Internet DRAFT - draft-ota-dhc-auth-chap
draft-ota-dhc-auth-chap
dhc Working Group M. Ota
M.Yanagiya
Internet Draft NTT
Expires: December 2005 June 30, 2005
CHAP-based Authentication for DHCPv6
draft-ota-dhc-auth-chap-00.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that
any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is
aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she
becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of
BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 30, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
In delayed authentication in DHCPv6[RFC3315], the hardware
identifier is used to select the key, and the key is exchanged
between the server and the client in advance. Therefore, when a user
tries to use a new device, it is necessary to add key information to
the new device and DHCPv6 servers.
In this document, we propose a procedure for introducing
CHAP[RFC1994] into the DHCPv6 authentication procedure. This
procedure allows the client get the host configuration information
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
related to the user and exchanges a secret key to use in later
sequence.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119.
Most of the terms used in this draft are defined in RFC3315.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction...................................................3
2. Issues.........................................................3
3. Protocol Overview..............................................4
4. Packet Format of the Authentication Option in the CHAP-based
Authentication Procedure..........................................5
4.1. Authentication Information in Advertise Messages..........7
4.2. Authentication Information in Request Messages............7
4.3. Authentication Information in Reply Messages corresponding to
Request Message................................................8
5. Client and Server Considerations...............................9
5.1. Client Considerations.....................................9
5.1.1. Sending Solicit Messages.............................9
5.1.2. Receiving Advertise Messages.........................9
5.1.3. Sending Request Messages.............................9
5.1.4. Sending Confirm, Renew, Rebind, Decline or Release
Messages....................................................9
5.1.5. Sending Information-Request Messages.................9
5.1.6. Receiving Reply Messages............................10
5.1.7. Receiving Reconfigure Messages......................10
5.1.8. When the key life time is over......................10
5.2. Server Considerations....................................10
5.2.1. Receiving Solicit Messages and Sending Advertise
Messages...................................................10
5.2.2. Receiving Request Messages and Sending Reply Messages10
5.2.3. Receiving Confirm, Renew, Rebind, Decline or Release
Messages...................................................11
5.2.4. Sending Reply Messages in Information-Request/Reply
sequence...................................................11
6. Security Considerations.......................................11
7. IANA Consideration............................................11
8. Informative Reference.........................................11
Author's Addresses...............................................11
Intellectual Property Statement..................................12
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
Disclaimer of Validity...........................................12
Copyright Statement..............................................12
Acknowledgment...................................................13
1. Introduction
In delayed authentication, which is the authentication procedure
described in RFC3315, the hardware identifier, such as the MAC
address, is used to select the key, and it is assumed that the key is
exchanged between the server and the client in advance. Therefore,
when a user tries to use a new device, it is necessary to submit new
hardware identifiers and new key information to the DHCPv6 server. We
think that it will be deployment issue.
To avoid this problem, we propose a user based authentication
procedure. In this procedure, DHCPv6 server authenticates user using
CHAP mechanism during solicitation procedure. To identify users, we
assumed that user identifier, such as FQDN of user, is used as
identifier of peer. And shared secret, which is used to establish
security association between DHCPv6 client and server for subsequent
sequences, is exchanged using Diffie-Hellman mechanism.
2. Issues
In the Delayed Authentication procedure, the DHCPv6 server selects a
key based on the hardware identifier of the DHCPv6 client, such as
MAC address, and it is assumed that keys are exchanged between the
server and the client in advance. Therefore, when a user tries to use
a new device, it is necessary to add the key to the new device and
DHCPv6 servers. We think that there will be the following deployment
issues:
-The user is required to submit a new hardware identifier and a new
key to the operator of the DHCPv6 server.
The original purpose of DHCPv6 authentication was to avoid server
and client spoofing in general environments such as a LAN, so the
DHCPv6 authentication procedure is required to provide mutual
authentication. On the other hand, we can assume that nobody can
spoof the DHCPv6 server in a commercial network. In such a network,
we think that it is unnecessary for the client to authenticate the
server. A network access authentication procedure, such as CHAP, is
one of the major one-way authentication procedures. A lot of network
access procedures use the user identifier to select a secret.
Therefore, an AAA server is required to manage one secret per user
even if users change terminal.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
Therefore, we propose a new authentication procedure that applies an
access authentication method based on the user identifier to the
DHCPv6 authentication procedure.
3. Protocol Overview
Here, we introduce a new authentication procedure that uses CHAP as
the authentication method. This procedure allows the server to
execute authentication based on the user identifier. We call it the
CHAP-based Authentication Procedure. An example sequence of this
procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.
When the DHCPv6 server receives a Solicit message, the server
replies with the Advertise message, which carries the challenge and
identifier. The client calculates the Response value using the
challenge and a pre-shared secret such as a password. And the client
sends a Request message with the user-identifier, identifier, and
Response value. When the DHCPv6 server receives a Request message, it
selects a challenge based on the identifier. The DHCPv6 server may
send an authentication request message to the AAA server, and the AAA
server selects a secret based on the user identifier and evaluates
the Response value. But the protocol between the DHCPv6 server and
the AAA server is out of our scope. If the evaluation has been
completed successfully, the DHCPv6 server sends a Reply message to
the DHCPv6 client.
DHCPv6 DHCPv6 AAA
client Server Server
| | |
| Solicit [Auth-opt] | |
| (demands authentication using this procedure) |
|-------------------------->| |
| | |
| Advertise | |
| [Auth-opt (Challenge, Identifier)] |
|<--------------------------| |
| | |
| Request | |
|[Auth-opt (User-Identifier,| |
| Identifier, Response, DH-group, KeyExchange)] |
|-------------------------->| |
| | Authentication Request |
| |------------------------->|
| | |
| | Authentication Reply |
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
| Reply[Auth-opt |<-------------------------|
| (Success or Failure, KeyExchange, etc.)] |
|<--------------------------| |
| | |
Fig. 1. Example sequence of CHAP-based authentication procedure.
4. Packet Format of the Authentication Option in the CHAP-based
Authentication Procedure
In a Solicit message, the client fills in the protocol, algorithm,
and RDM fields in the Authentication option with the clientÆs
preferences. The client sets the replay detection field to zero and
omits the authentication information field. The client sets the
option-len field to 11.
In all other messages, the protocol and algorithm fields identify
the procedure used to construct the contents of the authentication
information field. The RDM field identifies the procedure used to
construct the contents of the replay detection field.
The format of the Authentication information for CHAP-based
authentication procedure is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MSG_TYPE | Identifier | MSG_Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Attribute |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ......... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
MSG TYPE
The MSG TYPE identifies the type of message.
We set the following types.
1 Challenge
2 Response
3 Success
4 Failure
Identifier The Identifier shows that it is a series of
a CHAP sequence. When a Challenge value is
generated, the identifier is generated at
random by DHCPv6 Server.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
MSG_Length The total size of the authentication information
field. The value contains MSG TYPE, Identifier,
MSG length, and Attribute field length.
Attribute The Attribute carries authentication information.
Details of the format in the Attribute field
are shown below.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | Length | Value ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
TYPE The TYPE of Attribute shows the type of
information of Value.
1 User-Name
3 CHAP-Password
60 CHAP-Challenge
80 DH-group
81 KeyExchange
82 DHCP realm
83 key ID
84 life time of the key
Length
Length of Value in octets.
Value
Value of Attribute related to TYPE number.
Information corresponding to the TYPE number
buried under the Value field is shown below.
TYPE Value
1 String of User-Name and domain tied by using @.
3 Response value
60 Challenge value
80 Diffie-Hellman group value
81 Diffie-Hellman public key value
82 DHCP realm info
83 key Identifier
84 Exchanged keyÆs life time
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
4.1. Authentication Information in Advertise Messages
The Advertise message has the following authentication information
field.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Challenge(1) | Identifier | MSG_Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type(60) | Length | Challenge value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
MSG TYPE field is 1 (Challenge). The values of Identifier and
Challenge value are generated by the server. This authentication
information has an attribute, Type(60). The attribute Type 60 is
filled with the Challenge value.
4.2. Authentication Information in Request Messages
A Request message has the following authentication information field.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Response(2) | Identifier | MSG_Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type(1) | Length | User-Name@domain |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type(3) | Length | Response value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| DH-group(80) | Length | DH-group value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|KeyExchange(81)| Length | public key value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
MSG TYPE field is 2 (Response). Identifier is the same as the one
included in the Advertise message. This authentication information
has two attributes: Type (1) and Type (3). The attribute Type 1 is
filled with User-Name@domain, which the client has beforehand. The
attribute Type 3 is filled with Response value, which is calculated
by the client. The attribute Type 80 is filled with DH-group value.
The attribute Type 81 is filled with public key value generated by
the client, which uses to calculate secret key with the server.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
4.3. Authentication Information in Reply Messages corresponding to
Request Message
The server selects authentication information included in the Reply
message according to the authentication information received from the
AAA server. When the server receives the message of authentication
success, it sends a Reply message containing authentication
information with the MSG_TYPE field set to 3 (Success). The attribute
Type 80 is filled with DH-group value. The attribute Type 81 is
filled with public key value generated by the server, which uses to
calculate secret key by the client. Additionally, the message
includes other necessary information (DHCP realm, key ID, life time
of the key).
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Success | Identifier | MSG_Length (4[Octets]) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| DH-group(80) | Length | DH-group value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|KeyExchange(81)| Length | public key value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| DHCP realm(82)| Length | DHCP realm info |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| key ID(83) | Length | key identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| life time(84) | Length | Exchanged keyÆs life time |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
When the server receives the message of the authentication failure,
the server sends the Reply message with the MSG TYPE field set to 4
(Failure).
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Failure | Identifier | MSG_Length (4[Octets]) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The server that receives an authentication failure can be allowed to
send a Reply message that does not include other options.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
5. Client and Server Considerations
5.1. Client Considerations
The client announces its intention to use DHCPv6 authentication by
including an authentication option in its Solicit message.
5.1.1. Sending Solicit Messages
When the client demands to authenticate, a Solicit message includes
an authentication option with the desired protocol, algorithm, and
RDM. The client does not include any replay detection or
authentication information in the authentication option.
5.1.2. Receiving Advertise Messages
The client validates Advertise messages. If the Advertise messages
have a Challenge value in the authentication information field, the
client generates a Response value by applying MD5 to the data
connecting Identifier, the secret that the client has beforehand, and
the Challenge value.
5.1.3. Sending Request Messages
The client sends a Request message with User-Name as the user
identifier, Identifier, Response value, DH-group, and KeyExchange
attribute in the authentication information fields. A public key
value in KeyExchange attribute is calculated by the client using DH-
group which received in Advertise message.
5.1.4. Sending Confirm, Renew, Rebind, Decline or Release Messages
If the client received Reply messages before, it can send Confirm,
Renew, Decline or Release Messages with authentication information
using generated key. In this time, the client follows the sequence at
section 21.4.4.3 in RFC3315. It is different only to put put the
number of this authentication in the protocol field in the
Authentication option.
5.1.5. Sending Information-Request Messages
In this document, we support only stateful DHCP. Because, this
procedure assumes use to the situation which is disbursed the address
to the client, and managed by the server. The client follows the
sequence at section 21.4.4.3 in RFC3315 using the secret key which
the client gets in section 5.1.6. It is different only to put put the
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
number of this authentication in the protocol field in the
Authentication option.
5.1.6. Receiving Reply Messages
If the messages which client received include "Success" in
authentication information, the client draws the public key value in
KeyExchange Attribute. And the client calculates secret key by
Diffie-Hellman algorism.
5.1.1. Receiving Reconfigure Messages
The client follows the sequence at section 21.4.4.6 in RFC3315. It is
different only to put put the number of this authentication in the
protocol field in the Authentication option.
5.1.2. When the key life time is over
The client sends Solicit Message and start solicitation procedure to
exchange new secret key. It is different only to put put the number
of this authentication in the protocol field in the Authentication
option.
5.2. Server Considerations
5.2.1. Receiving Solicit Messages and Sending Advertise Messages
A server that receives a Solicit message with the protocol field set
to CHAP-based authentication procedure value generates a Challenge
value and Identifier. The server sends them with Advertise Messages.
The server MUST record the identifier related to the Challenge value
during the authentication procedure.
5.2.2. Receiving Request Messages and Sending Reply Messages
If the Request message includes authentication option which type is
set with CHAP Authentication, the receiving server chooses a
Challenge value related to the Identifier and sends the User-Name,
Identifier, Challenge value, and Response value to the AAA server.
After the server has received the authentication result from the AAA
server, it sends the client a Reply message containing the
authentication option, which includes success or failure in MSG TYPE
and KeyExchange attribute which include public key value generated by
the server and other information. And the server get secret key of
the client calculated by received public key value from the client.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
5.2.3. Receiving Confirm, Renew, Rebind, Decline or Release Messages
The client follows the sequence at section 21.4.5.2 in RFC3315. It
is different only to put put the number of this authentication in the
protocol field in the Authentication option.
5.2.4. Sending Reply Messages in Information-Request/Reply sequence
The client follows the sequence at section 21.4.5.2 in RFC3315. It
is different only to put put the number of this authentication in the
protocol field in the Authentication option.
6. Security Considerations
The CHAP-based authentication procedure gives the procedure for
authenticating the client. This protocol does not give the means of
server authentication, so it has a weakness in terms of clarifying
the server.
7. IANA Consideration
This document introduces a new authentication mechanism. The type
numbers for the protocol field in the authentication option are
currently TBD. An appropriate request will be made to IANA if this
Internet draft gets accepted as an RFC.
8. Informative Reference
[RFC3315] R. Dorms ed., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6
(DHCPv6)," July 2003.
[RFC1994] W. Simpson, "PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication
Protocol (CHAP)," August 1996.
Author's Addresses
Masazumi Ota, Mayumi Yanagiya
NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories
3-9-11 Midori-cho, Musashino-shi
Tokyo, Japan
Phone: 81-422-597629
Email: oota.masazumi@lab.ntt.co.jp
yanagiya.mayumi@lab.ntt.co.jp
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft CHAP based authentication for DHCPv6 June 2005
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Ota Expires December 30, 2005 [Page 13]
