Internet DRAFT - draft-guo-roll-loop-free-dodag-repair

draft-guo-roll-loop-free-dodag-repair



 



ROLL                                                              J. Guo
Internet-Draft                                                  P. Orlik
Intended status: Standards Track                               G. Bhatti
Expires: October 5, 2013       Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories
                                                           April 3, 2013


                      Loop Free DODAG Local Repair
                draft-guo-roll-loop-free-dodag-repair-01

Abstract

   IETF has been developing IPv6 based standards for Low-power and Lossy
   Networks (LLNs) to meet requirements of constrained applications,
   such as field monitoring, inventory control and so on. IPv6 Routing
   Protocol for LLNs (RPL) has been published in [RFC6550]. Based on
   routing metrics and constraints [RFC6551], RPL builds Directed
   Acyclic Graph (DAG) topology to establish bidirectional routes for
   LLNs for traffic types of multipoint-to-point, point-to-multipoint,
   and point-to-point. RPL routes are optimized for traffic to or from
   one or more roots that act as sinks. As a result, a DAG is
   partitioned into one or more Destination Oriented DAGs (DODAGs), one
   DODAG per sink. RPL is widely considered as a feasible routing
   protocol for LLNs. However, DODAG loops caused by local DODAG repair
   mechanism is an issues to be addressed. This draft introduces a loop
   free local DODAG repair mechanism. This draft also introduces a
   piggybacked data option for transferring delay sensitive data during
   route repair process. The piggybacked data can be included in DODAG
   Repair Request (DRQ) message or DODAG Information Solicitation (DIS)
   message.    


















 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 4, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

















 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


Table of Contents

   1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   2. Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   3. ICMPv6 RPL Control Message Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
      3.1. DODAG Repair Request (DRQ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
           3.1.1. Format of the DRQ Base Object  . . . . . . . . . . . 6
           3.1.2. Secure DRQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
           3.1.3. DRQ Options  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
      3.2. DODAG Repair Reply (DRP). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
           3.2.1. Format of the DRP Base Object  . . . . . . . . . . . 8
           3.2.2. Secure DRP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
           3.2.3. DRP Options  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
      3.3. Format of the Path Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
   4. DODAG Local Repair  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
      4.1. DODAG Local Repair in Storing Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
           4.1.1. DRQ Message Processing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
           4.1.2. DRP Message Processing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
      4.2. DODAG Local Repair in Non-Storing Mode . . . . . . . . . . 13
          4.2.1. DRQ Message Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
          4.2.2. DRP Message Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
   5. DIS Message with Piggybacked Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
      5.1. Format of the Modified DIS Base Object . . . . . . . . . . 17
      5.2. Modified DIS Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
      5.3. Process of the Modified DIS message  . . . . . . . . . . . 17
   6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
   7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
   8. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
      8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
      8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

















 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


1.  Introduction

   Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) are a class of networks in which
   nodes and their communication links are constrained. LLN nodes
   typically operate with constrains on processing power, physical size,
   memory, power consumption, lifetime, and rate of activity. Their
   communication links are characterized by high loss rate, low data
   rate, instability, low transmission power, and short transmission
   range. There can be from a few dozen up to thousands of nodes within
   a LLN. Routing in LLNs is different from routing in mobile ad-hoc
   networks. IETF has developed an IPv6 Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL)
   in [RFC6550]. RPL supports multipoint-to-point traffic and point-to-
   multipoint traffic. The support for point-to-point traffic is also
   available.

   RPL builds Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) topology, which is
   partitioned into one or more Destination Oriented  DAGs (DODAGs).
   DODAG is basic logical structure in RPL. RPL nodes construct and
   maintain DODAG through the DODAG Information Object (DIO) message
   which is transmitted via link-local multicasting by using the Trickle
   timer [RFC6206]. The sink in a DODAG is called the DODAG root. RPL
   defines rules to transmit the DIO messages within a DODAG. The DODAG
   root configures the DODAG parameters including RPLInstanceID,
   DODAGVersionNumber, DODAGID, Rank, etc. and advertises the DODAG
   parameters in the DIO messages. To join a DODAG, a node selects a set
   of DODAG parents, on the routes towards the DODAG root, and a
   preferred DODAG parent as the preferred next hop node for upward
   traffic. Once a node joins a DODAG, it transmits DIO messages to
   advertise the DODAG parameters.

   The traffic inside a LLN flows along the edges of the DODAG, either
   upward or downward. In RPL, upward routes, having the DODAG root as
   destination, are provided by the DODAG construction mechanism using
   DIO messages. Downward routes, from the DODAG root to any other
   destination, are provided by these destinations transmitting the
   Destination Advertisement Object (DAO) messages. 

   Three different modes of operation (MOP) for downward routes are
   specified in [RFC6550]:

     1) No downward routes maintained by RPL.
     2) Storing mode of operation in which each router stores downward
      routing tables for its sub-DODAG. In Storing mode, the DAO message
      is sent to DAO parents. A node unicasts the DAO messages to the
      selected parent(s). Transmission of the DAO messages propagates
      from the nodes towards the DODAG root, where each intermediate
      router adds its downward routing stack to the DAO messages. In
      Storing mode, downward traffic is sent by using the downward
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


      routing tables.
     3) Non-Storing mode of operation in which only the DODAG root
      stores routes to all nodes in the network. In Non-Storing mode,
      the DAO message is sent to the DODAG root. A node unicasts the DAO
      messages to the DODAG root, which then calculates routes to all
      destinations by piecing together the information collected from
      the DAO messages. In Non-Storing mode, downward traffic is sent by
      way of source routing.

   An RPL node may act as a leaf node or as a router. RPL defines
   operation rules for both leaf node and router in [RFC6550]. For
   example, a leaf node does not extend DODAG connectivity. An RPL
   router needs to implement Trickle [RFC6206]. An RPL router
   implementation needs to support the MOP in use by the DODAG, that is,
   support for upward routes only or support for upward routes and
   downward routes in Storing mode or support for upward routes and
   downward routes in Non-Storing mode.  

   RPL has been implemented and tested. It has been shown that DODAG
   loops occur quite often [83rd IETF Meeting Presentation]. The cause
   of DODAG loops comes from rank increase by DODAG local repair
   mechanism. This draft introduces a method for repairing DODAG locally
   without causing any DODAG loops. The DODAG local repair method
   applies to both Storing and Non-Storing modes of operation in RPL.

2.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

   Additionally, this draft employs terminologies defined in [RFC6550],
   and extends following terminologies:

   DIO: DODAG Information Object in which the rank is represented by two
         integers.

   Up: Up refers to the direction from leaf node or router node towards
         the DODAG root.

   Down: Down refers to the direction from the DODAG root towards leaf
         node or router node.

   This draft introduces the following new terminologies:

   DRQ: DODAG Repair Request

   DRP: DODAG Repair Reply
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   Rank_DRQ: The rank of the node generating the DRQ message.

   Rank_DRP: The rank of the node transmitting the DRP message.

   DRQID: IPv6 address of the node generating DRQ message.

   DRSN: Sequence number of the DRQ message of the node generating DRQ
         message.

3.  ICMPv6 RPL Control Message Extension

         This draft uses RPL control messages defined in in Figure 6 and
         Figure 7 of [RFC6550]. In addition, to repair DODAG locally,
         two new RPL control messages, DODAG Repair Request (DRQ)
         message and DODAG Repair Reply (DRP) message, are introduced.
         The code field for the DRQ and DRP messages needs to be
         assigned by IANA. The message base for DRQ and DRP are defined
         as follows.

3.1.  DODAG Repair Request (DRQ)

         The DRQ message is used by a node to repair a DODAG locally if
         a parent becomes unreachable. A node may also use the DRQ
         message to discover additional parents if it is necessary.

3.1.1.  Format of the DRQ Base Object

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | RPLInstanceID |Version Number |             RankQ             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |      DRSN     |   HC  |   MH  |P|         Reserved            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +                            DODAGID                            +
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +                             DRQID                             +
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Option(s)...
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                      Figure 1: The DRQ Base Object

   RPLInstanceID: 8-bit unsigned field as described in [RFC6550] to
         indicate which RPL Instance the DODAG is a part.

   Version Number: 8-bit unsigned integer as described in [RFC6550] to
         indicate the DODAGVersionNumber.

   RankQ: 16-bit unsigned integer indicating rank of the node generating
         the DRQ message.

   DRSN: 8-bit field indicating sequence number of the DRQ message at
         the node generating the DRQ message.

   HC: 4-bit field to indicate the number of hops traveled by a DRQ
         message.

   MH: 4-bit field to indicate the maximum number of hops a DRQ message
         can travel. If a DRQ message reaches the maximum number of
         hops, it must be ignored.

   P: 1-bit flag to indicate if the sender has included the piggybacked
         data.  If P = 1, piggybacked data is present and a receiver MAY
         consider to forward piggybacked data towards the DODAG root. If
         P = 0, piggybacked is not present. A node sets P flag to 1 only
         if its parent set is empty and it has a delay sensitive packet
         to transmit. For example, if a building monitoring sensor
         detects fire, it must send a notification as soon as possible.

   Reserved: 15 bits of the DRQ Base are reserved.  They must be set to
         zero on transmission and must be ignored on reception.

   DODAGID: 128-bit field as defined in [RFC6550]. A DODAGID is the
         identifier of a DODAG root. The DODAGID is unique within the
         scope of a RPL Instance in the LLN. The DODAGID must be a
         routable IPv6 address belonging to the DODAG root.

   DRQID: 128-bit IPv6 address of the node generating the DRQ message.

3.1.2.  Secure DRQ

   A Secure DRQ message follows the format in Figure 7 of [RFC6550],
   where the base format is the DRQ message shown in Figure 1.
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 7]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


3.1.3.  DRQ Options

   The DRQ message may carry valid options.

   This draft allows for the DRQ message to carry the following options:

      0x00 Pad1
      0x01 PadN
      Path: This option field is present only if MOP is Non-Storing. The
      Path field contains IPv6 addresses of traversed nodes by the DRQ
      message along the path. 
      PiggyData: This option field is present only if flag P = 1.
      PiggyData field contains data to be forward to the root.. 

3.2.  DODAG Repair Reply (DRP)

      Upon receiving a DRQ message, a router with lower rank and non-
      empty DODAG parent set may generate a DRP message in responding to
      a received DRQ message.

3.2.1.  Format of the DRP Base Object

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | RPLInstanceID |Version Number |             RankQ             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |              RankP            |      DRSN     |   Reserved    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +                            DODAGID                            +
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +                             DRPID                             +
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Option(s)...
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 8]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


                      Figure 2: The DRP Base Object

   RPLInstanceID: 8-bit unsigned field as described in [RFC6550] to
         indicate which RPL Instance the DODAG is a part.

   Version Number: 8-bit unsigned integer as described in [RFC6550] to
         indicate the DODAGVersionNumber.

   RankQ: 16-bit unsigned integer indicating rank of the node generating
         the DRQ message.

   RankP: 16-bit unsigned integer indicating rank of the node
         transmitting the DRP message.

   DRSN: 8-bit field indicating the sequence number of DRQ message at
         the node generating the DRQ message.

   Reserved: 8 bits of the DRP Base are reserved. They must be set to
         zero on transmission and must be ignored on reception.

   DODAGID: 128-bit field as defined in [RFC6550]. A DODAGID is the
         identifier of a DODAG root. The DODAGID is unique within the
         scope of a RPL Instance in the LLN. The DODAGID MUST be a
         routable IPv6 address belonging to the DODAG root.

   DRPID: 128-bit IPv6 address of the node that is destination of the
         DRP message.

3.2.2.  Secure DRP

   A Secure DRP message follows the format in Figure 7 of [RFC6550],
   where the base format is the DRP message shown in Figure 2.

3.2.3.  DRP Options

   The DRP message may carry valid options.

   This draft allows for the DRP message to carry the following options:

      0x00 Pad1
      0x01 PadN
      Path: This option is present only if MOP is Non-Storing. The Path
      field contains IPv6 addresses of traversed nodes by the DRQ
      message along the path.

3.3.  RPL Control Message Options

   The formats of option Pad1 and PadN are described in Figure 20 and
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                 [Page 9]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   Figure 21 of [RFC6550], respectively.

   The format of the Path option is as follows:

        0                   1                   2
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - -
       |  Option Type  | Option Length | Path Data
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - -

                   Figure 3: Format of the Path Option

   Option Type: 8-bit identifier of the type of option. The Option Type
         value needs to be assigned by IANA.

   Option Length: 8-bit unsigned integer, representing the length in
         octets of the option Path Data field, not including the Option
         Type and Option Length fields.

   Path Data: A variable length field that contains a list of IPv6
         addresses.

   The format of the PiggyData option is as follows:

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Option Type  | Option Length | RPLInstanceID |Version Number |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +                            DODAGID                            +
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +                            SourceID                           +
       |                                                               |
       +                                                               +
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Payload
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 10]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


                   Figure 4: Format of the PiggyData Option

   Option Type: 8-bit identifier of the type of option. The Option Type
         value needs to be assigned by IANA.

   Option Length: 8-bit unsigned integer, representing the length in
         octets of the option PiggyData field, not including the Option
         Type and Option Length fields.

   RPLInstanceID, Version Number and DODAGID are described in RFC 6550.
         SourceID is same as DRQID.

   PiggyData: A variable length field that contains payload of
         piggybacked data.

4.  Loop Free DODAG Local Repair

   In RPL, the rank plays very important role in the DODAG construction
   and maintenance. The rank of a node defines a position of the node
   relative to other nodes with respect to the DODAG root. Each node
   maintains its own rank. The DODAG root has the lowest rank. Nodes
   maintain their ranks based on parent-child relationship such that a
   child must have a rank strictly greater than ranks of all its DODAG
   parents. The DODAG root has no parent. The acyclic structure of the
   DODAG is guaranteed as long as the rank of any node is strictly
   greater than ranks of its DODAG parents. It is safe for a node to
   decrease its rank, as long as its rank remains greater than the ranks
   of its DODAG parents. However, rank increase can cause DODAG loops. 

   The DODAG local repair methods provided in this draft does not
   increase the rank, and therefore, is loop free.

   When a DODAG parent becomes unreachable, a node may switch to another
   DODAG parent for upward traffic. DODAG may be locally repaired by the
   node transmitting a DRQ message. The DRQ message is transmitted by
   the DRQ message generator via link-local multicasting to all-RPL-
   nodes.

   Upon receiving a DRQ message, a link-local neighboring router which
   is not the DODAG root discards the DRQ message if it does not have
   any DODAG parent. If the link-local neighboring router is the DODAG
   root, it accepts the DRQ message and generates a DRP message. If the
   link-local neighboring router is not the DODAG root and has a non-
   empty DODAG parent set and its rank is lower than RankQ, it accepts
   the DRQ message and generates a DRP message. If the link-local
   neighboring router is not the DODAG root and has a non-empty DODAG
   parent set and its rank is greater than or equal to RankQ, it
   forwards the DRQ message to its preferred DODAG parent. This
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 11]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   forwarding process continues until the DRQ message is discarded by a
   router that has an empty DODAG parent set or the DRQ message reaches
   a node which is either the DODAG root or a router that has a non-
   empty DODAG parent set and a rank lower than RankQ, a DRP message is
   then generated.  

   The DRP message is unicasted. In Storing mode, the DRP message
   generator transmits the DRP message to the DRQ message generator by
   using a downward routing table. In Non-Storing mode, the DRP message
   generator transmits the DRP message to the DRQ message generator by
   way of source routing via the Path option.

4.1.  DODAG Local Repair in Storing Mode

   In Storing mode, if a DODAG parent becomes unreachable, a node
   removes that DODAG parent from its DODAG parent set. 

   If the updated DODAG parent set becomes empty, the node shall
   transmit a DRQ message to discover new DODAG parents. 

   If the updated DODAG parent set is not empty, the node checks if the
   removed DODAG parent is its preferred DODAG parent. If yes, the node
   shall select a new preferred DODAG parent. Whether or not the removed
   DODAG parent is the preferred DODAG parent, the node may transmit a
   DRQ message to discover additional parents. The node may also
   schedule a No-Path DAO message transmission if the removed DODAG
   parent is its DAO parent. 

   To transmit a DRQ message in Storing mode, the node generates a DRQ
   message. It sets RPLInstanceID, DODAGVersionNumber and DODAGID by
   using the maintained DODAG parameters. It sets RankQ to its rank. The
   node increases its DRSN by 1 and sets HC = 0, and MH to an
   appropriate value. There is no Path option field in Storing mode.

4.1.1.  DRQ Message Processing

   When a router receives a DRQ message, it discards the DRQ message if
   its DODAG parent set is empty. Otherwise, the router performs the
   following filtering process and discards the DRQ message if any of
   following conditions is true: 

      i) RPLInstanceID or DODAGVersionNumber or DODAGID in the DRQ
      message is not equal to the respective value maintained by the
      router.
      ii) The DRQ message was received already by comparing DRQID and
      DRSN.
      iii) HC is equal to MH.
      iv) The DRQ message is transmitted by router's DODAG parent.
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 12]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


      v) The DRQ message is generated by router itself or by its DODAG
      parent.

   If the DRQ message passes filtering process, the receiving router
   processes the DRQ message further.

   If the receiving router is the DODAG root, it accepts the DRQ message
   and generates a DRP message. To generate a DRP message, the DODAG
   root copies RPLInstanceID, DODAGVersionNumber, DRSN, and DODAGID from
   the DRQ message. It sets DRPID to DRQID, RankQ to the RankQ in DRQ
   message, and RankP to its rank. The DODAG root forwards the DRP
   message to the node from which it received the DRQ message. 

   If the receiving router is not the DODAG root and its rank is lower
   than RankQ, the router accepts the DRQ message and generates a DRP
   message as the root does. The router forwards the DRP message to the
   node from which it received the DRQ message.

   If the receiving router is not the DODAG root and its rank is greater
   than or equal to RankQ, it adds a route entry to node DRQID into its
   downward routing table, increases value of HC field by 1 and forwards
   the DRQ message to its preferred DODAG parent.

   If P = 1 and the receiver is the DODAG root, the root processes
   piggybacked data. The root MAY also mark downward routes to sender as
   invalid and waits for new DAO messages to reestablish downward
   routes.

   If P = 1 and the receiver is not the DODAG root, besides generating
   DRP message, the receiver MAY forward the piggybacked data to its
   parent.

4.1.2.  DRP Message Processing

   When a node receives a DRP message, it first performs filtering
   process and discards the DRP message if any of following conditions
   is true: 

      i) RPLInstanceID or DODAGVersionNumber or DODAGID in the DRP
      message is not equal to the respective value maintained by the
      receiving node. 
      ii) The DRP message was received already by comparing DRPID and
      DRSN.
      iii) The receiving node is leaf node and is not the DRQ message
      generator.

   If DRP message passes filtering process, the receiving node processes
   the DRP message further.
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 13]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   The receiving node can be a leaf node or a router.

   If the receiving node is the DRQ message generator and the DRP
   message sender is not in its DODAG parent set, it may add the DRP
   message sender into its DODAG parent set and select a new preferred
   DODAG parent. The receiving node may schedule a DAO message
   transmission if the DRP message sender is added into its DAO parent
   set.

   If the receiving node is not the DRQ message generator, it must be a
   router. If the receiving router has no route entry to node DRPID in
   its downward routing table, it discards the DRP message. 

   If the receiving router has a downward route entry to node DRPID and
   its rank is greater than or equal to RankQ, it checks if it can
   decrease its rank such that RankQ > its rank > RankP. If not, the
   receiving router discards the DRP message. If yes, the receiving
   router decreases its rank to an appropriate value and may add the DRP
   message sender into its DODAG parent set if the sender is not in its
   DODAG parent set. The receiving router updates its DODAG parent set
   caused by its rank decrease, that is, removing DODAG parents whose
   ranks are greater than or equal to its new rank. If its preferred
   DODAG parent is removed, it selects a new preferred DODAG parent. The
   receiving router then updates the RankP of the DRP message to its
   rank, and forwards the DRP message to next hop node on the downward
   route. It may schedule a No-Path DAO message transmission if any of
   its DAO parents is removed due to its rank decrease or the DRP sender
   was added into its DAO parent set.

   If the receiving router has a downward route entry to node DRPID and
   its rank is lower than RankQ, it updates the RankP field of the DRP
   message to its rank, and forwards the DRP message to next hop node on
   the downward route. 

   The rank of receiving router is less than RankQ if the receiving
   router is on multiple DODAG repair downward routes. When the
   receiving router receives a DRP message, it may decrease its rank.
   Therefore, subsequent DRP messages may carry a RankQ greater than or
   equal to the rank of receiving router. If the receiving router is
   only on a single DODAG repair downward route, its rank must be
   greater than or equal to RankQ based on the DRQ message process
   procedure.

4.2.  DODAG Local Repair in Non-Storing Mode

   The handling of unreachable parent in Non-Storing mode is similar to
   that in Storing mode. However, there are two differences. The first
   difference is that after removing a DAO parent from its DAO parent
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 14]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   set, if its DODAG parent set is not empty, a node may schedule a DAO
   message transmission instead of the No-Path DAO message transmission.
   The second difference is that to generate a DRQ message in Non-
   Storing mode, a node adds a Path option field by inserting its IPv6
   address into the Path option field.

4.2.1.  DRQ Message Processing

   When a router receives a DRQ message, it performs same filtering
   process as that in Storing mode. If the DRQ message passes filtering
   process, the receiving router processes the DRQ message further.

   If the receiving router is the DODAG root, it accepts the DRQ message
   and generates a DRP message similarly as in Storing mode. In
   addition, the DODAG root adds a Path option in DRP message and copies
   Path option field from DRQ message to Path option field of DRP
   message. The DODAG root transmits the DRP message to destination node
   DRPID along the route specified by the Path option, and on the
   downward route, intermediate routers obtain route information from
   the Path option field of DRP message.

   If the receiving router is not the DODAG root and its rank is lower
   than Rank_DRQ, it accepts the DRQ message and generates a DRP message
   as the DODAG root does. It then transmits the DRP message to
   destination node DRPID along the route specified by the Path option.

   If the receiving router is not the DODAG root and its rank is greater
   than or equal to RankQ, it updates the DRQ message by inserting its
   own IPv6 address into the Path option field, increasing the value of
   HC field by 1 and forwards the DRQ message to its preferred DODAG
   parent.

   If P = 1 and the receiver is the DODAG root, the DODAG root processes
   piggybacked data. The DODAG root MAY also mark downward routes to
   node REQID as invalid and waits for new DAO messages to reestablish
   downward routes. 

   If P = 1 and the receiver is not the DODAG root, besides generating
   the DRP message, the receiver MAY forward the piggybacked data to its
   parent.

4.2.2.  DRP Message Processing

   When a node receives a DRP message, it performs the same filtering
   process as in Storing mode. If the DRP message passes filtering
   process, the receiving node processes the DRP message further.

   The receiving node can be a leaf node or a router.
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 15]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   If the receiving node is the DRQ message generator and the DRP
   message sender is not in its DODAG parent set, it may add the DRP
   message sender into its DODAG parent set. The receiving node may
   select a new preferred DODAG parent. It may also schedule a DAO
   message transmission if the DRP message sender is added into its DAO
   parent set. 

   If the receiving node is not DRQ message generator, it must be a
   router. If the receiving router is not on the route specified by Path
   option, it discards the DRP message. 

   If the receiving router is on the route specified by Path option and
   its rank is greater than or equal to RankQ, the receiving router
   checks if it can decrease its rank such that RankQ > its rank >
   RankP. If no, the receiving node discards the DRP message. If yes,
   the receiving node decreases its rank to an appropriate value and may
   add the DRP message sender into its DODAG parent set if the sender is
   not in its DODAG parent set. The receiving router updates its DODAG
   parent set by removing any DODAG parent whose rank is greater than or
   equal to its new rank. If its preferred DODAG parent is removed, it
   selects a new preferred DODAG parent. The receiving router updates
   the RankP of DRP message to its new rank, and forwards the DRP
   message to the destination node DRPID by obtaining next hop node via
   the Path option field. Furthermore, the receiving router may schedule
   a DAO message transmission if any of its DAO parents was removed due
   to its rank decrease or the DRP sender was added into its DAO parent
   set.

   If the receiving router is on the route specified by Path option and
   its rank is lower than RankQ, the receiving router updates the RankP
   to its rank, and forwards the DRP message to destination node DRPID
   by obtaining next hop node via Path option.

   The rank of receiving router is less than RankQ if the receiving
   router is on multiple DODAG repair downward routes. When the
   receiving router receives a DRP message, it may decrease its rank.
   Therefore, subsequent DRP messages may carry a RankQ greater than or
   equal to the rank of receiving router. If the receiving router is
   only on a single DODAG repair downward route, its rank must be
   greater than or equal to RankQ based on the DRQ message process
   procedure.


5.  DIS Message with Piggybacked Data

   For some delay sensitive applications, data must be sent to data sink
   as soon as possible. For example, if a building monitoring sensor
   detects fire, it must send the alert message to system controller
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 16]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   without delay since in this case, any delay could be costly. 

   If a node has a delay sensitive dada and an empty parent set, it MAY
   piggyback data into the DIS message. To accomplish this, a modified
   DIS message is proposed.

5.1 Format of the Modified DIS Base Object

        0                   1                   2
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - -
       |P|    Flags    |   Reserved    | Option(s) ...
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - -

                   Figure 5: Modified Format of the DIS Base Object

   P: 1-bit flag to indicate if sender has included a piggybacked data
         option. If P = 1, piggybacked data is present, and the receiver
         MAY consider to forward piggybacked data towards the DODAG
         root. If P = 0, piggybacked is not present. A sender sets P
         flag to 1 only if its parent set is empty and it has a delay
         sensitive data to transmit.

   Flags: 7-bit unused filed reserved for flags. The filed MUST be
         initialized to zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the
         receiver.

   8-bit Reserved filed and Option(s) field are same as described in RFC
         6550.

5.2 Modified DIS Options

   Besides options specified in RFC 6550, the DIS message MAY carry
   PiggyData option as shown in Figure 4. However, this option is
   present only if flag P = 1.

5.3 Process of the Modified DIS Message

   If flag P = 0, the process of the DIS message is same as specified in
   RFC 6550. If flag P = 1, the receiver MAY perform extra process. If
   receiver is the DODAG root, the root processes piggybacked data. The
   root MAY also mark downward routes to node REQID as invalid and waits
   for new DAO messages to reestablish downward routes. If the receiver
   is not the DODAG root and sender is not its parent, it MAY forward
   the piggybacked data to its parent.

6.  Security Considerations

 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 17]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


   This draft introduces an alternative rank computation method and a
   DODAG local repair mechanism. In general, the security considerations
   for the DODAG construction and maintenance are similar to the ones
   for the operation of RPL as described in Section 19 of [RFC6550].
   Section 10 of RPL specification [RFC6550] describes a variety of
   security mechanisms that provide data confidentiality,
   authentication, replay protection and delay protection services. Each
   RPL control message has a secure version that allows the
   specification of the level of security and the algorithms used to
   secure the message. New RPL control messages (DRQ and DRP) defined in
   this draft have secure versions as well.

7.  IANA Considerations

   This draft defines two new RPL Control Messages types and a new RPL
   Control Message Option.

   Code field for the DODAG Repair Request (DRQ) message needs to be
   assigned by IANA.

   Code field for the DODAG Repair Reply (DRP) message needs to be
   assigned by IANA.

   Option Type field for Path option field needs to be assigned by IANA.


8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4443]  Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, "Internet Control
              Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol
              Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 4443, March 2006.

   [RFC6550]  Winter, T., Thubert, P., Brandt, A., Hui, J., Kelsey, R.,
              Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur, JP., and R.
              Alexander, "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and  
               Lossy Networks", RFC 6550, March 2012.

   [RFC6206]  Levis, P., Clausen, T., Hui, J., Gnawali, O., Ko, J., "The
              Trickle Algorithm", RFC 6206, March 2011.

   [RFC6551]  Vasseur, JP., Kim, M., Pister, K., Dejean, N., and D.
              Barthel, "Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in
              Low-Power and Lossy Networks", RFC 6551, March 2012.
 


Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 18]

Internet-Draft           Loop Free DODAG Repair            April 3, 2013


8.2.  Informative References

   [83rd IETF Meeting Presentation]  Clausen, T., Yi, J., Colin de
              Verdiere, A., Herberg, U., "Experiences with RPL: IPv6
              Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks", Paris,
              France, March 2012.


Authors' Addresses

   Jianlin Guo
   Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories
   201 Broadway
   Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
   USA

   Phone: +1 617 621 7541
   Email: guo@merl.com


   Philip Orlik
   Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories
   201 Broadway
   Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
   USA

   Phone: +1 617 621 7570
   Email: porlik@merl.com

   Ghulam Bhatti
   Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories
   201 Broadway
   Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
   USA

   Phone: +1 617 621 7513
   Email: gbhatti@merl.com














Guo, et al.             Expires October 5, 2013                [Page 19]