to serve several use cases, it does not prescribe Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 any interpretation by the client or server. Such processing is typically highly policy-dependent and therefore specific to implementations. Operations on application objects are done via one or more of the existing EPP verbs defined in the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. Registries may choose to support a subset of the operations. 3.1. EPP Command This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP command and response to be used in conjunction with the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. This extension defines a new command called the Claims Check Command that is used to determine whether or not there are any matching trademarks, in the specified launch phase, for each domain name passed in the command. The availability check information defined in the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731] MUST NOT be returned for the Claims Check Command. Instead of returning whether the domain name is available, the Claims Check Command will return whether or not at least one matching trademark exists for the domain name. If there is at least one matching trademark that exists for the domain name, a element is returned. The client may then use the value of the element to obtain information needed to generate the trademark Claims Notice from a third-party trademark validator such as the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH). The third party trademark validator should also return a unique notice identifier that can be passed in the element of the extension to the Create Command (Section 3.3). The elements in the EPP command of EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731] define the domain names to check for matching trademarks. The element contains the following child elements: The launch phase, with a value of either "claims1" or "claims2" to indicate that the command is a Claims Check Command. The "claims1" Claims Check Command will match the against the full list of trademark labels. The "claims2" Claims Check Command will match the against the list of trademark labels that opted into the "claims2" launch phase. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Example Claims Check command using the domain command and the extension to determine if "example1.tld" and "example2.tld" have any matching trademarks during the "claims1" launch phase: example1.tld example2.tld claims1 ABC-12345 Example Claims Check Command using the domain command and the extension to determine if "example3.tld" and "example4.tld" have any matching trademarks that opted into the "claims2" launch phase: example3.tld example4.tld claims2 ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 If the command has been processed successfully, the EPP element MUST contain a child element that identifies the launch namespace. The element contains the following child elements: The launch phase, with a value of either "claims1" or "claims2", which matches the associated Claims Check Command . One or more elements that contain the following child elements: Contains the fully qualified name of the queried domain name. This element MUST contain an "exists" attribute whose value indicates if a matching trademark exists for the domain name. A value of "1" (or "true") means that a matching trademark does exist for the claims launch phase. A value of "0" (or "false") means that a matching trademark does not exist. An OPTIONAL claim key that MAY be passed to a third-party trademark validator such as the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) for querying the information needed to generate a Trademark Claims Notice. The is used as the key for the query in place of the domain name to securely query the service without using a well-known value like a domain name. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Example Claims Check response when no matching trademarks are found for the domain name example1.tld and matching trademarks are found for the domain name example2.tld for the "claims1" launch phase: Command completed successfully claims1 example1.tld example2.tld abc123 ABC-12345 54321-XYZ Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Example Claims Check response when no matching trademarks are found for the domain name example3.tld and matching trademarks are found for the domain name example4.tld for the "claims2" launch phase: Command completed successfully claims2 example3.tld example4.tld abc123 ABC-12345 54321-XYZ 3.2. EPP Command This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP command and response to be used in conjunction with the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. The EPP command is used to retrieve information for a launch phase registration or application. The Application Identifier (Section 2.1) returned in the element of the create response (Section 3.3) is used for retrieving information for a Launch Application. A element is sent along with the regular domain command. The element includes an OPTIONAL "includeMark" boolean attribute, with a default value of "false", to indicate whether or not to include the mark in the response. The element contains the following child elements: Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The phase during which the application or registration was submitted or is associated with. Server policy defines the phases that are supported. OPTIONAL application identifier of the Launch Application. Example domain command with the extension to retrieve information for the sunrise application for example.tld and application identifier "abc123": example.tld sunrise abc123 ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Example domain command with the extension to retrieve information for the sunrise registration for example.tld: example.tld sunrise ABC-12345 If the query was successful, the server replies with a element along with the regular EPP . The contains the following child elements: The phase during which the application was submitted, or is associated with, that matches the associated command . OPTIONAL Application Identifier of the Launch Application. OPTIONAL status of the Launch Application using one of the supported status values (Section 2.3). Zero or more (Section 2.6) elements. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Example domain response using the extension with the mark information: Command completed successfully example.tld EXAMPLE1-REP jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 ClientX ClientY 2012-04-03T22:00:00.0Z 2fooBAR sunrise abc123 ... ABC-12345 54321-XYZ Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 3.3. EPP Command There are two forms of the extension to the EPP command that are dependent on the supported launch phases (Section 2.2) as defined below: sunrise The EPP command with the "sunrise" launch phase is used to submit a registration with trademark information that can be verified by the server with the value. The Sunrise Create Form (Section 3.3.1) is used for the "sunrise" launch phase. Optionally, the server can support multiple overlapping applications that are chosen asynchronously with a server generated Application Identifier (Section 2.1) for later reference. landrush The EPP command with the "landrush" launch phase is undefined but the form supported is up to server policy. claims1 The EPP command with the "claims1" launch phase is used to pass the information associated with the presentation and acceptance of the "claims1" Claims Notice. The Claims Create Form (Section 3.3.2) is used for the "claims1" launch phase. claims2 The EPP command with the "claims2" launch phase is used to pass the information associated with the presentation of the "claims2" Claims Notice. The Claims Create Form (Section 3.3.2) is used for the "claims2" launch phase. open The EPP command with the "open" launch phase is undefined but the form supported is up to server policy. custom The EPP command with the "custom" launch phase is undefined but the form supported is up to server policy. 3.3.1. Sunrise Create Form The Sunrise Create Form of the extension to the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731] includes the verifiable trademark information that the server uses to match against the domain name to authorize the domain create. A server MUST support one of four models in Claim Validation Models (Section 2.5) to verify the trademark information passed by the client. A element is sent along with the regular domain command. The element contains the following child elements: The identifier for the launch phase. or or Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Zero or more elements. The child elements are defined in the element (Section 2.5.1) section. Zero or more elements. The child elements are defined in the element (Section 2.7.1) section. Zero or more elements. The child elements are defined in the element (Section 2.7.2) section. The following is an example domain command using the extension, following the "code" validation model, with multiple sunrise codes: example.tld jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 2fooBAR sunrise 49FD46E6C4B45C55D4AC 49FD46E6C4B45C55D4AD 49FD46E6C4B45C55D4AE ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The following is an example domain command using the extension, following the "mark" validation model, with the mark information: exampleone.tld jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 2fooBAR sunrise ... ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The following is an example domain command using the extension, following the "code with mark" validation model, with a code and mark information: example.tld jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 2fooBAR sunrise 49FD46E6C4B45C55D4AC ... ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The following is an example domain command using the extension, following the "signed mark" validation model, with the signed mark information: exampleone.tld jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 2fooBAR sunrise ... ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The following is an example domain command using the extension, following the "signed mark" validation model, with the base64 encoded signed mark information: exampleone.tld jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 2fooBAR sunrise ... ABC-12345 If the create was successful, the server MAY reply with the element along with the regular EPP to indicate the server generated Application Identifier (Section 2.1), when multiple applications of a given domain name is supported; otherwise no extension is included with the regular EPP . The element contains the following child elements: The phase of the application that mirrors the element included in the . The application identifier of the application. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 An example response when multiple overlapping applications are supported by the server: Command completed successfully; action pending example.tld 2010-08-10T15:38:26.623854Z 2012-08-10T15:38:26.623854Z sunrise 2393-9323-E08C-03B1 ABC-12345 54321-XYZ 3.3.2. Claims Create Form The Claims Create Form of the extension to the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731] includes the information related to the registrant's acceptance of the Claims Notice for the "claims1" launch phase and the display of the Claims Notice for the "claims2" launch phase. A element is sent along with the regular domain command. The element contains the following child elements: Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 MUST contain the value of "claims1" or "claim2" to indicate the claims launch phase. Unique notice identifier generated by the source of the Claims Notice information such as the Claims Notice Information Service (CNIS). Contains the date and time that the Claims Notice was generated. Contains the date and time that the Claims Notice was displayed or accepted. Contains the source information of the end-user client that was shown, or that accepted, the Claims Notice, such the end-user client's IP address. The following is an example domain command using the extension with the information for the "claims1" claims launch phase: Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 example.tld jd1234 sh8013 sh8013 2fooBAR claims1 49FD46E6C4B45C55D4AC 2012-06-19T09:00:10.0Z 2012-06-19T09:01:30.0Z 192.0.2.29 ABC-12345 This extension does not define any extension to the response of a domain command for the Claims Create Form. After processing the command, the server replies with a standard EPP response as defined in the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. 3.4. EPP Command This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP command to be used in conjunction with the domain name mapping. A server that does not support multiple applications of a given domain name with an Application Identifier (Section 2.1) during its launch phase operations MUST return an EPP error result code of 2102. Registry policies permitting, clients may update an application Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 object by submitting an EPP command along with a element to indicate the application object to be updated. The element contains the following child elements: The phase during which the application was submitted or is associated with. The application identifier for which the client wishes to update. This extension does not define any extension to the response of an domain command. After processing the command, the server replies with a standard EPP response as defined in the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. The following is an example domain command with the extension to add and remove a name server of a sunrise application with the application identifier "abc123": example.tld ns2.example.tld ns1.example.tld sunrise abc123 ABC-12345 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 An example response that corresponds to the above command: Command completed successfully ABC-12345 54321-XYZ 3.5. EPP Command This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP command to be used in conjunction with the domain name mapping. A server that does not support multiple applications of a given domain name with an Application Identifier (Section 2.1) during its launch phase operations MUST return an EPP error result code of 2102. Registry policies permitting, clients MAY withdraw an application by submitting an EPP command along with a element to indicate the application object to be deleted. The element contains the following child elements: The phase during which the application was submitted or is associated with. The application identifier for which the client wishes to delete. This extension does not define any extension to the response of a domain command. After processing the command, the server replies with a standard EPP response as defined in the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 The following is an example domain command with the extension: example.tld sunrise abc123 ABC-12345 An example response that corresponds to the above command: Command completed successfully ABC-12345 54321-XYZ 3.6. EPP Command This extension does not define any extension to the EPP command or response described in the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731]. 3.7. EPP Command This extension does not define any extension to the EPP command or response described in the EPP domain name mapping Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 [RFC5731]. 4. Formal Syntax One schema is presented here that is the EPP Launch Phase Mapping schema. The formal syntax presented here is a complete schema representation of the object mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML instances. The BEGIN and END tags are not part of the schema; they are used to note the beginning and ending of the schema for URI registration purposes. 4.1. Launch Schema Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: o Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. o Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. o Neither the name of Internet Society, IETF or IETF Trust, nor the names of specific contributors, may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. BEGIN Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0 domain name extension schema for the launch phase processing. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 34] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 35] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 36] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 37] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 END 5. Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of the leading participants of the Community TMCH Model that led to many of the changes to this document, which include Chris Wright, Jeff Neuman, Jeff Eckhaus, and Will Shorter. Special suggestions that have been incorporated into this document were provided by Jothan Frakes, Keith Gaughan, Jan Jansen, Rubens Kuhl, Gustavo Lozano, Klaus Malorny, Patrick Mevzek, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer, Trung Tran, Ulrich Wisser and Sharon Wodjenski. 6. Change History 6.1. Change from 00 to 01 1. Changed to use camel case for the XML elements. 2. Replaced "cancelled" status to "rejected" status. 3. Added the child elements of the element. 4. Removed the XML schema and replaced with "[TBD]". 6.2. Change from 01 to 02 1. Added support for both the ICANN and ARI/Neustar TMCH models. 2. Changed the namespace URI and prefix to use "launch" instead of "launchphase". 3. Added definition of multiple claim validation models. 4. Added the and elements. 5. Added support for Claims Info Command Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 38] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 6.3. Change from 02 to 03 1. Removed XSI namespace per Keith Gaughan's suggestion on the provreg list. 2. Added extensibility to the launch:status element and added the pendingAuction status per Trung Tran's feedback on the provreg list. 3. Added support for the Claims Check Command, updated the location and contents of the signedNotice, and replaced most references of Claim to Mark based on the work being done on the ARI/Neustar launch model. 6.4. Change from 03 to 04 1. Removed references to the ICANN model. 2. Removed support for the Claims Info Command. 3. Removed use of the signedClaim. 4. Revised the method for referring to the signedClaim from the XML Signature using the IDREF URI. 5. Split the launch-1.0.xsd into three XML schemas including launch- 1.0.xsd, signeMark-1.0.xsd, and mark-1.0.xsd. 6. Split the "claims" launch phase to the "claims1" and "claims2" launch phases. 7. Added support for the encodedSignedMark with base64 encoded signedMark. 8. Changed the elements in the createNoticeType to include the noticeID, timestamp, and the source elements. 9. Added the class and effectiveDate elements to mark. 6.5. Change from 04 to 05 1. Removed reference to in the example. 2. Incorporated feedback from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer on the provreg mail list. 3. Added missing launch XML prefix to applicationIDType reference in the idContainerType of the Launch Schema. 4. Added missing description of the element in the element. 5. Updated note on replication of the EPP contact mapping elements in the Mark Contact section. 6.6. Change from 05 to 06 1. Removed the definition of the mark-1.0 and signedMark-1.0 and replaced with reference to draft-lozano-smd, that contains the definition for the mark, signed marked, and encoded signed mark. Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 39] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 2. Split the into and based on feedback from Trung Tran. 3. Added the "includeMark" optional attribute to the element to enable the client to request whether or not to include the mark in the info response. 4. Fixed state diagram to remove redundant transition from "invalid" to "rejected"; thanks Klaus Malorny. 6.7. Change from 06 to 07 1. Proof-read grammar and spelling. 2. Changed "pendingAuction" status to "pendingAllocation", changed "pending" to "pendingValidation" status, per proposal from Trung Tran and seconded by Rubens Kuhl. 3. Added text related to the use of RFC 5731 pendingCreate to the Application Identifier section. 4. Added the Poll Messaging section to define the use of poll messaging for intermediate state transitions and pending action poll messaging for final state transitions. 7. IANA Considerations This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas conforming to a registry mechanism described in [RFC3688]. Three URI assignments have been registered by the IANA. Registration request for the Launch namespace: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launch-1.0 Registrant Contact: See the "Author's Address" section of this document. XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification. 8. Security Considerations The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any security services beyond those described by EPP [RFC5730], the EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731], and protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described in these other specifications apply to this specification as well. Updates to, and deletion of an application object must be restricted to clients authorized to perform the said operation on the object. As information contained within an application, or even the mere fact that an application exists may be confidential. Any attempt to Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 40] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 operate on an application object by an unauthorized client MUST be rejected with an EPP 2303 (object does not exist) or an appropriate auhorization error. Server policy may allow operation with filtered output by clients other than the sponsoring client, in which case the and response SHOULD be filtered to include only fields that are publicly accessible. 9. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. [RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", STD 69, RFC 5730, August 2009. [RFC5731] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping", STD 69, RFC 5731, August 2009. [draft-lozano-smd] Lozano, G., "Mark and Signed Mark Objects Mapping". [1] Authors' Addresses Wil Tan Cloud Registry Suite 32 Seabridge House 377 Kent St Sydney, NSW 2000 AU Phone: +61 414 710899 Email: wil@cloudregistry.net URI: http://www.cloudregistry.net Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 41] Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP March 2013 Gavin Brown CentralNic Ltd 35-39 Mooregate London, England EC2R 6AR GB Phone: +44 20 33 88 0600 Email: gavin.brown@centralnic.com URI: https://www.centralnic.com James Gould VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 US Email: jgould@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisigninc.com Tan, et al. Expires September 13, 2013 [Page 42]