Network Working Group N. Banks Internet-Draft Microsoft Corporation Intended status: Experimental August 11, 2020 Expires: February 12, 2021 QUIC Disable Encryption draft-banks-quic-disable-encryption-00 Abstract The disable_1rtt_encryption transport parameter can be used to negotiate the disablement of encryption on 1-RTT packets, allowing for reduced CPU load and improved performance. This extension is only meant to be used in environments where both endpoints completely trust the path between themselves; not, for instance, on the open internet. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on February 12, 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of Banks Expires February 12, 2021 [Page 1] Internet-Draft QUIC-DIS-ENCRYPT August 2020 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2. Applicable Scenarios for Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Disable 1-RTT Encryption Transport Parameter . . . . . . 3 2.2. Negotiating the Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.3. Disabling 1-RTT Encryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.4. Interactions with Path Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. Introduction By default QUIC Transport Protocol [I-D.ietf-quic-transport] provides secured (authenticated and encrypted) connections via a TLS handshake. The handshake allows for the endpoints to be authenticated by a certificate and then securely generates shared secrets to encrypt the QUIC packet traffic. Post-handshake, this packet encryption can occupy a considerable percentage of CPU usage, depending on the scenario. Additionally, there are scenarios where the protections given by this encryption are either unnecessary or unwanted. For these scenarios, this document defines an extension to the QUIC protocol to allow for mutually participating endpoints to negotiate the disablement of encryption for the 1-RTT packets sent after the handshake. 1.1. Terms and Definitions The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 1.2. Applicable Scenarios for Use QUIC connections are generally meant to always be encrypted, to prevent unauthenticated middleboxes from reading or modifying the QUIC packets. This is the desired behavior for most environments; especially any that go over the open internet. There are two possible scenarios where disabling packet encryption makes sense: Banks Expires February 12, 2021 [Page 2] Internet-Draft QUIC-DIS-ENCRYPT August 2020 o Trusted Environment/Path - There are scenarios or environments where there is no need for the additional security measures of QUIC encryption; such as walled-gardens or tunneled connections. These scenarios are either already trusted or secured by other means. o Performance Testing - When the actual contents of the QUIC packets are unimportant and the goal is purely to measure the performance characteristics of either the network, machine or QUIC implementation without encryption. 2. Specification The disable_1rtt_encryption transport parameter used for negotiating the use of the extension is defined below. 2.1. Disable 1-RTT Encryption Transport Parameter The disable_1rtt_encryption transport parameter can be sent by both a client and server. The transport parameter is sent with an optional variable-length value by the client and an empty value by the server; a client that understands this transport parameter MUST treat the receipt of a non-empty value as a connection error of type TRANSPORT_PARAMETER_ERROR. Advertising the disable_1rtt_encryption transport parameter indicates that the endpoint wishes to disable encryption for 1-RTT packets. Both sides must advertise support for the feature for it to be considered successfully negotiated. If successfully negotiated, all packets that would normally be encrypted with the 1-RTT key are instead sent as cleartext; both header and packet protections are disabled. 2.2. Negotiating the Extension The payload sent in the transport parameter by the client, along with any other information the server has about the client (such as IP address) may be used to negotiate the extension on the server side. The TP payload could be considered a key or identifier used by the server to verify the client should be allowed to disable encryption. These additional security measures are optional, but RECOMMENDED to ensure encryption is not accidentally enabled when it should not be. Banks Expires February 12, 2021 [Page 3] Internet-Draft QUIC-DIS-ENCRYPT August 2020 2.3. Disabling 1-RTT Encryption When the extension is negotiated, all aspects of encryption on 1-RTT packets are removed: o Header protection o Payload protection o AEAD tag This effectively gives the transport an additional 16 bytes per packet to be used for payload, since it is no longer including an AEAD tag. Because the AEAD tag is removed along with the encryption, the UDP checksum must be relied upon to determine any packet corruption. 2.4. Interactions with Path Changes When making the trust determination about the path, each endpoints must take into account possible path changes; NAT rebinding for instance. An endpoint MUST NOT enable enable this extension if it is possible for the path to change during the connection to some untrusted state. Additionally, a client MUST NOT try to migrate to any path that is untrusted if this extension is negotiated. If a server receives a packet for a connection with this extension negotiated on an untrusted path, it MUST silently drop the packet. 3. Security Considerations Disabling encryption for 1-RTT packets has some fairly obvious security drawbacks: o Packets can be read, modified and injected by any middleboxes This extension is not meant to be used for any practical application protocol on the open internet. Internet facing servers MUST NOT enable this extension. Clients that do not trust their network and path to the server MUST NOT enable this extension. This extension does not modify the packet protections used during the handshake, so the handshake can still be securely authenticated. This prevents scenarios where one endpoint might trust (or think it trusts) the path, but the other endpoint does not, and a man-in-the- middle tries to force this extension to be used. Banks Expires February 12, 2021 [Page 4] Internet-Draft QUIC-DIS-ENCRYPT August 2020 To prevent accidental use of the feature on production systems it is RECOMMENDED for servers to have additional measures such as IP filtering or a security key. 4. IANA Considerations This document registers a new value in the QUIC Transport Parameter Registry: Value: TBD (using value 0xBAAD in early deployments) Parameter Name: disable_1rtt_encryption Specification: Indicates disabled 1-RTT encryption is being negotiated 5. Normative References [I-D.ietf-quic-transport] Iyengar, J. and M. Thomson, "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", draft-ietf-quic-transport-29 (work in progress), June 2020. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . Author's Address Nick Banks Microsoft Corporation Email: nibanks@microsoft.com Banks Expires February 12, 2021 [Page 5]