Internet Draft Author: Blake Ramsdell, draft-ramsdell-smime31-msg-01.txt Tumbleweed Communications July 14, 2000 Expires January 14, 2001 S/MIME Version 3.1 Message Specification Addendum Status of this memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 1. Introduction In light of the expiration of the primary RSA patent, it is proposed that the RSA algorithm replace the DSS and Diffie-Hellman as the MUST implement algorithms in the S/MIME profile. This draft will describe only the proposed changes to the S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification RFC [SMIMEV3MSG], and the rest of that RFC will remain identical. 1.1 Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [MUSTSHOULD]. 1.2 Discussion of This Draft This draft is being discussed on the "ietf-smime" mailing list. To subscribe, send a message to: ietf-smime-request@imc.org with the single word subscribe in the body of the message. There is a Web site for the mailing list at . 2. Changes to the S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification RFC The following changes are proposed to [SMIMEV3MSG]: 1. Section 2.2 is replaced with the following: 2.2 SignatureAlgorithmIdentifier Sending and receiving agents MUST support rsaEncryption, defined in [PKCS-1]. Sending and receiving agents MAY support id-dsa defined in [DSS]. The algorithm parameters MUST be absent (not encoded as NULL). Note that S/MIME v3 clients might only implement signing or signature verification using DSS. Also note that S/MIME v2 clients are only capable of verifying digital signatures using the rsaEncryption algorithm. 2. Section 2.3 is replaced with the following: 2.3 KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier Sending and receiving agents MUST support rsaEncryption, defined in [PKCS-1]. Sending and receiving agents MAY support Diffie-Hellman defined in [DH]. Note that S/MIME v3 clients might only implement key encryption and decryption using the Diffie-Hellman algorithm. Also note that S/MIME v2 clients are only capable of decrypting content encryption keys using the rsaEncryption algorithm. 3. Security Considerations The security considerations are the same as for [SMIMEV3MSG]. A. References [DH] "Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method", RFC 2631 [DSS] NIST FIPS PUB 186, "Digital Signature Standard", 18 May 1994. [MUSTSHOULD] "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 2119 [PKCS-1] "PKCS #1: RSA Encryption Version 1.5", RFC 2313 [SMIMEV3MSG] "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC 2633. B. Acknowledgements C. Changes from last draft Initial revision. D. AuthorĘs address Blake Ramsdell Tumbleweed Communications 17720 NE 65th St Ste 201 Redmond, WA 98052 +1 425 376 0225 blake.ramsdell@tumbleweed.com