Network Working Group S. Smyshlyaev, Ed. Internet-Draft E. Alekseev Intended status: Informational I. Oshkin Expires: February 7, 2016 V. Popov S. Leontiev CRYPTO-PRO V. Podobaev FACTOR-TS D. Belyavsky TCI August 6, 2015 Guidelines on the cryptographic algorithms, accompanying the usage of standards GOST R 34.10-2012 and GOST R 34.11-2012 draft-smyshlyaev-gost-usage-07 Abstract The purpose of this document is to make the specifications of the cryptographic algorithms defined by GOST R 34.10-2012 and GOST R 34.11-2012 standards available to the Internet community for their implementation in the cryptographic protocols based on the accompanying algorithms. These specifications define the pseudorandom functions, the key agreement algorithm based on Diffie-Hellman algorithm, the parameters of elliptic curves, the key derivation functions and the key export functions. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on February 7, 2016. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Conventions used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.2. Basic terms and definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Algorithm descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. HMAC functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2. PRF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3. VKO algorithms for key agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.4. Key derivation function KDF_GOSTR3411_2012_256 . . . . . 10 4.5. Key derivation function KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256 . . . 10 4.6. Key wrap and unwrap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5. The parameters of elliptic curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.1. Canonical form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.2. Twisted Edwards form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Appendix A. Values of the parameter sets . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 A.1. Canonical form parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 A.2. Twisted Edwards form parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Appendix B. Test examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 1. Introduction The accompanying algorithms are intended for the cryptographic protocols implementation. This memo contains a description of the accompanying algorithms based on Russian national standards GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] and GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012]. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 English versions of these standards can be found in [RFC7091] and [RFC6986]. The specifications of algorithms and parameters proposed in this memo are provided on the basis of experience in the development of the cryptographic protocols, as described in the [RFC4357], [RFC4490] and [RFC4491]. This memo contains a description of the accompanying algorithms defining the pseudorandom functions, the key agreement algorithm based on Diffie-Hellman algorithm, the parameters of elliptic curves, the key derivation functions and the key export functions. The main reason for the development of this document is the need to ensure compatibility of the cryptographic protocol implementation based on the Russian cryptographic standards GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] and GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012]. 2. Scope This memo is recommended for usage in encryption and protection the authenticity of the data based on the usage of the digital signature algorithms GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] and hash function GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012] in public and corporate networks to protect information that does not contain a classified information. 3. Conventions used in This Document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3.1. Notation This document uses the following notation for the sets and operations on the elements of these sets in accordance with GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012]: (xor) exclusive-or of two binary vectors of the same length; V_n the finite-dimensional vector space over GF(2) of dimension n with the (xor) operation, for n = 0 the V_0 space consists of a single empty element of size 0; U the element of V_n; in the binary representation U = (u_(n-1), u_(n-2), ..., u_1, u_0), where u_i in {0, 1}; Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 A|B concatenation of vectors A, B, i.e., if A in V_n1, B in V_n2, A = (a_(n1-1), a_(n1-2), ..., a_0), and B = (b_(n2-1), b_(n2-2), ..., b_0), then A|B = (a_(n1-1), a_(n1-2), ..., a_0, b_(n2-1), b_(n2-2), ..., b_0) is an element of V_(n1+n2); V_(8, r) the set of byte strings of size r; if W is an element of V(8, r), then W = (w^0, w^1, ..., w^(r-1)), where w^0, w^1, ..., w^(r-1) are elements of V_8; if A in V_(8, r1), B in V_(8, r2), A = (a^0, a^1, ..., a^(r1-1)), and B = (b^0, b^1, ..., b^(r2-1)), then A|B = (a^0, a^1, ..., a^(r1-1), b^0, b^1, ..., b^(r2-1)) is an element of V_(8, r1+r2); Bit representation the bit representation of the element W = (w^0, w^1, ..., w^(r-1)) of V_(8, r), where w^0 = (w_7, w_6, ..., w_0), w^1 = (w_15, w_14, ..., w_8), ..., w^(r-1) = (w_(8r-1), w_(8r-2), ..., w_(8r-8)) are elements of V_8, is an element (w_(8r-1), w_(8r-2), ..., w_1, w_0) of V_(8*r); Byte representation if n is a multiple of 8, r = n/8, then the byte representation of the element W = (w_(n-1), w_(n-2), ..., w_0) of V_n is a byte string (w^0, w^1, ..., w^(r-1)) of V_(8, r), where w^0 = (w_7, w_6, ..., w_0), w^1 = (w_15, w_14, ..., w_8), ..., w^(r-1) = (w_(8r-1), w_(8r-2), ..., w_(8r-8)) are elements of V_8; K (key) arbitrary element of V_n; if K in V_n, then its size (in bits) is equal to n, where n can be an arbitrary natural number. Note: It is proposed to interpret and edit the formulas in accordance with the above definitions. 3.2. Basic terms and definitions This memo uses the following terms, abbreviations and symbols: Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 +----------+--------------------------------------------------------+ | Symbols | Meaning | +----------+--------------------------------------------------------+ | H_256 | GOST R 34.11-2012 hash function, 256-bit | | | | | H_512 | GOST R 34.11-2012 hash function, 512-bit | | | | | HMAC | a function for calculating a message authentication | | | code, based on hash function in accordance with | | | [RFC2104] | | | | | HMAC_256 | an HMAC function based on the hash function H_256, | | | intended for computing a message authentication code | | | | | HMAC_512 | an HMAC function based on the hash function H_512, | | | intended for computing a message authentication code | | | | | PRF | a pseudorandom function, i.e., a transformation that | | | allows to generate pseudorandom sequence of bytes | | | | | KDF | a key derivation function, i.e., a transformation, | | | that allows to derive keys and keying material for the | | | root key and random data using a pseudorandom function | +----------+--------------------------------------------------------+ To produce a byte sequence of the size r with functions that give a longer output the input should be taken from the output sequence of the first r bytes. This remark applies to the following functions: o the functions described in Section 4.2; o KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256. When n is multiple of 8, an element of V_n can be represented both in the bit and byte form. The result of operation <<|>>, applied to the elements in the bit representation is described in the bit representation. The result of the operation <<|>>, applied to the same elements in byte representation has the byte representation. Thus, the symbol <<|>> is used to refer to two different operations, depending on the form of their arguments. The operation is uniquely determined by the representation of arguments. Hereinafter all data (the elements of V_n) are considered given in the byte representation unless otherwise specified. Operation <<|>> on the arguments of functions, unless explicitly stated, is performed on their byte representation. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 If the function is defined outside this document (eg, H_256) and its definition requires arguments in bit representation, it is assumed that the bit representation of the argument is formed immediately before the calculation of the function (in particular, immediately after the application of the operation <<|>> to the byte representation of the arguments). If the output of another function that is defined outside of this document is used as the argument of the function defined below and has output value in bit representation, it is assumed that the output value will be translated into the byte representation before substitution in arguments. 4. Algorithm descriptions For the algorithms described in this paper the possible values of the functions are limited by the permissibility of applying them as the input parameter of the transformations and are assigned by the protocols. 4.1. HMAC functions This section defines the HMAC transformations based on GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012] algorithms. 4.1.1. HMAC_GOSTR3411_2012_256 This HMAC transformation is based on GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012] algorithm, 256-bit output. The identifier of this transformation is shown below: id-tc26-hmac-gost-3411-12-256, <>. This algorithm uses H_256 as a hash function for HMAC, described in [RFC2104]. The method of forming the values of ipad and opad is also specified in [RFC2104]. The size of the HMAC_256 output in bytes is equal to 32, the block size of the iterative procedure for the H_256 compression function in bytes is equal to 64 (in the notation of [RFC2104], L = 32 and B = 64, respectively). 4.1.2. HMAC_GOSTR3411_2012_512 This HMAC transformation is based on GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012] algorithm, 512-bit output. The identifier of this transformation is shown below: Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 id-tc26-hmac-gost-3411-12-512, <>. This algorithm uses H_512 as a hash function for HMAC, described in [RFC2104]. The method of forming the values of ipad and opad is also specified in [RFC2104]. The size of the HMAC_512 output in bytes is equal to 64, the block size of the iterative procedure for the H_512 compression function in bytes is equal to 64 (in the notation of [RFC2104], L = 64 and B = 64, respectively). 4.2. PRF This section defines six HMAC-based PRF transformations recommended for usage. Two of them are designed for the TLS protocol and four are designed for the IPsec protocol. 4.2.1. PRFs for the TLS protocol 4.2.1.1. PRF_TLS_GOSTR3411_2012_256 This is the transformation providing the pseudorandom function of the TLS protocol in accordance with GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012]; the transformation uses P_GOSTR3411_2012_256 function that is similar to the P_hash function in Section 5 of [RFC2246], where HMAC_256 function (defined in Section 4.1.1) is used as an HMAC_hash function. PRF_TLS_GOSTR3411_2012_256 (secret, label, seed) = = P_GOSTR3411_2012_256 (secret, label | seed). 4.2.1.2. PRF_TLS_GOSTR3411_2012_512 This is the transformation providing the pseudorandom function of the TLS protocol in accordance with GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012]; the transformation uses P_GOSTR3411_2012_512 function that is similar to the P_hash function in Section 5 of [RFC2246], where HMAC_512 function (defined in Section 4.1.2) is used as an HMAC_hash function. PRF_TLS_GOSTR3411_2012_512 (secret, label, seed) = = P_GOSTR3411_2012_512 (secret, label | seed). 4.2.2. PRFs for the IPsec protocols based on GOST R 34.11-2012 IPsec family protocols make use of pseudorandom functions for the purposes of keying material generation and authentication. Specifications for the version 1 (IKEv1) [RFC2409] and version 2 (IKEv2) [RFC7296] of the Internet Key Exchange protocol contain definitions of using PRF in various parts of the protocols. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 4.2.2.1. PRF in the IKEv1 protocol According to the Section 4 of [RFC2409] if a PRF is not negotiated, the HMAC based on the negotiated hash algorithm is used. So, when GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012] is used as a hash function in IKEv1, either HMAC_GOST3411_2012_256 or HMAC_GOST3411_2012_512 are used as a PRF depending on the negotiated hash algorithm. 4.2.2.2. PRF in the IKEv2 protocol IKEv2 has no default PRF. This document specifies that for IKEv2 either HMAC_GOST3411_2012_256 or HMAC_GOST3411_2012_512 must be used as PRF. 4.3. VKO algorithms for key agreement This section identifies the key agreement algorithms using GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012]. 4.3.1. VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_256 The VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_256 transformation is used for an agreement of the VKO 256-bit keys and is based on GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012], 256-bit. This algorithm can be applied for a key agreement using the GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] 256-bit and 512-bit keys. The algorithm is designed to produce an encryption key or a keying material of size 256 bits to be used in various cryptographic protocols. Key or keying material KEK_VKO (x, y, UKM) is produced by the side of communication from his private key x, the public key y*P of the opposite side and UKM value, considered as a number. The algorithm can be used for deriving both static and ephemeral key with the public key size n >= 512 bits including the case where one side uses a static key and the other - ephemeral. UKM parameter is optional (the default UKM = 1) and can take any value from 1 to 2^(n/2)-1. It is allowed to use a nonzero UKM of arbitrary size not exceeding n/2 bits. If at least one of the parties uses static keys, the recommended length of UKM is 64 bit or more. K is calculated using formula K (x, y, UKM) = (m/q*UKM*x mod q)*(y*P), Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 where m and q are the parameters of the elliptic curve defined in the GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] notation. KEK_VKO is calculated using formula KEK_VKO (x, y, UKM) = H_256 (K(x, y, UKM)). This algorithm is defined similar to Section 5.2 of [RFC4357], but applies the hash function H_256 instead of the hash function GOST R 34.11-94 [GOST3411-94] (referred as gostR3411) and K(x, y, UKM) is calculated with public key size n >= 512 bits and UKM size up to n/2 bits. 4.3.2. VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_512 The VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_256 transformation is used for an agreement of the VKO 512-bit keys and is based on GOST R 34.11-2012 [GOST3411-2012], 512-bit. This algorithm can be applied for a key agreement using the GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] 512-bit keys. The algorithm is designed to produce an encryption key or keying material of size 512 bits to be used in cryptographic protocols. Key or keying material KEK_VKO (x, y, UKM) is produced by the exchange participant from his private key x, the public key y*P of the opposite side and the UKM value, considered as a number. The algorithm can be used for both static and ephemeral key with the public key size n >= 1024 bits including the case where one side uses a static key and the other uses an ephemeral one. UKM parameter is optional (the default UKM = 1) and can take any value from 1 to 2^(n/2)-1. It is allowed to use a nonzero UKM of arbitrary size not exceeding n/2 bits. If at least one of the parties uses static keys, the recommended length of UKM is 128 bit or more. K (x, y, UKM) = (m/q*UKM*x mod q)*(y*P), where m and q - the parameters of the elliptic curve according GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] notation. KEK_VKO (x, y, UKM) = H_512 (K (x, y, UKM)). This algorithm is defined similar to Section 5.2 of [RFC4357], but instead of the hash function GOST R 34.11-94 [GOST3411-94] (referred as gostR3411) applies the hash function H_256, and K(x, y, UKM) is calculated at the public key size n >= 1024 bits and UKM size up to n/2 bits. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 4.4. Key derivation function KDF_GOSTR3411_2012_256 The key derivation function KDF_GOSTR3411_2012_256 based on HMAC_256 function is designed to generate a 256-bit keying material and is given by: KDF (K_in, label, seed) = HMAC_256 (K_in, 0x01 | label | 0x00 | seed | 0x01 | 0x00), where o K_in -- derivation key, o label, seed -- the parameters, fixed and assigned by a protocol. The key derivation function KDF_GOSTR3411_2012_256 is a special case of KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012 function, described in the next section. 4.5. Key derivation function KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256 The key derivation function KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256 based on HMAC_256 and is given by: KDF_TREE (K_in, label, seed, R) = K(1)| K(2)| K(3)| K(4)|..., K(i) = HMAC_256 (K_in, [i]_2 | label | 0x00 | seed| [L]_2), i >= 1, where R a fixed external parameter, with possible values of 1, 2, 3 or 4; K_in derivation key; L the required size (in bits) of the generated keying material (an integer, not exceeding 256*(2^(8*R)-1)); [L]_2 byte representation of L, in network byte order; i iteration counter; [i]_2 byte representation of the iteration counter (in the network byte order), the number of bytes in the representation [i]_2 is equal to R (no more than 4 bytes); label, seed the parameters, fixed and assigned by a protocol. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 The key derivation function KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256 is intended for generating a keying material in size of L, not exceeding 256*(2^(8*R)-1) bits, and utilizes general principles of the input and output for the key derivation function outlined in Section 5.1 of NIST SP 800-108 [NISTSP800-108]. HMAC_256 algorithm with 256-bit output described in Section 4.1.1 is selected as a pseudorandom function. When R = 1 and L = 256 the function KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256 is equivalent to KDF_GOSTR3411_2012_256 from the previous section. Each key derived from the keying material formed using the derivation key K_in (0-level key) may be a 1-level diversification key and may be used to generate a new keying material. The keying material derived from the 1-level derivation key, can be split down into the 2nd level derivation keys. The application of this procedure leads to the construction of the key tree with the root key and the formation of the keying material to the hierarchy of the levels, as described in Section 6 of NIST SP 800-108 [NISTSP800-108]. The partitioning procedure for keying material at each level is defined according to the specific protocols. 4.6. Key wrap and unwrap Wrapped representation of the secret key K (GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] key or GOST 28147-89 [GOST28147-89] key) is formed as follows by using a given export key K_e (GOST 28147-89 [GOST28147-89] key) and a random UKM vector from 8 to 16 bytes in size: 1. Generate a random UKM vector. 2. With the key derivation function, using export key K_e as a derivation key, and a UKM vector as the value of seed, generate a key, denoted by KEK_e (UKM), where KEK_e (UKM) = KDF (K_e, label, UKM), where KDF function (see previous section) is used as a key derivation function for the fixed value label = (0x26 | 0xBD | 0xB8 | 0x78), and the seed value that is equal to UKM. 3. MAC value GOST 28147-89 (4-byte) for the data K and the key KEK_e (UKM) is calculated, initialization vector (IV) in this case is equal to the first 8 bytes of UKM. The resulting value is denoted as CEK_MAC. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 4. The key K is encrypted by the GOST 28147-89 algorithm in the Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode with the key KEK_e (UKM). The encoding result is denoted as CEK_ENC. 5. The wrapped representation of the key is considered (UKM | CEK_ENC | CEK_MAC). During the key import the value of key K is restored as follows from the wrapped representation of the key (GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] key or GOST 28147-89 key [GOST28147-89] key) and the export key K_e: 1. From the wrapped representation of the key selects the sets UKM, CEK_ENC, and CEK_MAC. 2. With the key derivation function, using the export key K_e as a derivation key, and a random UKM value as the value of seed, generates a key, denoted by KEK_e(UKM), where KEK_e (UKM) = KDF (K_e, label, UKM). 3. The CEK_ENC set is decrypted by the GOST 28147-89 algorithm in the Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode with the key KEK_e(UKM). The unwrapped key K is assumed to be equal to the result of decryption. 4. MAC value GOST 28147-89 (4-byte) for the data K and the key KEK_e(UKM) is calculated, initialization vector (IV) in this case is equal to the first 8 bytes of UKM. If the result does not equal to CEK_MAC, an error is returned. The algorithms for wrapping and unwrapping of the GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] keys are modifications of the CryptoPro Key Wrap and CryptoPro Key Unwrap algorithms, described in Sections 6.3 and 6.4 of [RFC4357]. 5. The parameters of elliptic curves This section defines the elliptic curves parameters and identifiers that are recommended for the usage with signature and verification algorithms of digital signature in accordance with GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] standard and with the key agreement algorithms VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_256 and VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_512. This document does not negate the use of other parameters of the elliptic curves. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 5.1. Canonical form This section defines the elliptic curves parameters of the GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] standard for the case of elliptic curves with a prime 512-bit modulus in canonical (Weierstrass) form, that is given by the following equation defined in GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012]: y^2 = x^3 + ax + b. In case of an elliptic curves with 256-bit the parameters defined in [RFC4357] are proposed to use. 5.1.1. Parameters and identifiers The parameters for each of the elliptic curve are represented by the following values which are defined in GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012]: p the elliptic curve modulus; a, b the coefficients of the equation of the elliptic curve in the canonical form; q the order of the elliptic curve; (x, y) the coordinates of a point P (generator of the prime order group) of the elliptic curve in the canonical form. Both sets of the parameters are presented as ASN structures of the form: SEQUENCE { a INTEGER, b INTEGER, p INTEGER, q INTEGER, x INTEGER, y INTEGER } The parameter sets have the following identifiers: 1. id-tc26-gost-3410-12-512-paramSetA, <>; Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 2. id-tc26-gost-3410-12-512-paramSetB, <>. Corresponding values of the parameter sets can be found in Appendix A.1. 5.2. Twisted Edwards form This section defines the elliptic curves parameters and identifiers of the GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012] standard for the case of elliptic curves that have a representation in Twisted Edwards form with a prime 256-bit and 512-bit modulus. A Twisted Edwards curve E over a finite prime field F_p, p > 3, is an elliptic curve defined by the equation: e*u^2 + v^2 = 1 + d*u^2*v^2, where e, d are in F_p, ed(e-d) != 0. A Twisted Edwards curve has an equivalent representation in the Weierstrass form defined by parameters a, b. The parameters a, b, e, d are related as follows: a = s^2 - 3*t^2, b = 2*t^3 - t*s^2, where s = (e - d) / 4, t = (e + d) / 6, Coordinate transformation is defined as follows: (u,v) --> (x,y) = (s(1 + v) / (1 - v) + t, s(1 + v) / ((1 - v) u)), (x,y) --> (u,v) = ((x - t) / y, (x - t - s) / (x - t + s)). 5.2.1. Parameters and identifiers The parameters for each of the elliptic curve are represented by the following values which are defined in GOST R 34.10-2012 [GOST3410-2012]: p the elliptic curve modulus; Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 a, b the coefficients of the equation of the elliptic curve in the canonical form; e, d the coefficients of the equation of the elliptic curve in the Twisted Edwards form; m the order of the elliptic curve group; q the order of the subgroups of prime order elliptic curve group; (x, y) the coordinates of a point P (generator of the prime order group) of the elliptic curve in the canonical form; (u, v) the coordinates of a point P (generator of the prime order group) of the elliptic curve in the Twisted Edwards form. Both sets of the parameters are presented as ASN structures of the form: SEQUENCE { p INTEGER, a INTEGER, b INTEGER, e INTEGER, d INTEGER, m INTEGER, q INTEGER, x INTEGER, y INTEGER, u INTEGER, v INTEGER } The parameter sets have the following identifiers: 1. id-tc26-gost-3410-2012-256-paramSetA, <>; 2. id-tc26-gost-3410-2012-512-paramSetC, <>. Corresponding values of the parameter sets can be found in Appendix A.2. Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 6. Acknowledgments We thank Valery Smyslov, Igor Ustinov, Basil Dolmatov and Russ Housley for their careful readings and useful comments. 7. References 7.1. Normative References [GOST28147-89] Gosudarstvennyi Standard of USSR, Government Committee of the USSR for Standards, "Systems of information processing. Cryptographic data security. Algorithms of cryptographic transformation", GOST 28147-89, 1989. [GOST3410-2012] Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, "Information technology. Cryptographic data security. Signature and verification processes of [electronic] digital signature", GOST R 34.10-2012, 2012. [GOST3411-2012] Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Hashing function", GOST R 34.11-2012, 2012. [GOST3411-94] Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Hashing function", GOST R 34.11-94, 1994. [RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed- Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104, DOI 10.17487/RFC2104, February 1997, . [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC4357] Popov, V., Kurepkin, I., and S. Leontiev, "Additional Cryptographic Algorithms for Use with GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 Algorithms", RFC 4357, DOI 10.17487/RFC4357, January 2006, . Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 7.2. Informative References [NISTSP800-108] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Recommendation for Key Derivation Using Pseudorandom Functions", NIST SP 800-108, October 2009. [RFC2246] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol Version 1.0", RFC 2246, DOI 10.17487/RFC2246, January 1999, . [RFC2409] Harkins, D. and D. Carrel, "The Internet Key Exchange (IKE)", RFC 2409, DOI 10.17487/RFC2409, November 1998, . [RFC4490] Leontiev, S., Ed. and G. Chudov, Ed., "Using the GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-94, and GOST R 34.10-2001 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 4490, DOI 10.17487/RFC4490, May 2006, . [RFC4491] Leontiev, S., Ed. and D. Shefanovski, Ed., "Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 Algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile", RFC 4491, DOI 10.17487/RFC4491, May 2006, . [RFC6986] Dolmatov, V., Ed. and A. Degtyarev, "GOST R 34.11-2012: Hash Function", RFC 6986, DOI 10.17487/RFC6986, August 2013, . [RFC7091] Dolmatov, V., Ed. and A. Degtyarev, "GOST R 34.10-2012: Digital Signature Algorithm", RFC 7091, DOI 10.17487/RFC7091, December 2013, . [RFC7296] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., Eronen, P., and T. Kivinen, "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)", STD 79, RFC 7296, DOI 10.17487/RFC7296, October 2014, . Appendix A. Values of the parameter sets Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 A.1. Canonical form parameters Parameter set: id-tc26-gost-3410-12-512-paramSetA SEQUENCE { OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-tc26-gost-3410-12-512-paramSetA SEQUENCE { INTEGER 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FD C4 INTEGER 00 E8 C2 50 5D ED FC 86 DD C1 BD 0B 2B 66 67 F1 DA 34 B8 25 74 76 1C B0 E8 79 BD 08 1C FD 0B 62 65 EE 3C B0 90 F3 0D 27 61 4C B4 57 40 10 DA 90 DD 86 2E F9 D4 EB EE 47 61 50 31 90 78 5A 71 C7 60 INTEGER 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FD C7 INTEGER 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 27 E6 95 32 F4 8D 89 11 6F F2 2B 8D 4E 05 60 60 9B 4B 38 AB FA D2 B8 5D CA CD B1 41 1F 10 B2 75 INTEGER 3 INTEGER 00 75 03 CF E8 7A 83 6A E3 A6 1B 88 16 E2 54 50 E6 CE 5E 1C 93 AC F1 AB C1 77 80 64 FD CB EF A9 21 DF 16 26 BE 4F D0 36 E9 3D 75 E6 A5 0E 3A 41 E9 80 28 FE 5F C2 35 F5 B8 89 A5 89 CB 52 15 F2 A4 } } Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 Parameter set: id-tc26-gost-3410-12-512-paramSetB SEQUENCE { OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-tc26-gost-3410-12-512-paramSetB SEQUENCE { INTEGER 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6C INTEGER 00 68 7D 1B 45 9D C8 41 45 7E 3E 06 CF 6F 5E 25 17 B9 7C 7D 61 4A F1 38 BC BF 85 DC 80 6C 4B 28 9F 3E 96 5D 2D B1 41 6D 21 7F 8B 27 6F AD 1A B6 9C 50 F7 8B EE 1F A3 10 6E FB 8C CB C7 C5 14 01 16 INTEGER 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6F INTEGER 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 49 A1 EC 14 25 65 A5 45 AC FD B7 7B D9 D4 0C FA 8B 99 67 12 10 1B EA 0E C6 34 6C 54 37 4F 25 BD INTEGER 2 INTEGER 00 1A 8F 7E DA 38 9B 09 4C 2C 07 1E 36 47 A8 94 0F 3C 12 3B 69 75 78 C2 13 BE 6D D9 E6 C8 EC 73 35 DC B2 28 FD 1E DF 4A 39 15 2C BC AA F8 C0 39 88 28 04 10 55 F9 4C EE EC 7E 21 34 07 80 FE 41 BD } } A.2. Twisted Edwards form parameters Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 Parameter set: id-tc26-gost-3410-2012-256-paramSetA SEQUENCE { OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-tc26-gost-3410-2012-256-paramSetA SEQUENCE { INTEGER 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FD 97 INTEGER 00 C2 17 3F 15 13 98 16 73 AF 48 92 C2 30 35 A2 7C E2 5E 20 13 BF 95 AA 33 B2 2C 65 6F 27 7E 73 35 INTEGER 29 5F 9B AE 74 28 ED 9C CC 20 E7 C3 59 A9 D4 1A 22 FC CD 91 08 E1 7B F7 BA 93 37 A6 F8 AE 95 13 INTEGER 01 INTEGER 06 05 F6 B7 C1 83 FA 81 57 8B C3 9C FA D5 18 13 2B 9D F6 28 97 00 9A F7 E5 22 C3 2D 6D C7 BF FB INTEGER 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3F 63 37 7F 21 ED 98 D7 04 56 BD 55 B0 D8 31 9C INTEGER 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0F D8 CD DF C8 7B 66 35 C1 15 AF 55 6C 36 0C 67 INTEGER 00 91 E3 84 43 A5 E8 2C 0D 88 09 23 42 57 12 B2 BB 65 8B 91 96 93 2E 02 C7 8B 25 82 FE 74 2D AA 28 INTEGER 32 87 94 23 AB 1A 03 75 89 57 86 C4 BB 46 E9 56 5F DE 0B 53 44 76 67 40 AF 26 8A DB 32 32 2E 5C INTEGER 0D INTEGER 60 CA 1E 32 AA 47 5B 34 84 88 C3 8F AB 07 64 9C E7 EF 8D BE 87 F2 2E 81 F9 2B 25 92 DB A3 00 E7 } } Parameter set: id-tc26-gost-3410-2012-512-paramSetC Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 SEQUENCE { OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-tc26-gost-3410-2012-512-paramSetC SEQUENCE { INTEGER 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FD C7 INTEGER 00 DC 92 03 E5 14 A7 21 87 54 85 A5 29 D2 C7 22 FB 18 7B C8 98 0E B8 66 64 4D E4 1C 68 E1 43 06 45 46 E8 61 C0 E2 C9 ED D9 2A DE 71 F4 6F CF 50 FF 2A D9 7F 95 1F DA 9F 2A 2E B6 54 6F 39 68 9B D3 INTEGER 00 B4 C4 EE 28 CE BC 6C 2C 8A C1 29 52 CF 37 F1 6A C7 EF B6 A9 F6 9F 4B 57 FF DA 2E 4F 0D E5 AD E0 38 CB C2 FF F7 19 D2 C1 8D E0 28 4B 8B FE F3 B5 2B 8C C7 A5 F5 BF 0A 3C 8D 23 19 A5 31 25 57 E1 INTEGER 01 INTEGER 00 9E 4F 5D 8C 01 7D 8D 9F 13 A5 CF 3C DF 5B FE 4D AB 40 2D 54 19 8E 31 EB DE 28 A0 62 10 50 43 9C A6 B3 9E 0A 51 5C 06 B3 04 E2 CE 43 E7 9E 36 9E 91 A0 CF C2 BC 2A 22 B4 CA 30 2D BB 33 EE 75 50 INTEGER 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 26 33 6E 91 94 1A AC 01 30 CE A7 FD 45 1D 40 B3 23 B6 A7 9E 9D A6 84 9A 51 88 F3 BD 1F C0 8F B4 INTEGER 3F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF C9 8C DB A4 65 06 AB 00 4C 33 A9 FF 51 47 50 2C C8 ED A9 E7 A7 69 A1 26 94 62 3C EF 47 F0 23 ED INTEGER 00 E2 E3 1E DF C2 3D E7 BD EB E2 41 CE 59 3E F5 DE 22 95 B7 A9 CB AE F0 21 D3 85 F7 07 4C EA 04 3A A2 72 72 A7 AE 60 2B F2 A7 B9 03 3D B9 ED 36 10 C6 FB 85 48 7E AE 97 AA C5 BC 79 28 C1 95 01 Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 48 INTEGER 00 F5 CE 40 D9 5B 5E B8 99 AB BC CF F5 91 1C B8 57 79 39 80 4D 65 27 37 8B 8C 10 8C 3D 20 90 FF 9B E1 8E 2D 33 E3 02 1E D2 EF 32 D8 58 22 42 3B 63 04 F7 26 AA 85 4B AE 07 D0 39 6E 9A 9A DD C4 0F INTEGER 12 INTEGER 46 9A F7 9D 1F B1 F5 E1 6B 99 59 2B 77 A0 1E 2A 0F DF B0 D0 17 94 36 8D 9A 56 11 7F 7B 38 66 95 22 DD 4B 65 0C F7 89 EE BF 06 8C 5D 13 97 32 F0 90 56 22 C0 4B 2B AA E7 60 03 03 EE 73 00 1A 3D } } Appendix B. Test examples 1) HMAC_GOSTR3411_2012_256 Key K: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f T: 01 26 bd b8 78 00 af 21 43 41 45 65 63 78 01 00 HMAC_256(K, T) value: a1 aa 5f 7d e4 02 d7 b3 d3 23 f2 99 1c 8d 45 34 01 31 37 01 0a 83 75 4f d0 af 6d 7c d4 92 2e d9 Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 2) HMAC_GOSTR3411_2012_512 Key K: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f T: 01 26 bd b8 78 00 af 21 43 41 45 65 63 78 01 00 HMAC_256(K, T) value: a5 9b ab 22 ec ae 19 c6 5f bd e6 e5 f4 e9 f5 d8 54 9d 31 f0 37 f9 df 9b 90 55 00 e1 71 92 3a 77 3d 5f 15 30 f2 ed 7e 96 4c b2 ee dc 29 e9 ad 2f 3a fe 93 b2 81 4f 79 f5 00 0f fc 03 66 c2 51 e6 3) PRF_TLS_GOSTR3411_2012_256 Key K: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f Seed: 18 47 1d 62 2d c6 55 c4 d2 d2 26 96 91 ca 4a 56 0b 50 ab a6 63 55 3a f2 41 f1 ad a8 82 c9 f2 9a Label: 11 22 33 44 55 Output T1: ff 09 66 4a 44 74 58 65 94 4f 83 9e bb 48 96 5f 15 44 ff 1c c8 e8 f1 6f 24 7e e5 f8 a9 eb e9 7f Output T2: c4 e3 c7 90 0e 46 ca d3 db 6a 01 64 30 63 04 0e c6 7f c0 fd 5c d9 f9 04 65 23 52 37 bd ff 2c 02 Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 4) PRF_TLS_GOSTR3411_2012_512 Key K: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f Seed: 18 47 1d 62 2d c6 55 c4 d2 d2 26 96 91 ca 4a 56 0b 50 ab a6 63 55 3a f2 41 f1 ad a8 82 c9 f2 9a Label: 11 22 33 44 55 Output T1: f3 51 87 a3 dc 96 55 11 3a 0e 84 d0 6f d7 52 6c 5f c1 fb de c1 a0 e4 67 3d d6 d7 9d 0b 92 0e 65 ad 1b c4 7b b0 83 b3 85 1c b7 cd 8e 7e 6a 91 1a 62 6c f0 2b 29 e9 e4 a5 8e d7 66 a4 49 a7 29 6d Output T2: e6 1a 7a 26 c4 d1 ca ee cf d8 0c ca 65 c7 1f 0f 88 c1 f8 22 c0 e8 c0 ad 94 9d 03 fe e1 39 57 9f 72 ba 0c 3d 32 c5 f9 54 f1 cc cd 54 08 1f c7 44 02 78 cb a1 fe 7b 7a 17 a9 86 fd ff 5b d1 5d 1f Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 5) PRF_IPSEC_KEYMAT_GOSTR3411_2012_256 Key K: c9 a9 a7 73 20 e2 cc 55 9e d7 2d ce 6f 47 e2 19 2c ce a9 5f a6 48 67 05 82 c0 54 c0 ef 36 c2 21 Data of S: 01 26 bd b8 78 00 1d 80 60 3c 85 44 c7 27 01 00 Output T1: 21 01 d8 0c 47 db 54 bc 3c 82 9b 8c 30 7c 47 55 50 88 83 a6 d6 9e 60 1b f7 aa fb 0a bc a4 ed 95 Output T2: 33 b8 4e d0 8f 93 56 f8 1d f8 d2 79 f0 79 c9 02 87 cb 45 2c 81 d4 1e 80 38 43 08 86 c1 92 12 aa 6) PRF_IPSEC_PRFPLUS_GOSTR3411_2012_256 Key K: c9 a9 a7 73 20 e2 cc 55 9e d7 2d ce 6f 47 e2 19 2c ce a9 5f a6 48 67 05 82 c0 54 c0 ef 36 c2 21 Data of S: 01 26 bd b8 78 00 1d 80 60 3c 85 44 c7 27 01 00 Output T1: 2d e5 ee 84 e1 3d 7b e5 36 16 67 39 13 37 0a b0 54 c0 74 b7 9b 69 a8 a8 46 82 a9 f0 4f ec d5 87 Output T2: 29 f6 0d da 45 7b f2 19 aa 2e f9 5d 7a 59 be 95 4d e0 08 f4 a5 0d 50 4d bd b6 90 be 68 06 01 53 Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 7) PRF_IPSEC_KEYMAT_GOSTR3411_2012_512 Key K: c9 a9 a7 73 20 e2 cc 55 9e d7 2d ce 6f 47 e2 19 2c ce a9 5f a6 48 67 05 82 c0 54 c0 ef 36 c2 21 Data of S: 01 26 bd b8 78 00 1d 80 60 3c 85 44 c7 27 01 00 Output T1: b9 55 5b 29 91 75 4b 37 9d a6 8e 60 98 f5 b6 0e df 91 8a 56 20 4b ff f3 a8 37 6d 1f 57 ed b2 34 a5 12 32 81 23 cd 6c 03 0b 54 14 2e 1e c7 78 2b 03 00 be a5 7c c2 a1 4c a3 b4 f0 85 a4 5c d6 ca Output T2: 37 b1 e0 86 52 43 a4 fb 29 14 8d 27 4d 30 63 fc bf b0 f2 f4 68 d5 27 e4 3b ca 41 fa 6b b5 3e c8 df 21 bf c4 62 3a 2e 76 8b 64 54 03 3e 09 52 32 d1 8c 86 a6 8f 00 98 d3 31 81 75 f6 59 05 ae db Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 8) PRF_IPSEC_ PRFPLUS_GOSTR3411_2012_512 Key K: c9 a9 a7 73 20 e2 cc 55 9e d7 2d ce 6f 47 e2 19 2c ce a9 5f a6 48 67 05 82 c0 54 c0 ef 36 c2 21 Data of S: 01 26 bd b8 78 00 1d 80 60 3c 85 44 c7 27 01 00 Output T1: 5d a6 71 43 a5 f1 2a 6d 6e 47 42 59 6f 39 24 3f cc 61 57 45 91 5b 32 59 10 06 ff 78 a2 08 63 d5 f8 8e 4a fc 17 fb be 70 b9 50 95 73 db 00 5e 96 26 36 98 46 cb 86 19 99 71 6c 16 5d d0 6a 15 85 Output T2: 48 34 49 5a 43 74 6c b5 3f 0a ba 3b c4 6e bc f8 77 3c a6 4a d3 43 c1 22 ee 2a 57 75 57 03 81 57 ee 9c 38 8d 96 ef 71 d5 8b e5 c1 ef a1 af a9 5e be 83 e3 9d 00 e1 9a 5d 03 dc d6 0a 01 bc a8 e3 9) VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_256 with 256-bit output on the GOST R 34.10-2012 keys (512-bit output) with id-tc26-gost- 3410-12-512-paramSetA Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 UKM value: 1d 80 60 3c 85 44 c7 27 Private key x of A: c9 90 ec d9 72 fc e8 4e c4 db 02 27 78 f5 0f ca c7 26 f4 67 08 38 4b 8d 45 83 04 96 2d 71 47 f8 c2 db 41 ce f2 2c 90 b1 02 f2 96 84 04 f9 b9 be 6d 47 c7 96 92 d8 18 26 b3 2b 8d ac a4 3c b6 67 Public key x*P of A (curve point (X, Y)): aa b0 ed a4 ab ff 21 20 8d 18 79 9f b9 a8 55 66 54 ba 78 30 70 eb a1 0c b9 ab b2 53 ec 56 dc f5 d3 cc ba 61 92 e4 64 e6 e5 bc b6 de a1 37 79 2f 24 31 f6 c8 97 eb 1b 3c 0c c1 43 27 b1 ad c0 a7 91 46 13 a3 07 4e 36 3a ed b2 04 d3 8d 35 63 97 1b d8 75 8e 87 8c 9d b1 14 03 72 1b 48 00 2d 38 46 1f 92 47 2d 40 ea 92 f9 95 8c 0f fa 4c 93 75 64 01 b9 7f 89 fd be 0b 5e 46 e4 a4 63 1c db 5a Private key y of part B: 48 c8 59 f7 b6 f1 15 85 88 7c c0 5e c6 ef 13 90 cf ea 73 9b 1a 18 c0 d4 66 22 93 ef 63 b7 9e 3b 80 14 07 0b 44 91 85 90 b4 b9 96 ac fe a4 ed fb bb cc cc 8c 06 ed d8 bf 5b da 92 a5 13 92 d0 db Public key y*P of B (curve point (X, Y)): 19 2f e1 83 b9 71 3a 07 72 53 c7 2c 87 35 de 2e a4 2a 3d bc 66 ea 31 78 38 b6 5f a3 25 23 cd 5e fc a9 74 ed a7 c8 63 f4 95 4d 11 47 f1 f2 b2 5c 39 5f ce 1c 12 91 75 e8 76 d1 32 e9 4e d5 a6 51 04 88 3b 41 4c 9b 59 2e c4 dc 84 82 6f 07 d0 b6 d9 00 6d da 17 6c e4 8c 39 1e 3f 97 d1 02 e0 3b b5 98 bf 13 2a 22 8a 45 f7 20 1a ba 08 fc 52 4a 2d 77 e4 3a 36 2a b0 22 ad 40 28 f7 5b de 3b 79 KEK_VKO value: c9 a9 a7 73 20 e2 cc 55 9e d7 2d ce 6f 47 e2 19 2c ce a9 5f a6 48 67 05 82 c0 54 c0 ef 36 c2 21 10) VKO_GOSTR3410_2012_512 with 512-bit output on the GOST R 34.10-2012 keys (512-bit output) with id-tc26-gost- Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 3410-12-512-paramSetA Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 UKM value: 1d 80 60 3c 85 44 c7 27 Private key x of A: c9 90 ec d9 72 fc e8 4e c4 db 02 27 78 f5 0f ca c7 26 f4 67 08 38 4b 8d 45 83 04 96 2d 71 47 f8 c2 db 41 ce f2 2c 90 b1 02 f2 96 84 04 f9 b9 be 6d 47 c7 96 92 d8 18 26 b3 2b 8d ac a4 3c b6 67 Public key x*P of A (curve point (X, Y)): aa b0 ed a4 ab ff 21 20 8d 18 79 9f b9 a8 55 66 54 ba 78 30 70 eb a1 0c b9 ab b2 53 ec 56 dc f5 d3 cc ba 61 92 e4 64 e6 e5 bc b6 de a1 37 79 2f 24 31 f6 c8 97 eb 1b 3c 0c c1 43 27 b1 ad c0 a7 91 46 13 a3 07 4e 36 3a ed b2 04 d3 8d 35 63 97 1b d8 75 8e 87 8c 9d b1 14 03 72 1b 48 00 2d 38 46 1f 92 47 2d 40 ea 92 f9 95 8c 0f fa 4c 93 75 64 01 b9 7f 89 fd be 0b 5e 46 e4 a4 63 1c db 5a Private key y of B: 48 c8 59 f7 b6 f1 15 85 88 7c c0 5e c6 ef 13 90 cf ea 73 9b 1a 18 c0 d4 66 22 93 ef 63 b7 9e 3b 80 14 07 0b 44 91 85 90 b4 b9 96 ac fe a4 ed fb bb cc cc 8c 06 ed d8 bf 5b da 92 a5 13 92 d0 db Public key y*P of B (curve point (X, Y)): 19 2f e1 83 b9 71 3a 07 72 53 c7 2c 87 35 de 2e a4 2a 3d bc 66 ea 31 78 38 b6 5f a3 25 23 cd 5e fc a9 74 ed a7 c8 63 f4 95 4d 11 47 f1 f2 b2 5c 39 5f ce 1c 12 91 75 e8 76 d1 32 e9 4e d5 a6 51 04 88 3b 41 4c 9b 59 2e c4 dc 84 82 6f 07 d0 b6 d9 00 6d da 17 6c e4 8c 39 1e 3f 97 d1 02 e0 3b b5 98 bf 13 2a 22 8a 45 f7 20 1a ba 08 fc 52 4a 2d 77 e4 3a 36 2a b0 22 ad 40 28 f7 5b de 3b 79 KEK_VKO value: 79 f0 02 a9 69 40 ce 7b de 32 59 a5 2e 01 52 97 ad aa d8 45 97 a0 d2 05 b5 0e 3e 17 19 f9 7b fa 7e e1 d2 66 1f a9 97 9a 5a a2 35 b5 58 a7 e6 d9 f8 8f 98 2d d6 3f c3 5a 8e c0 dd 5e 24 2d 3b df Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 11) Key derivation function KDF_GOSTR3411_2012_256: K_in key: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f Label: 26 bd b8 78 Seed: af 21 43 41 45 65 63 78 KDF(K_in, label, seed) value: a1 aa 5f 7d e4 02 d7 b3 d3 23 f2 99 1c 8d 45 34 01 31 37 01 0a 83 75 4f d0 af 6d 7c d4 92 2e d9 Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 12) Key derivation function KDF_TREE_GOSTR3411_2012_256 Output size of L: 512 K_in key: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f Label: 26 bd b8 78 Seed: af 21 43 41 45 65 63 78 Value of K1: 22 b6 83 78 45 c6 be f6 5e a7 16 72 b2 65 83 10 86 d3 c7 6a eb e6 da e9 1c ad 51 d8 3f 79 d1 6b Value of K2: 07 4c 93 30 59 9d 7f 8d 71 2f ca 54 39 2f 4d dd e9 37 51 20 6b 35 84 c8 f4 3f 9e 6d c5 15 31 f9 Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 13) Key wrap and unwrap with the szOID_Gost28147_89_TC26_Z_ParamSet parameters Key K: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f UKM value: af 21 43 41 45 65 63 78 Label: 26 bd b8 78 KEK_e(UKM) = KDF(K_e, label, UKM): a1 aa 5f 7d e4 02 d7 b3 d3 23 f2 99 1c 8d 45 34 01 31 37 01 0a 83 75 4f d0 af 6d 7c d4 92 2e d9 CEK_MAC: 38 d5 8a a3 CEK_ENC: b9 fb 92 42 95 0f 84 3f 0f bd 5b 9a 5e cf 9f 17 f7 9e 6d 21 58 16 56 de 6d c5 85 dd 62 7a 44 0a Authors' Addresses Stanislav Smyshlyaev (editor) CRYPTO-PRO 18, Suschevsky val Moscow 127018 Russian Federation Phone: +7 (495) 995-48-20 Email: svs@cryptopro.ru Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 Evgeny Alekseev CRYPTO-PRO 18, Suschevsky val Moscow 127018 Russian Federation Email: alekseev@cryptopro.ru Igor Oshkin CRYPTO-PRO 18, Suschevsky val Moscow 127018 Russian Federation Email: oshkin@cryptopro.ru Vladimir Popov CRYPTO-PRO 18, Suschevsky val Moscow 127018 Russian Federation Email: vpopov@cryptopro.ru Serguei Leontiev CRYPTO-PRO 18, Suschevsky val Moscow 127018 Russian Federation Phone: +7 (495) 933 11 68 Email: vpopov@cryptopro.ru Vladimir Podobaev FACTOR-TS 11A, 1st Magistralny proezd Moscow 123290 Russian Federation Phone: +7 (495) 644-31-30 Email: v_podobaev@factor-ts.ru Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 34] Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title August 2015 Dmitry Belyavsky TCI 8, Zoologicheskaya st Moscow 117218 Russian Federation Phone: +7 (499) 254-24-50 Email: beldmit@gmail.com Smyshlyaev, et al. Expires February 7, 2016 [Page 35]