Network Working Group L-E. Jonsson, Ericsson
INTERNET-DRAFT P. Kremer, Ericsson
Expires: December 2004 June 9, 2004
ROHC Implementer's Guide
<draft-ietf-rohc-rtp-impl-guide-05.txt>
Status of this memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I (we) certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am (we are) aware have been
disclosed, and any of which I (we) become aware will be disclosed, in
accordance with RFC 3668 (BCP 79).
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I (we) accept the provisions of
Section 3 of RFC 3667 (BCP 78).
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or cite them other than as "work in progress".
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/lid-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
This document is a submission of the IETF ROHC WG. Comments should be
directed to the ROHC WG mailing list, rohc@ietf.org.
Abstract
This document describes common misinterpretations and some ambiguous
points of ROHC [1], which defines the framework and four profiles of
a robust and efficient header compression scheme. These points have
been identified by the members of the ROHC working group during
different interoperability test events.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.....................................................3
2. CRC calculation and coverage issues..............................3
2.1. CRC calculation.............................................3
2.2. Padding octet in CRC........................................3
2.3. CRC coverage in CRC feedback options........................3
2.4. CRC coverage of the ESP NULL header.........................4
3. Enhanced mode transition procedures..............................4
3.1. Modified transition logic for enhanced transitions..........4
3.2. Transition from Reliable to Optimistic mode.................5
3.3. Transition to Unidirectional mode...........................6
4. Timestamp encoding considerations................................6
4.1. Encoding of TS values.......................................6
4.2. Interpretation intervals for TS encoding....................6
4.3. Recalculating TS_OFFSET.....................................7
4.4. TS_STRIDE and the Tsc flag in Extension 3...................7
5. List compression issues..........................................7
5.1. Generic extension header list...............................7
5.2. CSRC list items in RTP dynamic chain........................8
5.3. RTP dynamic chain...........................................8
5.4. Compressed lists in UO-1-ID packets.........................8
5.5. Bit masks in list compression...............................8
5.6. Headers compressed with list compression....................9
5.7. ESP NULL header list compression............................9
6. Updating properties..............................................9
6.1. Implicit updates............................................9
6.2. Updating properties of UO-1*................................9
7. Other protocol clarifications...................................10
7.1. Meaning of NBO.............................................10
7.2. IP-ID......................................................10
7.3. Extension-3 in UO-1-ID packets.............................10
7.4. Extension-3 in UOR-2* packets..............................10
7.5. Multiple SN options in one feedback packet.................11
7.6. Multiple CRC options in one feedback packet................11
7.7. Packet decoding during mode transition.....................11
7.8. How to respond to lost feedback links?.....................11
7.9. What does "presumed zero if absent" mean on page 88?.......12
7.10. UOR-2 in profile 2 (UDP)..................................12
7.11. Sequence number LSB's in IP extension headers.............12
8. ROHC negotiation clarifications.................................12
9. PROFILES suboption in ROHC-over-PPP.............................13
10. Test Configuration.............................................13
11. Security considerations........................................14
12. Acknowledgment.................................................14
13. References.....................................................14
14. Authors' Addresses.............................................14
Appendix A - Sample CRC algorithm..................................15
Appendix B - Potential improvements in updated profiles............17
Appendix C - Issues identified but not yet resolved................17
Jonsson, et al. [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
1. Introduction
ROHC [1] defines a robust and efficient header compression algorithm,
and its description is rather long and complex. During the
implementation and the interoperability tests of the algorithm some
unclear areas have been identified. This document tries to collect
and clarify these points. Note that all section and chapter
references in this document refer to [1], if not stated otherwise.
2. CRC calculation and coverage issues
2.1. CRC calculation
ROHC uses CRC checksum in order to provide some protection against
bit errors. CRC is used in the segmentation protocol and in the
compressed packets, as well.
Section 5.2.5.2 describes the segmentation protocol and refers to
[3], which describes a well-defined CRC algorithm for 32 bit
checksums. Although, Section 5.9 only defines the polynomials for 3,
7 and 8-bit long checksum, the same algorithm can be used in these
cases as well.
A PERL implementation of the algorithm (written by Carsten Bormann)
can be found in Appendix A.
2.2. Padding octet in CRC
According to Section 5.9.1, in case of IR and IR-DYN packets the CRC
"is calculated over the entire IR or IR-DYN packet, excluding Payload
and including CID or Add-CID octet". Padding isn't meant to be
meaningful part of a packet and not included in CRC calculation. As
a result, CRC doesn't cover the Add-CID octet for CID 0, either.
2.3. CRC coverage in CRC feedback options
Section 5.7.6.3 states "The CRC option contains an 8-bit CRC computed
over the entire feedback payload, without the packet type and code
octet, but including any CID fields, using the polynomial of section
5.9.1". However, it does not mention how the "size" field is handled,
if present. Since the "size" field can be considered an extension of
the "code" field, it must be treated as the "code" field, i.e. the
"size" field is not covered by the CRC.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
2.4. CRC coverage of the ESP NULL header
Section 5.8.7 gives the CRC coverage of the ESP NULL header as
"Entire ESP header". This should be interpreted as being only the
initial part of the header (i.e. SPI and Sequence number), and not
the trailer part at the end of the payload. Therefore, the ESP NULL
header will have the same CRC coverage as the ESP header used in the
ESP profile (section 5.7.7.7).
3. Enhanced mode transition procedures
To reduce transmission overhead and computational complexity
(including CRC calculation) associated with feedback packets sent for
each decompressed packet during mode transition, a decompressor can
be implemented with slightly modified mode transition procedures,
compared to those defined in [1].
These modifications affect transitions to Optimistic and
Unidirectional modes of operation, i.e. the transitions described in
sections 5.6.5 and 5.6.6 of [1], and make those transition diagrams
more consistent with the diagram describing the transition to R-mode.
However, the differences between the original diagrams of [1] were
motivated by robustness concerns for mode transitions to Optimistic
and Unidirectional modes. To avoid deadlock situations in mode
transitions, these aspects must be addressed also when a decompressor
implements the enhanced transition procedures, and that is done by
following a slightly modified definition of the decompressor
transition states. All aspects related to implementation of the
enhanced transition procedures are described in subsequent chapters.
Note that these modified operations should be seen only as an
improved decompressor implementation, since interoperability is not
at all affected. A decompressor implemented according to the
optimized procedures would be able to interoperate with an RFC3095
compressor, as well as a decompressor implemented according to the
procedures described in RFC3095 would do.
3.1. Modified transition logic for enhanced transitions
The intent with these enhanced transition procedures is to allow the
decompressor to stop sending feedback packets for all packets
decompressed during the second half of the transition procedure, i.e.
after an appropriate IR/IR-DYN/UOR-2 packet has been received from
the compressor. In the transition diagrams, sections 3.2 and 3.3
below, this is realized by allowing the decompressor transition
parameter (D_TRANS) to be set to P (Pending) at that stage. However,
as mentioned above, there are robustness concerns related to this
optimization, and to avoid deadlock situations with never completed
transitions as a result of feedback losses, the decompressor must
continue to send feedback at least periodically, also when in Pending
Jonsson, et al. [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
transition state. That would be the equivalence of enhancing the
D_TRANS parameter definition in section 5.6.1 of [1], to include a
definition of Pending state operation.
- D_TRANS:
Possible values for the D_TRANS parameter are (I)NITIATED,
(P)ENDING and (D)ONE. D_TRANS MUST be initialized to D, and a mode
transition can be initiated only when D_TRANS is D. While D_TRANS
is I, the decompressor sends a NACK or ACK carrying a CRC option
for each packet received. When D_TRANS is set to P, the
decompressor do not have to send a NACK or ACK for each packet
received, but it MUST continue to send feedback on a regular
basis, and all feedback packets sent MUST include the CRC option.
This ensures that all mode transitions will be completed also in
case of feedback losses.
3.2. Transition from Reliable to Optimistic mode
The enhanced procedure for transition from Reliable to Optimistic
mode is shown below:
Compressor Decompressor
----------------------------------------------
| |
| ACK(O)/NACK(O) +-<-<-<-| D_TRANS = I
| +-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-+ |
C_TRANS = P |-<-<-<-+ |
C_MODE = O | |
|->->->-+ IR/IR-DYN/UOR-2(SN,O) |
| +->->->->->->->-+ |
|->-.. +->->->-| D_TRANS = P
|->-.. | D_MODE = O
| ACK(SN,O) +-<-<-<-|
| +-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-+ |
C_TRANS = D |-<-<-<-+ |
| |
|->->->-+ UO-0, UO-1* |
| +->->->->->->->-+ |
| +->->->-| D_TRANS = D
| |
Jonsson, et al. [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
3.3. Transition to Unidirectional mode
The enhanced procedure for transition to Unidirectional mode is shown
on the following figure:
Compressor Decompressor
----------------------------------------------
| |
| ACK(U)/NACK(U) +-<-<-<-| D_TRANS = I
| +-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-+ |
C_TRANS = P |-<-<-<-+ |
C_MODE = U | |
|->->->-+ IR/IR-DYN/UOR-2(SN,U) |
| +->->->->->->->-+ |
|->-.. +->->->-| D_TRANS = P
|->-.. |
| ACK(SN,U) +-<-<-<-|
| +-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-+ |
C_TRANS = D |-<-<-<-+ |
| |
|->->->-+ UO-0, UO-1* |
| +->->->->->->->-+ |
| +->->->-| D_TRANS = D
| | D_MODE= U
4. Timestamp encoding considerations
4.1. Encoding of TS values
RTP Timestamp values (TS) are always encoded using W-LSB encoding,
both when sent scaled and when sent unscaled. For TS values sent in
Extension 3, W-LSB encoded values are sent using the self-describing
variable-length format (section 4.5.6), and this applies to both
scaled and unscaled values.
4.2. Interpretation intervals for TS encoding
Section 4.5.4 defines the interpretation interval, p, for timer-based
compression of the RTP timestamp. However, Section 5.7 defines a
different interpretation interval, which is defined as the
interpretation interval to use for all TS values. It is thus unclear
which p-value to use, at least for timer-based compression.
The way this should be interpreted is that the p-value differs
depending on whether timer-based compression is enabled or not. For
timer-based compression, the interpretation interval of section
4.5.4, p = 2^(k-1) - 1, is used for TS. Otherwise, the interval of
section 5.7, p = 2^(k-2) - 1, is used for TS with regular W-LSB
encoding.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
Since two different p-values are used, the compressor must take this
into account during the process of enabling timer-based compression.
Before timer-based compression can be used, the decompressor will
have to inform the compressor (on a per-channel basis) about its
clock resolution, and the compressor has to send (on a per-context
basis) a non-zero TIME_STRIDE to the decompressor.
When the compressor is confident that the decompressor has received
the TIME_STRIDE value, it can switch to timer-based compression.
During this transition from window-based compression to timer-based
compression, it is necessary that the compressor keeps k large enough
to cover both interpretation intervals.
4.3. Recalculating TS_OFFSET
TS can be sent unscaled if the TS value change does not match the
established TS_STRIDE, but the TS_STRIDE might still stay unchanged.
To ensure correct decompression of subsequent packets, the
decompressor should therefore always recalculate the RTP TS modulo,
TS_OFFSET, when a packet with an unscaled TS value is received.
4.4. TS_STRIDE and the Tsc flag in Extension 3
The Tsc flag in Extension 3 indicates whether TS is scaled or not. It
must be noted that the Tsc value apply to all TS bits, also if there
are no TS bits in the extension itself.
Note also that if Tsc=1, TS is scaled using context(TS_STRIDE), not
value(TS_STRIDE) as is said in the legend for Extension 3 in section
5.7.5.
When a compressor uses Extension 3 to re-establish a new value for
TS_STRIDE, it must send unscaled TS together with TS_STRIDE for some
packets until decompressor confidence is obtained. When the TS_STRIDE
field is present in Extension 3, the Tsc flag must thus be set to 0.
5. List compression issues
5.1. Generic extension header list
Section 5.7.7.4 defines the static and dynamic parts of the IPv4
header. This section indicates a 'Generic extension header list'
field in the dynamic chain, which has a variable length. The
detailed description of this field can be found in Section 5.8.6.1.
The generic extension header list starts with an octet that is always
present, so its length is one octet, at least. If the 'GP' bit in
the first octet is set to 1 then the length of the list is two
octets, even if the list is empty.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
5.2. CSRC list items in RTP dynamic chain
Section 5.7.7.6 defines the static and dynamic parts of the RTP
header. This section indicates a 'Generic CSRC list' field in the
dynamic chain, which has a variable length. This field uses the same
encoding rules as the 'Generic extension header list' in the IPv4
header, so the same rules apply to its length.
5.3. RTP dynamic chain
Section 5.7.7.6 defines the static and dynamic parts of the RTP
header. In the dynamic part, a 'CC' field indicates the number of
CSRC items present in the 'Generic CSRC list'. A 'CC' field can also
be found within the 'Generic CSRC list' (when present), and these
fields would then have the same meaning. In order to decode a
compressed packet correctly it's necessary to know the 'CC' value
because it has serious impact on the packet's length. In normal
case, the values of the fields are equal.
Proposed behavior if the values are different:
Both fields are within the RTP dynamic part but only the second
'CC' field resides inside the 'Generic CSRC list' together with
the XI items. Since the 'CC' value determines the number of XI
items in the CSRC list and isn't used otherwise, the first CC
field should be ignored and only the second field (inside the CSRC
list) should be used for incoming packets. For outgoing packets
both fields should be set to the same value.
5.4. Compressed lists in UO-1-ID packets
This section describes the situation when a UO-1-ID packet carries a
compressed list. Compressed lists are encoded using Encoding Type 0
(section 5.7.5 and 5.8.6.1) and every list may have a unique
identifier (gen_id). The identifier is present in U/O-mode when the
compressor decides that it may use this list as a future reference.
On one hand, the decompressor shouldn't save the list because UO-1-ID
packets doesn't update the context. On the other hand, the
decompressor updates its translation table whenever an (Index, item)
pair is received (section 5.8.1). The decompressor must be able to
handle such a packet, thus it has to behave as described in the
latter case. According to section 5.8.1.2, the compressor must
increment Counter by 1.
5.5. Bit masks in list compression
A 7-bit or 15-bit mask may be used in the insertion and/or removal
schemes for compressed lists. It should be noted that even if a list
has more than 7 items, a 7-bit mask could be used as long as changes
are only applied in the first part of the reference list, and items
with an index not covered by the 7-bit mask are thus kept unchanged.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
5.6. Headers compressed with list compression
In section 5.8, it is stated that headers which can be part of
extension header chains INCLUDE AH, null ESP, minimal encapsulation,
GRE, and IPv6 extensions. This list of headers which can be
compressed is correct, but the work INCLUDE should not be there,
since only the header types listed can actually be handled.
5.7. ESP NULL header list compression
Due to the offset of the fields in the trailer part of the ESP
header, a compressor must only compress packets containing at most
one NULL ESP header.
6. Updating properties
6.1. Implicit updates
If an updating packet (e.g. R-0-CRC or UO-0) contains information
about a specific field X (compressed RTP sequence number, typically),
then X is updated according to the content of that packet. But this
packet implicitly updates all other inferred fields (i.e. RTP
timestamp) according to the current mode and the appropriate mapping
function of the updated and the inferred fields.
An updating packet thus updates the reference values of all header
fields, either explicitly or implicitly, with an exception for the
UO-1-ID packet, which only updates TS, SN, IP-ID, and sequence
numbers of IP extension headers (see 5.7.3). In UO-mode, all packets
are updating packets, while in R-mode all packets with a CRC are
updating packets.
For example, a UO-0 packet contains the compressed RTP sequence
number (SN). Such a packet also implicitly updates RTP timestamp,
IPv4 ID, and sequence numbers of IP extension headers.
6.2. Updating properties of UO-1*
In section 5.7.3, the updating properties of UO-1* are stated:
"Values provided in extensions, except those in other SN, TS,
or IP-ID fields, do not update the context."
However, also sequence number fields of extension headers must be
updated, which means the updating properties should be rephrased as:
"The only values provided in extensions that update the context are
the additional bits for the SN, TS, or IP-ID fields. Other values
provided in extensions do not update the context. Note that
sequence number fields of extension headers are also updated."
Jonsson, et al. [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
7. Other protocol clarifications
7.1. Meaning of NBO
In general, an unset flag indicates the normal operation and a set
flag indicates unusual behavior. However, in IPv4 dynamic part
(Section 5.7.7.4), if the 'NBO' bit is set, it means that network
byte order is used.
7.2. IP-ID
According to Section 5.7 IP-ID means the compressed value of the IPv4
header's 'Identification' field. Compressed packets contain this
compressed value (IP-ID), while IR packets with dynamic chain and IR-
DYN packets transmit the original, uncompressed Identification field
value. The IP-ID field always represents the Identification value of
the innermost IPv4 header whose corresponding RND flag is not 1.
If RND or RND2 is set to 1, the corresponding IP-ID(s) is(are) sent
as 16-bit original Identification value(s) at the end of the
compressed base header, according to the IP-ID description (see the
beginning of section 5.7).
It should be noted that when RND*=0, IP-ID is always compressed, i.e.
expressed as an SN offset and byte-swapped if NBO=0. This is the case
even when 16 bits of IP-ID is sent in extension 3.
7.3. Extension-3 in UO-1-ID packets
Extension-3 is applied to give values and indicate changes to fields
other than SN, TS and IP-ID in IP header(s) and RTP header. In case
of UO-1-ID packets, it should be noted that values provided in
extensions do not update the context, with an exception for SN, TS
and IP-ID fields, which always update the context (Section 5.7.3.).
It should also be noted that a UO-1-ID packet with Extension 3 must
never be sent with RND flags that changes the packet interpretation,
i.e. that would violate the base condition for UO-1-ID (at least one
RND value must be 0).
Besides, usage of Extension-3 in UO-1-ID can be useful to compress a
transient change in a packet stream. For example, if a field's value
changes in the current packet but in the next packet it returns to
its regular behavior. E.g. changes in TTL.
7.4. Extension-3 in UOR-2* packets
If Extension-3 is used in a UOR-2* packet then the information of the
extension updates the context (Section 5.7.4). Some flags of the IP
header in the extension (e.g. NBO or RND) changes the interpretation
of fields in UOR-2* packets. In these cases, when a flag changes in
Extension-3, a decompressor should re-parse the UOR-2* packet.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
7.5. Multiple SN options in one feedback packet
The length of the sequence number field in the original ESP header is
32 bits. A decompressor can't send back all the 32 bits in a
feedback packet unless it uses multiple SN options in one feedback
packet. Section 5.7.6.1 declares that a FEEDABCK-2 packet can
contain variable number of feedback options and the options can
appear in any order.
A compressor should be able to process multiple SN options in one
feedback packet.
7.6. Multiple CRC options in one feedback packet
Although it is never required to have more than one single CRC option
in a feedback packet, having multiple CRC options is still allowed.
If multiple CRC options are included, all such CRC options will be
identical, as they will be calculated over the same header.
7.7. Packet decoding during mode transition
Each ROHC profile defines its own set of packet formats, and also its
own feedback packets. The use of various operational modes is also
defined by each specific profile. A decompressor can therefore not
initiate a mode transfer request before at least one packet of a new
context has been correctly decompressed, establishing the context
based on one specific profile (as specified in IR packets). First
then the context has been established, the decompressor knows the
profile used, which modes are defined by that profile, and the
feedback packet formats available.
If the transition procedures in sections 5.6.5 and 5.6.6 of [1] are
followed (and not the enhanced procedures described in section 3 of
this document), it is important to note that type 0 or type 1 packets
may be received by the decompressor during the first half of the
transition procedure, and these packets must not mistakenly be
interpreted as the packets sent by the compressor to indicate
completed transition. The decompressor side must therefore keep track
of the transition status, e.g. with an additional parameter. If the
enhanced transition procedures described in section 3 of this
document are used, the D_TRANS parameter can serve this purpose since
its definition and usage is slightly modified.
7.8. How to respond to lost feedback links?
One potential issue that might have to be considered, depending on
link technology, is whether feedback links might get lost, and in
such cases how this is handled. When the compressor is notified that
the feedback channel is down, the compressor must be able to handle
Jonsson, et al. [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
it by restarting compression with creating a new context. Creating a
new context also implies to use a new CID value.
Generally, feedback links are not expected to disappear when once
present, but it should be noted that this might be the case for
certain link technologies.
7.9. What does "presumed zero if absent" mean on page 88?
On page 88, RFC 3095 says that R-P contains the absolute value of RTP
Padding bit and it's presumed zero if absent. It could be absent
from RTP header flags and fields, from the extension type 3 or from
the ROHC packet. It's been agreed that the RTP padding bit is
presumed zero if absent from the RTP header flags.
7.10. UOR-2 in profile 2 (UDP)
One single new format is defined for UOR-2 in profile 2, which
replaces all three (UOR-2, UOR-2-ID, UOR-2-TS) formats from profile
1. The same UOR-2 format is thus used independent of if there are IP
headers with a corresponding RND=1 or not.
7.11. Sequence number LSB's in IP extension headers
In section 5.8.5, formats are defined for compression of IP extension
header fields. These include compressed sequence number fields, and
it is said that these fields contain "LSB of sequence number". This
means these sequence numbers are not "LSB-encoded" as e.g. the RTP
sequence number with an interpretation interval, but are actually
just the LSB's of the uncompressed fields.
8. ROHC negotiation clarifications
Section 4.1 states that the link layer must provide means to
negotiate e.g. the channel parameters listed in section 5.1.1. One
of these parameters is the PROFILES parameter, which is said to be a
set of non-negative integers where each integer indicates a profile
supported by the decompressor. This can be interpreted as if it is
sufficient to have a mechanism to announce profile support from
decompressor to compressor. However, things are a little bit more
complicated than that.
Each profile is identified by a 16-bit value, where the 8 LSB bits
indicate the actual profile, and the 8 MSB bits indicate the variant
of that profile (see chapter 8). In the ROHC headers sent over the
link, the profile used is identified only with the 8 LSB bits, which
means that the compressor and decompressor must have agreed on which
variant to use for each profile. This can be done in various ways,
but the negotiation protocol must provide means to do it.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
In conclusion, the negotiation protocol must be able to communicate
to the compressor the set of profiles supported by the decompressor,
and when multiple variants of the same profile are available, also
provide means for the decompressor to know which variant will be used
by the compressor. This basically means that the PROFILES set after
negotiation must not include more than one variant of the same
profile.
9. PROFILES suboption in ROHC-over-PPP
The logical union of suboptions for IPCP and IPV6CP negotiations, as
specified by ROHC over PPP [2], can not be used for the PROFILES
suboption, as the whole union would then have to be considered within
each of the two IPCP negotiations, to avoid getting an ambiguous
profile set. An implementation of RFC 3241 must therefore make sure
the same profile set is negotiated for both IPv4 and IPv6 (IPCP and
IPV6CP).
10. Test Configuration
ROHC is used to compress IP/UDP/RTP, IP/UDP and IP/ESP headers, thus
every ROHC implementation has an interface that can send and receive
IP packets (i.e. Ethernet). On the other hand, there must be an
interface (a serial link for example) or other means of transport (an
IP/UDP flow), which can transmit ROHC packets. Having these two
interfaces several configurations can be set up. The figure below
shows sample configurations that can be used for testing a ROHC
implementation:
IP/UDP/RTP +------------+ ROHC +--------------+ IP/UDP/RTP
packets | ROHC | packets | ROHC | packets
---------->| Compressor |-----> ----->| Decompressor |---------->
+------------+ +--------------+
Unfortunately, comparing the IP/UDP/RTP packets at the endpoints can
only show whether the reconstructed stream differs from the original
or not. In order to identify the place of the error more detailed
tests are needed. The next figure shows another possible scenario:
IP/UDP/RTP +------------+ ROHC ROHC +--------------+ IP/UDP/RTP
packets | ROHC | packets packets | ROHC | packets
+----->| Compressor |----->+ +----->| Decompressor |----->+
| +------------+ | | +--------------+ |
| | | |
| +------------+ | | +------------+ |
| | Test | | | | Test | |
+<-----| Equipment |<-----+ +<------| Equipment |<------+
+------------+ +------------+
Jonsson, et al. [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
In the first case, the test equipment generates the RTP stream and
also acts as a ROHC decompressor. The tester must recognize if the
original RTP stream was compressed in a bad way and gives an alarm.
In the second case, it is the test equipment that sends the
compressed ROHC packets and the Decompressor reconstructs the RTP
stream. Since the tester knows the ROHC packets and the
reconstructed RTP stream it can detect if the Decompressor makes a
mistake.
11. Security considerations
This document provides a number of clarifications to [1], but it does
not make any changes or additions to the protocol. As a consequence,
the security considerations of [1] apply without additions.
12. Acknowledgment
The authors would like thank Vicknesan Ayadurai, Carsten Bormann,
Mikael Degermark, Ghyslain Pelletier, Zhigang Liu, Abigail Surtees,
Mark West, Kristofer Sandlund, Tommy Lundemo, Alan Kennington and
Remi Pelland for their contributions and comments.
13. References
[1] C. Bormann, et al., "RObust Header Compression (ROHC)",
RFC 3095, July 2001.
[2] C. Bormann, "Robust Header Compression (ROHC) over PPP",
RFC 3241, April 2002.
[3] W. Simpson, "PPP in HDLC-like Framing", RFC 1662, July 1994.
14. Authors' Addresses
Lars-Erik Jonsson
Ericsson AB
Box 920
SE-971 28 Lulea, Sweden
Phone: +46 70 513 56 21
Fax: +46 920 20 20 99
EMail: lars-erik.jonsson@ericsson.com
Peter Kremer
Conformance and Software Test Laboratory
Ericsson Hungary
H-1300 Bp. 3., P.O. Box 107, HUNGARY
Phone: +36-1-437-7033
Fax: +36-1-437-7767
Email: Peter.Kremer@ericsson.com
Jonsson, et al. [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
Appendix A - Sample CRC algorithm
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
#=================================
#
# ROHC CRC demo - Carsten Bormann cabo@tzi.org 2001-08-02
#
# This little demo shows the three types of CRC in use in RFC 3095,
# the robust header compression standard. Type your data in
# hexadecimal form and the press Control+D.
#
#---------------------------------
#
# utility
#
sub dump_bytes($) {
my $x = shift;
my $i;
for ($i = 0; $i < length($x); ) {
printf("%02x ", ord(substr($x, $i, 1)));
printf("\n") if (++$i % 16 == 0);
}
printf("\n") if ($i % 16 != 0);
}
#---------------------------------
#
# The CRC calculation algorithm.
#
sub do_crc($$$) {
my $nbits = shift;
my $poly = shift;
my $string = shift;
my $crc = ($nbits == 32 ? 0xffffffff : (1 << $nbits) - 1);
for (my $i = 0; $i < length($string); ++$i) {
my $byte = ord(substr($string, $i, 1));
for( my $b = 0; $b < 8; $b++ ) {
if (($crc & 1) ^ ($byte & 1)) {
$crc >>= 1;
$crc ^= $poly;
} else {
$crc >>= 1;
}
$byte >>= 1;
}
}
printf "%2d bits, ", $nbits;
printf "CRC: %02x\n", $crc;
Jonsson, et al. [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
}
#---------------------------------
#
# Test harness
#
$/ = undef;
$_ = <>; # read until EOF
my $string = ""; # extract all that looks hex:
s/([0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F])/$string .= chr(hex($1)), ""/eg;
dump_bytes($string);
#---------------------------------
#
# 32-bit segmentation CRC
# Note that the text implies this is complemented like for PPP
# (this differs from 8, 7, and 3-bit CRC)
#
# C(x) = x^0 + x^1 + x^2 + x^4 + x^5 + x^7 + x^8 + x^10 +
# x^11 + x^12 + x^16 + x^22 + x^23 + x^26 + x^32
#
do_crc(32, 0xedb88320, $string);
#---------------------------------
#
# 8-bit IR/IR-DYN CRC
#
# C(x) = x^0 + x^1 + x^2 + x^8
#
do_crc(8, 0xe0, $string);
#---------------------------------
#
# 7-bit FO/SO CRC
#
# C(x) = x^0 + x^1 + x^2 + x^3 + x^6 + x^7
#
do_crc(7, 0x79, $string);
#---------------------------------
#
# 3-bit FO/SO CRC
#
# C(x) = x^0 + x^1 + x^3
#
do_crc(3, 0x6, $string);
Jonsson, et al. [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
Appendix B - Potential improvements in updated profiles
Regarding the CC field and CSRC list, the following interpretation
has been proposed as an improvement:
"It should be noted that when the value of this CC field is equal to
zero, there is no Generic CSRC list present in the dynamic chain,
i.e. the field comment should have said "variable length, present if
CC > 0". "<introduction text>
Appendix C - Issues identified but not yet resolved
These issues have been identified but are still under discussion on
the ROHC WG mail list. Resolutions to these issues will have to be
added in later revisions of this document.
* Mode inheritance in case of context re-use
* Slope used to compress/decompress RTP Timestamp
Jonsson, et al. [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT ROHC Implementer's Guide June 9, 2004
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
This Internet-Draft expires December 9, 2004.
Jonsson, et al. [Page 18]