| SALUD | L. Liess, Ed. |
| Internet-Draft | R. Jesske |
| Updates: 3261 (if approved) | Deutsche Telekom AG |
| Intended status: Standards Track | A. Johnston |
| Expires: June 01, 2012 | D. R. Worley |
| Avaya | |
| P. Kyzivat | |
| December 2011 |
Alert-Info URNs for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-04
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) supports the capability to provide a reference to a specific rendering to be used by the UA when the user is alerted. This is done using the Alert-Info header field. However, the reference addresses only network resources with specific rendering properties. There is currently no support for predefined standard identifiers for describing the semantics of the alerting situation or the characteristics of the alerting signal, without being tied to a particular rendering. To overcome this limitation and support new applications, a new family of URNs for use in SIP Alert-Info header fields is defined in this specification.
This document normatively updates [RFC3261], the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). It changes the usage of the SIP Alert-Info header field defined in the [RFC3261] by additionally allowing its use in all provisional responses to INVITE (except the 100 response).
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http:/⁠/⁠datatracker.ietf.org/⁠drafts/⁠current/⁠.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 01, 2012.
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http:/⁠/⁠trustee.ietf.org/⁠license-⁠info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261] includes a means to suggest to a user agent (UA) a particular ringback tone or ring tone to be used during session establishment. In [RFC3261] this is done by including a URI in the Alert-Info header field, that specifies the tone. The URI is most commonly the HTTP URL to the audio file. On the receipt of the Alert-Info header field the user agent may fetch the referenced ringback tone or ring tone and play it to the user.
This mechanism hinders interoperability when there is no common understanding of the meaning of the referenced tone, which might be country- or vendor-specific. It can lead to problems for the user trying to interpret the tone and for the UA wanting to substitute its own tone (e.g., in accordance with user preferences) or provide an alternative alerting mode (e.g., for hearing-impaired users). If caller and callee are from different countries, the understanding of the tones may vary significantly. Hearing impaired users may not sense the specific tone if it is provided as an audio file. The tone per se is also not useful for automata.
There are currently interoperability issues around the use of the Alert-Info header field when not using an external ring file. For example, consider the PBX special ring tone for an external (to the PBX) caller. Different vendors use different approaches such as: Alert-Info: <file://ring.pcm>;alert=normal where ring.pcm is a dummy file or: Alert-Info: <file://normal.ring.pcm> or: Alert-Info: <sip:normal-ringtone@example.com>. As a result, Alert-Info currently only works when the same vendor provides proxy and UA, as only then is the same "fake" proprietary URI convention used.
Another limitation of the current solution is that the referenced tones are tied to particular rendering. It is not possible to provide semantic indications or names for rendering characteristics that signals the intent and allows the recipient to decide how to render the received information in an appropriate way.
To solve the described issues, this specification defines the new URN namespace 'alert' for the Alert-Info header field that allows for programmatic user interface adaptation and for conversion of equivalent alerting tones in the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) when the client is a gateway. The work to standardize an Alert-Info URN will increase SIP interoperability for this header field by replacing proprietary conventions used today.
Using the 'alert' namespace provides syntax for several different application spaces, e. g.:
Some advantages of a URN rather than a URL of a downloadable resource:
The downside is that if the recipient does not understand the URN then it will only be able to render a default ringback tone or ring tone.
This document creates a new URN namespace and registry for alert indications and registers some initial values.
This specification changes the usage of the SIP Alert-Info header field defined in the [RFC3261] by additionally allowing its use in all provisional responses to INVITE (except the 100 response).
In practice, this specification extends Alert-Info in that it will cause the use of a new class of URIs and the use of multiple URIs. Backward compatibility issues are not expected, as devices that do not understand an Alert-Info URN should ignore it, and devices should not malfunction upon receiving multiple Alert-Info alert-params (which was syntactically permitted before, but rarely used).
This specification uses a number of terms to refer to the roles involved in the use of alerting indications in SIP. A "specifier" sends an "alerting indication" (one or more URNs in an Alert-Info header) to a "renderer" which then "renders" a "signal" or "rendering" based on the indication to a human user. A "category" is a characteristic whose "values" can be used to classify indications.
This specification uses the terms "ring tone" and "ringback tone". A "ring tone" or "calling signal" (terminology used in [E182]) is a signal generated by the callee's end device, advising the callee about an incoming call. A "ringback tone" or "ringing tone" (terminology used in [E182]) is a signal advising the caller that a connection has been made and that a ring tone is being rendered to the callee.
This section discusses the requirements for an alerting indication to transport the semantics of the alerting situation or the characteristics of the rendering.
REQ-1: The mechanism will allow user agents (UAs) and proxies to provide in the Alert-Info header field an alerting indication which describes the semantics of the signaling situation or the characteristics of the rendering and allows the recipient to decide how to render the received information to the user.
REQ-2: The mechanism will allow the alerting indication to be specified "by name" rather than "by value", to enable local policy decisions whether to use it or not.
REQ-3: The mechanism will enable alerting indications to represent a wide variety of signals, which have many largely-orthogonal characteristics.
REQ-4: has been deleted. To avoid confusion, the number will not be reused.
REQ-5: The mechanism will enable the set of alerting indications to be able to support extensibility by a wide variety of organizations that are not coordinated with each other. Extensions will be able to:
REQ-6: The mechanism will be flexible, so new alerting indications can be defined in the future, when SIP-applications evolve. E. g. Alert-Info URNs could identify specific media by name, such as "Beethoven's Fifth", and the end device could render some small part of it as a ring tone.
REQ-7a: The mechanism will provide only an indication capability, not a negotiation capability.
REQ-7b: The mechanism will not require an alerting indication to depend on context provided by a previous alerting indication in either direction.
REQ-8: The mechanism will allow transmission in the Alert-Info header field of SIP INVITE requests and provisional 1xx responses excepting the 100 responses.
REQ-9: The mechanism will be able to accommodate renderers that are customized with a limited or uncommon set of signals they can render and renderers that are provided with a set of signals that have uncommon semantics. (The canonical example is a UA for the hearing-impaired, customized with an uncomon set of signals, video or text instead of audio. By REQ-7, the renderer has no way of transmitting this fact to the specifier.)
REQ-10: The mechanism will allow an alerting indication to reliably carry all extensions if the specifier and the renderer have designs that are properly coordinated.
REQ-11: The mechanism will allow a renderer to select a tone that approximates to that intended by the specifier if the renderer is unable to provide the precise tone indicated.
REQ-12: The mechanism will support alerting indications relating to services such as call waiting, forward, transfer-recall, auto-callback and hold-recall.
REQ-13: The mechanism will allow rendering common PBX ring tone types.
REQ-14: The mechanism will allow rendering specific country ringback tones.
REQ-15: The mechanism will allow rendering tones for emergency alerts. (Use cases and values definition are not subject of this specification.)
REQ-16: The mechanism will allow rendering using other means than tones, e.g. text or images.
REQ-17: The mechanism will allow TDM gateways to map ring/ringback tones from legacy protocols to SIP at the edge of a network, e.g. national ring tones as defined in TIA/EIA-41-D and 3GPP2 A.S0014. (Use cases and values definition are not subject of this specification.)
REQ-18: The mechanism will ensure that if an UA receives Alert-Info URNs or portions of an Alert-Info URN it does not understand, it can ignore them.
REQ-19: The mechanism will allow storage of the actual encoding of the rendering locally rather than fetching it.
REQ-20: The mechanism must provide a simple way to combine two alerting indications to produce an alerting indication that requests a combination of the intentions of the two alerting indications, where any contradictions or conflicts between the two alerting indications are resolved in favor of the intention of the first alerting indication.
This section describes some use cases for which the Alert-Info URN mechanism is needed today.
This section defines some commonly encountered ring tones on PBX or business phones. They are as follows:
This tone indicates that the default or normal ring tone should be rendered. This is essentially a no-operation Alert-Info URN and should be treated by the UA as if no Alert-Info URN is present. This is most useful when Alert-Info header field parameters are being used. For example, in [I-D.ietf-bliss-shared-appearances], an Alert-Info header field needs to be present containing the "appearance" parameter, but no special ring tone needs to be specified.
This tone is used to indicate that the caller is external to the enterprise or PBX system. This could be a call from the PSTN or from a SIP trunk.
This tone is used to indicate that the caller is internal to the enterprise or PBX system. The call could have been originated from another user on this PBX or on another PBX within the enterprise.
A PBX tone needs to indicate that a priority level alert should be applied for the type of alerting specified (e.g. internal alerting).
In this case the alerting type specified (e.g. internal alerting) should be rendered shorter than normal. In contact centers, this is sometimes referred to as "abbreviated ringing" or a "zip tone".
In this case the alerting type specified should be rendered after a short delay. In some bridged line/shared line appearance implementations, this is used so that the bridged line does not ring at exactly the same time as the main line, but is delayed a few seconds.
These tones are used to indicate specific PBX and public network telephony services.
The Call Waiting Service [TS24.615] permits a callee to be notified of an incoming call while the callee is engaged in an active or held call. Subsequently, the callee can either accept, reject, or ignore the incoming call. There is an interest on the caller side to be informed about the call waiting situation on the callee side. Having this information the caller can decide whether to continue waiting for callee to pickup or better to call some time later when it is estimated that the callee could have finished the ongoing conversation. To provide this information, the callee's UAS ( or proxy) aware of the call waiting condition can add the call-waiting indication to the Alert-Info header field in the 180 Ringing response. As call-waiting information may be subject to the callee's privacy concerns, the exposure of this information shall be done only if explicitly required by the user.
This feature is used in a 180 Ringing response when a call forwarding feature has been initiated on an INVITE. Many PBX system implement a forwarding "beep" followed by normal ringing to indicate this. Note that a 181 response can be used in place of this URN.
This feature is used when a blind transfer [RFC5589] has been performed by a server on behalf of the transferor and fails. Instead of failing the call, the server calls back the transferor, giving them another chance to transfer or otherwise deal with the call. This service tone is used to distinguish this INVITE from any other normal incoming call.
This feature is used when a user has utilized a server to implement an automatic callback service. When the user is available, the server calls back the user and utilizes this service tone to distinguish this from any other normal incoming call.
This feature is used when a server implements a call hold timer on behalf of an endpoint. After a certain period of time of being on hold, the user who placed the call on hold is alerted to either retrieve the call or otherwise dispose of the call. This service tone is used to distinguish this case from any other normal incoming call.
In the PSTN, different tones are used in different countries. End users are accustomed to hear the callee's country ringback tone and would like to have this feature for SIP.
This section describes the registration template for the 'alert' URN namespace identifier (NID) according to the [RFC2141] and [RFC3406]
alert-URN = "URN:alert:" alert-identifier
alert-identifier= alert-category ":" alert-indication
alert-category = name
alert-indication= name *(":" name)
name = let-dig [ *let-dig-hyp let-dig ]
let-dig-hyp = let-dig / "-"
let-dig = ALPHA / DIGIT
ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; A-Z / a-z
DIGIT = %x30-39 ; 0-9
Following alert-category values are defined in this document:
This section describes the Alert-Info URN indication values for the alert-categories defined in this document.
For each alert-category, a default indication is defined, which is essentially a no-operation Alert-Info URN and should be treated by the UA as if no Alert-Info URN for the respective category is present. Alert-Info URN default indications are most useful when Alert-Info header field parameters are being used. For example, in [I-D.ietf-bliss-shared-appearances], an Alert-Info header field needs to be present containing the "appearance" parameter, but no special ringtone need be specified.
The "<private-name>" syntax is used for extensions specific to independent organizations, as described in Section Section 6.2.
Examples: urn:alert:service:call-waiting or urn:alert:service:recall:transfer.
Examples: urn:alert:source:external.
Examples: urn:alert:priority:high.
Examples: urn:alert:duration:short.
Examples: urn:alert:delay:yes .
The ISO 3166-1 country code [ISO3166-1] is used to inform the UA on the other side of the call that a country-specific rendering should be used. For example, to indicate ringback tones from South Africa, the following URN would be used: <urn:alert:locale:country:za>.
The set of Alert-Info URNs is intended to be extensible. An extension "at the top level" creates an entirely new category (or characteristic), an extension "at the second level" creates a new indication value for a category, an extension "at the third level" creates a subdivision of a indication value, etc. Extensions at lower levels are preferred over those at upper levels.
URNs allow in principle infinite subdivision of existing indication values, although most of the standard Alert-Info URNs give only one level of subdivision and a few give two levels of subdivision.
The process for defining new Alert-Info URNs is described in section Section 11.1. Adding new categories and adding alert-indication values other than via the "private" mechanism described above is standards action.
The "<private-name>" syntax is for proprietary extensions specific to independent organizations. The "<private-name>" is used in the form of a "reverse FQDN" of the entity that defines the extension, possibly followed by further components. Standard URNs will never contain a ".", so proprietary extensions need no further marker. This gives a way of assigning unique names without the need for a new registry. The namespace for each alert category is independent. Those assigning new names must ensure they are in a position to assign names uniquely for the FQDN they choose.
For example, some company SomeCompany.example.org could use urn:alert:service:call-waiting:SomeCompany.example.org, which is the SomeCompany.private version for call-waiting or it may have several distinct private versions of call-waiting, e.g. urn:alert:service:call-waiting:abc.SomeCompany.example.org and urn:alert:service:call-waiting:def.SomeCompany.example.org (which are siblings in the tree under urn:alert:service:call-waiting). Also it can subdivide its private version of call-waiting in urn:alert:service:call-waiting:SomeCompany.example.org:abc and urn:alert:service:call-waiting:SomeCompany.example.org:def (which are siblings in the tree under service:call-waiting:SomeCompany.example.org).
Adding new categories and adding alert-indication values via the "private" mechanism is not a standards action.
This section describes combination rules for the case when all the Alert-Info header fields only contain Alert-Info URNs. Combinations of URNs and URIs in the Alert-Info header fields of the same SIP-message are not defined in this specification.
In many cases, more than one URNs will be needed to fully define a particular tone. This is done by including multiple Alert-Info URNs, in one or more Alert-Info header fields in a request or a response. For example, an internal, priority call could be indicated by Alert-Info: <urn:alert:source:internal>, <urn:alert:priority:high>. A priority call waiting tone could be indicated by Alert-Info: <urn:alert:service:call-waiting>, <urn:alert:priority:high>.
The sender of the Alert-Info header may include an arbitrary list of Alert-Info URNs, even if they are redundant or contradictory. An earlier URN has priority over any later contradictory URN. This allows any element to modify a list of URNs to require a feature value (by adding a URN at the beginning of the list) or to suggest a feature value (by adding a URN at the end of the list).
The receiving UA attempts to match the received Alert-Info URNs combination with the signal(s) it is able to render.
The implementation is free to ignore any or all parts of the received Alert-Info URNs. The exact way in which a UA renders a received combination of Alert-Info URNs is left as an implementation issue. However, the implementation MUST comply to following rules:
There are cases when the device can render audio and visual (e.g. video or text) at the same time. This kind of rendering can be considered as one signal which has a set of sensory components instead of a set of different signals. E. g., if the device generates audio signals and visual signals at the same time, each "signal" is a combination of one audio and one visual component. There is some benefit to treating separately audio and visual signals, since the total number that need to be defined can be a lot less. It is an implementation choice to use one option or another.
The following text is a non-normative example for a possible implementation of the algorithm for handling combinations of URNs. The device may use any other algorithm which complies to the mandatory rules described in previous section.
For each category (feature), there is a tree of possible values. For this description, we will name each tree by the category name, and name each node by the trailing portion of the URN. Each URN thus corresponds to a node in a category tree. Thus, there is a tree named "source", whose root node is also named "source", and which has the children source:internal, source:external, source:friend, and source:family. For example, urn:alert:source:external is placed at the node "source:external" in the "source" tree. (Of course, there are an infinite number of potential additional nodes in the tree for private values, but we don't have to represent those nodes explicitly unless the device has a signal representing the private value.)
We assign similar locations to signals, but each signal has a place in *every* tree. If a signal has a simple meaning, such as "external source", its place in the "source" tree is source:external, but its place in every other feature tree is at the root node, meaning that it has no particular meaning for that feature.
A signal that has a complex meaning may have non-root positions in more than one feature tree. For example, an "external, high priority" signal would be placed at source:external and priority:high in those trees, but be at the root in all other feature trees.
In order to assure that the algorithm always selects at least one signal, we assume that there is a "default" signal, whose position in every feature tree is at the root. The default signal is set up so that it will never be excluded from the set of acceptable signals for an indication, but will usually be the least-desirable signal for any indication.
The algorithm proceeds by considering each URN in the received Alert-Info header from left to right, while revising a set of signals. The set of signals starts as the entire set of signals available to the device. Each URN excludes some signals from the set, and *sorts* the signals that remain in the set according to how well they represent the URN. The first URN is the "major sort", and has the most influence on the position of a signal in the set. The second URN is a "minor sort", in that it arranges the orders of the signals that are tied within the first sort, the third URN arranges the orders of the signals that are tied within the first two sorts, etc.
At the end of the algorithm, a final, "most minor" sort is done, which orders the signals which have been tied under all the sorts driven by the URNs. This sort places the least specific signal *first*.
Once all the URNs are processed and the sorting is done, the device selects the first signal in the set.
Here is how a single sort step proceeds, examining a single URN to modify the set of signals (by excluding some signals and further sorting the signals that remain):
In cases when the device can render audio and visual (e.g. video or text) signals at the same time, the algorithms as we have been discussing them would work correctly if we consider that the input set of signals is a set of *pairs*, each pair containing an audio component and a visual component, and the input set of pairs contains all possible pairs of audio and visual components.
The following examples show how the algorithm described in the previous section works:
Example 1
The device has a set of 4 alerting signals. We list their primary meanings, and the locations that they are placed in the feature trees:
Meaning: <urn:alert:source:external>
Locations:
Meaning: <urn:alert:source:internal>
Locations:
Meaning: <urn:alert:priority:low>
Locations:
Meaning: <urn:alert:priority:high>
Locations:
To which we add:
Meaning: default
Locations:
If the device receives <urn:alert:source:internal>, then the sort is:
Signals at source:internal:
<urn:alert:source:internal>
Signals at source:
<urn:alert:priority:low>
<urn:alert:priority:high>
default
And these signals are excluded from the set:
<urn:alert:source:external>
So in this example, the sorting algorithm properly gives first place to <urn:alert:source:internal>.
Example 2
Let us add to the set of signals in Example 1 ones that express combinations like "internal, high priority", but let us specifically exclude the combination "internal, low priority" so as to set up some tricky examples. This enlarges our set of signals:
Meaning: default
Locations:
Meaning: external
Locations:
Meaning: internal
Locations:
Meaning: low
Locations:
Meaning: high
Locations:
Meaning: external high
Locations:
Meaning: external low
Locations:
Meaning: internal high
Locations:
If the device receives <urn:alert:source:internal>, then the sort is:
Signals at source:internal: (that is, tied for first place)
Signals at source: (tied for second place)
Signals excluded from the set:
Two signals are tied for the first place, but the final sort orders them:
because it puts the least-specific signal first. So the signal "internal" is chosen.
Example 3
The same device receives <urn:alert:source:external>, <urn:alert:priority:low>. The first sort (due to <urn:alert:source:external>) is:
Signals at source:external:
Signals at source:
Signals excluded:
The second sort (due to <urn:alert:priority:low>) puts signals at priority:low before signals at priority, and excludes signal at priority:high:
Excluded:
So, we choose "external low".
Example 4
Suppose the same device receives <urn:alert:source:internal>, <urn:alert:priority:low>. Note that there is no signal that corresponds to this combination.
The first sort is based on source:internal, and results in this order:
Excluded:
The second sort is based on priority:low, and results in this order:
Excluded:
So we choose the signal "internal".
Example 5
Let us set up a simple set of signals, with three signals giving priority:
Meaning: default
Locations:
Meaning: low
Locations:
Meaning: high
Locations:
Notice that we've used the "default" signal to cover "normal priority". That is so the signal will cover situations where no priority URN is present, as well as the ones with <urn:alert:priority:normal>. So we're deliberately failing to distinguish "priority:normal" from the default priority.
If the device receives <urn:alert:priority:low>, the sort is:
Excluded:
and signal "low" is chosen.
Similarly, if the device receives <urn:alert:priority:high>, signal "high" is chosen.
If the device receives <urn:alert:priority:normal>, the sort is:
Excluded:
and signal "default" is chosen.
If no "priority" URN is received, "default" will be put before "low" and "high" by the final sort, and so it will be chosen.
Upon receiving a SIP INVITE request or a SIP provisional response with an Alert-Info header field that contains a combination of Alert-Info URNs, the User Agent (UA) attempts to match the received Alert-Info URNs combination with a signal it can render. The mandatory rules and an algorythm example are described in Section Section 7. The User Agent (UA) ignores the Alert-Info URNs for which no match is found and proceeds with the normal operation.
The User Agent (UA) is responsible for the non disturbing rendering if multiple indications and network resources are to be rendered simultaneously.
A SIP proxy MAY add a URN or multiple URNs to the Alert-Info header field in a SIP request or a provisional 1xx response excepting 100 response when it needs to provide additional information about the call or about the provided service. A SIP Proxy SHOULD NOT add a mixture of Alert-Info URNs and URIs to the Alert-Info header field that may cause disturbing rendering interference at the recipient's User Agent (UA).
Following example shows both the network audio resource referenced by the HTTP URI and the URN indication for the call-waiting service transported by the Alert-Info header field in a 180 Ringing provisional response.
Alert-Info: <http://www.example.com/sound/moo.wav>,
<urn:alert:service:call-waiting>
This section registers a new URN namespace identifier (NID) in accordance with RFC 3406 with the registration template provided in Section 4 .
Alert URN identifiers are identified by labels managed by IANA, according to the processes outlined in [RFC5226] in a new registry called "Alert URN Labels". Thus, creating a new Alert-Info URN identifier requires IANA action. The policy for adding a new alert category is 'Standards Action'. (This document defines the alert categories 'service', 'source', 'priority', 'duration', 'delay' and 'locale'. ) The policy for assigning labels to alert-indications and the rules to combine them may differ for each alert-category and MUST be defined by the document describing the corresponding alert category. The entries in the registration table have the following format:
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
---------------------------------------------------------------
foo RFCxyz Description of the 'foo'
alert-category
foo:bar RFCabc Description of the 'foo:bar'
alert-identifier
Each alert-category or alert-indication label MUST NOT exceed 27 characters.
The following table contains the initial IANA registration for the "service" alert-category and alert-identifiers. The value of this indicator is set to a value different from "normal" if the caller or callee is informed that a specific telephony service which has been initiated.
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
-----------------------------------------------------------
service RFC XXXX Alert-category for "service"
alert-identifiers.
service:normal RFC XXXX Normal ring /rinback
rendering (default value).
service:call-waiting RFC XXXX Call waiting was
initiated at the other side
of the call.
service:forward RFC XXXX Call has been forwarded.
service:recall:calback RFC XXXX Recall due to callback.
service:recall:hold RFC XXXX Recall due to call hold.
service:recall:transfer RFC XXXX Recall due to callback.
service:<private-name> RFC XXXX Reserved for private
extensions.
The following table contains the initial IANA registration for the "source" alert-category and alert-identifiers. The value of this indicator provides information about the user at the other side of the call.
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
-----------------------------------------------------------
source RFC XXXX Alert-category for "source"
alert-identifiers
source:unclassified RFC XXXX Unclassified ring /rinback
rendering (default value)
source:internal RFC XXXX User at the other side of
the call is internal to the
enterprise or PBX system.
source:external RFC XXXX User at the other side of
the call is internal to the
enterprise or PBX system.
source:friend RFC XXXX User at the other side of
the call is a friend.
source:family RFC XXXX User at the other side of
the call is a family member.
source:<private-name> RFC XXXX Reserved for private
extensions.
The following table contains the initial IANA registration for the "priority" alert-category and alert-identifiers. The value of this indicator provides information about the priority the alerted user should give to the call.
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
-----------------------------------------------------------
priority RFC XXXX Alert-category for
"priority" alert-
identifiers.
priority:normal RFC XXXX Normal ring /rinback
rendering (default value).
priority:low RFC XXXX Low priority call.
priority:high RFC XXXX High priority call.
priority:<private-name> RFC XXXX Reserved for private
extensions.
The following table contains the initial IANA registration for the "duration" alert-category and alert-identifiers. The value of this indicator provides information about the duration of the alerting signals compared to the default alerting signals.
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
-----------------------------------------------------------
duration RFC XXXX Alert-category for "duration"
alert-identifiers
duration:normal RFC XXXX Normal ring /rinback
rendering (default value)
duration:short RFC XXXX Shorter than normal
duration:long RFC XXXX Longer than normal
duration:<private-name> RFC XXXX Reserved for private
extensions.
The following table contains the initial IANA registration for the "delay" alert-category and alert-identifiers. The value of this indicator provides information about the delay of the alerting signals.
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
-----------------------------------------------------------
delay RFC XXXX Alert-category for "delay"
alert-identifiers
delay:none RFC XXXX Immediate alerting
(default value)
delay:yes RFC XXXX Delayed alerting
delay:<private-name> RFC XXXX Reserved for private
extensions.
The following table contains the initial IANA registration for the "locale" alert-category and alert-identifiers. The value of this indicator provides information about the location of the user at the other side of the call.
alert-category/ Reference Description
alert-identifier
-----------------------------------------------------------
locale RFC XXXX Alert-category for "locale"
alert-identifiers
locale:default RFC XXXX Alerting not location
specific
(default value)
locale:country:<ISO 3166-1 country code>
RFC XXXX Country-specific alerting
locale:<private-name> RFC XXXX Reserved for private
extensions.
The alert-identifier labels are protocol elements [RFC6365] and are not normally seen by users. Thus, the character set for these elements is restricted, as described in Section 11.
As an identifier, the alert URN does not appear to raise any particular security issues. The indications described by the 'alert' URN are meant to be well-known, so privacy considerations do not apply to the URN.
Provision of the specific indications from callee to caller may raise privacy issues. Such provision SHALL always be explicitly authorised by the callee.
Proxies may choose to suppress undesired indications from untrusted callers while allowing them from trusted callers.
The authors wish to thank Denis Alexeitsev, the editor of the initial draft in BLISS, Anwar Siddiqui for his contributions to the draft, and Adam Roach, Dean Willis, Martin Huelsemann, Shida Schubert, John Elwell and Tom Taylor for their comments and suggestions.
| [RFC1123] | Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October 1989. |
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC2141] | Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. |
| [RFC3261] | Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002. |
| [RFC3406] | Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R. and P. Faltstrom, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002. |
| [RFC5234] | Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. |