Individual Submission K. Meadors, Ed. Internet-Draft Drummond Group Inc. Intended status: Informational June 16, 2011 Expires: December 18, 2011 Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT draft-meadors-multiple-attachments-ediint-13 Abstract The EDI-INT AS1, AS2 and AS3 messages were designed specifically for the transport of EDI documents. Since multiple interchanges could be placed within a single EDI document, there was not a need for sending multiple EDI documents in a single message. As adoption of EDI-INT grew, other uses developed aside from single EDI document transport. Some transactions required multiple attachments to be interpreted together and stored in a single message. This informational draft describes how multiple documents, including non-EDI payloads, can be attached and transmitted in a single EDI-INT transport message. The attachments are stored within the MIME Multipart/Related structure. A minimal list of content-types to be supported as attachments is provided. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on December 18, 2011. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Using Multiple-Attachments in EDI-INT . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Multipart/Related Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. EDI-INT Features Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3. MIC Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4. Document Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5. Content-Types to Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3. Example Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 1. Introduction The primary work of EDI-INT was to develop a secure means of transporting EDI documents over the Internet. This was described in the three working group developed standards for secure transport over SMTP AS1 [RFC3335], HTTP AS2 [RFC4130] and FTP AS3 [RFC4823]. For most uses of EDI, all relevant information to complete a single business transaction could be stored in a single document. As adoption of EDI-INT grew, new industries and businesses began using AS2 and needing to include multiple documents in a single message to complete a trading partner transaction. These documents were a variety of MIME media types. This informational draft describes how to use the MIME multipart/related body structure within EDI-INT messages to store multiple document attachments. Details of computing the MIC value over this body is covered. A minimum listing of MIME media types to support within the multipart/related body is given along with information on extracting these documents. 1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. 2. Using Multiple-Attachments in EDI-INT 2.1. Multipart/Related Structure Multiple payload attachments for EDI-INT messages are stored within a multipart/related MIME body [RFC2387]. The multipart/related structure allows an multiple number of MIME attachments or message payloads to be communicated in a single structure and message. The attached payloads can be of any MIME content-type depending on the trading partner agreement, but section 2.4 lists the content- types which MUST be supported. The use and format of the multipart/ related body follows the rules in RFC 2387, including the required type parameter to determine the root body part. The use of the optional start parameter is recommended. 2.2. EDI-INT Features Header To indicate support for multiple-attachments (MA), an EDI-INT application MUST use the EDI-INT Features header [RFC6017]. The Feature Header indicates the instance application can support various features, such as certification exchange. The header is present in all messages from the instance application, not just those which Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 feature certification exchange. For applications implementing multiple attachments, the MA-Feature- Name MUST be used within the EDI-INT Features header as listed in this ABNF [RFC5234] syntax: MA-Feature-Name = "multiple-attachments" An example of the EDI-INT Features header in a message from an application supporting MA: EDIINT-Features: multiple-attachments 2.3. MIC Calculation MIC calculation in an EDI-INT message with multiple attachments is performed in the same manner as for a single EDI payload. The only difference is calculating the message integrity check (MIC) over the whole multipart/related body rather than a single EDI payload. Section 5.2.1 of AS1 [RFC3335] and section 2 of EDIINT COMPRESSION [RFC5402] describe the MIC calculations used for single payload document within an EDI-INT message. The approach is summerized below for multipart/related. Refer to stated sections above for more details. For a compressed but unsigned message, regardless of encryption, the MIC is calculated over the uncompressed multipart/related body including any applied Content-Transfer-Encoding. The body MUST be canonicalized according to the procedure described in the underlying transport protocol (e.g. HTTP AS2 [RFC4130]) before the MIC is calculated. For an encrypted but unsigned and uncompressed message, the MIC is calculated on the decrypted multipart/related body, including header and all attached documents. The body MUST be canonicalized according to the procedure described in the underlying transport protocol (e.g. HTTP AS2 [RFC4130]) before the MIC is calculated. For an unsigned and unencrypted message, the MIC is calculated over the data inside the multipart/related boundaries prior to Content- Transfer-Encoding. However, unsigned and unencrypted messages SHOULD NOT be sent due to lack of security. If the expected MIC value differs from the calculated MIC value, all attachments MUST be considered invalid and retransmitted. Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 2.4. Document Processing Upon receipt of an EDI-INT message with multiple attachments, the receiving user agent MUST be able to extract the attached payloads from the message rather than only removing the multipart/related body from the message. The storing or processing of the documents as they relate to the pending transaction is implementation dependent. 2.5. Content-Types to Support Documents of the following MIME media types MAY be found in a multipart/related body and MUST be accepted by the user agent. However, any media type can be used depending upon industry need, and other media types MAY be accepted depending upon trading partner agreement. application/xml application/pdf application/msword application/vnd.ms-excel, application/x-msexcel application/rtf application/octet-stream application/zip image/bmp image/gif image/tiff image/jpeg text/plain text/html text/rtf text/xml Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 3. Example Message Here is an example AS2 message which uses two attachments. The first attachment is an XML document which is the root attachment, and the second attachment is a PDF document. For both the XML and PDF documents as well as the applied digital signature, their content has been omitted for size consideration. This example is provided as an illustration only and is not considered part of the specification. If the example conflicts with the definitions specified above or in the other referenced RFCs, the example is considered invalid. Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 POST /as2 HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com:8080 Connection: Close, TE Message-ID: <1109712943488@10.65.122.242> Subject: Multiple Attachment Example Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:37:03 GMT AS2-To: TradingPartner AS2-From: User AS2-Version: 1.2 EDIINT-Features: multiple-attachments Disposition-Notification-To: http://www.example.com/as2 Disposition-Notification-Options: signed-receipt-protocol=optional,pkcs7-signature; signed-receipt-micalg=optional,sha1 Content-type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="OUTER-BOUNDARY" Content-length: 207440 --OUTER-BOUNDARY Content-Type: Multipart/Related; boundary="INNER-BOUNDARY"; start=""; type="application/xml" --INNER-BOUNDARY Content-Type: application/xml Content-ID: [XML DOCUMENT] --INNER-BOUNDARY Content-Type: application/pdf Content-ID: <2nd.attachment> [PDF DOCUMENT] --INNER-BOUNDARY-- --OUTER-BOUNDARY Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature [DIGITAL SIGNATURE] --OUTER-BOUNDARY-- Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 4. Security Considerations Multiple attachments have very similar security concerns to what is described in the three EDI-INT transport standards. This includes the importance of using strong cryptography and the necessity of using valid certificates and chaining to a trusted CA. Please refer to these standards for details of their security considerations. The only additional security consideration is that if the MIC calculation by user agent differs from expected MIC calculation, all the attached documents MUST be considered invalid. Because the MIC calculation is over the multipart/related body, the MIC validates the content-integrity of all the documents. 5. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2387] Levinson, E., "The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type", RFC 2387, August 1998. [RFC3335] Harding, T., Drummond, R., and C. Shih, "MIME-based Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange over the Internet", RFC 3335, September 2002. [RFC4130] Moberg, D. and R. Drummond, "MIME-Based Secure Peer-to- Peer Business Data Interchange Using HTTP, Applicability Statement 2 (AS2)", RFC 4130, July 2005. [RFC4823] Harding, T. and R. Scott, "FTP Transport for Secure Peer- to-Peer Business Data Interchange over the Internet", RFC 4823, April 2007. [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. [RFC5402] Harding, T., "Compressed Data within an Internet Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Message", RFC 5402, February 2010. [RFC6017] Meadors, K., "Electronic Data Interchange - Internet Integration (EDIINT) Features Header Field", RFC 6017, September 2010. Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Multiple Attachments for EDI-INT June 2011 Author's Address Kyle Meadors (editor) Drummond Group Inc. Nashville, Tennessee 37221 US Phone: +1 (817) 709-1627 Email: kyle@drummondgroup.com Meadors Expires December 18, 2011 [Page 10]