Network Working Group M. Boucadair Internet-Draft Orange Intended status: Standards Track S. Sivakumar Expires: April 4, 2018 Cisco Systems C. Jacquenet Orange S. Vinapamula Juniper Networks Q. Wu Huawei October 1, 2017 A YANG Data Model for Network Address Translation (NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT) draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-05 Abstract For the sake of network automation and the need for programming Network Address Translation (NAT) function in particular, a data model for configuring and managing the NAT is essential. This document defines a YANG module for the NAT function. NAT44, Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers (NAT64), Customer-side transLATor (CLAT), Explicit Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation (SIIT EAM), and IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (NPTv6) are covered in this document. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on April 4, 2018. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Overview of the NAT YANG Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. Various NAT Flavors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3. TCP, UDP and ICMP NAT Behavioral Requirements . . . . . . 6 2.4. Other Transport Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5. IP Addresses Used for Translation . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.6. Port Set Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.7. Port-Restricted IP Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.8. NAT Mapping Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.9. Resource Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.10. Binding the NAT Function to an External Interface or VRF 10 2.11. Tree Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3. NAT YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Appendix A. Sample Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 A.1. Traditional NAT44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 A.2. CGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 A.3. CGN Pass-Through . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 A.4. NAT64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 A.5. Explicit Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 A.6. Static Mappings with Port Ranges . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 A.7. Static Mappings with IP Prefixes . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 A.8. Destination NAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 A.9. CLAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 A.10. NPTv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 1. Introduction This document defines a data model for Network Address Translation (NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT) capabilities using the YANG data modeling language [RFC6020]. Traditional NAT is defined in [RFC2663], while Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) is defined in [RFC6888]. Unlike traditional NAT, the CGN is used to optimize the usage of global IP address space at the scale of a domain: a CGN is not managed by end users, but by service providers instead. This document covers both traditional NATs and CGNs. This document also covers NAT64 [RFC6146], customer-side translator (CLAT) [RFC6877], Explicit Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation (EAM) [RFC7757], and IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (NPTv6) [RFC6296]. The full set of translation schemes that are in scope is included in Section 2.2. Sample examples are provided in Appendix A. These examples are not intended to be exhaustive. 1.1. Terminology This document makes use of the following terms: o Basic NAT44: translation is limited to IP addresses alone (Section 2.1 of [RFC3022]). o Network Address/Port Translator (NAPT): translation in NAPT is extended to include IP addresses and transport identifiers (such as a TCP/UDP port or ICMP query ID); refer to Section 2.2 of [RFC3022]. o Destination NAT: is a translation that acts on the destination IP address and/or destination port number. This flavor is usually deployed in load balancers or at devices in front of public servers. o Port-restricted IPv4 address: An IPv4 address with a restricted port set. Multiple hosts may share the same IPv4 address; however, their port sets must not overlap [RFC7596]. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 o Restricted port set: A non-overlapping range of allowed external ports to use for NAT operation. Source ports of IPv4 packets translated by a NAT must belong to the assigned port set. The port set is used for all port-aware IP protocols [RFC7596]. o Internal Host: A host that may solicit a NAT or an NPTv6 (or both) capability to send to and receive traffic from the Internet. o Internal Address/prefix: The IP address/prefix of an internal host. o External Address: The IP address/prefix assigned by a NAT/NPTv6 to an internal host; this is the address that will be seen by a remote host on the Internet. o Mapping: denotes a state at the NAT that is necessary for network address and/or port translation. o Dynamic implicit mapping: is created implicitly as a side effect of traffic such as an outgoing TCP SYN or an outgoing UDP packet. A validity lifetime is associated with this mapping. o Dynamic explicit mapping: is created as a result of an explicit request, e.g., PCP message [RFC6887]. A validity lifetime is associated with this mapping. o Static explicit mapping: is created manually. This mapping is likely to be maintained by the NAT function till an explicit action is executed to remove it. The usage of the term NAT in this document refers to any NAT flavor (NAT44, NAT64, etc.) indifferently. This document uses the term "session" as defined in [RFC2663] and [RFC6146] for NAT64. 1.2. Tree Diagrams The meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is as follows: o Brackets "[" and "]" enclose list keys. o Curly braces "{" and "}" contain names of optional features that make the corresponding node conditional. o Abbreviations before data node names: "rw" means configuration (read-write), "ro" state data (read-only). Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 o Symbols after data node names: "?" means an optional node, "!" a container with presence, and "*" denotes a "list" or "leaf-list". o Parentheses enclose choice and case nodes, and case nodes are also marked with a colon (":"). o Ellipsis ("...") stands for contents of subtrees that are not shown. 2. Overview of the NAT YANG Data Model 2.1. Overview The NAT YANG module is designed to cover dynamic implicit mappings and static explicit mappings. The required functionality to instruct dynamic explicit mappings is defined in separate documents such as [I-D.boucadair-pcp-yang]. Considerations about instructing explicit dynamic means (e.g., [RFC6887], [RFC6736], or [RFC8045]) are out of scope. A single NAT device can have multiple NAT instances (nat-instance); each of these instances can be provided with its own policies (e.g., be responsible for serving a group of hosts). This document does not make any assumption about how internal hosts or flows are associated with a given NAT instance. The NAT YANG module assumes that each NAT instance can be enabled/ disabled, be provisioned with a specific set of configuration data, and maintains its own mapping tables. Further, the NAT YANG module allows for a NAT instance to be provided with multiple NAT policies (nat-policy). The document does not make any assumption about how flows are associated with a given NAT policy of a given NAT instance. Classification filters are out of scope. Defining multiple NAT instances or configuring multiple NAT policies within one single NAT instance is implementation- and deployment- specific. To accommodate deployments where [RFC6302] is not enabled, this YANG module allows to instruct a NAT function to log the destination port number. The reader may refer to [I-D.ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging] which provides the templates to log the destination ports. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 2.2. Various NAT Flavors The following modes are supported: 1. Basic NAT44 2. NAPT 3. Destination NAT 4. Port-restricted NAT 5. Stateful and stateless NAT64 6. EAM SIIT 7. CLAT 8. NPTv6 9. Combination of Basic NAT/NAPT and Destination NAT 10. Combination of port-restricted and Destination NAT 11. Combination of NAT64 and EAM [I-D.ietf-softwire-dslite-yang] specifies an extension to support DS- Lite. 2.3. TCP, UDP and ICMP NAT Behavioral Requirements This document assumes [RFC4787][RFC5382][RFC5508] are enabled by default. Furthermore, the NAT YANG module relies upon the recommendations detailed in [RFC6888] and [RFC7857]. 2.4. Other Transport Protocols The module is structured to support other protocols than UDP, TCP, and ICMP. The mapping table is designed so that it can indicate any transport protocol. For example, this module may be used to manage a DCCP-capable NAT that adheres to [RFC5597]. Future extensions can be defined to cover NAT-related considerations that are specific to other transport protocols such as SCTP [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-natsupp]. Typically, the mapping entry can be extended to record two optional SCTP-specific parameters: Internal Verification Tag (Int-VTag) and External Verification Tag (Ext-VTag). 2.5. IP Addresses Used for Translation The NAT YANG module assumes that blocks of IP external addresses (external-ip-address-pool) can be provisioned to the NAT function. These blocks may be contiguous or not. This behavior is aligned with [RFC6888] which specifies that a NAT function should not have any limitations on the size or the Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 contiguity of the external address pool. In particular, the NAT function must be configurable with contiguous or non-contiguous external IPv4 address ranges. Likewise, one or multiple IP address pools may be configured for Destination NAT (dst-ip-address-pool). 2.6. Port Set Assignment Port numbers can be assigned by a NAT individually (that is, a single port is a assigned on a per session basis). Nevertheless, this port allocation scheme may not be optimal for logging purposes. Therefore, a NAT function should be able to assign port sets (e.g., [RFC7753]) to optimize the volume of the logging data (REQ-14 of [RFC6888]). Both features are supported in the NAT YANG module. When port set assignment is activated (i.e., port-allocation- type==port-range-allocation), the NAT can be provided with the size of the port set to be assigned (port-set-size). 2.7. Port-Restricted IP Addresses Some NATs require to restrict the port numbers (e.g., Lightweight 4over6 [RFC7596], MAP-E [RFC7597]). Two schemes of port set assignments (port-set-restrict) are supported in this document: o Simple port range: is defined by two port values, the start and the end of the port range [RFC8045]. o Algorithmic: an algorithm is defined in [RFC7597] to characterize the set of ports that can be used. 2.8. NAT Mapping Entries A TCP/UDP mapping entry maintains an association between the following information: (internal-src-address, internal-src-port) (internal-dst-address, internal-dst-port) <=> (external-src-address, external-src-port) (external-dst-address, external-dst-port) An ICMP mapping entry maintains an association between the following information: (internal-src-address, internal-dst-address, internal ICMP/ICMPv6 identifier) <=> (external-src-address, external-dst-address, external ICMP/ICMPv6 identifier) Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 To cover TCP, UDP, and ICMP, the NAT YANG module assumes the following structure of a mapping entry: type: Indicates how the mapping was instantiated. For example, it may indicate whether a mapping is dynamically instantiated by a packet or statically configured. transport-protocol: Indicates the transport protocol (e.g., UDP, TCP, ICMP) of a given mapping. internal-src-address: Indicates the source IP address as used by an internal host. internal-src-port: Indicates the source port number (or ICMP identifier) as used by an internal host. external-src-address: Indicates the source IP address as assigned by the NAT. external-src-port: Indicates the source port number (or ICMP identifier) as assigned by the NAT. internal-dst-address: Indicates the destination IP address as used by an internal host when sending a packet to a remote host. internal-dst-port: Indicates the destination IP address as used by an internal host when sending a packet to a remote host. external-dst-address: Indicates the destination IP address used by a NAT when processing a packet issued by an internal host towards a remote host. external-dst-port: Indicates the destination port number used by a NAT when processing a packet issued by an internal host towards a remote host. In order to cover both NAT64 and NAT44 flavors in particular, the NAT mapping structure allows to include an IPv4 or an IPv6 address as an internal IP address. Remaining fields are common to both NAT schemes. For example, the mapping that will be created by a NAT64 upon receipt of a TCP SYN from source address 2001:db8:aaaa::1 and source port number 25636 to destination IP address 2001:db8:1234::198.51.100.1 and destination port number 8080 is characterized as follows: o type: dynamic implicit mapping. o transport-protocol: TCP (6) Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 o internal-src-address: 2001:db8:aaaa::1 o internal-src-port: 25636 o external-src-address: T (an IPv4 address configured on the NAT64) o external-src-port: t (a port number that is chosen by the NAT64) o internal-dst-address: 2001:db8:1234::198.51.100.1 o internal-dst-port: 8080 o external-dst-address: 198.51.100.1 o external-dst-port: 8080 The mapping that will be created by a NAT44 upon receipt of an ICMP request from source address 198.51.100.1 and ICMP identifier (ID1) to destination IP address 198.51.100.11 is characterized as follows: o type: dynamic implicit mapping. o transport-protocol: ICMP (1) o internal-src-address: 198.51.100.1 o internal-src-port: ID1 o external-src-address: T (an IPv4 address configured on the NAT44) o external-src-port: ID2 (an ICMP identifier that is chosen by the NAT44) o internal-dst-address: 198.51.100.11 The mapping that will be created by a NAT64 upon receipt of an ICMP request from source address 2001:db8:aaaa::1 and ICMP identifier (ID1) to destination IP address 2001:db8:1234::198.51.100.1 is characterized as follows: o type: dynamic implicit mapping. o transport-protocol: ICMPv6 (58) o internal-src-address: 2001:db8:aaaa::1 o internal-src-port: ID1 o external-src-address: T (an IPv4 address configured on the NAT64) o external-src-port: ID2 (an ICMP identifier that is chosen by the NAT64) o internal-dst-address: 2001:db8:1234::198.51.100.1 o external-dst-address: 198.51.100.1 Note that a mapping table is maintained only for stateful NAT functions. Particularly: o No mapping table is maintained for NPTv6 given that it is stateless and transport-agnostic. o The double translations are stateless in CLAT if a dedicated IPv6 prefix is provided for CLAT. If not, a stateful NAT44 will be required. o No per-flow mapping is maintained for EAM [RFC7757]. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 o No mapping table is maintained for stateless NAT64. As a reminder, in such deployments internal IPv6 nodes are addressed using IPv4-translatable IPv6 addresses, which enable them to be accessed by IPv4 nodes [RFC6052]. 2.9. Resource Limits In order to comply with CGN deployments in particular, the NAT YANG module allows limiting the number of external ports per subscriber (port-quota) and the amount of state memory allocated per mapping and per subscriber (mapping-limit and connection-limit). According to [RFC6888], the model allows for the following: o Per-subscriber limits are configurable by the NAT administrator. o Per-subscriber limits are configurable independently per transport protocol. o Administrator-adjustable thresholds to prevent a single subscriber from consuming excessive CPU resources from the NAT (e.g., rate- limit the subscriber's creation of new mappings) can be configured. 2.10. Binding the NAT Function to an External Interface or VRF The model allows to specify the interface or Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instance on which the NAT function must be applied (external-realm). Distinct interfaces/VRFs can be provided as a function of the NAT policy (see for example, Section 4 of [RFC7289]). If no external interface/VRF is provided, this assumes that the system is able to determine the external interface/VRF instance on which the NAT will be applied. Typically, the WAN and LAN interfaces of a CPE is determined by the CPE. 2.11. Tree Structure The tree structure of the NAT YANG module is provided below: module: ietf-nat +--rw nat-module +--rw nat-instances +--rw nat-instance* [id] +--rw id uint32 +--rw name? string +--rw enable? boolean +--rw nat-capabilities | +--rw nat-flavor* identityref Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 | +--rw nat44-flavor* identityref | +--rw restricted-port-support? boolean | +--rw static-mapping-support? boolean | +--rw port-randomization-support? boolean | +--rw port-range-allocation-support? boolean | +--rw port-preservation-suport? boolean | +--rw port-parity-preservation-support? boolean | +--rw address-roundrobin-support? boolean | +--rw paired-address-pooling-support? boolean | +--rw endpoint-independent-mapping-support? boolean | +--rw address-dependent-mapping-support? boolean | +--rw address-and-port-dependent-mapping-support? boolean | +--rw endpoint-independent-filtering-support? boolean | +--rw address-dependent-filtering? boolean | +--rw address-and-port-dependent-filtering? boolean +--rw nat-pass-through* [nat-pass-through-id] | +--rw nat-pass-through-id uint32 | +--rw nat-pass-through-pref? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw nat-pass-through-port? inet:port-number +--rw nat-policy* [policy-id] | +--rw policy-id uint32 | +--rw clat-parameters | | +--rw clat-ipv6-prefixes* [clat-ipv6-prefix] | | | +--rw clat-ipv6-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix | | +--rw clat-ipv4-prefixes* [clat-ipv4-prefix] | | +--rw clat-ipv4-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix | +--rw nptv6-prefixes* [translation-id] | | +--rw translation-id uint32 | | +--rw internal-ipv6-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix | | +--rw external-ipv6-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix | +--rw eam* [eam-ipv4-prefix] | | +--rw eam-ipv4-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix | | +--rw eam-ipv6-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix | +--rw nat64-prefixes* [nat64-prefix] | | +--rw nat64-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix | | +--rw destination-ipv4-prefix* [ipv4-prefix] | | | +--rw ipv4-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix | | +--rw stateless-enable? boolean | +--rw external-ip-address-pool* [pool-id] | | +--rw pool-id uint32 | | +--rw external-ip-pool? inet:ipv4-prefix | +--rw port-set-restrict | | +--rw (port-type)? | | +--:(port-range) | | | +--rw start-port-number? inet:port-number | | | +--rw end-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--:(port-set-algo) | | +--rw psid-offset? uint8 Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 | | +--rw psid-len uint8 | | +--rw psid uint16 | +--rw dst-nat-enable? boolean | +--rw dst-ip-address-pool* [pool-id] | | +--rw pool-id uint32 | | +--rw dst-in-ip-pool? inet:ip-prefix | | +--rw dst-out-ip-pool? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw supported-transport-protocols* [transport-protocol-id] | | +--rw transport-protocol-id uint8 | | +--rw transport-protocol-name? string | +--rw subscriber-mask-v6? uint8 | +--rw subscriber-match* [sub-match-id] | | +--rw sub-match-id uint32 | | +--rw sub-mask inet:ip-prefix | +--rw paired-address-pooling? boolean | +--rw nat-mapping-type? enumeration | +--rw nat-filtering-type? enumeration | +--rw port-quota* [quota-type] | | +--rw port-limit? uint16 | | +--rw quota-type enumeration | +--rw port-allocation-type? enumeration | +--rw address-roundrobin-enable? boolean | +--rw port-set | | +--rw port-set-size? uint16 | | +--rw port-set-timeout? uint32 | +--rw timers | | +--rw udp-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw tcp-idle-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw tcp-trans-open-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw tcp-trans-close-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw tcp-in-syn-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw fragment-min-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw icmp-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw per-port-timeout* [port-number] | | | +--rw port-number inet:port-number | | | +--rw port-timeout inet:port-number | | +--rw hold-down-timeout? uint32 | | +--rw hold-down-max? uint32 | +--rw algs* [alg-name] | | +--rw alg-name string | | +--rw alg-transport-protocol? uint32 | | +--rw alg-transport-port? inet:port-number | | +--rw alg-status? boolean | +--rw all-algs-enable? boolean | +--rw notify-pool-usage | | +--rw pool-id? uint32 | | +--rw notify-pool-hi-threshold percent | | +--rw notify-pool-low-threshold? percent Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 | +--rw external-realm | +--rw (realm-type)? | +--:(interface) | | +--rw external-interface? if:interface-ref | +--:(vrf) | +--rw external-vrf-instance? identityref +--rw mapping-limit | +--rw limit-per-subscriber? uint32 | +--rw limit-per-vrf? uint32 | +--rw limit-per-subnet? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw limit-per-instance uint32 | +--rw limit-per-udp uint32 | +--rw limit-per-tcp uint32 | +--rw limit-per-icmp uint32 +--rw connection-limit | +--rw limit-per-subscriber? uint32 | +--rw limit-per-vrf? uint32 | +--rw limit-per-subnet? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw limit-per-instance uint32 | +--rw limit-per-udp uint32 | +--rw limit-per-tcp uint32 | +--rw limit-per-icmp uint32 +--rw logging-info | +--rw logging-enable? boolean | +--rw destination-address inet:ip-prefix | +--rw destination-port inet:port-number | +--rw (protocol)? | +--:(syslog) | | +--rw syslog? boolean | +--:(ipfix) | | +--rw ipfix? boolean | +--:(ftp) | +--rw ftp? boolean +--rw mapping-table | +--rw mapping-entry* [index] | +--rw index uint32 | +--rw type? enumeration | +--rw transport-protocol? uint8 | +--rw internal-src-address? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw internal-src-port | | +--rw (port-type)? | | +--:(single-port-number) | | | +--rw single-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--:(port-range) | | +--rw start-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--rw end-port-number? inet:port-number | +--rw external-src-address? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw external-src-port Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 | | +--rw (port-type)? | | +--:(single-port-number) | | | +--rw single-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--:(port-range) | | +--rw start-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--rw end-port-number? inet:port-number | +--rw internal-dst-address? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw internal-dst-port | | +--rw (port-type)? | | +--:(single-port-number) | | | +--rw single-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--:(port-range) | | +--rw start-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--rw end-port-number? inet:port-number | +--rw external-dst-address? inet:ip-prefix | +--rw external-dst-port | | +--rw (port-type)? | | +--:(single-port-number) | | | +--rw single-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--:(port-range) | | +--rw start-port-number? inet:port-number | | +--rw end-port-number? inet:port-number | +--rw lifetime? uint32 +--ro statistics +--ro traffic-statistics | +--ro sent-packet? yang:zero-based-counter64 | +--ro sent-byte? yang:zero-based-counter64 | +--ro rcvd-packet? yang:zero-based-counter64 | +--ro rcvd-byte? yang:zero-based-counter64 | +--ro dropped-packet? yang:zero-based-counter64 | +--ro dropped-byte? yang:zero-based-counter64 +--ro mapping-statistics | +--ro total-mappings? uint32 | +--ro total-tcp-mappings? uint32 | +--ro total-udp-mappings? uint32 | +--ro total-icmp-mappings? uint32 +--ro pool-stats +--ro pool-id? uint32 +--ro address-allocated? uint32 +--ro address-free? uint32 +--ro port-stats +--ro ports-allocated? uint32 +--ro ports-free? uint32 notifications: +---n nat-event +--ro id? -> /nat-module/nat-instances/nat-instance/id +--ro policy-id? -> /nat-module/nat-instances/nat-instance/nat-policy/policy-id +--ro pool-id? -> /nat-module/nat-instances/nat-instance/nat-policy/external-ip-address-pool/pool-id Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 +--ro notify-pool-threshold percent 3. NAT YANG Module file "ietf-nat@2017-10-02.yang" module ietf-nat { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-nat"; //namespace to be assigned by IANA prefix "nat"; import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; } import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; } import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; } //import iana-if-type { prefix ianaift; } organization "IETF OPSAWG Working Group"; contact "Mohamed Boucadair Senthil Sivakumar Chritsian Jacquenet Suresh Vinapamula Qin Wu "; description "This module is a YANG module for NAT implementations (including NAT44 and NAT64 flavors). Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-10-02 { description "Comments from Rajiv Asati to call out explicitly stateless NAT64."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 reference "-ietf-04"; } revision 2017-09-27 { description "Comments from Kris Poscic about NAT44, mainly: - Allow for multiple NAT policies within the same instance. - Associate an external interface/vrf per NAT policy."; reference "-ietf-04"; } revision 2017-09-18 { description "Comments from Tore Anderson about EAM-SIIT."; reference "-ietf-03"; } revision 2017-08-23 { description "Comments from F. Baker about NPTv6."; reference "-ietf-02"; } revision 2017-08-21 { description " Includes CLAT (Lee/Jordi)."; reference "-ietf-01"; } revision 2017-08-03 { description "Integrates comments from OPSAWG CFA."; reference "-ietf-00"; } revision 2017-07-03 { description "Integrates comments from D. Wing and T. Zhou."; reference "-07"; } revision 2015-09-08 { description "Fixes few YANG errors."; reference "-02"; } revision 2015-09-07 { description "Completes the NAT64 model."; reference "01"; } revision 2015-08-29 { description "Initial version."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 reference "00"; } /* * Definitions */ typedef percent { type uint8 { range "0 .. 100"; } description "Percentage"; } /* * Identities */ identity nat-type { description "Base identity for nat type."; } identity nat44 { base nat:nat-type; description "Identity for traditional NAT support."; reference "RFC 3022."; } identity basic-nat { //base nat:nat-type; base nat:nat44; description "Identity for Basic NAT support."; reference "RFC 3022."; } identity napt { //base nat:nat-type; base nat:nat44; description "Identity for NAPT support."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 reference "RFC 3022."; } identity restricted-nat { //base nat:nat-type; base nat:nat44; description "Identity for Port-Restricted NAT support."; reference "RFC 7596."; } identity dst-nat { base nat:nat-type; description "Identity for Destination NAT support."; } identity nat64 { base nat:nat-type; description "Identity for NAT64 support."; reference "RFC 6146."; } identity clat { base nat:nat-type; description "Identity for CLAT support."; reference "RFC 6877."; } identity eam { base nat:nat-type; description "Identity for EAM support."; reference "RFC 7757."; } identity nptv6 { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 base nat:nat-type; description "Identity for NPTv6 support."; reference "RFC 6296."; } identity vrf-routing-instance { description "This identity represents a VRF routing instance."; reference "Section 8.9 of RFC 4026."; } /* * Grouping */ // Set of ports grouping port-set { description "Indicates a set of ports. It may be a simple port range, or use the PSID algorithm to represent a range of transport layer ports which will be used by a NAPT."; choice port-type { default port-range; description "Port type: port-range or port-set-algo."; case port-range { leaf start-port-number { type inet:port-number; description "Begining of the port range."; reference "Section 3.2.9 of RFC 8045."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf end-port-number { type inet:port-number; description "End of the port range."; reference "Section 3.2.10 of RFC 8045."; } } case port-set-algo { leaf psid-offset { type uint8 { range 0..16; } description "The number of offset bits. In Lightweight 4over6, the default value is 0 for assigning one contiguous port range. In MAP-E/T, the default value is 6, which excludes system ports by default and assigns port ranges distributed across the entire port space."; } leaf psid-len { type uint8 { range 0..15; } mandatory true; description "The length of PSID, representing the sharing ratio for an IPv4 address."; } leaf psid { type uint16; mandatory true; description "Port Set Identifier (PSID) value, which identifies a set of ports algorithmically."; } } } } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 // port numbers: single or port-range grouping port-number { description "Individual port or a range of ports."; choice port-type { default single-port-number; description "Port type: single or port-range."; case single-port-number { leaf single-port-number { type inet:port-number; description "Used for single port numbers."; } } case port-range { leaf start-port-number { type inet:port-number; description "Begining of the port range."; reference "Section 3.2.9 of RFC 8045."; } leaf end-port-number { type inet:port-number; description "End of the port range."; reference "Section 3.2.10 of RFC 8045."; } } } } // Mapping Entry grouping mapping-entry { description "NAT mapping entry."; leaf index { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 type uint32; description "A unique identifier of a mapping entry."; } leaf type { type enumeration { enum "static" { description "The mapping entry is manually configured."; } enum "dynamic-explicit" { description "This mapping is created by an outgoing packet."; } enum "dynamic-implicit" { description "This mapping is created by an explicit dynamic message."; } } description "Indicates the type of a mapping entry. E.g., a mapping can be: static, implicit dynamic or explicit dynamic."; } leaf transport-protocol { type uint8; description "Upper-layer protocol associated with this mapping. Values are taken from the IANA protocol registry. For example, this field contains 6 (TCP) for a TCP mapping or 17 (UDP) for a UDP mapping. No transport protocol is indicated if a mapping applies for any protocol."; } leaf internal-src-address { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Corresponds to the source IPv4/IPv6 address/prefix Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 of the packet received on an internal interface."; } container internal-src-port { description "Corresponds to the source port of the packet received on an internal interface. It is used also to carry the internal source ICMP identifier."; uses port-number; } leaf external-src-address { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Source IP address/prefix of the packet sent on an external interface of the NAT."; } container external-src-port { description "Source port of the packet sent on an external interafce of the NAT. It is used also to carry the external source ICMP identifier."; uses port-number; } leaf internal-dst-address { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Corresponds to the destination IP address/prefix of the packet received on an internal interface of the NAT. For example, some NAT implementations support the translation of both source and destination addresses and ports, sometimes referred to as 'Twice NAT'."; } container internal-dst-port { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "Corresponds to the destination port of the IP packet received on the internal interface. It is used also to carry the internal destination ICMP identifier."; uses port-number; } leaf external-dst-address { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Corresponds to the destination IP address/prefix of the packet sent on an external interface of the NAT."; } container external-dst-port { description "Corresponds to the destination port number of the packet sent on the external interface of the NAT. It is used also to carry the external destination ICMP identifier."; uses port-number; } leaf lifetime { type uint32; //mandatory true; description "When specified, it tracks the connection that is fully-formed (e.g., once the 3WHS TCP is completed) or the duration for maintaining an explicit mapping alive. Static mappings may not be associated with a lifetime. If no lifetime is associated with a static mapping, an explicit action is requried to remove that mapping."; } } /* * NAT Module Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 */ container nat-module { description "NAT"; container nat-instances { description "NAT instances"; list nat-instance { key "id"; description "A NAT instance."; leaf id { type uint32; description "NAT instance identifier."; reference "RFC7659."; } leaf name { type string; description "A name associated with the NAT instance."; } leaf enable { type boolean; description "Status of the the NAT instance."; } container nat-capabilities { // config false; description "NAT capabilities"; leaf-list nat-flavor { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 type identityref { base nat-type; } description "Type of NAT."; } leaf-list nat44-flavor { when "../nat-flavor = 'nat44'"; type identityref { base nat44; } description "Type of NAT44: Basic NAT or NAPT."; } leaf restricted-port-support { type boolean; description "Indicates source port NAT restriction support."; } leaf static-mapping-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether static mappings are supported."; } leaf port-randomization-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether port randomization is supported."; } leaf port-range-allocation-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether port range Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 allocation is supported."; } leaf port-preservation-suport { type boolean; description "Indicates whether port preservation is supported."; } leaf port-parity-preservation-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether port parity preservation is supported."; } leaf address-roundrobin-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether address allocation round robin is supported."; } leaf paired-address-pooling-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether paired-address-pooling is supported"; } leaf endpoint-independent-mapping-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether endpoint-independent- mapping in Section 4 of RFC 4787 is supported."; } leaf address-dependent-mapping-support { type boolean; description Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 "Indicates whether address-dependent- mapping is supported."; } leaf address-and-port-dependent-mapping-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether address-and-port- dependent-mapping is supported."; } leaf endpoint-independent-filtering-support { type boolean; description "Indicates whether endpoint-independent -filtering is supported."; } leaf address-dependent-filtering { type boolean; description "Indicates whether address-dependent -filtering is supported."; } leaf address-and-port-dependent-filtering { type boolean; description "Indicates whether address-and-port -dependent is supported."; } } // Parameters for NAT pass through list nat-pass-through { key nat-pass-through-id; description "IP prefix NAT pass through."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf nat-pass-through-id { type uint32; description "An identifier of the IP prefix pass through."; } leaf nat-pass-through-pref { type inet:ip-prefix; description "The IP address subnets that match should not be translated. According to REQ#6 of RFC6888, it must be possible to administratively turn off translation for specific destination addresses and/or ports."; } leaf nat-pass-through-port { type inet:port-number; description "The IP address subnets that match should not be translated. According to REQ#6 of RFC6888, it must be possible to administratively turn off translation for specific destination addresses and/or ports."; } } // NAT Policies: Multiple policies per NAT instance list nat-policy { key policy-id; description "NAT parameters for a given instance"; leaf policy-id { type uint32; description "An identifier of the NAT policy."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 // CLAT Parameters container clat-parameters { description "CLAT parameters."; list clat-ipv6-prefixes { when "../../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'clat' "; key clat-ipv6-prefix; description "464XLAT double translation treatment is stateless when a dedicated /64 is available for translation on the CLAT. Otherwise, the CLAT will have both stateful and stateless since it requires NAT44 from the LAN to a single IPv4 address and then stateless translation to a single IPv6 address."; reference "RFC 6877."; leaf clat-ipv6-prefix { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "An IPv6 prefix used for CLAT."; } } list clat-ipv4-prefixes { when "../../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'clat'"; key clat-ipv4-prefix; description "Pool of IPv4 addresses used for CLAT. 192.0.0.0/29 is the IPv4 service continuity prefix."; reference "RFC 7335."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf clat-ipv4-prefix { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description "464XLAT double translation treatment is stateless when a dedicated /64 is available for translation on the CLAT. Otherwise, the CLAT will have both stateful and stateless since it requires NAT44 from the LAN to a single IPv4 address and then stateless translation to a single IPv6 address. The CLAT performs NAT44 for all IPv4 LAN packets so that all the LAN-originated IPv4 packets appear from a single IPv4 address and are then statelessly translated to one interface IPv6 address that is claimed by the CLAT. An IPv4 address from this pool is also provided to an application that makes use of literals."; reference "RFC 6877."; } } } // NPTv6 Parameters list nptv6-prefixes { when "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'nptv6' "; key translation-id; description "Provides one or a list of (internal IPv6 prefix, external IPv6 prefix) required for NPTv6. In its simplest form, NPTv6 interconnects two network links, one of which is an 'internal' network link attachedto a leaf network within a single administrative domain and the other of which is an 'external' network with connectivity to the global Internet."; reference "RFC 6296."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf translation-id { type uint32; description "An identifier of the NPTv6 prefixs."; } leaf internal-ipv6-prefix { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "An IPv6 prefix used by an internal interface of NPTv6."; reference "RFC 6296."; } leaf external-ipv6-prefix { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "An IPv6 prefix used by the external interface of NPTv6."; reference "RFC 6296."; } } // EAM SIIT Parameters list eam { when "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'eam' "; key eam-ipv4-prefix; description "The Explicit Address Mapping Table, a conceptual table in which each row represents an EAM. Each EAM describes a mapping between IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes/addresses."; reference "Section 3.1 of RFC 7757."; leaf eam-ipv4-prefix { type inet:ipv4-prefix; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "The IPv4 prefix of an EAM."; reference "Section 3.2 of RFC 7757."; } leaf eam-ipv6-prefix { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "The IPv6 prefix of an EAM."; reference "Section 3.2 of RFC 7757."; } } //NAT64 IPv6 Prefixes list nat64-prefixes { when "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'nat64' " + " or ../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'clat'"; key nat64-prefix; description "Provides one or a list of NAT64 prefixes with or without a list of destination IPv4 prefixes. Destination-based Pref64::/n is discussed in Section 5.1 of [RFC7050]). For example: 192.0.2.0/24 is mapped to 2001:db8:122:300::/56. 198.51.100.0/24 is mapped to 2001:db8:122::/48."; reference "Section 5.1 of RFC7050."; leaf nat64-prefix { type inet:ipv6-prefix; //default "64:ff9b::/96"; description "A NAT64 prefix. Can be NSP or a Well-Known Prefix (WKP). Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 Organizations deploying stateless IPv4/IPv6 translation should assign a Network-Specific Prefix to their IPv4/IPv6 translation service. For stateless NAT64, IPv4-translatable IPv6 addresses must use the selected Network-Specific Prefix. Both IPv4-translatable IPv6 addresses and IPv4-converted IPv6 addresses should use the same prefix."; reference "Sections 3.3 and 3.4 of RFC 6052."; } list destination-ipv4-prefix { key ipv4-prefix; description "An IPv4 prefix/address."; leaf ipv4-prefix { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description "An IPv4 address/prefix."; } } leaf stateless-enable { type boolean; description "Enable explicitly statless NAT64."; } } list external-ip-address-pool { key pool-id; description "Pool of external IP addresses used to service internal hosts. Both contiguous and non-contiguous pools can be configured for NAT purposes."; leaf pool-id { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 34] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 type uint32; description "An identifier of the address pool."; } leaf external-ip-pool { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description "An IPv4 prefix used for NAT purposes."; } } container port-set-restrict { when "../../nat-capabilities/restricted-port-support = 'true'"; description "Configures contiguous and non-contiguous port ranges."; uses port-set; } leaf dst-nat-enable { type boolean; default false; description "Enable/Disable destination NAT. A NAT44 may be configured to enable Destination NAT, too."; } list dst-ip-address-pool { //if-feature dst-nat; when "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'dst-nat' "; key pool-id; description "Pool of IP addresses used for destination NAT."; leaf pool-id { type uint32; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 35] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "An identifier of the address pool."; } leaf dst-in-ip-pool { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Internal IP prefix/address"; } leaf dst-out-ip-pool { type inet:ip-prefix; description "IP address/prefix used for destination NAT."; } } list supported-transport-protocols { key transport-protocol-id; description "Supported transport protocols. TCP and UDP are supported by default."; leaf transport-protocol-id { type uint8; mandatory true; description "Upper-layer protocol associated with this mapping. Values are taken from the IANA protocol registry. For example, this field contains 6 (TCP) for a TCP mapping or 17 (UDP) for a UDP mapping."; } leaf transport-protocol-name { type string; description "For example, TCP, UDP, DCCP, and SCTP."; } } leaf subscriber-mask-v6 { type uint8 { range "0 .. 128"; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 36] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 } description "The subscriber-mask is an integer that indicates the length of significant bits to be applied on the source IP address (internal side) to unambiguously identify a CPE. Subscriber-mask is a system-wide configuration parameter that is used to enforce generic per-subscriber policies (e.g., port-quota). The enforcement of these generic policies does not require the configuration of every subscriber's prefix. Example: suppose the 2001:db8:100:100::/56 prefix is assigned to a NAT64 serviced CPE. Suppose also that 2001:db8:100:100::1 is the IPv6 address used by the client that resides in that CPE. When the NAT64 receives a packet from this client, it applies the subscriber-mask (e.g., 56) on the source IPv6 address to compute the associated prefix for this client (2001:db8:100:100::/56). Then, the NAT64 enforces policies based on that prefix (2001:db8:100:100::/56), not on the exact source IPv6 address."; } list subscriber-match { key sub-match-id; description "IP prefix match."; leaf sub-match-id { type uint32; description "An identifier of the subscriber masck."; } leaf sub-mask { type inet:ip-prefix; mandatory true; description "The IP address subnets that match Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 37] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 should be translated. E.g., all addresses that belong to the 192.0.2.0/24 prefix must be processed by the NAT."; } } leaf paired-address-pooling { type boolean; default true; description "Paired address pooling informs the NAT that all the flows from an internal IP address must be assigned the same external address."; reference "RFC 4007."; } leaf nat-mapping-type { type enumeration { enum "eim" { description "endpoint-independent-mapping."; reference "Section 4 of RFC 4787."; } enum "adm" { description "address-dependent-mapping."; reference "Section 4 of RFC 4787."; } enum "edm" { description "address-and-port-dependent-mapping."; reference "Section 4 of RFC 4787."; } } description Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 38] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 "Indicates the type of a NAT mapping."; } leaf nat-filtering-type { type enumeration { enum "eif" { description "endpoint-independent- filtering."; reference "Section 5 of RFC 4787."; } enum "adf" { description "address-dependent-filtering."; reference "Section 5 of RFC 4787."; } enum "edf" { description "address-and-port-dependent-filtering"; reference "Section 5 of RFC 4787."; } } description "Indicates the type of a NAT filtering."; } list port-quota { when "../../nat-capabilities/nat44-flavor = "+ "'napt' or "+ "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'nat64'"; key quota-type; description "Configures a port quota to be assigned per subscriber. It corresponds to the maximum number of ports to be used by a subscriber."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 39] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf port-limit { type uint16; description "Configures a port quota to be assigned per subscriber. It corresponds to the maximum number of ports to be used by a subscriber."; reference "REQ-4 of RFC 6888."; } leaf quota-type { type enumeration { enum "all" { description "The limit applies to all protocols."; reference "REQ-4 of RFC 6888."; } enum "tcp" { description "TCP quota."; reference "REQ-4 of RFC 6888."; } enum "udp" { description "UDP quota."; reference "REQ-4 of RFC 6888."; } enum "icmp" { description "ICMP quota."; reference "REQ-4 of RFC 6888."; } } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 40] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "Indicates whether the port quota applies to all protocols or to a specific transport."; } } leaf port-allocation-type { type enumeration { enum "random" { description "Port randomization is enabled."; } enum "port-preservation" { description "Indicates whether the NAT should preserve the internal port number."; } enum "port-parity-preservation" { description "Indicates whether the NAT should preserve the port parity of the internal port number."; } enum "port-range-allocation" { description "Indicates whether the NAT assigns a range of ports for an internal host."; } } description "Indicates the type of a port allocation."; } leaf address-roundrobin-enable { type boolean; description "Enable/disable address allocation round robin."; } container port-set { when "../port-allocation-type='port-range-allocation'"; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 41] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "Manages port-set assignments."; leaf port-set-size { type uint16; description "Indicates the size of assigned port sets."; } leaf port-set-timeout { type uint32; description "Inactivty timeout for port sets."; } } container timers { description "Configure values of various timeouts."; leaf udp-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 300; description "UDP inactivity timeout. That is the time a mapping will stay active without packets traversing the NAT."; reference "RFC 4787."; } leaf tcp-idle-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 7440; description "TCP Idle timeout should be 2 hours and 4 minutes."; reference "RFC 5382."; } leaf tcp-trans-open-timeout { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 42] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 type uint32; units "seconds"; default 240; description "The value of the transitory open connection idle-timeout. Section 2.1 of [RFC7857] clarifies that a NAT should provide different configurable parameters for configuring the open and closing idle timeouts. To accommodate deployments that consider a partially open timeout of 4 minutes as being excessive from a security standpoint, a NAT may allow the configured timeout to be less than 4 minutes. However, a minimum default transitory connection idle-timeout of 4 minutes is recommended."; reference "RFC 7857."; } leaf tcp-trans-close-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 240; description "The value of the transitory close connection idle-timeout. Section 2.1 of [RFC7857] clarifies that a NAT should provide different configurable parameters for configuring the open and closing idle timeouts."; reference "RFC 7857."; } leaf tcp-in-syn-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 6; description "A NAT must not respond to an unsolicited inbound SYN packet for at least 6 seconds after the packet is received. If during this interval the NAT receives and translates Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 43] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 an outbound SYN for the connection the NAT must silently drop the original unsolicited inbound SYN packet."; reference "RFC 5382."; } leaf fragment-min-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 2; description "As long as the NAT has available resources, the NAT allows the fragments to arrive over fragment-min-timeout interval. The default value is inspired from RFC6146."; } leaf icmp-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 60; description "An ICMP Query session timer must not expire in less than 60 seconds. It is recommended that the ICMP Query session timer be made configurable"; reference "RFC 5508."; } list per-port-timeout { key port-number; description "Some NATs are configurable with short timeouts for some ports, e.g., as 10 seconds on port 53 (DNS) and NTP (123) and longer timeouts on other ports."; leaf port-number { type inet:port-number; description "A port number."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 44] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf port-timeout { type inet:port-number; mandatory true; description "Timeout for this port"; } } leaf hold-down-timeout { type uint32; units "seconds"; default 120; description "Hold down timer. Ports in the hold down pool are not reassigned until this timer expires. The length of time and the maximum number of ports in this state must be configurable by the administrator [RFC6888]. This is necessary in order to prevent collisions between old and new mappings and sessions. It ensures that all established sessions are broken instead of redirected to a different peer."; reference "REQ#8 of RFC 6888."; } leaf hold-down-max { type uint32; description "Maximum ports in the Hold down timer pool. Ports in the hold down pool are not reassigned until hold-down-timeout expires. The length of time and the maximum number of ports in this state must be configurable by the administrator [RFC6888]. This is necessary in order to prevent collisions between old and new mappings and sessions. It ensures that all established sessions are broken instead of redirected to a different peer."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 45] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 reference "REQ#8 of RFC 6888."; } } list algs { key alg-name; description "ALG-related features."; leaf alg-name { type string; description "The name of the ALG"; } leaf alg-transport-protocol { type uint32; description "The transport protocol used by the ALG."; } leaf alg-transport-port { type inet:port-number; description "The port number used by the ALG."; } leaf alg-status { type boolean; description "Enable/disable the ALG."; } } leaf all-algs-enable { type boolean; description "Enable/disable all ALGs."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 46] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 container notify-pool-usage { description "Notification of pool usage when certain criteria are met."; leaf pool-id { type uint32; description "Pool-ID for which the notification criteria is defined"; } leaf notify-pool-hi-threshold { type percent; mandatory true; description "Notification must be generated when the defined high threshold is reached. For example, if a notification is required when the pool utilization reaches 90%, this configuration parameter must be set to 90%."; } leaf notify-pool-low-threshold { type percent; description "Notification must be generated when the defined low threshold is reached. For example, if a notification is required when the pool utilization reaches below 10%, this configuration parameter must be set to 10%."; } } container external-realm { description "Identifies the external realm of the NAT."; choice realm-type { description Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 47] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 "Interface or VRF."; case interface { description "External interface."; leaf external-interface { type if:interface-ref; description "Name of an external interface."; } } case vrf { description "External VRF instance."; leaf external-vrf-instance { type identityref { base vrf-routing-instance; } description "A VRF instance."; } } } } } //nat-policy container mapping-limit { description "Information about the configuration parameters that limits the mappings based upon various criteria."; leaf limit-per-subscriber { type uint32; description "Maximum number of NAT mappings per subscriber."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 48] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf limit-per-vrf { type uint32; description "Maximum number of NAT mappings per VLAN/VRF."; } leaf limit-per-subnet { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Maximum number of NAT mappings per subnet."; } leaf limit-per-instance { type uint32; mandatory true; description "Maximum number of NAT mappings per instance."; } leaf limit-per-udp { type uint32; mandatory true; description "Maximum number of UDP NAT mappings per subscriber."; } leaf limit-per-tcp { type uint32; mandatory true; description "Maximum number of TCP NAT mappings per subscriber."; } leaf limit-per-icmp { type uint32; mandatory true; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 49] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "Maximum number of ICMP NAT mappings per subscriber."; } } container connection-limit { description "Information about the configuration parameters that rate limit the translation based upon various criteria."; leaf limit-per-subscriber { type uint32; description "Rate-limit the number of new mappings and sessions per subscriber."; } leaf limit-per-vrf { type uint32; description "Rate-limit the number of new mappings and sessions per VLAN/VRF."; } leaf limit-per-subnet { type inet:ip-prefix; description "Rate-limit the number of new mappings and sessions per subnet."; } leaf limit-per-instance { type uint32; mandatory true; description "Rate-limit the number of new mappings and sessions per instance."; } leaf limit-per-udp { type uint32; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 50] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 mandatory true; description "Rate-limit the number of new UDP mappings and sessions per subscriber."; } leaf limit-per-tcp { type uint32; mandatory true; description "Rate-limit the number of new TCP mappings and sessions per subscriber."; } leaf limit-per-icmp { type uint32; mandatory true; description "Rate-limit the number of new ICMP mappings and sessions per subscriber."; } } container logging-info { description "Information about logging NAT events"; leaf logging-enable { type boolean; description "Enable logging features as per Section 2.3 of [RFC6908]."; } leaf destination-address { type inet:ip-prefix; mandatory true; description "Address of the collector that receives the logs"; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 51] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf destination-port { type inet:port-number; mandatory true; description "Destination port of the collector."; } choice protocol { description "Enable the protocol to be used for the retrieval of logging entries."; case syslog { leaf syslog { type boolean; description "If SYSLOG is in use."; } } case ipfix { leaf ipfix { type boolean; description "If IPFIX is in use."; } } case ftp { leaf ftp { type boolean; description "If FTP is in use."; } } } } container mapping-table { when "../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'nat44' or "+ "../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 52] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 "'nat64'or "+ "../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'clat'or "+ "../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'dst-nat'"; description "NAT mapping table. Applicable for functions which maintains static and/or dynamic mappings, such as NAT44, Destination NAT, NAT64, or CLAT."; list mapping-entry { key "index"; description "NAT mapping entry."; uses mapping-entry; } } container statistics { config false; description "Statistics related to the NAT instance."; container traffic-statistics { description "Generic traffic statistics."; leaf sent-packet { type yang:zero-based-counter64; description "Number of packets sent."; } leaf sent-byte { type yang:zero-based-counter64; description "Counter for sent traffic in bytes."; } leaf rcvd-packet { type yang:zero-based-counter64; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 53] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 description "Number of received packets."; } leaf rcvd-byte { type yang:zero-based-counter64; description "Counter for received traffic in bytes."; } leaf dropped-packet { type yang:zero-based-counter64; description "Number of dropped packets."; } leaf dropped-byte { type yang:zero-based-counter64; description "Counter for dropped traffic in bytes."; } } container mapping-statistics { when "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'nat44' or "+ "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'nat64'or "+ "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = 'dst-nat'"; description "Mapping statistics."; leaf total-mappings { type uint32; description "Total number of NAT mappings present at a given time. This variable includes all the static and dynamic mappings."; } Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 54] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 leaf total-tcp-mappings { type uint32; description "Total number of TCP mappings present at a given time."; } leaf total-udp-mappings { type uint32; description "Total number of UDP mappings present at a given time."; } leaf total-icmp-mappings { type uint32; description "Total number of ICMP mappings present at a given time."; } } container pool-stats { when "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'nat44' or "+ "../../nat-capabilities/nat-flavor = "+ "'nat64'"; description "Statistics related to address/prefix pool usage"; leaf pool-id { type uint32; description "Unique Identifier that represents a pool of addresses/prefixes."; } leaf address-allocated { Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 55] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 type uint32; description "Number of allocated addresses in the pool"; } leaf address-free { type uint32; description "Number of unallocated addresses in the pool at a given time.The sum of unallocated and allocated addresses is the total number of addresses of the pool."; } container port-stats { description "Statistics related to port usage."; leaf ports-allocated { type uint32; description "Number of allocated ports in the pool."; } leaf ports-free { type uint32; description "Number of unallocated addresses in the pool."; } } } } //statistics } } } /* * Notifications Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 56] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 */ notification nat-event { description "Notifications must be generated when the defined high/low threshold is reached. Related configuration parameters must be provided to trigger the notifications."; leaf id { type leafref { path "/nat-module/nat-instances/" + "nat-instance/id"; } description "NAT instance ID."; } leaf policy-id { type leafref { path "/nat-module/nat-instances/" + "nat-instance/nat-policy/policy-id"; } description "Policy ID."; } leaf pool-id { type leafref { path "/nat-module/nat-instances/" + "nat-instance/nat-policy/" + "external-ip-address-pool/pool-id"; } description "Pool ID."; } leaf notify-pool-threshold { type percent; mandatory true; description "A treshhold has been fired."; Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 57] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 } } } 4. Security Considerations The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the support of SSH is mandatory to implement secure transport [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides means to restrict access by some users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol operations and data. All data nodes defined in the YANG module which can be created, modified and deleted (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes are considered sensitive. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) applied to these data nodes without proper protection can negatively affect network operations. 5. IANA Considerations This document requests IANA to register the following URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-nat Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. This document requests IANA to register the following YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020]. name: ietf-nat namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-nat prefix: nat reference: RFC XXXX 6. Acknowledgements Many thanks to Dan Wing and Tianran Zhou for the review. Thanks to Juergen Schoenwaelder for the comments on the YANG structure and the suggestion to use NMDA. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 58] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 Thanks to Lee Howard and Jordi Palet for the CLAT comments, Fred Baker for the NPTv6 comments, Tore Anderson for EAM SIIT review, and Kristian Poscic for the CGN review. Special thanks to Maros Marsalek and Marek Gradzki for sharing their comments based on the FD.io implementation of an earlier version of this module. Rajiv Asati suggested to clarify how the module applies for both stateless and stateful NAT64. 7. References 7.1. Normative References [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC4787] Audet, F., Ed. and C. Jennings, "Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP", BCP 127, RFC 4787, DOI 10.17487/RFC4787, January 2007, . [RFC5382] Guha, S., Ed., Biswas, K., Ford, B., Sivakumar, S., and P. Srisuresh, "NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCP", BCP 142, RFC 5382, DOI 10.17487/RFC5382, October 2008, . [RFC5508] Srisuresh, P., Ford, B., Sivakumar, S., and S. Guha, "NAT Behavioral Requirements for ICMP", BCP 148, RFC 5508, DOI 10.17487/RFC5508, April 2009, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6146] Bagnulo, M., Matthews, P., and I. van Beijnum, "Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers", RFC 6146, DOI 10.17487/RFC6146, April 2011, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 59] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536, DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012, . [RFC6877] Mawatari, M., Kawashima, M., and C. Byrne, "464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation", RFC 6877, DOI 10.17487/RFC6877, April 2013, . [RFC6888] Perreault, S., Ed., Yamagata, I., Miyakawa, S., Nakagawa, A., and H. Ashida, "Common Requirements for Carrier-Grade NATs (CGNs)", BCP 127, RFC 6888, DOI 10.17487/RFC6888, April 2013, . [RFC7757] Anderson, T. and A. Leiva Popper, "Explicit Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation", RFC 7757, DOI 10.17487/RFC7757, February 2016, . [RFC7857] Penno, R., Perreault, S., Boucadair, M., Ed., Sivakumar, S., and K. Naito, "Updates to Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements", BCP 127, RFC 7857, DOI 10.17487/RFC7857, April 2016, . 7.2. Informative References [I-D.boucadair-pcp-yang] Boucadair, M., Jacquenet, C., Sivakumar, S., and S. Vinapamula, "YANG Data Models for the Port Control Protocol (PCP)", draft-boucadair-pcp-yang-04 (work in progress), May 2017. [I-D.ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging] Sivakumar, S. and R. Penno, "IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events", draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat- logging-13 (work in progress), January 2017. [I-D.ietf-softwire-dslite-yang] Boucadair, M., Jacquenet, C., and S. Sivakumar, "YANG Data Models for the DS-Lite", draft-ietf-softwire-dslite- yang-06 (work in progress), August 2017. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 60] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-natsupp] Stewart, R., Tuexen, M., and I. Ruengeler, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Network Address Translation Support", draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-11 (work in progress), July 2017. [RFC2663] Srisuresh, P. and M. Holdrege, "IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations", RFC 2663, DOI 10.17487/RFC2663, August 1999, . [RFC3022] Srisuresh, P. and K. Egevang, "Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT)", RFC 3022, DOI 10.17487/RFC3022, January 2001, . [RFC5597] Denis-Courmont, R., "Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol", BCP 150, RFC 5597, DOI 10.17487/RFC5597, September 2009, . [RFC6052] Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., Boucadair, M., and X. Li, "IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators", RFC 6052, DOI 10.17487/RFC6052, October 2010, . [RFC6296] Wasserman, M. and F. Baker, "IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation", RFC 6296, DOI 10.17487/RFC6296, June 2011, . [RFC6302] Durand, A., Gashinsky, I., Lee, D., and S. Sheppard, "Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers", BCP 162, RFC 6302, DOI 10.17487/RFC6302, June 2011, . [RFC6736] Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Singh, V., and V. Fajardo, "Diameter Network Address and Port Translation Control Application", RFC 6736, DOI 10.17487/RFC6736, October 2012, . [RFC6887] Wing, D., Ed., Cheshire, S., Boucadair, M., Penno, R., and P. Selkirk, "Port Control Protocol (PCP)", RFC 6887, DOI 10.17487/RFC6887, April 2013, . Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 61] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 [RFC7289] Kuarsingh, V., Ed. and J. Cianfarani, "Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) Deployment with BGP/MPLS IP VPNs", RFC 7289, DOI 10.17487/RFC7289, June 2014, . [RFC7335] Byrne, C., "IPv4 Service Continuity Prefix", RFC 7335, DOI 10.17487/RFC7335, August 2014, . [RFC7596] Cui, Y., Sun, Q., Boucadair, M., Tsou, T., Lee, Y., and I. Farrer, "Lightweight 4over6: An Extension to the Dual- Stack Lite Architecture", RFC 7596, DOI 10.17487/RFC7596, July 2015, . [RFC7597] Troan, O., Ed., Dec, W., Li, X., Bao, C., Matsushima, S., Murakami, T., and T. Taylor, Ed., "Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E)", RFC 7597, DOI 10.17487/RFC7597, July 2015, . [RFC7659] Perreault, S., Tsou, T., Sivakumar, S., and T. Taylor, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NATs)", RFC 7659, DOI 10.17487/RFC7659, October 2015, . [RFC7753] Sun, Q., Boucadair, M., Sivakumar, S., Zhou, C., Tsou, T., and S. Perreault, "Port Control Protocol (PCP) Extension for Port-Set Allocation", RFC 7753, DOI 10.17487/RFC7753, February 2016, . [RFC8045] Cheng, D., Korhonen, J., Boucadair, M., and S. Sivakumar, "RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting", RFC 8045, DOI 10.17487/RFC8045, January 2017, . Appendix A. Sample Examples This section provides a non-exhaustive set of examples to illustrate the use of the NAT YANG module. A.1. Traditional NAT44 Traditional NAT44 is a Basic NAT44 or NAPT that is used to share the same IPv4 address among hosts that are owned by the same subscriber. This is typically the NAT that is embedded in CPE devices. This NAT is usually provided with one single external IPv4 address; disambiguating connections is achieved by rewriting the source port Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 62] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 number. The XML snippet to configure the external IPv4 address in such case together with a mapping entry is depicted below: 1 NAT_Subscriber_A .... 1 192.0.2.1 .... .... 192.0.2.1 .... The following shows the XML excerpt depicting a dynamic UDP mapping entry maintained by a traditional NAT44. In reference to this example, the UDP packet received with a source IPv4 address (192.0.2.1) and source port number (1568) is translated into a UDP packet having a source IPv4 address (198.51.100.1) and source port (15000). The lifetime of this mapping is 300 seconds. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 63] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 15 dynamic-explicit 17 192.0.2.1 1568 198.51.100.1 15000 300 A.2. CGN The following XML snippet shows the example of the capabilities supported by a CGN as retrieved using NETCONF. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 64] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 nat44 false true true true true false true true true false false true false false Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 65] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 The following XML snippet shows the example of a CGN that is provisioned with one contiguous pool of external IPv4 addresses (192.0.2.0/24). Further, the CGN is instructed to limit the number of allocated ports per subscriber to 1024. Ports can be allocated by the CGN by assigning ranges of 256 ports (that is, a subscriber can be allocated up to four port ranges of 256 ports each). 1 myCGN .... 1 192.0.2.0/24 1024 all port-range-allocation 256 .... An administrator may decide to allocate one single port range per subscriber (port range of 1024 ports) as shown below: Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 66] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 1 myotherCGN .... 1 192.0.2.0/24 1024 all port-range-allocation 1024 .... .... A.3. CGN Pass-Through Figure 1 illustrates an example of the CGN pass-through feature. X1:x1 X1':x1' X2:x2 +---+from X1:x1 +---+from X1:x1 +---+ | C | to X2:x2 | | to X2:x2 | S | | l |>>>>>>>>>>>>| C |>>>>>>>>>>>>>>| e | | i | | G | | r | | e |<<<<<<<<<<<<| N |<<<<<<<<<<<<<<| v | | n |from X2:x2 | |from X2:x2 | e | | t | to X1:x1 | | to X1:x1 | r | +---+ +---+ +---+ Figure 1: CGN Pass-Through Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 67] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 For example, in order to disable NAT for communications issued by the client (192.0.2.25), the following configuration parameter must be set: ... 192.0.2.25 ... A.4. NAT64 Let's consider the example of a NAT64 that should use 2001:db8:122:300::/56 to perform IPv6 address synthesis [RFC6052]. The XML snippet to configure the NAT64 prefix in such case is depicted below: 2001:db8:122:300::/56 A NAT64 can be instructed to behave in the stateless mode by providing the following configuration. The same NAT64 prefix is used for constructing both IPv4- translatable IPv6 addresses and IPv4-converted IPv6 addresses (Section 3.3 of [RFC6052]). 2001:db8:122:300::/56 true Let's now consider the example of a NAT64 that should use 2001:db8:122::/48 to perform IPv6 address synthesis [RFC6052] only if the destination address matches 198.51.100.0/24. The XML snippet to configure the NAT64 prefix in such case is shown below: Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 68] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 2001:db8:122::/48 198.51.100.0/24 A.5. Explicit Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation As specified in [RFC7757], an EAM consists of an IPv4 prefix and an IPv6 prefix. Let's consider the set of EAM examples in Figure 2. +---+----------------+----------------------+ | # | IPv4 Prefix | IPv6 Prefix | +---+----------------+----------------------+ | 1 | 192.0.2.1 | 2001:db8:aaaa:: | | 2 | 192.0.2.2/32 | 2001:db8:bbbb::b/128 | | 3 | 192.0.2.16/28 | 2001:db8:cccc::/124 | | 4 | 192.0.2.128/26 | 2001:db8:dddd::/64 | | 5 | 192.0.2.192/29 | 2001:db8:eeee:8::/62 | | 6 | 192.0.2.224/31 | 64:ff9b::/127 | +---+----------------+----------------------+ Figure 2: EAM Examples (RFC7757) The following XML excerpt illustrates how these EAMs can be configured using the YANG NAT module: Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 69] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 192.0.2.1 2001:db8:aaaa:: 192.0.2.2/32 2001:db8:bbbb::b/128 192.0.2.16/28 2001:db8:cccc::/124 192.0.2.128/26 2001:db8:dddd::/64 192.0.2.192/29 2001:db8:eeee:8::/62 192.0.2.224/31 64:ff9b::/127 Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 70] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 EAMs may be enabled jointly with statefull NAT64. This example shows a NAT64 fucntion that supports static mappings: nat64 true true true true false true true true false false true false false Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 71] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 A.6. Static Mappings with Port Ranges The following example shows a static mapping that instructs a NAT to translate packets issued from 192.0.2.1 and with source ports in the 100-500 range to 198.51.100.1:1100-1500. 1 static 6 192.0.2.1 100 500 198.51.100.1 1100 1500 ... A.7. Static Mappings with IP Prefixes The following example shows a static mapping that instructs a NAT to translate packets issued from 192.0.2.1/24 to 198.51.100.1/24. Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 72] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 1 static 6 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24 ... A.8. Destination NAT The following XML snippet shows an example a destination NAT that is instructed to translate packets having 192.0.2.1 as a destination IP address to 198.51.100.1. 1 192.0.2.1 198.51.100.1 In order to instruct a NAT to translate TCP packets destined to 192.0.2.1:80 to 198.51.100.1:8080, the following XML snippet shows the static mapping to be configured on the NAT: Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 73] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 1 static 6 192.0.2.1 80 198.51.100.1 8080 In order to instruct a NAT to translate TCP packets destined to 192.0.2.1:80 (http traffic) to 198.51.100.1 and 192.0.2.1:22 (ssh traffic) to 198.51.100.2, the following XML snippet shows the static mappings to be configured on the NAT: Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 74] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 1 static 6 192.0.2.1 80 198.51.100.1 ... 2 static 6 192.0.2.1 22 198.51.100.2 ... The NAT may also be instructed to proceed with both source and destination NAT. To do so, in addition to the above sample to configure destination NAT, the NAT may be provided, for example with a pool of external IP addresses (198.51.100.0/24) to use for source address translation. An example of the corresponding XML snippet is provided hereafter: Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 75] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 1 198.51.100.0/24 Instead of providing an external IP address to share, the NAT may be configured with static mapping entries that modifies the internal IP address and/or port number. A.9. CLAT The following XML snippet shows the example of a CLAT that is configured with 2001:db8:1234::/96 as PLAT-side IPv6 prefix and 2001:db8:aaaa::/96 as CLAT-side IPv6 prefix. The CLAT is also provided with 192.0.0.1/32 (which is selected from the IPv4 service continuity prefix defined in [RFC7335]). 2001:db8:aaaa::/96 192.0.0.1/32 2001:db8:1234::/96 A.10. NPTv6 Let's consider the example of a NPTv6 translator that should rewrite packets with the source prefix (fd01:203:405:/48) with the external prefix (2001:db8:1:/48). The internal interface is "eth0" while the external interface is "eth1". Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 76] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 External Network: Prefix = 2001:db8:1:/48 -------------------------------------- | |eth1 +-------------+ eth4| NPTv6 |eth2 ...-----| |------... +-------------+ |eth0 | -------------------------------------- Internal Network: Prefix = fd01:203:405:/48 Example of NPTv6 (RFC6296) The XML snippet to configure NPTv6 prefixes in such case is depicted below: 1 fd01:203:405:/48 2001:db8:1:/48 ... eth1 Figure 3 shows an example of an NPTv6 that interconnects two internal networks (fd01:203:405:/48 and fd01:4444:5555:/48); each is translated using a dedicated prefix (2001:db8:1:/48 and 2001:db8:6666:/48, respectively). Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 77] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 Internal Prefix = fd01:4444:5555:/48 -------------------------------------- V | External Prefix V |eth1 2001:db8:1:/48 V +---------+ ^ V | NPTv6 | ^ V | | ^ V +---------+ ^ External Prefix |eth0 ^ 2001:db8:6666:/48 | ^ -------------------------------------- Internal Prefix = fd01:203:405:/48 Figure 3: Connecting two Peer Networks (RFC6296) To that aim, the following configuration is provided to the NPTv6: 1 1 fd01:203:405:/48 2001:db8:1:/48 eth1 2 2 fd01:4444:5555:/48 2001:db8:6666:/48 eth0 Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 78] Internet-Draft Yang Model for NAT October 2017 Authors' Addresses Mohamed Boucadair Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Senthil Sivakumar Cisco Systems 7100-8 Kit Creek Road Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 USA Phone: +1 919 392 5158 Email: ssenthil@cisco.com Christian Jacquenet Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: christian.jacquenet@orange.com Suresh Vinapamula Juniper Networks 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale 94089 USA Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 China Email: bill.wu@huawei.com Boucadair, et al. Expires April 4, 2018 [Page 79]