CoRE Z. Shelby Internet-Draft Sensinode Intended status: Standards Track January 2, 2012 Expires: July 5, 2012 CoRE Interfaces draft-shelby-core-interfaces-00 Abstract This document defines well-known interface descriptions for Batch, Sensor, Parameter and Actuator types for use in contrained web servers using the CoRE Link Format. A short reference is provided for each type that can be efficiently included in the interface description attribute of the CoRE Link Format. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on July 5, 2012. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 1] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Interface Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Batch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2. Sensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3. Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4. Actuator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.5. Future Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.6. WADL Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7. Changelog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 2] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 1. Introduction The Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) working group aims at realizing the REST architecture in a suitable form for the most constrained nodes (e.g. 8-bit microcontrollers with limited RAM and ROM) and networks (e.g. 6LoWPAN). CoRE is aimed at machine-to- machine (M2M) applications such as smart energy and building automation. The discovery of resources offered by a constrained server is very important in machine-to-machine applications where there are no humans in the loop and static interfaces result in fragility. The discovery of resources provided by an HTTP Web Server is typically called Web Linking [RFC5988]. The use of Web Linking for the description and discovery of resources hosted by constrained web servers is specified by the CoRE Link Format [I-D.ietf-core-link-format] and can be used by CoAP [I-D.ietf-core-coap] or HTTP servers. The CoRE Link Format defines an attribute that can be used to describe the REST interface of a resource, and may include a link to a description document. This document defines well-known interface descriptions for Batch, Sensor, Parameter and Actuator types for use in contrained web servers. A short reference is provided for each type that can be efficiently included in the interface description (if=) attribute of the CoRE Link Format. 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. This specification requires readers to be familiar with all the terms and concepts that are discussed in [RFC5988] and [I-D.ietf-core-link-format]. 3. Interface Descriptions This section defines REST interfaces for Batch, Sensor, Parameter and Actuator resources. Each type is described along with its Interface Description attribute value, recommended path pattern and valid methods. These are defined for each interface in the table below. These interfaces can support plain text and/or SenML Media types. The if= column defines the Interface Description (if=) attribute value to be used in the CoRE Link Format for a resource conforming to Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 3] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 that interface. When this value appears in the if= attribute of a link, the resource MUST support the corresponding REST interface described in this section. The resource MAY support additional functionality, which is out of scope for this specification. Although these interface descriptions are intended to be used with the CoRE Link Format, they are applicable for use in any REST interface definition. The Path column defines an example path pattern that a resource of this type might use for simple end-points. These interfaces are expected to be used in other path patterns. In any case, resource paths SHOULD be discoverable as described in [I-D.ietf-core-link-format]. The Methods column defines the methods supported by that interface, which are described in more detail below. +-----------+--------+--------------+-----------------------------+ | Interface | if= | Path Example | Methods | +-----------+--------+--------------+-----------------------------+ | Batch | core#b | /s,/p,/a | GET, PUT (where applicable) | | Sensor | core#s | /s/{name} | GET | | Parameter | core#p | /p/{name} | GET, PUT | | Actuator | core#a | /a/{name} | GET, PUT | +-----------+--------+--------------+-----------------------------+ The following is an example of links in the CoRE Link Format using these interface descriptions. These links are used in the subsequent examples below. Req: GET /.well-known/core Res: 2.05 Content (application/link-format) ;if="core#b", ;if="core#s", ;if="core#s", ;if="core#s",

;if="core#p", ;if="core#b", ;if="core#a", ;if="core#a" 3.1. Batch The Batch interface is used to manipulate a collection of sub- resources at the same time. The Batch interface type supports the same methods as its sub-resources, and can be used to read (GET) or set (PUT) the values of those sub-resource with a single resource Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 4] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 representation. The sub-resources of a Batch MAY be heterogeneous, a method used on the Batch only applies to sub-resources that support it. For example Sensor interfaces do not support PUT, and thus a PUT request to a Sensor member of that Batch would be ignored. A batch requires the use of SenML Media types in order to support multiple sub-resources. The following example interacts with a Batch /s with Sensor sub- resources /s/light, /s/temp and /s/humidity. Req: GET /s Res: 2.05 Content (application/senml+json) {"e":[ { "n": "light", "v": 123, "u": "lx" }, { "n": "temp", "v": 27.2, "u": "degC" }, { "n": "humidity", "v": 80, "u": "%RH" }], } 3.2. Sensor The Sensor interface allows the value of a sensor resource to be read (GET). The Media type of the resource can be either plain text or SenML. Plain text MAY be used for a single measurement that does not require meta-data. For a measurement with meta-data such as a unit or time stamp, SenML SHOULD be used. A resource with this interface MAY use SenML to return multiple measurements in the same representation, for example a list of recent measurements. The following are examples of Sensor interface requests in both text/ plain and application/senml+json. Req: GET /s/humidity (Accept: text/plain) Res: 2.05 Content (text/plain) 80 Req: GET /s/humidity (Accept: application/senml+json) Res: 2.05 Content (application/senml+json) {"e":[ { "n": "humidity", "v": 80, "u": "%RH" }], } Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 5] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 3.3. Parameter The Parameter interface allows configurable parameters and other information to be modeled as a resource. The value of the parameter can be read (GET) or set (PUT). The PUT method is not required, and thus a parameter can be made read-only. Plain text or SenML Media types MAY be returned from this type of interface. The following example shows request for reading and setting a parameter. Req: GET /p/name Res: 2.05 Content (text/plain) node5 Req: PUT /p/name (text/plain) outdoor Res: 2.04 Changed 3.4. Actuator The Actuator interface is used by resources that model different kinds of actuators (changing its value has an effect on its environment). Examples of actuators include for example LEDs, relays, motor controllers and light dimmers. The current value of the actuator can be read (GET) or a new actuator value set (PUT). Plain text or SenML Media types MAY be returned from this type of interface. A resource with this interface MAY use SenML to include multiple measurements in the same representation, for example a list of recent actuator values or a list of values to set. The following example shows request for reading and setting an actuator (turning on a led). Req: GET /a/led1 Res: 2.05 Content (text/plain) 0 Req: PUT /a/led1 (text/plain) 1 Res: 2.04 Changed Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 6] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 3.5. Future Interfaces It is expected that further interface descriptions will be defined in this and other specifications. Potential interfaces to be considered for this specifications include: Batch of Links: This resource would contain a list of links, pointing to resources that will be manipulated by requesting a method on that resource. Collection: This resource would be a container that allows sub- resources to be added or removed. 3.6. WADL Description This section defines the formal Web Application Description Langauge (WADL) definition of these CoRE interface descriptions. Retrieve the representations of all resources under this collection in a single request. Update the representations of all resources under this collection in a single request that support PUT. Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 7] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 Retrieve the value of the sensor Retrieve the value of the parameter Update to the parameter value Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 8] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 Retrieve the value of the actuator Control the actuator with a new value or command 4. Security Considerations An implementation of a client needs to be prepared to deal with responses to a request that differ from what is specified in this document. A server implementing what the client thinks is a resource with one of these interface descriptions could return malformed representations and response codes either by accident or maliciously. A server sending maliciously malformed responses could attempt to take advantage of a poorly implemented client for example to crash the node or perform denial of service. 5. IANA Considerations To be determined if a registry of interface descriptions should be created for CoRE, allowing other interface descriptions to be registered by other specifications (and if this document is the place to create such a registry). Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 9] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 6. Acknowledgments Acknowledgement is given to colleagues from the SENSEI project who were critical in the initial development of the well-known REST interface conept, and to Szymon Sasin and Carsten Bormann who have provided useful discussion and input to the concepts in this document. Special thanks to Matthieu Vial for helping develop ideas for the batch, link batch and collection resources and for providing useful comments and the document. 7. Changelog 8. References 8.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-core-link-format] Shelby, Z., "CoRE Link Format", draft-ietf-core-link-format-09 (work in progress), November 2011. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC5988] Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 5988, October 2010. 8.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-core-coap] Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., Bormann, C., and B. Frank, "Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", draft-ietf-core-coap-08 (work in progress), October 2011. Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 10] Internet-Draft CoRE Interfaces January 2012 Author's Address Zach Shelby Sensinode Kidekuja 2 Vuokatti 88600 FINLAND Phone: +358407796297 Email: zach@sensinode.com Shelby Expires July 5, 2012 [Page 11]