Network Working Group V. Singh Internet-Draft Intended status: Experimental H. Schulzrinne Expires: May 3, 2009 Columbia University H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks October 30, 2008 Dynamic Feature Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) draft-singh-geopriv-pidf-lo-dynamic-04.txt Status of this Memo By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2009. Abstract The Geopriv Location Object introduced by the Presence Information Data Format - Location Object (PIDF-LO), RFC 4119, defines a basic XML format for carrying geographical information of a presentity. The PIDF-LO specification made a subset of the functionality offered by the Geography Markup Language (GML) standard 3.0 mandatory to implement. This document defines child elements to the element specified in RFC 4119 to carry temporal feature elements useful for tracking moving objects. It defines five Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 elements, namely speed, bearing, acceleration elevation and directionOfObject. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. XML Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. XML Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Appendix A. Transferring Multiple Location Objects within SIP . . 6 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 10 Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 1. Introduction The Presence Information Data Format - Location Object (PIDF-LO) (see RFC 4119 [RFC4119]) provides geographical location of the presentity. This corresponds to a physical location at a given instance of time. The PIDF-LO specification made a subset of the functionality offered by the Geography Markup Language (GML) standard 3.0 mandatory to implement. With the extensions defined in [I-D.ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile] more guidelines to implementers are being provided with respect to a number of location shapes that have to be supported for usage within PIDF-LO. However, a number of applications benefit from having access to information about changes in location. Location change information is likely to be useful for logistics and public safety. For example, shipping companies or dispatch centers can use it to track whether vehicles are deviating from an established path or exceeding speed limits. 2. Terminology In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. 3. XML Extensions This document defines a location vector by adding child elements to the element described in RFC 4119 [RFC4119], to carry temporal feature elements. A receiver MAY ignore the temporal elements defined in this document if it does not understand this extension. speed: Speed is the rate of motion. (The terms speed and velocity are often used interchangeably, but speed is a scalar, having magnitude only, while velocity is a vector, having both magnitude and direction.) This element contains a 'uom' (Units Of Measure) attribute, which is a reference to a reference system for the amount. The 'uom' attribute uses a URI to refer to a unit of measure definition. The GML document defines a set of convenience measure types and a further explaination is provided at the end of this section. Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 bearing: Bearing is defined as the horizontal direction of one terrestrial point from another, expressed as the angular distance from a reference direction. It is usually measured from 000 degrees at the reference direction clockwise through 360 degrees. The element is of type gml:DirectionPropertyType and contains a gml:DirectionVector, gml:CompassPoint, DirectionKeyword, or a DirectionString element. This document profiles the usage of this GML element and mandates applications using this document to make use of the element only. acceleration: This element specifies the rate (usually rapid) at which something happens. The element also contains a 'uom' attribute. directionOfObject: The describes the instantaneous horizontal of the front of the object relative to true north and the vertical angle relative to the earth's spheroid. It uses the GML element. GML permits a range of units of measure for the uom attribute. This document restricts this set to the #m/s (meters per second). 4. XML Schema This document does not define a new schema but instead re-uses a subset of the dynamicFeature.xsd schema available with GML 3.1.1, namely , , , and . These four elements are conveyed inside the element defined by RFC 4119 [RFC4119]. 5. Example The following example shows a PIDF-LO document indicating geospatial location information using the gml:Point structure. Following the element the additional fields releated to temporal characteristics are included. Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 -34.407 150.883 12 270.0 -60.0 no 2003-06-23T04:57:29Z 2008-06-22T20:57:29Z Figure 1: Example of a PIDF-LO with Speed Information 6. Security Considerations This document defines additional location elements carried by PIDF-LO (see [RFC4119]). The security considerations of RFC 4119 [RFC4119] are applicable to this document. 7. IANA Considerations This document does not require actions by IANA. Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 8. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Klaus Darilion, Cullen Jennings, Rohan Mahy, Carl Reed, Brian Rosen, and Martin Thomson for their comments. 9. References 9.1. Normative References [GML] "Geographic information - Geography Markup Language (GML), OpenGIS 03-105r1, available at: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=4700", April 2004. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, BCP 14, March 1997. [RFC4119] Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format", RFC 4119, December 2005. [RFC4481] Schulzrinne, H., "Timed Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) to Indicate Status Information for Past and Future Time Intervals", RFC 4481, July 2006. 9.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile] Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and H. Tschofenig, "GEOPRIV PIDF-LO Usage Clarification, Considerations and Recommendations", draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-13 (work in progress), September 2008. Appendix A. Transferring Multiple Location Objects within SIP To show the path of an object, it may be useful to deliver multiple location vector objects in one PIDF-LO document to reduce the number of notifications. The element [RFC4481] can contain multiple location objects, with the structure shown in Figure 2 and an example in Figure 3. Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 .......... ..... ............ ........... ....... ....... Figure 2: Structure of Handling Multiple Location Objects The following example shows multiple PIDF-LO using . Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 140. -35. 12 no 2003-06-23T04:57:29Z 2003-06-22T20:57:29Z > 110. -35. 10 yes 2003-06-23T04:55:29Z 114. -35. 18 yes 2003-06-23T04:53:29Z Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 Figure 3: Example showing multiple Location Vectors transmitted simultaneously. Authors' Addresses Singh Vishal Email: singh.vishal@gmail.com Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University Department of Computer Science 450 Computer Science Building, New York, NY 10027 US Phone: +1 212 939 7004 Email: hgs@cs.columbia.edu URI: http://www.cs.columbia.edu Hannes Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks Linnoitustie 6 Espoo 02600 Finland Phone: +358 (50) 4871445 Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net URI: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Dynamic Feature Extensions to PIDF-LO October 2008 Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Singh, et al. Expires May 3, 2009 [Page 10]