Network Working Group M. Kerwin Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track July 28, 2014 Expires: January 29, 2015 HTTP/2 Segments draft-kerwin-http2-segments-00 Abstract This document introduces the concept of "segments" to HTTP/2, and adds a flag to the DATA frame type to allow the expression segments. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 29, 2015. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Kerwin Expires January 29, 2015 [Page 1] Internet-Draft http2-segments July 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. SEGMENT_CONTINUES Flag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1. Introduction This document extends HTTP/2 [I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2] by introducing the concept of "segments" to HTTP/2, as a mechanism to combat the effects of fragmentation within a stream. It does this by adding a new flag to the DATA frame type ([I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2], Section 6.1). 1.1. Notational Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 2. Segments A "segment" is a contiguous region of a HTTP/2 message's payload data which can be freely fragmented and recombined. A segment is expressed by marking all but the final frame in the segment with the "SEGMENT_CONTINUES" flag (Section 3). Any data-bearing frame that does not have the "SEGMENT_CONTINUES" flag set, and does not follow one that does, comprises a single segment. Segments can be used to mitigate the effects of fragmentation within a stream. For example, an endpoint may have a large chunk of data which it has to transmit via multiple DATA frames in order to comply with frame size limits. It can mark those frames as a single segment so that any downstream peer without the same frame size restrictions knows that it can safely coalesce the frames. 3. SEGMENT_CONTINUES Flag The following new flag is defined for the "DATA" frame ([I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2], Section 6.1): o "SEGMENT_CONTINUES" (0x10): Bit 5 being set indicates that the current segment continues after the current frame (see Section 2). Kerwin Expires January 29, 2015 [Page 2] Internet-Draft http2-segments July 2014 Intermediaries MUST NOT coalesce frames across a segment boundary and MUST preserve segment boundaries when forwarding frames. 4. Security Considerations 5. IANA Considerations This document has no actions for IANA. 6. Normative References [I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2] Belshe, M., Peon, R., and M. Thomson, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2", draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-13 (work in progress), June 2014. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. Author's Address Matthew Kerwin Email: matthew@kerwin.net.au URI: http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/ Kerwin Expires January 29, 2015 [Page 3]