Network Working Group B. Cheng Internet-Draft Lincoln Laboratory Intended status: Standards Track L. Berger, Ed. Expires: May 3, 2018 LabN Consulting, L.L.C. October 30, 2017 DLEP Lantency Range Extension draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01 Abstract This document defines an extension to the DLEP protocol to provide the range of latency that may be experienced on a link. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2018. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Cheng & Berger Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 1] Internet-Draft DLEP Latency Range Extension October 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Key Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Extension Usage and Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Latency Range Data Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.1. Extension Type Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.2. Data Item Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. Introduction The Dynamic Link Event Protocol (DLEP) is defined in [RFC8175]. It provides the exchange of link related control information between DLEP peers. DLEP peers are comprised of a modem and a router. DLEP defines a base set of mechanisms as well as support for possible extensions. This document defines one such extension. The base DLEP specification includes the Latency metric which provides an average latency on a link. This document adds the ability to relay the minimum and maximum latency range seen on a link. The extension defined in this document is referred to as "Latency Range". This document defines a new DLEP Extension Type Value in Section 2 which is used to indicate the use of the extension, and one new DLEP Data Items in Section 3. 1.1. Key Words The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 2. Extension Usage and Identification The use of the Latency Range Extension SHOULD be configurable. To indicate that the Latency Range Extension is to be used, an implementation MUST include the Latency Range Extension Type Value in the Extensions Supported Data Item. The Extensions Supported Data Item is sent and processed according to [RFC8175]. The Latency Range Extension Type Value is TBA1, see Section 5. Cheng & Berger Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 2] Internet-Draft DLEP Latency Range Extension October 2017 3. Latency Range Data Items The Latency Range Data Item serves much the same purpose as the Latency Data Item defined in [RFC8175] with the addition of being able to communicate the latency range that may be experienced by traffic on a link. The Latency Range Item MAY be carried in the same messages and MUST be processed according to the same rules as the Latency Range Data Item defined in [RFC8175]. The format of the Latency Range Data Item is: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Data Item Type | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Maximum Latency : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ : Maximum Latency | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Minimum Latency : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ : Minimum Latency | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Data Item Type: TBA2 Length: 16 Maximum Latency: A 64-bit unsigned integer, representing the transmission longest delay, in microseconds, that a packet encounters as it is transmitted over the link. Minimum Latency: A 64-bit unsigned integer, representing the transmission shortest delay, in microseconds, that a packet encounters as it is transmitted over the link. 4. Security Considerations The extension introduces a new Data Item for the DLEP protocol. The extension does not inherently introduce any additional threats above those documented in [RFC8175]. The approach taken to Security in that document applies equally when running the extension defined in this document. Cheng & Berger Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 3] Internet-Draft DLEP Latency Range Extension October 2017 5. IANA Considerations This document requests the assignment of 2 values by IANA. All assignments are to registries defined by [RFC8175]. 5.1. Extension Type Value This document requests one new assignment to the DLEP Extensions Registry named "Extension Type Values" in the range with the "Specification Required" policy. The requested value is as follows: +------+---------------+ | Code | Description | +------+---------------+ | TBA1 | Latency Range | +------+---------------+ Table 1: Requested Extension Type Value 5.2. Data Item Value This document requests one new assignment to the DLEP Data Item Registry named "Data Item Values" in the range with the "Specification Required" policy. The requested values are as follows: +-----------+---------------+ | Type Code | Description | +-----------+---------------+ | TBA2 | Latency Range | +-----------+---------------+ Table 2: Requested Data Item Values 6. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . Cheng & Berger Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 4] Internet-Draft DLEP Latency Range Extension October 2017 [RFC8175] Ratliff, S., Jury, S., Satterwhite, D., Taylor, R., and B. Berry, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)", RFC 8175, DOI 10.17487/RFC8175, June 2017, . Authors' Addresses Bow-Nan Cheng Lincoln Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology 244 Wood Street Lexington, MA 02421-6426 Email: bcheng@ll.mit.edu Lou Berger (editor) LabN Consulting, L.L.C. Email: lberger@labn.net Cheng & Berger Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 5]