DHC Working Group S. Jiang Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Intended status: Standards Track G. Chen Expires: January 21, 2015 China Mobile S. Krishnan Ericsson R. Asati Cisco Systems, Inc. July 20, 2014 Registering Self-generated IPv6 Addresses in DNS using DHCPv6 draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration-06 Abstract In networks that are centrally managed, self-generated addresses cause some traceability issues due to their decentralized nature. One of the most important issues in this regard is the inability to register such addresses in DNS. This document defines a mechanism to register self-generated and statically configured addresses in DNS through a DHCPv6 server. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 21, 2015. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 1] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Solution Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. DHCPv6 ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST Message . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. DHCPv6 Address Registration Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.1. DHCPv6 Address Registration Request . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.2. Registration Expiry and Refresh . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.3. Acknowledging Registration and Retransmission . . . . . . 6 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1. Introduction In several common network scenarios, IPv6 addresses are self- generated by the end-hosts by appending a self-generated interface identifier to a network-specified prefix. Examples of self-generated addresses include those created using IPv6 Stateless Address Configuration [RFC4862] , temporary addresses [RFC4941] and Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA) [RFC3972] etc. In several tighly controlled networks, hosts with self-generated addresses may face some limitations. One such limitation is related to the inability of nodes with self-generated addresses to register their IPv6-address-to-FQDN bindings in DNS. This is related to the fact that, in such networks, only certain nodes (e.g. The DHCPv6 server) are allowed to update these bindings in order to prevent end- hosts from registering arbitrary addresses for their FQDNs or associating their addresses with arbitrary domain names. For nodes that obtain their addresses through DHCPv6, a solution has been specified in [RFC4704]. The solution works by including a Client FQDN option in the SOLICIT, REQUEST, RENEW or REBIND messages during the process of acquiring an address through DHCPv6. This document provides an analogous mechanism to register self-generated addresses in DNS. Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 2] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 A new ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST DHCPv6 message type is defined to initiate the address registration request, and two new Status codes are defined to indicate registration errors on the server side. 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. Certificate In this document, the term "Certificate" is all referred to public key certificate. 3. Solution Overview After successfully assigning a self-generated IPv6 address on one of its interfaces, an end-host implementing this specification SHOULD send an ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message to a DHCPv6 address registration server. After receiving the address registration request, the DHCPv6 server registers the IPv6 address to FQDN binding towards a configured DNS server. An acknowledgement MUST be sent back to the end host to indicate whether or not the registration operation succeeded. +----+ +-----------+ +---------------+ |Host| |Edge router| |Addr-Reg Server| +----+ +-----------+ +---------------+ | SLAAC | | |<--------->| | | | | | | ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST | |-------------------------------------------->| | | |Register | | |address | | Acknowledgment |in DNS |<--------------------------------------------| Figure 1: Address Registration Procedure It is RECOMMENDED to only set up one address registration server within an administration domain, although there may be multiple DHCPv6 servers. While multiple address registration servers does potentially increase the load on DNS, because of how [RFC4703] and [RFC4704] work, this should NOT be an issue - the servers should work correctly in updating DNS (either adding or removing the entries). The broken part with multiple servers is the 'extension' of the registration. If there are two address registration servers and both receive the initial registration and (correctly) update DNS, the Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 3] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 problem comes when the client extends this but one of the servers does not receive this extension. Then, the server that missed the extension removes the entry prematurely (i.e., when it expired originally). The coordination of multiple address registration servers is out of scope. 4. DHCPv6 ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST Message The DHCPv6 client sends an ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message to a server to request an address to be registered in the DNS. The format of the ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message is described as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | msg-type | transaction-id | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . options . . (variable) . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ msg-type Identifies the DHCPv6 message type; Set to ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST (TBA1). transaction-id The transaction ID for this message exchange. options Options carried in this message. DHCPv6 ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message The ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message MUST NOT contain server- identifier option and MUST contain the IA_NA option and the DHCPv6 FQDN option [RFC4704]. The ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message is dedicated for clients to initiate an address registration request toward an address registration server. Consequently, clients MUST NOT put any Option Request Option(s) in the ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message. Clients MUST discard any received ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST messages. Servers MUST discard any ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST messages that meet any of the following conditions: o the message does not include a Client Identifier option. o the message includes a Server Identifier option. Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 4] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 o the message does not include at least one IA_NA option. o the message does not include an IAADDR option encapsulated within the IA_NA option(s). o the message does not include FQDN option (or include multiple FQDN options). o the message includes an Option Request Option. Servers MUST discard any ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST messages that do not Servers MUST discard any ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST messages that do include any Option Request Option(s). 5. DHCPv6 Address Registration Procedure The DHCPv6 protocol is used as the address registration protocol when a DHCPv6 server performs the role of an address registration server. The DHCPv6 IA_NA option [RFC3315] and the DHCPv6 FQDN option [RFC4704] are adopted in order to fulfill the address registration interactions. 5.1. DHCPv6 Address Registration Request The end-host sends a DHCPv6 ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message to the address registration server to the All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers multicast address (ff02::1:2). The end-host MUST include a Client Identifier option in the ADDR- REGISTRATION-REQUEST message to identify itself to the server. The DHCPv6 ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message MUST contain at least one IA_NA option and exactly one FQDN option. The IA_NA option MUST contain at least one IA Address option. The valid-lifetime field of the IA Address option MUST be set to the period for which the client would like to register the binding in DNS. After receiving this ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message, the address registration server MUST register the binding between the provided FQDN and address(es) in DNS. If the DHCPv6 server does not support address registration function, a Reply message with includes a Status Code option with the value the RegistrationNotSupported (TBA2) MAY be sent back to the initiated client. 5.2. Registration Expiry and Refresh For every successful binding registration, the address registration server MUST record the IPv6-address-to-FQDN bindings and associated valid-lifetimes in its storage. Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 5] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 The address registration client MUST refresh the registration before it expires (i.e. before the valid-lifetime of the IA address elapses) by sending a new ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST to the address registration server. If the address registration server does not receive such a refresh after the valid-lifetime has passed, it SHOULD remove the IPv6-address-to-FQDN bindings in DNS, also the local record. It is RECOMMENDED that clients initiate a refresh at about 85% of the valid-lifetime. Because RAs may periodically 'reset' the valid- lifetime, the refresh timer MUST be independently maintained from the address valid-lifetime. Clients SHOULD set a refresh timer to 85% of the valid-lifetime when they complete a registration operation and only update this timer if 85% of any updated valid-lifetime would be sooner than the timer. 5.3. Acknowledging Registration and Retransmission After an address registration server accepts an address registration request, it MUST send a Reply message as the response to registration The server is responsilbe to register all the addresses in DNS. The server generates a Reply message and includes a Status Code option with value Success, a Server Identifier option with the server's DUID, and a Client Identifier option with the client's DUID. If there is no reply received within some interval, the client SHOULD retransmits the message according to section 14 of [RFC3315], using the following parameters: o IRT ADDR_REG_TIMEOUT o MRT ADDR_REG_MAX_RT o MRC ADDR_REG_MAX_RC o MRD 0 Where ADDR_REG_TIMEOUT might be 1 second, ADDR_REG_MAX_RT might be 30 minutes and ADDR_REG_MAX_RC might be 5. For each IA in the ADDR-REGISTRATION-REQUEST message for which the server does not accept its associated in registration request, the server adds an IA option using the IAID from the ADDR-REGISTRATION- REQUEST message, and includes a Status Code option with the value RegistrationDenied (TBA3) in the IA option. No other options are included in the IA option. Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 6] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 Upon receiving a RegistrationDenied error status code, the client MAY also resend the message following normal retransmission routines defined in [RFC3315] with above parameters. 6. Security Considerations An attacker may attempt to register large number of addresses in quick succession in order to overwhelm the address registration server. These attacks may be prevented generic DHCPv6 protection by using the AUTH option [RFC3315] or Secure DHCPv6 [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6]. 7. IANA Considerations This document defines a new DHCPv6 message, the ADDR-REGISTRATION- REQUEST message (TBA1) described in Section 4, that requires an allocation out of the registry defined at http://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters/ This document defines two new DHCPv6 Status code, the RegistrationNotSupported (TBA2) and RegistrationDenied (TBA3) described in Section 5, that requires an allocation out of the registry defined at http://www.iana.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters/ 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Ralph Droms, Ted Lemon, Bernie Volz, Sten Carlsen, Erik Kline, Lorenzo Colitti, Joel Jaeggli, Sten Carlsen, Mark Smith, Marcin Siodelski, Darpan Malhotra, Tomek Mrugalski and other members of dhc and v6ops working groups for their valuable comments. 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2136] Vixie, P., Thomson, S., Rekhter, Y., and J. Bound, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)", RFC 2136, April 1997. Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 7] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 [RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003. [RFC3972] Aura, T., "Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA)", RFC 3972, March 2005. [RFC4703] Stapp, M. and B. Volz, "Resolution of Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Conflicts among Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Clients", RFC 4703, October 2006. [RFC4704] Volz, B., "The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Option", RFC 4704, October 2006. [RFC4862] Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration", RFC 4862, September 2007. [RFC4941] Narten, T., Draves, R., and S. Krishnan, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6", RFC 4941, September 2007. 9.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6] Jiang, S., Shen, S., Zhang, D., and T. Jinmei, "Secure DHCPv6 with Public Key", draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-03 (work in progress), June 2014. Authors' Addresses Sheng Jiang Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Q14, Huawei Campus No.156 Beiqing Road Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095 P.R. China Email: jiangsheng@huawei.com Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 8] Internet-Draft IPv6 Address Registration July 2014 Gang Chen China Mobile 53A, Xibianmennei Ave., Xuanwu District, Beijing P.R. China Phone: 86-13910710674 Email: phdgang@gmail.com Suresh Krishnan Ericsson 8400 Decarie Blvd. Town of Mount Royal, QC Canada Phone: +1 514 345 7900 x42871 Email: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com Rajiv Asati Cisco Systems, Inc. 7025 Kit Creek road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-4987 USA Email: rajiva@cisco.com Jiang, et al. Expires January 21, 2015 [Page 9]