Internet DRAFT - draft-hamnaberg-publish-link-relation

draft-hamnaberg-publish-link-relation







Network Working Group                                       E. Hamnaberg
Internet-Draft
Intended status: Informational                          January 17, 2014
Expires: July 21, 2014


                    The 'publish' Link Relation Type
                draft-hamnaberg-publish-link-relation-01

Abstract

   This memo defines a 'publish' link relation and provides a number of
   examples.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 21, 2014.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.






Hamnaberg                 Expires July 21, 2014                 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft      The 'publish' Link Relation Type        January 2014


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Notational Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.2.  Editorial Note (to be removed by RFC Editor)  . . . . . .   2
   2.  Publishing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  The 'publish' link relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Appendix A.  Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     A.1.  Publishing multiple resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6

1.  Introduction

   This specification outlines the "publish" link relation and what it
   means to publish something.  The specification will register the
   relation according to [RFC5988].

   No assumptions will be made about which media type the target IRI
   will accept, but some examples and guidelines will be given.

1.1.  Notational Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

1.2.  Editorial Note (to be removed by RFC Editor)

   Please discuss this draft on the apps-discuss@ietf.org mailing list.

2.  Publishing

   What does it mean to publish something?  In effect it can be
   interpreted as making something available for general consumption.

   A newspaper can publish an article, then it can be read by
   'everyone'.

   A publisher can publish a book, so it can be read.

   A video can be submitted to youtube so it can be watched.




Hamnaberg                 Expires July 21, 2014                 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft      The 'publish' Link Relation Type        January 2014


2.1.  The 'publish' link relation

   The "publish" link relation allows a resource to be published using
   the target IRI.

   Clients SHOULD use an appropriate write method of the target IRI
   protocol uniform interface.

   Servers MAY ignore the request to publish something if the resource
   URI is already published.

   Examples can be found in Appendix A

3.  IANA Considerations

   IANA is asked to register the link relation "publish", as per
   [RFC5988]

   Relation Name:

   publish

   Description:

   Allows resources to be published using the target IRI.

   Reference:

   [ this document ]

4.  Security Considerations

   TBD

5.  Acknowledgements

   Thanks to Jan Algermissen, Peter Rushforth and Darrel Miller for
   their valuable feedback and comments.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC5988]  Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 5988, October 2010.




Hamnaberg                 Expires July 21, 2014                 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft      The 'publish' Link Relation Type        January 2014


6.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2169]  Daniel, R., "A Trivial Convention for using HTTP in URN
              Resolution", RFC 2169, June 1997.

   [RFC5023]  Gregorio, J. and B. de hOra, "The Atom Publishing
              Protocol", RFC 5023, October 2007.

Appendix A.  Examples

   Let's say you have an atom feed like the one below








































Hamnaberg                 Expires July 21, 2014                 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft      The 'publish' Link Relation Type        January 2014


     <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
     <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
           xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">
       <title>Content feed</title>
       <updated>2005-07-31T12:29:29Z</updated>
       <id>tag:example.org,2003:3</id>
       <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"
           href="http://example.org/feed"/>
       <link rel="publish"
         href="http://example.org/publish"/>
       <entry>
         <title>Item 1</title>
         <link rel="edit"
            href="http://example.org/item/1"/>
         <id>urn:id:1</id>
         <app:control>
           <app:draft>yes</app:draft>
       <app:control>
         <updated>2012-05-04T12:00:29Z</updated>
         <author>
           <name>Erlend Hamnaberg</name>
         </author>
         <content type="text">
           Some Content here.
         </content>
       </entry>
       <entry>
         <title>Item 2</title>
         <link rel="edit"
            href="http://example.org/item/2"/>
         <id>urn:id:1</id>
         <app:control>
           <app:draft>yes</app:draft>
       <app:control>
         <updated>2012-05-04T12:29:29Z</updated>
         <author>
           <name>Erlend Hamnaberg</name>
         </author>
         <content type="text">
           Some Content here.
         </content>
       </entry>
     </feed>

   Using Atompub ([RFC5023]), a Client would have to GET each entry
   using it's "edit" relation and PUT each back with

     <app:draft>no</app:draft>



Hamnaberg                 Expires July 21, 2014                 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft      The 'publish' Link Relation Type        January 2014


   being the only change in both entries.

   This is highly inefficient.  So let us find a better way.

A.1.  Publishing multiple resources

   To be able to publish many resources at once we need a representation
   which allows this.

   Appendix A in [RFC2169] defines the "text/uri-list" media type.

   Extra linefeeds are for display purposes only.

     POST /publish
     Host: example.org
     Content-Type: text/uri-list

     http://example.org/item/1\r\n
     http://example.org/item/2\r\n

   The problem with this approach is that is is a separate resource, and
   will not invalidate the caches of the feed.  This problem is also
   apparent in the single item approach.

   One might mediate this by making the feed resource also accept "text/
   uri-list" for publishing.

   We could then change the request to this:

     POST /feed
     Host: example.org
     Content-Type: text/uri-list

     http://example.org/item/1\r\n
     http://example.org/item/2\r\n

Author's Address

   Erlend Hamnaberg

   Email: erlend@hamnaberg.net
   URI:   http://www.hamnis.org/









Hamnaberg                 Expires July 21, 2014                 [Page 6]