PCE Quan Xiong Internet-Draft Greg Mirsky Intended status: Standards Track ZTE Corporation Expires: April 24, 2020 Fangwei Hu Individual Weiqiang Cheng China Mobile October 22, 2019 Stitching LSP Association draft-hu-pce-stitching-lsp-association-02 Abstract The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group] proposed an association mechanism for a set of LSPs. This document defines the stitching LSP association type and stitching LSP association TLV for the inter-domain scenairo. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on April 24, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Stitching LSP association October 2019 (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Stitching LSPs in SR-MPLS Inter-domain Scenario . . . . . . . 3 4. PCEP Extension for Stitching LSP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.1. I-flag in LSP Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.2. Stitching LSP Association Type and Group . . . . . . . . 4 4.3. Stitching LSP Association TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7.1. New LSP Flag Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7.2. Association Object Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1. Introduction [RFC5440] describes the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) which is used between a Path Computation Element (PCE) and a Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCE) to enable computation of Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) for Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path (TE LSP). [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group] proposed an association mechanism to create a grouping of LSPs in the context of a PCE. [I-D.xiong-pce-stateful-pce-sr-inter-domain] introduces the procedure and the PCEP extension to form the inter-domain MPLS data entries and the multiple LSPs from multiple contiguous domains need to be stitched to an end-to-end LSP in SR inter-domain scenario. This document proposes a new association object type called "stitching Association LSP type" and TLV called "Stitching LSP Association TLV" to associate a grouping of LSPs from multiple domains for inter-domain scenario. Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Stitching LSP association October 2019 2. Conventions used in this document 2.1. Terminology The terminology is defined as [RFC5440], [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group] and [I-D.xiong-pce-stateful-pce-sr-inter-domain]. 2.2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 3. Stitching LSPs in SR-MPLS Inter-domain Scenario As described in [I-D.xiong-pce-stateful-pce-sr-inter-domain], the domains of the networks may be IGP Areas in stitching inter-domain scenario. As Figure 1 shown, the multiple SR-MPLS domains may be interconnect with a ABR within areas. The multiple LSPs in each domain can be stitched to an inter-domain end-to-end LSP. The LSP-1, LSP-2 and LSP-3 can be associated to a group. .................. ................. .................... . . . . . . +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ | A | | X | | Y | | Z | +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ . IGP-1 . . IGP-2 . . IGP-3 . .................. ................. ................... |--------LSP-1------>|-------LSP-2------->|-------LSP-3------->| |--------------Stitching LSP Association Group---------------->| Figure 1: Stitching LSPs in SR-MPLS Inter-domain Scenario 4. PCEP Extension for Stitching LSP 4.1. I-flag in LSP Object The LSP Object is defined in Section 7.3 of [RFC8231]. This document defiend a new flag (I-flag) for the LSP Object as Figure 2 shown: Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Stitching LSP association October 2019 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | PLSP-ID | Flag|I|C| O |A|R|S|D| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ // TLVs // | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: I-flag in LSP Object I (Request for Inter-domain Path) : If the bit is set to 1, it indicates that the PCC requests PCE to compute the end-to-end path for inter-domain scenario carried in PCReq message. A parent PCE would set this bit to 1 to indicate that it is an end-to-end inter- domain path and a chid PCE would set it to 1 to indicate that the path is part of an end-to-end inter-domain path. That may be encoded in the PCRep, PCUpd or PCInitiate message. 4.2. Stitching LSP Association Type and Group An association ID will be used to identify the group and a new Association Type is defined in this document, based on the generic Association object : Association Type (TBD) = Stitching LSP Association Group (SLAG). SLAG may carry optional TLVs including but not limited to : STITCHING-LSP-ASSOCIATION-TLV: Used to identify the role of stitching LSPs, described in Section 4.3. As [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group] specified, the capability advertisement of the association types supported by a PCEP speaker is performed by defining a ASSOC-Type-List TLV to be carried within an OPEN object. The association type which defined in this document should be added in the list and be advertised between the PCEP speakers before the stitching LSP association. Stitching LSP Association could be created dynamically or configured by the operator when operator-configured association is needed. 4.3. Stitching LSP Association TLV The format of the Stitching LSP Association TLV is shown in Figure 3. Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Stitching LSP association October 2019 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reserved |S|T|D| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 3: Stitching LSP Association TLV The fields of the Stitching LSP Association TLV are following: Type:16 bits, it indicates the stitching LSP Association Group TLV: TBD2, the value is assigned by IANA). Length: the value is 4, it indicates the length of the TLV is 4 bytes. Reserved: it is reserved for future use. Stitching LSP Association Flags-S:1bit, indicates stitching LSP of the source domain when it is set. Stitching LSP Association Flags-T:1bit, indicates stitching LSP of the transit domain when it is set. Stitching LSP Association Flags-D:1bit, indicates stitching LSP of the destination layer when it is set. 5. Security Considerations TBA 6. Acknowledgements TBA 7. IANA Considerations 7.1. New LSP Flag Registry [RFC8231] defines the LSP object; per that RFC, IANA created a registry to manage the value of the LSP object's Flag field. IANA is requested to make allocations from the registry, as follows: Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Stitching LSP association October 2019 +--------+------------------------------------+------------------+ | Value | Name | Reference | +--------+------------------------------------+------------------+ | TBD | Request for Inter-domain Path (I) | [this document] | +--------+------------------------------------+------------------+ Table 1 7.2. Association Object Type This document defines a new association type and TLV in Association object which originally defined in [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group]. IANA is requested to make allocations from the registry, as follows: +--------+---------------------------------+------------------+ | Value | Name | Reference | +--------+---------------------------------+------------------+ | TBD | Stitching LSP Association Type | [this document] | | TBD | Stitching LSP Association TLV | [this document] | +--------+---------------------------------+------------------+ Table 2 8. Normative References [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group] Minei, I., Crabbe, E., Sivabalan, S., Ananthakrishnan, H., Dhody, D., and Y. Tanaka, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Establishing Relationships Between Sets of Label Switched Paths (LSPs)", draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10 (work in progress), August 2019. [I-D.xiong-pce-stateful-pce-sr-inter-domain] Xiong, Q., hu, f., Mirsky, G., and W. Cheng, "Stateful PCE for SR-MPLS Inter-domain", draft-xiong-pce-stateful-pce- sr-inter-domain-01 (work in progress), July 2019. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC5440] Vasseur, JP., Ed. and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 5440, DOI 10.17487/RFC5440, March 2009, . Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Stitching LSP association October 2019 [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8231] Crabbe, E., Minei, I., Medved, J., and R. Varga, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE", RFC 8231, DOI 10.17487/RFC8231, September 2017, . Authors' Addresses Quan Xiong ZTE Corporation No.6 Huashi Park Rd Wuhan, Hubei 430223 China Phone: +86 27 83531060 Email: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Greg Mirsky ZTE Corporation USA Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com Fangwei Hu Individual China Email: hufwei@gmail.com Weiqiang Cheng China Mobile Beijing China Email: chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com Quan Xiong, et al. Expires April 24, 2020 [Page 7]