NETCONF A. Bierman Internet-Draft InterWorking Labs Intended status: Standards Track B. Lengyel Expires: September 29, 2010 Ericsson March 28, 2010 With-defaults capability for NETCONF draft-ietf-netconf-with-defaults-06 Abstract The NETCONF protocol defines ways to read configuration data from a NETCONF server. Part of this data is not set by the NETCONF client, but rather a default value is used. In many situations the NETCONF client has a priori knowledge about default data, so the NETCONF server does not need to send it to the client. In other situations the NETCONF client will need this data as part of the NETCONF messages. This document defines a capability-based extension to the NETCONF protocol that allows the NETCONF client to control whether default values are part of NETCONF messages or output to the target URL. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on September 29, 2010. Copyright Notice Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 1] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 2] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2. Current handling of default data . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. With-defaults Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2. Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3. Conformance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.4. Capability Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5. New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.6. Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.7. Interactions with Other Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Appendix A. Usage Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 A.1. Example YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 A.2. Example Data Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 A.3. Protocol Operation Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.3.1. = 'report-all' . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.3.2. = 'trim' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 A.3.3. = 'explicit' . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Appendix B. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 B.1. 05-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 B.2. 04-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 B.3. 03-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 B.4. 02-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 B.5. 01-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 B.6. 00-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 B.7. -00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 3] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 1. Introduction The NETCONF protocol [RFC4741] defines ways to read configuration and state data from a NETCONF server. Part of the configuration data may not be set by the NETCONF client, but rather by a default value from the data model. In many situations the NETCONF client has a priori knowledge about default data, so the NETCONF server does not need to send it to the client. A priori knowledge can be e.g., a document formally describing the data models supported by the NETCONF server. A networking device may have a large number of default values. Often the default values are not interesting or specifically defined with a "reasonable" value, so that the management user does not have to handle them. For these reasons it is quite common for networking devices to suppress the output of parameters having the default value. However there are use-cases when a NETCONF client will need the default data from the node: o The management application often needs a single, definitive and complete set of configuration values that determine how the a networking device works. o Documentation about default values can be unreliable or unavailable. o Some management applications might not have the capabilities to correctly parse and interpret formal data models. o Human users might want to understand the received data without consultation of the documentation. In all these cases the NETCONF client will need default data as part of the NETCONF messages. This document defines a capability-based extension to the NETCONF protocol that allows the NETCONF client to control whether default data is part of NETCONF messages. 1.1. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. Data model schema: A document or set of documents describing the data models supported by the NETCONF server. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 4] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 Management Application: A computer program running outside the NETCONF server that configures or supervises the NETCONF server. A management application can reach the device e.g. via the NETCONF, CLI or SNMP. Default data: Data specified in the data model schema as default, that is set or used by the device whenever the NETCONF client or other management application/user does not provide a specific value for the relevant data item. Default data MAY or may not be stored as part of a configuration datastore. Explicitly set data: Data that is set to any value by a NETCONF client or other management application by the way of an actual management operation, including any data model schema default value. Any value set by the NETCONF server which is not the schema defined default value is also considered explicitly set data. In addition the following terms are defined in RFC 4741 and are not redefined here: o client o operation o server 1.2. Current handling of default data NETCONF does not define whether default data is part of the datastore/data model, or if it is meta-data that influences the behavior of the NETCONF server, but is not actually part of the datastore. This document is intended to support either type of implementation, without deciding which approach is better. As a consequence of this approach, NETCONF servers that do not implement the :with-defaults capability may or may not return default data. Different NETCONF servers report default data in different ways. This document specifies the following three basic modes: report-all: All default data is always reported. trim: Values are not reported if they match the default value (as specified in the data model schema). Note that non-configuration data nodes containing the schema default value are not reported either. explicit: Report only values that match the definition of explicitly set data. For non-configuration data, this has the same affect as 'report-all'. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 5] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 2. With-defaults Capability 2.1. Overview The :with-defaults capability indicates that the NETCONF server makes it possible for the NETCONF client to control whether default data is part of NETCONF messages. The capability affects both configuration and state data (while acknowledging that the usage of default values for state data is less prevalent). Sending of default data is controlled for each individual operation separately. A NETCONF server implementing the :with-defaults capability MUST indicate its basic behavior, whether it sends default data in the absence of any specific request from the NETCONF client; and MUST support the 'report-all' handling mode and MAY support other modes. A server indicating 'explicit' either in the 'basic-mode' or the 'also-supported' parameter MUST be able to differentiate between normal default data and explicitly set data. 2.2. Dependencies None 2.3. Conformance Every NETCONF server SHOULD implement this capability. 2.4. Capability Identifier urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:with-defaults The identifier MUST have a parameter: "basic-mode". This indicates how the server reports default data in messages, in the case the client does not specify the required behavior in the request. The allowed values of this parameter are report-all, trim, explicit as listed in Section 1.2. The identifier MAY have another parameter: "also-supported". This parameter indicates which additional default handling modes the server supports. The value of the parameter is a comma separated list of one or two modes that are supported beside the mode indicated in the 'basic-mode' parameter. Possible modes are taken from the list in Section 1.2. In addition to these parameters, the identifier MUST have the YANG 'module' and 'revision' parameters if the ietf-with-defaults YANG module is supported, as defined in section 5.6.4 of Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 6] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang]. Example: urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:with-defaults?module=ietf-netconf- with-defaults&revision=2010-03-25&basic-mode=report-all urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:with-defaults?module=ietf-netconf- with-defaults&revision=2010-03-25&basic-mode=report-all& also-supported=trim,explicit 2.5. New Operations None 2.6. Modifications to Existing Operations A new XML child element is added to the , and operations. If the element is present, it controls the reporting of default data. The server MUST return default data in the NETCONF messages according to the value of the element. The element is defined in the XML namespace for the ietf-netconf-with-defaults.yang module in Section 3, not the XML namespace for the , and operations. Allowed values of the with-defaults element are taken from the list in Section 1.2. The allowed values are restricted to the values that the device indicates support for in the with-defaults capability in the basic and also-supported parameters. If an unsupported value is used, the NETCONF server MUST return an with an element. The MUST be 'operation-not-supported', and the MUST be 'with- defaults-mode-not-supported'. If the element is not present, the server follows its basic behavior as indicated by the capability identifier's 'basic- mode' parameter see Section 2.4. Affected operations: o o o is only affected if the target of the operation is a URL. If the target is a NETCONF datastore (running, candidate or Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 7] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 startup) the capability has no effect; the with-defaults parameter, if present, MUST be silently ignored. Other operations that return configuration data SHOULD also handle default data according to the rules set in this document, and explicitly state this in their documentation. If this is not specified in the document defining the respective operation, the default handling rules described herein do not affect these operations. 2.7. Interactions with Other Capabilities None 3. YANG Module The following YANG module defines the addition of the with-defaults element to the , and operations. The YANG language is defined in [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang]. The above operations are defined in YANG in [I-D.ietf-netconf-4741bis]. Every NETCONF server SHOULD implement this YANG module. file="ietf-netconf-with-defaults.yang" module ietf-netconf-with-defaults { namespace "urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:with-defaults"; prefix nwd; import ietf-netconf { prefix nc; } organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration Protocol) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: WG Chair: Bert Wijnen WG Chair: Mehmet Ersue Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 8] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 Editor: Andy Bierman Editor: Balazs Lengyel "; description "This module defines a capability-based extension to the NETCONF protocol that allows the NETCONF client to control whether default values are part of NETCONF messages or output to the target URL. Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this note // RFC Ed.: remove this note // Note: extracted from draft-ietf-netmod-with-defaults-06.txt revision 2010-03-25 { description "Initial version."; reference "RFC XXXX: With-defaults capability for NETCONF"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this note typedef with-defaults-mode { description "Possible modes to report default data in rpc-reply messages."; type enumeration { enum report-all { description "All default data is always reported."; } enum trim { Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 9] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 description "Values are not reported if they match the default."; } enum explicit { description "Report values that match the definition of explicitly set data."; } } } grouping with-defaults-parameters { leaf with-defaults { description "The explicit defaults processing mode requested."; type with-defaults-mode; } } // extending the get-config operation augment /nc:get-config/nc:input { uses with-defaults-parameters; } // extending the get operation augment /nc:get/nc:input { uses with-defaults-parameters; } // extending the copy-config operation augment /nc:copy-config/nc:input { uses with-defaults-parameters; } } 4. IANA Considerations This document registers one capability identifier URN from the 'Network Configuration Protocol [RFC4741] Capability URNs' registry, and registers the same URN for the NETCONF XML namespace in the "IETF XML registry" [RFC3688]. Note that the capability URN is compliant to [RFC4741] section 10.3. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 10] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 +----------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Index | Capability Identifier | +----------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | :with-defaults | urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:with-defaults | +----------------+--------------------------------------------------+ This document also registers one module name in the 'YANG Module Names' registry, defined in [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang] . The following data should be recorded in this registry: +----------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +----------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Module Name | ietf-netconf-with-defaults | | Module Prefix | nwd | | XML Namespace | urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:with-defaults | | Module RFC | XXXX // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX and remove | +----------------+--------------------------------------------------+ 5. Security Considerations This document defines a minor extension to existing NETCONF protocol operations. It does not introduce any new or increased security risks into the management system. The 'with-defaults' capability gives client control over the retrieval of particular types of XML data from a configuration database. They only suppress data that can already be retrieved with the standard protocol operations, and do not add any data to the configuration database. 6. Acknowledgements Thanks to Martin Bjorklund, Sharon Chisholm, Phil Shafer, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Washam Fan and many other members of the NETCONF WG for providing important input to this document. 7. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 11] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 [RFC4741] Enns, R., "NETCONF Configuration Protocol", RFC 4741, December 2006. [I-D.ietf-netconf-4741bis] Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., and A. Bierman, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-02 (work in progress), February 2010. [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang] Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A data modeling language for NETCONF", draft-ietf-netmod-yang-11 (work in progress), February 2010. [W3C.REC-xml-20081126] Yergeau, F., Bray, T., Maler, E., Paoli, J., and C. Sperberg-McQueen, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xml-20081126, November 2008, . Appendix A. Usage Examples A.1. Example YANG Module The following YANG module defines an example interfaces table to demonstrate how the parameter behaves for a specific data model. Note that this is not a real module, and implementation of this module is not required for conformance to the :with-defaults protocol capability, defined in Section 2. This module is not to be registered with IANA. It is intentionally very terse, and include few descriptive statements. file="example.yang" module example { namespace "http://example.com/ns/interfaces"; prefix exam; typedef itf-status-type { description "Interface status"; type enumeration { Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 12] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 enum ok; enum 'waking up'; enum 'not feeling so good'; enum 'better check it out'; enum 'better call for help'; } default ok; } container interfaces { description "Example interfaces group"; list interface { description "Example interface entry"; key name; leaf name { description "The administrative name of the interface. This is an identifier which is only unique within the scope of this list, and only within a specific server."; type string { length "1 .. max"; } } leaf mtu { description "The maximum transmission unit (MTU) value assigned to this interface."; type uint32; default 1500; } leaf itf-status { description "The current status of this interface."; type itf-status-type; config false; } } } } Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 13] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 A.2. Example Data Set The following figure shows the conceptual contents of the example server for the protocol operation examples in the next section. This includes all the configuration data nodes, non-configuration data nodes, and default leafs. eth0 8192 up eth1 1500 up eth2 9000 not feeling so good eth3 1500 waking up In this example, the 'mtu' field for each interface entry is set in the following manner: +--------------+--------------+--------------+ | name | set by | mtu | +--------------+--------------+--------------+ | eth0 | client | 8192 | | eth1 | server | 1500 | | eth2 | client | 9000 | | eth3 | client | 1500 | +--------------+--------------+--------------+ Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 14] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 A.3. Protocol Operation Examples The following examples shows some operations which are using the 'with-defaults' element. The data model used for these examples is defined in Appendix A.1. The client is retrieving all the data nodes within the 'interfaces' object, filtered with the parameter. A.3.1. = 'report-all' The behavior of the parameter handling for the value 'report-all' is demonstrated in this example. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 15] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 report-all eth0 8192 up eth1 1500 up eth2 9000 not feeling so good eth3 1500 waking up A.3.2. = 'trim' The behavior of the parameter handling for the value 'trim' is demonstrated in this example. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 16] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 trim eth0 8192 eth1 eth2 9000 not feeling so good eth3 waking up A.3.3. = 'explicit' The behavior of the parameter handling for the value 'explicit' is demonstrated in this example. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 17] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 explicit eth0 8192 up eth1 up eth2 9000 not feeling so good eth3 1500 waking up Appendix B. Change Log -- RFC Ed.: remove this section before publication. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 18] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 B.1. 05-06 Removed ':1.0' from capability URI. Removed open issues section because all known issues are closed. Moved examples to a separate appendix, and expanded them. Added example.yang as an appendix to properly explain the examples used within the document. Replaced normative term 'SHALL' with 'MUST' to be consistent within this document. Clarified behavior for non-configuration data nodes. Clarified various sections based on WGLC comments on mailing list. Removed some unused terms. Reversed the order of the change log sections so the most recent changes are shown first. B.2. 04-05 Updated I-D and YANG module boiler-plate. Removed redundant 'with-defaults' YANG feature. Changed definition of 'explicit' mode to match the YANG definition Removed XSD because the YANG is normative and the XSD is unconstrained, and does not properly extend the 3 affected NETCONF operations. Made the YANG module a normative section instead of non-normative appendix. Changed YANG from an informative to a normative reference, Changed 4741bis from an informative to a normative reference because the YANG module imports the ietf-netconf module in order to augment some operations. Updated capability requirements to include YANG module capability parameters. Added a description statement to the with-defaults leaf definition. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 19] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 Update open issues section; ready to close all open issues. B.3. 03-04 Clarifications Added non-netconf interfaces to the definition of explicitly set default data B.4. 02-03 Clarifications YAM added Use the same URN for the capability and the XML namespace to accommodate YANG, and avoid two separate URN/URIs being advertised in the HELLO message, for such a small function. B.5. 01-02 report-all made mandatory Placeholder for YAM added, XSD will be removed when 4741 provides the NETCONF YAM with-defaults is valid for state data as well (if state data has a defined default which might not be so frequent). The definition of explicit was modified for state data. B.6. 00-01 Changed value set of with-default capability and element Added version to URI B.7. -00 Created from draft-bierman-netconf-with-defaults-01.txt It was decided by the NETCONF mailing list, that with-defaults should be a sub-element of each affected operation. While this violates the XSD of RFC4741 this is acceptable and follows the ideas behind NETCONF and YANG. Hopefully it will be clarified in the 4741bis RFC whether such extensions are allowed. Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 20] Internet-Draft with-defaults March 2010 Authors' Addresses Andy Bierman InterWorking Labs 303 Potrero Street, Suite 52 Santa Cruz, CA 95060-2760 USA Phone: +1 831 460 7010 Email: andyb@iwl.com Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Budapest, Hungary Email: balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com Bierman & Lengyel Expires September 29, 2010 [Page 21]