Point-to-Point Extensions Working Group H. Haverinen Internet Draft Nokia April 2001 EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) draft-haverinen-pppext-eap-sim-01.txt Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at: http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This document is an individual submission for the Point-to-Point Extensions Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Comments should be submitted to the ietf-ppp@merit.edu mailing list. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This document specifies an Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) mechanism for authentication and session key distribution using the GSM Subscriber Identity Module (SIM). Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 1] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 Table of Contents Status of this Memo.........................................1 Abstract....................................................1 Table of Contents...........................................2 1. Introduction.............................................2 2. Terms....................................................2 3. Overview.................................................3 4. EAP-Response/Identity....................................5 5. EAP-Request/SIM/Start....................................6 6. EAP-Response/SIM/Start...................................7 7. EAP-Request/SIM/Challenge................................8 8. EAP-Response/SIM/Challenge...............................9 9. Unsuccessful Cases......................................10 9.1. EAP-Response/SIM/Unknown-Subtype......................11 9.2. EAP-Response/SIM/Unsupported-Version..................12 9.3. Other Failures on EAP/SIM Client......................13 10. Calculation of Cryptographic Values....................13 11. IANA Considerations....................................14 12. Security Considerations................................14 13. Intellectual Property Right Notice.....................14 14. Acknowledgements.......................................14 References.................................................14 Author's Address...........................................15 1. Introduction This document specifies an Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) [1] mechanism for authentication and session key distribution using the GSM Subscriber Identity Module (SIM). GSM authentication is based on a challenge-response mechanism. The authentication algorithm that runs on the SIM can be given a 128-bit random number (RAND) as a challenge. The SIM runs an operator- specific confidential algorithm which takes the RAND and a secret key Ki stored on the SIM as input, and produces a 32-bit response (SRES) and a 64-bit long key Kc as output. The Kc key is originally intended to be used as an encryption key over the air interface. Please find more information about GSM authentication in [2]. In EAP/SIM, several RAND challenges are used for generating several 64-bit Kc keys, which are combined to constitute a longer session key. EAP/SIM also enhances the basic GSM authentication mechanism by accompanying the RAND challenges with a message authentication code in order to provide mutual authentication. 2. Terms The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3]. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 2] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 This document frequently uses the following terms and abbreviations: AAA protocol Authentication, Authorization and Accounting protocol AAA server In this document, AAA server refers to the network element that resides on the border of Internet AAA network and GSM network. AuC Authentication Centre. The GSM network element that can authorize the subscriber. EAP Extensible Authentication Protocol. GSM Global System for Mobile communications. IMSI International Mobile Subscriber Identifier, used in GSM to identify subscribers. NAI Network Access Identifier SIM Subscriber Identity Module. SIM cards are smart cards distributed by GSM operators. 3. Overview Figure 1 shows an overview of the EAP/SIM authentication procedure. This version of EAP/SIM exchange uses three roundtrips to authorize the user and generate a session key. The Authenticator typically communicates with the user's AAA server using an AAA protocol. The AAA communications is not shown in the figure. The first EAP Request issued by the Authenticator is EAP- Request/Identity. The clients response includes the user's International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) (Section 4). Following the client's EAP-Response/Identity packet, the client receives EAP Requests of type 18 (SIM) from the Authenticator and sends the corresponding EAP Responses. The EAP packets that are of Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 3] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 the Type SIM also have a Subtype field. The first EAP-Request/SIM packet is of the Subtype 1 (Start). This packet contains the list of EAP/SIM protocol version numbers supported by the AAA server. The client's response (EAP-Response/SIM/Start) contains the version number selected by the client. The client must select one of the versions from the EAP Request. The EAP-Response/SIM/Start packet also contains the client's key lifetime proposal and a random number NONCE_MT, picked up by the client. All subsequent EAP Request and Response packets contain the same version as the client's EAP- Response/SIM/Start packet. This document describes the EAP/SIM protocol version 1. In this document, we assume that the AAA server has an interface to the GSM network and it operates as a gateway between the Internet AAA network and the GSM authentication infrastructure. After receiving the EAP Response/SIM/Start, the AAA server obtains n GSM triplets from the user's home operator's Authentication Centre (AuC) on the GSM network. From the triplets, the AAA server derives MAC_RAND and the session key. Section 10 specifies how these cryptographic values are calculated. The next EAP Request the Authenticator issues is of the type SIM and subtype Challenge. It contains the RAND challenges, the key lifetime decided by the AAA Server, and a message authentication code for the challenges and the lifetime (MAC_RAND). On receipt of this message, the client runs the GSM authentication algorithm on the SIM card and calculates a copy of MAC_RAND. The client then verifies that the calculated MAC_RAND equals the received MAC_RAND. If the MAC_RAND's do not match, then the client cancels the authentication procedure and does not send any authentication values calculated on the SIM to the network. Since the RAND's given to a client are accompanied with the message authentication code MAC_RAND, the client is able to verify that the RAND's are fresh and they have been generated by the GSM network. If all checks out, the client responds with the EAP- Response/SIM/Challenge, containing the client's response MAC_SRES (Section 10). The AAA server verifies that the MAC_SRES is correct and sends the EAP-Success packet, indicating that the authentication was successful. The AAA server may also include the derived session key in the message it sends to the Authenticator. In the following sections, we discuss the EAP/SIM authentication and key distribution mechanism in detail. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 4] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 Client Authenticator | | | EAP-Request/Identity | |<---------------------------------------------------------| | | | EAP-Response/Identity | | (Includes user's IMSI) | |--------------------------------------------------------->| | | | EAP-Request/SIM/Start | | (Supported versions) | |<---------------------------------------------------------| | | | EAP-Response/SIM/Start | | (Version, NONCE_MT, Key lifetime proposal) | |--------------------------------------------------------->| | | | EAP-Request/SIM/Challenge | | (Version, n*RAND, MAC_RAND, Key lifetime) | |<---------------------------------------------------------| | | +-------------------------------------+ | | Client runs GSM algorithms on SIM, | | | verifies MAC_RAND, derives MAC_SRES | | | and session key | | +-------------------------------------+ | | | | EAP-Response/SIM/Challenge | | (Version, MAC_SRES) | |--------------------------------------------------------->| | | | | | EAP-Success | |<---------------------------------------------------------| | | Figure 1 EAP/GSM SIM authentication procedure 4. EAP-Response/Identity In the beginning of EAP authentication, the Authenticator issues the EAP-Request/Identity packet to the client. The client responds with EAP-Response/Identity, which contains the user's identity. The formats of these packets are specified in [1]. GSM subscribers are identified with the International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) [4]. The IMSI is composed of a three digit Mobile Country Code (MCC), a two digit Mobile Network Code (MNC) and a not more than 10 digit Mobile Subscriber Identification Number (MSIN). In other words, the IMSI is a string of not more than 15 digits. MCC and MNC uniquely identify the GSM operator. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 5] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 Internet AAA protocols identify users with the Network Access Identifier (NAI) [5]. When used in a roaming environment, the NAI is composed of a username and a realm, separated with "@". The username portion identifies the subscriber within the realm. The AAA nodes use the realm portion of the NAI to route AAA requests to the correct AAA server. With EAP/SIM, the client transmits the user's IMSI as a NAI in the EAP Response/Identity packet. The NAI is of the format "0imsi@realm". In other words, the first character is the digit zero (ASCII 0x30), followed by the IMSI, followed by the @ character and the realm. The IMSI is an ASCII string that consists of not more than 15 decimal digits (ASCII values between 0x30 and 0x39) as specified in [4]. The AAA network routes the AAA request to the correct AAA server using the realm part of the NAI. 5. EAP-Request/SIM/Start In EAP/SIM Version 1, the first SIM specific EAP Request is of subtype Start. The EAP Request/SIM/Start packet contains a list of EAP/SIM versions supported by the AAA server. The format of the EAP Request/SIM/Start packet is shown below. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Code | Identifier | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Subtype | Version Count | Version 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ..............................................| Version N | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code 1 for Request Identifier See [1]. Length 7 + value of Version Count field (number of supported protocol versions) Type 18 Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 6] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 Subtype 1 Version Count Number of EAP/SIM versions supported by the AAA server. The supported versions are listed following this field. Version 1 is the protocol version described in this document. Version1...Version N The EAP/SIM versions supported by the AAA Server. Version 1 is the version described in this document. 6. EAP-Response/SIM/Start The format of the EAP Response/SIM/Start packet is shown below. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Code | Identifier | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Subtype | Version | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Key Lifetime Proposal | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | NONCE_MT | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code 2 for Response Identifier See [1]. Length 28 Type 18 Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 7] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 Subtype 1 Version 1 (The EAP/SIM version the client is using.) Reserved Set to zero when sending, ignored on reception. Key Lifetime Proposal Client's key lifetime proposal in seconds (four bytes). NONCE_MT A random number generated by the client (16 bytes), which is used as a seed value for the new key. 7. EAP-Request/SIM/Challenge The format of the EAP-Request/SIM/Challenge packet is shown below. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Code | Identifier | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Subtype | Version | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Key Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | MAC_RAND | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n*RAND ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code 1 for Request Identifier See [1] Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 8] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 Length The length of the EAP Request packet. 28 + n*16 bytes, where n is the number of RAND challenges given in this EAP Request. Type 18 Version 1 (the EAP/SIM protocol version) Subtype 2 Reserved Set to zero when sending, ignored on reception. Key lifetime Remaining key lifetime in seconds (4 bytes), decided by the AAA Server. The AAA Server may, but it doesn't have to, take into account the client's key lifetime proposal from EAP- Response/GSMSIM/Start. The key lifetime must be greater than zero. MAC_RAND A message authentication code for n*RAND and Key Lifetime (Section 10), 16 bytes. N*RAND N GSM RANDs (length n *16 bytes) 8. EAP-Response/SIM/Challenge The format of the EAP-Response/SIM/Challenge packet is shown below. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 9] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Code | Identifier | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Subtype | Version | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | MAC_SRES | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code 2 for Response Identifier See [1]. Length 40 bytes Type 18 Version 1 (the EAP/SIM version) Subtype 2 Reserved Set to zero when sending, ignored on reception. MAC_SRES The response calculated by the client (Section 10), 16 bytes. 9. Unsuccessful Cases As normally in EAP, the client is sent the EAP-Failure packet when the authentication procedure fails on the AAA Server. In EAP/SIM, Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 10] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 this may occur for example if the AAA server is not able to obtain the GSM triplets for the subscriber or the AAA server receives an incorrect MAC_SRES. As specified in [1], the EAP client must respond with EAP- Response/Nak when it receives an EAP Request of an undesired or unrecognized authentication type. Following subsections describe EAP/SIM specific operations on error cases. 9.1. EAP-Response/SIM/Unknown-Subtype If the client receives an EAP Request packet of the type SIM with a subtype that it does not recognize, the client MUST sends the EAP- Response/SIM/Unknown-Subtype packet shown below. The Authenticator (or the AAA server) MAY then proceed with other EAP Requests or it MAY send an EAP-Failure packet. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Code | Identifier | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Subtype |Unknown Subtype| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code 2 for Response Identifier See [1]. Length 7 + value of Supported Subtype Count (number of supported EAP- Request/SIM subtypes) Type 18 Subtype 3 Unknown Subtype The subtype of the EAP Request that was not recognized by this client. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 11] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 9.2. EAP-Response/SIM/Unsupported-Version If the client receives an EAP Request packet of the type SIM and a subtype that it recognizes, but with a version that it does not support, then the client MUST sends the EAP- Response/SIM/Unsupported-Version packet shown below. The Authenticator (or the AAA server) MAY then proceed with other EAP Requests or it MAY send an EAP-Failure packet. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Code | Identifier | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Subtype | Version Count | Version 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ..............................................| Version N | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code 2 for Response Identifier See [1]. Length 7 + value of Version Count field (number of supported protocol versions) Type 18 Subtype 4 Version Count Number of EAP/SIM versions supported by the client. The supported versions are listed following this field. Version 1 is the protocol version described in this document. Version1...Version N The EAP/SIM versions supported by the client. Version 1 is the version described in this document. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 12] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 9.3. Other Failures on EAP/SIM Client If some other error besides the ones listed above occurs on the client, then the client does not send EAP messages to the network but simply cancels the authentication procedure. An example of such an error is an invalid MAC_RAND value in the EAP- Request/SIM/Challenge packet. 10. Calculation of Cryptographic Values This section specifies how the SIM-generated session key K and the message authentication codes MAC_RAND and MAC_SRES are calculated. When calculating the session key and MAC_SRES, the IMSI is packed into 8 bytes. The most significant nibble of the first byte is the first digit in the IMSI, the least significant nibble the second digit in IMSI etc. The least significant nibble of the 8th byte is 'F' as the IMSI typically is 15 digits. Unused nibbles are filled with 'F' in case the IMSI is less than 15 digits. For example, the IMSI 244070100000112 is coded as follows: the first byte is 0x24, the second byte is 0x40, ..., and the eighth byte is 0x2F. In the formulae, the notation PRF(key, msg) denotes the keyed pseudo-random function used to generate a deterministic output that appears pseudo-random. The PRF() is used both for key derivations and for authentication (i.e. as a keyed MAC). With EAP/SIM version 1, the PRF() is HMAC-MD5 [6]. K PRF(n*Kc, n*RAND | IMSI | NONCE_MT) MAC_RAND PRF(n*Kc, n*RAND | NONCE_MT | key lifetime) MAC_SRES PRF(n*Kc, n*SRES | IMSI | NONCE_MT) When generating the key K, the PRF is used as a mixing function to combine several session keys (Kc's) generated by the GSM authentication procedure and the random number NONCE_MT into a single session key. There are several reasons for this. The current GSM session keys are at most 64 bits, so two or more of them are needed to generate a 128-bit key. By using a one-way function to combine the keys, we are assured that even if an attacker manages to learn the EAP/SIM session key, it doesn't help him in learning the original GSM Kc's. In addition, since we include the random number NONCE_MT in the calculation, the client is able to verify that the SIM authentication values it receives from the network are fresh and not a replay. Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 13] Internet Draft EAP SIM Authentication (Version 1) February 2001 11. IANA Considerations IANA has assigned the EAP type number 18 for EAP/SIM authentication. 12. Security Considerations The protocol in this document is intended to provide the appropriate level of security to operate Extensible Authentication Protocol using the GSM SIM. 13. Intellectual Property Right Notice On IPR related issues, Nokia refers to the Nokia Statement on Patent licensing, see http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/NOKIA. 14. Acknowledgements The following people have contributed ideas in this protocol: Juha Ala-Laurila, N. Asokan, Jan-Erik Ekberg, Patrik Flykt, Jukka-Pekka Honkanen, Antti Kuikka, Jukka Latva, Lassi Lehtinen, Jyri Rinnemaa, Timo Takam„ki and Raimo Vuonnala. References [1] L. Blunk, J. Vollbrecht, "PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)", RFC 2284, March 1998 [2] GSM Technical Specification GSM 03.20 (ETS 300 534): "Digital cellular telecommunication system (Phase 2); Security related network functions", European Telecommunications Standards Institute, August 1997 [3] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997. [4] GSM Technical Specification GSM 03.03 (ETS 300 523): "Digital cellular telecommunication system (Phase 2); Numbering, addressing and identification", European Telecommunications Standards Institute, April 1997 [5] Aboba, B. and M. Beadles, "The Network Access Identifier", RFC 2486, January 1999. [6] H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC2104, February 1997 Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 14] Author's Address Henry Haverinen Nokia Mobile Phones P.O. Box 88 FIN-33721 Tampere Finland E-mail: henry.haverinen@nokia.com Phone: +358 50 594 4899 Fax: +358 3 318 3690 Haverinen Expires October 2001 [Page 15]