Internet Engineering Task Force N. Akiya Internet-Draft C. Pignataro Intended status: Standards Track D. Ward Expires: July 6, 2015 Cisco Systems January 2, 2015 Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) for IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-01 Abstract This document defines procedures to use Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) for IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS environments. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on July 6, 2015. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Seamless BFD for IP January 2015 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. S-BFD UDP Port . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. S-BFD Echo UDP Port . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. S-BFD Control Packet Demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Initiator Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5.1. Details of S-BFD Control Packet Sent by SBFDInitiator . . 3 5.2. Target vs. Remote Entity (S-BFD Discriminator) . . . . . 4 6. Responder Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6.1. Details of S-BFD Control Packet Sent by SBFDReflector . . 5 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 10. Contributing Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1. Introduction Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD), [I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-base], defines a generalized mechanism to allow network nodes to seamlessly perform continuity checks to remote entities. This document defines necessary procedures to use S-BFD on IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS environments. The reader is expected to be familiar with the IP, MPLS BFD and S-BFD terminologies and protocol constructs. 2. S-BFD UDP Port A new UDP port is defined for the use of the S-BFD on IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS environments: 7784. SBFDReflector session MUST listen for incoming S-BFD control packets on the port 7784. SBFDInitiator sessions MUST transmit S-BFD control packets with destination port 7784. The source port of the S-BFD control packets transmitted by SBFDInitiator sessions can be of any but MUST NOT be 7784. The same UDP source port number MUST be used for all S-BFD control packets associated with a particular SBFDInitiator session. The source port number MAY be unique among all SBFDInitiator sessions on the system. Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Seamless BFD for IP January 2015 3. S-BFD Echo UDP Port The BFD Echo port defined by [RFC5881], port 3785, is used for the S-BFD Echo function on IPv4, IPv6 and MPLS environments. SBFDInitiator sessions MUST transmit S-BFD echo packets with destination port 3785. This document defines only the UDP port value for the S-BFD Echo function. The source port and the procedures for the S-BFD Echo function are outside the scope of this document. 4. S-BFD Control Packet Demultiplexing Received BFD control packet MUST be demultiplexed with the destination UDP port field. If the port is 7784, then the packet MUST be looked up to locate a corresponding SBFDReflector session based on the value from the "your discriminator" field in the table describing S-BFD discriminators. If the port is not 7784, then the packet MUST be looked up to locate a corresponding SBFDInitiator session or classical BFD session based on the value from the "your discriminator" field in the table describing BFD discriminators. If the located session is an SBFDInitiator, then the destination IP address of the packet SHOULD be validated to be for self. 5. Initiator Procedures S-BFD control packets are transmitted with IP header, UDP header and BFD control header ([RFC5880]). When S-BFD control packets are explicitly label switched (i.e. not IP routed which happen to go over an LSP, but explicitly sent on a specific LSP), the former is prepended with a label stack. Note that this document does not make a distinction between a single-hop S-BFD scenario and a multi-hop S-BFD scenario, both scenarios are supported. Necessary values in the BFD control headers are described in [I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-base]. Section 5.1 describes necessary values in the MPLS header, IP header and UDP header when an SBFDInitiator on the initiator is sending S-BFD control packets. 5.1. Details of S-BFD Control Packet Sent by SBFDInitiator o Specifications common to both IP routed S-BFD control packets and explicitly label switched S-BFD control packets: * Source IP address field of the IP header MUST be set to a local IP address that is expected to be routable by the target (i.e. not IPv6 link-local address when the target is multiple hops away). Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Seamless BFD for IP January 2015 * UDP destination port MUST be set to a well-known UDP destination port assigned for S-BFD: 7784. * UDP source port MUST be set to a value that is not 7784. o Specifications for IP routed S-BFD control packets: * Destination IP address field of the IP header MUST set to an IP address of the target. * TTL field of the IP header SHOULD be set to 255. o Specifications for explicitly label switched S-BFD control packets: * S-BFD control packets MUST have the label stack that is expected to reach the target. * TTL field of the top most label SHOULD be 255. * The destination IP address MUST be chosen from the 127/8 range for IPv4 and from the 0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:7F00/104 range for IPv6. * TTL field of the IP header MUST be set to 1. 5.2. Target vs. Remote Entity (S-BFD Discriminator) Typically, an S-BFD control packet will have "your discriminator" field corresponding to an S-BFD discriminator of the remote entity located on the target network node defined by the destination IP address or the label stack. It is, however, possible for an SBFDInitiator to carefully set "your discriminator" and TTL fields to perform a continuity test towards a target but to a transit network node. Section 5.1 intentionally uses the word "target", instead of "remote entity", to accommodate this possible S-BFD usage through TTL expiry. This also requires S-BFD control packets not be dropped by the responder node due to TTL expiry. Thus implementations on the responder MUST allow received S-BFD control packets taking TTL expiry exception path to reach corresponding reflector BFD session. 6. Responder Procedures S-BFD control packets are IP routed back to the initiator, and will have IP header, UDP header and BFD control header. If an SBFDReflector receives an S-BFD control packet with UDP source port as 7784, the packet MUST be discarded. Necessary values in the BFD Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Seamless BFD for IP January 2015 control header are described in [I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-base]. Section 6.1 describes necessary values in the IP header and UDP header when an SBFDReflector on the responder is sending S-BFD control packets. 6.1. Details of S-BFD Control Packet Sent by SBFDReflector o Destination IP address field of the IP header MUST be copied from source IP address field of received S-BFD control packet. o Source IP address field of the IP header MUST be set to a local IP address that is expected to be visible by the initiator (i.e. not IPv6 link-local address when the initiator is multiple hops away). o TTL field of the IP header SHOULD be set to 255. o UDP destination port MUST be copied from received UDP source port. o UDP source port MUST be copied from received UDP destination port. 7. Security Considerations Security considerations for S-BFD are discussed in [I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-base]. Additionally, implementing the following measures will strengthen security aspects of the mechanism described by this document: o Implementations MUST provide filtering capability based on source IP addresses of received S-BFD control packets: [RFC2827]. o Implementations MUST NOT act on received S-BFD control packets containing Martian addresses as source IP addresses. o Implementations MUST ensure that response S-BFD control packets generated to the initiator by the SBFDReflector have a reachable target (ex: destination IP address). 8. IANA Considerations A new value 7784 was allocated from the "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry". The allocated registry entry is: Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Seamless BFD for IP January 2015 Service Name (REQUIRED) s-bfd Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED) udp Assignee (REQUIRED) IESG Contact (REQUIRED) BFD Chairs Description (REQUIRED) Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Reference (REQUIRED) draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-ip Port Number (OPTIONAL) 7784 9. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the BFD WG members for helping to shape the contents of this document. In particular, significant contributions were made by following people: Marc Binderberger, Jeffrey Haas, Santosh Pallagatti, Greg Mirsky, Sam Aldrin, Vengada Prasad Govindan, Mallik Mudigonda and Srihari Raghavan. 10. Contributing Authors Tarek Saad Cisco Systems Email: tsaad@cisco.com Siva Sivabalan Cisco Systems Email: msiva@cisco.com Nagendra Kumar Cisco Systems Email: naikumar@cisco.com 11. References 11.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-base] Akiya, N., Pignataro, C., Ward, D., Bhatia, M., and J. Networks, "Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-03 (work in progress), August 2014. Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Seamless BFD for IP January 2015 [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5880, June 2010. [RFC5881] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop)", RFC 5881, June 2010. 11.2. Informative References [RFC2827] Ferguson, P. and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing", BCP 38, RFC 2827, May 2000. Authors' Addresses Nobo Akiya Cisco Systems Email: nobo@cisco.com Carlos Pignataro Cisco Systems Email: cpignata@cisco.com Dave Ward Cisco Systems Email: wardd@cisco.com Akiya, et al. Expires July 6, 2015 [Page 7]