Application-Layer Traffic Optimization Working Group Q. Wu
Internet-Draft L. Xia
Intended status: Standards Track Huawei
Expires: January 09, 2014 July 08, 2013

JSON Format Extensions for Traffic Engineering (TE) performance metrics in the ALTO Information Resource Directory
draft-wu-alto-json-te-00

Abstract

The base ALTO specification defines two properties for cost metric attribute in the Cost MAP, including 'hopcount' and 'routingcost'. This specification adds five new properties and one new parameter for Traffic Engineering(TE) performance related constraint attribute associated with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' in the ALTO Information Resource Directory: Link Delay, Delay Variation, Packet Loss, Residual Bandwidth, Available Bandwidth,linkstate.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on January 09, 2014.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The ALTO protocol [I.D-ietf-alto-protocol] uses a REST-ful design [Fielding-Thesis], and encodes its requests and responses using JSON. In ALTO architecture [I.D-ietf-alto-protocol], the ALTO server allows alto information to be gathered from multiple systems(e.g., routing protocol). [I.D-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions] describes extensions to OSPF TE called "OSPF TE Metric Extensions", that can be used to distribute network performance information (such as link delay, delay variation, packet loss, residual bandwidth, and available bandwidth). The mechanism defined in [I.D-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions]can be used by an ALTO Server to retrieve the necessary performance information supplementing the prefix and network topology data gathered from other sources in the underlying network.

In the ALTO Information Resource Directory, Network and Cost Map are two core ALTO Information provided to clients. The TE performance metric can be represented using Cost MAP. The base ALTO specification [I.D-ietf- alto-protocol] defines one typical cost metric attribute for Cost Type in the Cost MAP (i.e.,'routingcost')and uses constraint attribute to list additional constraints to which elements of the Cost Map are related. This specification adds five new properties and one new parameter for constraint attribute associated with 'routingcost' cost metric attribute in alto information service: Link Delay, Link Jitter, Packet Loss, Residual Bandwidth, Available Bandwidth,linkstate.

2. Conventions used in this document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [RFC2119].

Syntax specifications shown here use the augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) as described in [RFC5234], and are specified as in the base JSON specification [RFC4627].

3. Cost Metric Extensions: properties

3.1. property: linkdelay

Namespace:

property name:  linkdelay

Purpose:  To specify the average link delay between two directly
           connected neighboring peers in the network.

Value type:  A single number value containing an integer component that
              may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may
              be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part.

Cardinality:  *1

Member parameters:  N/A

Description: This is intended to be a cost constraint attribute used 
together with cost metric attribute ‘routingcost’. ‘routingcost’ may
also be used with other cost constraint attributes that is used to 
specify cost constraints. If ‘linkdelay’ is present, ‘routingcost’ MUST
have at most one ‘linkdelay’. 

Format definition:

  LINKDELAY-param = 
"VALUE”(“gt”/“lt"/”eq”/”ge”/”le”) ("number" / "object")
  LINKDELAY-value =  number / object
     ; Value type and VALUE parameter MUST match.

Examples:
   "data": {
           “cost type”: {
            "cost-mode": "numerical",
            "cost-metric":"routingcost"},
               "constraints" : {"linkdelay"},
               “endpoints”: {
                   "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ],
                   "dsts": [
                   "ipv4:192.0.2.89",
                   "ipv4:198.51.100.34",
                   "ipv4:203.0.113.45"
                            ]
                               }
             }
   "map": {
           "ipv4:192.0.2.2": {
           "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0.0[linkdelay eq 0.0],
           "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 15.0[linkdelay eq 3.0],
           "ipv4:203.0.113.45": 1.0[linkdelay eq 12.0],
                 }
             }

3.2. property: linkjitter

Namespace:

Property name:  linkjitter

Purpose:  To specify the average link delay variation between two
           directly connected neighboring peers.

Value type:  A single number value containing an integer component that
              may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may
              be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part.

Cardinality:  *1

Member parameters:  N/A

Description: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value 
used together with ‘routingcost’ cost metric attribute. 
routingcost’ may also be used with other cost constraint a
ttributes that is used to specify cost constraints.If ‘linkjitter’ 
is present, ‘routingcost’ MUST have at most one ‘linkjitter’. 


Format definition:

  LINKJITTER-param = 
  "VALUE”(“gt”/“lt"/”eq”/”ge”/”le”) ("number" / "object")
  LINKJITTER-value =  number / object
     ; Value type and VALUE parameter MUST match.

Examples:

   "data": {
              “cost type”: {
            "cost-mode": "numerical",
            "cost-metric":"routingcost"},
               "constraints" : {"linkdelay",”linkjitter”}
               “endpoints”: {
                   "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ],
                   "dsts": [
                   "ipv4:192.0.2.89",
                   "ipv4:198.51.100.34",
                   "ipv4:203.0.113.45"
                            ]
                              }
            }
   "map": {
            "ipv4:192.0.2.2": {
            "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0[linkdelay eq0.0,linkjitter eq0.00],
            "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 5[linkdelay eq3.0,linkjitter eq1.0],
            "ipv4:203.0.113.45":2[linkdelay eq12.0,linkjitter eq5.0],
                                  }
          }

3.3. property: linkloss

Namespace:

Property name:  linkloss

Purpose:  To specify a percentage of the total traffic sent over a
          configurable interval between two directly connected
          neighboring peers.

Value type:  A single number value containing an integer component that
             may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may
             be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part.

Cardinality:  *1

Format definition: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value
 used together with ‘routingcost’ cost metric attribute. 
routingcost’ may also be used with other cost constraint attributes t
hat is used to specify cost constraints. If ‘linkloss’ is present, 
routingcost’ MUST have at most one ‘linkloss’. 

Format definition:

   LINKLOSS-param = 
"VALUE”(“gt”/“lt"/”eq”/”ge”/”le”) ("number" / "object")
   LINKLOSS-value =  number / object
     ; Value type and VALUE parameter MUST match.

Examples:

   "data": {
              “cost type”: {
            "cost-mode": "numerical",
            "cost-metric":"routingcost"},
               "constraints" : {"linkloss"}
               “endpoints”: {
                   "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ],
                   "dsts": [
                   "ipv4:192.0.2.89",
                   "ipv4:198.51.100.34",
                   "ipv4:203.0.113.45"
                            ]
                                   }
           }
  "map": {
          "ipv4:192.0.2.2": {
          "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0 [linkloss eq0],
          "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 1 [linkloss eq0.0001],
          "ipv4:203.0.113.45": 0 [linkloss eq0],
                            }
            }

3.4. property: residualbandwidth

Namespace:

Property name:  residualbandwith

Purpose:  To specify Maximum Link Bandwidth minus the bandwidth
          currently allocated between two directly connected
          neighboring peers. For a link, residual bandwidth is
          defined to be Maximum Bandwidth minus the bandwidth
          currently allocated to RSVP-TE packets.  For a bundled
          link, residual bandwidth is defined to be the sum of
          the component link residual bandwidths.

Value type:  A single number value containing an integer component that
             may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may
             be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part.

Cardinality:  *1

Member parameters:  N/A

Description: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value
 used together with ‘routing cost’ cost metric attribute. 
‘routingcost’ may also be used with other cost constraint at
tributes that is used to specify cost constraints.If 
‘residualbw’ is present, ‘routingcost’ MUST have at most
 one ‘residualbw’. 

Format definition:

  RESIDUALBANDWIDTH-param = 
 "VALUE”(“gt”/“lt"/”eq”/”ge”/”le”) ("number" / "object")
  RESIDUALBANDWIDTH-value =  number / object
    ; Value type and VALUE parameter MUST match.

Examples:

   "data": {
              “cost type”: {
            "cost-mode": "numerical",
            "cost-metric":"routingcost"},
               "constraints" : {"residbw"}
               “endpoints”: {
                   "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ],
                   "dsts": [
                   "ipv4:192.0.2.89",
                   "ipv4:198.51.100.34",
                   "ipv4:203.0.113.45"
                            ]
                                   }
           }
   "map": {
           "ipv4:192.0.2.2": {
           "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0[residbw eq0.000000],
           "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 5[residbw eq12.5],
           "ipv4:203.0.113.45":2[residbw eq5.9],
                             }
            }

3.5. property: availablebandwidth

Namespace:

Property name:  availablebandwith

Purpose:  To specify the available bandwidth on a link between two
          directly connected neighboring peers. For a link, available
          bandwidth is defined to be residual bandwidth  minus the
          measured bandwidth used for the actual forwarding of non-
          RSVP-TE packets.  For a bundled link, available bandwidth
          is defined to be the sum of the component link available
          bandwidths.

Value type:  A single number value containing an integer component that
             may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may
             be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part.

Cardinality:  *1

Member parameters:  N/A

Description: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value 
used together with ‘routing cost’ cost metric attribute. 
‘routingcost’ may also be used with other cost constraint at
tributes that is used to specify cost constraints.
If ‘availablebw’ is present, ‘routingcost’ MUST have
 at most one ‘availablebw’. 

Format definition:

  AVAILABLEBANDWITH-param = 
 "VALUE”(“gt”/“lt"/”eq”/”ge”/”le”) ("number" / "object")
  AVAILABLEBANDWITH-value =  number / object
    ; Value type and VALUE parameter MUST match.

Examples:

   "data": {
              “cost type”: {
            "cost-mode": "numerical",
            "cost-metric":"routingcost"},
               "constraints" : {"residbw",”availbw”}
               “endpoints”: {
                   "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ],
                   "dsts": [
                   "ipv4:192.0.2.89",
                   "ipv4:198.51.100.34",
                   "ipv4:203.0.113.45"
                            ]
                                   }
            }
   "map": {
           "ipv4:192.0.2.2": {
           "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0[residbw eq0,availbw eq0],
           "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 0[residbw eq12.5,availbw eq10.5],
           "ipv4:203.0.113.45":0[residbw eq5.9,availbw eq3.9],
                             }
            }

4. Cost Metric Extensions: Parameters

The following sections define Parameters used within Properties definitions.

4.1. parameter: linkstate

Namespace:

Parameter name:  linkstate

Purpose:  Used in a multi-valued property to 
          indicate whether it is steady state
          link performance.

Description:  When a property is multi-valued,
LINKSTATE can be used to construct a steady state
performancetopology for initial tunnel path computation,
or to verify alternative failover paths. The LINSTATE 
is set when the measured value of this parameter exceeds
its configured maximum threshold.  The LINKSTATE is 
cleared when the measured value falls below its 
configured threshold.LINKSTATE should be used 
together with properties we defined in the 
section 3. 

Format definition:

    LINKSTATE-param =  "LINKSTATE=" INDEX-value

    LINKSTATE-value =  integer

Examples:

   object {
         JSONBOOL linkstate;
    } linkdelay;

       "data": {
                  “cost type”:{
               "cost-mode": "numerical",
                "cost-metric":"routingcost"}
                "constraints": {"linkdelay"}
                    endpoints”: {
                   "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ],
                   "dsts": [
                   "ipv4:192.0.2.89"
                            ]
                                   }
                }
     "map": {
            "ipv4:192.0.2.2": {
            "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0.0[linkdelay[linkstate eq 0] eq 10],
                                 }
               }

5. Security Considerations

The properties defined in this document present no security considerations beyond those in Section 14 of the base ALTO specification [draft-ietf-alto-protocol].

6. IANA Considerations

IANA has added the following entries to the ALTO cost map Properties registry, defined in Section 3 of [RFCXXX].

+-----------+--------------+------------------------+
| Namespace | Property     | Reference              |
+-----------+--------------+------------------------+
|           | linkdelay    | [RFCxxxx], Section 3.1 |
|           | linkjitter   | [RFCxxxx], Section 3.2 |
|           | linkloss     | [RFCxxxx], Section 3.3 |
|           |  residbw     | [RFCxxxx], Section 3.4 |
|           |  availbw     | [RFCxxxx], Section 3.5 |
+-----------+--------------+------------------------+

IANA has added the following entries to the " ALTO cost map Parameters" registry, defined in [RFCxxxx] Section 4.1.

+-------+------------------------+------------------------+
| Name- |                        |                        |
| space | Parameter              | Reference              |
+-------+------------------------+------------------------+
|       | LINKSTATE              | [RFCxxxx], Section 4.1 |
+-------+------------------------+------------------------+

7. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", March 1997.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 5234, January 2008.
[RFC4627] Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.
[ALTO] Alimi, R., "ALTO Protocol", ID draft-ietf-alto-protocol-16, May 2013.
[OSPF] Giacalone, S., "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", ID draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-04, June 2013.

Authors' Addresses

Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 China EMail: sunseawq@huawei.com
Liang Xia Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 China EMail: frank.xialiang@huawei.com