GEOPRIV M. Thomson Internet-Draft Microsoft Intended status: Standards Track B. Rosen Expires: February 16, 2014 Neustar D. Stanley Aruba Networks G. Bajko Nokia A. Thomson Cisco Systems, Inc. August 15, 2013 Relative Location Representation draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location-07 Abstract This document defines an extension to PIDF-LO (RFC4119) for the expression of location information that is defined relative to a reference point. The reference point may be expressed as a geodetic or civic location, and the relative offset may be one of several shapes. An alternative binary representation is described. Optionally, a reference to a secondary document (such as a map image) can be included, along with the relationship of the map coordinate system to the reference/offset coordinate system to allow display of the map with the reference point and the relative offset. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on February 16, 2014. Copyright Notice Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Relative Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.1. Relative Coordinate System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.2. Placement of XML Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.3. Binary Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.4. Distances and Angles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.5. Value Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.6. Relative Location Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.7. Baseline TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.8. Reference TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.9. Shapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.9.1. Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.9.2. Circle or Sphere Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.9.3. Ellipse or Ellipsoid Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.9.4. Polygon or Prism Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.9.5. Arc-Band Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.10. Dynamic Location TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.10.1. Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.10.2. Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.10.3. Heading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.11. Secondary Map Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.11.1. Map URL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.11.2. Map Coordinate Reference System . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.11.3. Map Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.1. Civic PIDF with Polygon Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.2. Geo PIDF with Circle Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.3. Civic TLV with Point Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6. Schema Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 8.1. Relative Location Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 8.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 8.3. XML Schema Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 8.4. Geopriv Identifiers Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 8.4.1. Registration of Two-Dimentional Relative Coordinate Reference System URN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 8.4.2. Registration of Three-Dimentional Relative Coordinate Reference System URN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 1. Introduction This document describes a format for the expression of relative location information. A relative location is formed of a reference location, plus a relative offset from that reference location. The reference location can be represented in either civic or geodetic form. The reference location can also have dynamic components such as velocity. The relative offset is specified in meters using a Cartesian coordinate system. In addition to the relative location, an optional URI can be provided to a document that contains a map, floorplan or other spatially oriented information. Applications could use this information to display the relative location. Additional fields allow the map to be oriented and scaled correctly. Two formats are included: an XML form that is intended for use in PIDF-LO [RFC4119] and a TLV format for use in other protocols such as those that already convey binary representation of location information defined in [RFC4776]. 2. Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3. Overview This document describes an extension to PIDF-LO [RFC4119] as updated by [RFC5139] and [RFC5491], to allow the expression of a location as an offset relative to a reference. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Reference Location o \ \ Offset \ _\| x Relative Location This extension allows the creator of a location object to include two location values plus an offset. The two location values, named "baseline" and "reference", combine to form the origin of the offset. The final, relative location is described relative to this reference point. ..--"""--.. .-' `-. ,' `. / Reference \ / o \ | \ | | \ | | \ | \ _\| / `. x .' \_ Baseline `._ Relative _.' Location `--..___..--' The "baseline" location is included outside of the element. The baseline location is visible to a client that does not understand relative location (i.e., it ignores the element). A client that does understand relative location will interpret the location within the relative element as a refinement of the baseline location. This document defines both a "reference" location, which serves as a refinement of the baseline location and the starting point; and an offset, which describes the location of the Target based on this starting point. Creators of location objects with relative location thus have a choice of how much information to put into the "baseline" location and how much to put into the "reference" location. For example, the baseline location value could be precise enough to specify a building Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 that contains the relative location, and the reference location could specify a point within the building from which the offset is measured. Location objects SHOULD NOT have all location information in the baseline location. Doing this would cause clients that do not understand relative location to incorrectly interpret the baseline location (i.e., the reference point) as the actual, precise location of the client. The baseline location is intended to carry a location that encompasses both the reference location and the relative location (i.e., the reference location plus offset). It is possible to provide a valid relative location with no information in the baseline. However, this provides recipients who do not understand relative location with no information. A baseline location SHOULD include sufficient information to encompass both the reference and relative locations while providing a baseline that is as accurate as possible. Both the baseline and the reference location are defined either as a geodetic location [OGC.GeoShape] or a civic address [RFC4776]. If the baseline location was expressed as a geodetic location, the reference MUST be geodetic. If the baseline location was expressed as a civic address, the reference MUST be a civic. Baseline and reference locations MAY also include dynamic location information [RFC5962]. The relative location can be expressed using a point (2- or 3-dimensional), or a shape that includes uncertainty: circle, sphere, ellipse, ellipsoid, polygon, prism or arc-band. Descriptions of these shapes can be found in [RFC5491]. Optionally, a reference to a 'map' document can be provided. The reference is a URI [RFC3986]. The document could be an image or dataset that represents a map, floorplan or other form. The type of document the URI points to is described as a MIME media type [RFC2046]. Metadata in the relative location can include the location of the reference point in the map as well as an orientation (angle from North) and scale to align the document Co-ordinate Reference System (CRS) with the WGS84 [WGS84] CRS. The document is assumed to be useable by the application receiving the PIDF with the relative location to locate the reference point in the map. This document does not describe any mechanisms for displaying or manipulating the document other than providing the reference location, orientation and scale. As an example, consider a relative location expressed as a point, Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 relative to a civic location: AU NSW Wollongong North Wollongong Flinders Street 123 Front Door 100 50 GPS http://example.com/location/map.png 20. 120. 29. 20. -20. mac:1234567890ab Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 2007-06-22T20:57:29Z 4. Relative Location Relative location is a shape (e.g., point, circle, ellipse). The shape is defined with a CRS that has a datum defined as the reference (which appears as a civic address or geodetic location in the tuple), and the shape coordinates as meter offsets North/East of the datum measured in meters (with an optional Z offset relative to datum altitude). An optional angle allows the reference CRS be to rotated with respect to North. 4.1. Relative Coordinate System The relative coordinate reference system uses a coordinate system with two or three axes. The baseline and reference locations are used to define a relative datum. The reference location defines the origin of the coordinate system. The centroid of the reference location is used when the reference location contains any uncertainty. The axes in this coordinate system are originally oriented based on the directions of East, North and Up from the reference location: the first (x) axis increases to the East, the second (y) axis points North, and the optional third (z) axis points Up. All axes of the coordinate system use meters as a basic unit. Any coordinates in the relative shapes use the described Cartesian coordinate system. In the XML form, this uses a URN of "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d" for two-dimensional shapes and "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d" for three-dimensional shapes. The binary form uses different shape type identifiers for 2D and 3D shapes. Dynamic location information [RFC5962] in the baseline or reference location alters relative coordinate system. The resulting Cartesian coordinate system axes are rotated so that the "y" axis is oriented along the direction described by the element. The coordinate system also moves as described by the and elements. The single timestamp included in the tuple (or equivalent) element applies to all location elements, including all three components of a relative location: baseline, reference and relative. This is Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 particularly important when there are dynamic components to these items. A location generator is responsible for ensuring the consistency of these fields. 4.2. Placement of XML Elements The baseline of the reference location is represented as like a normal PIDF-LO. Relative location adds a new element to . Within , and elements are described. Within are the shape elements described below. This document extends PIDF-LO as described in [RFC6848]. 4.3. Binary Format This document describes a way to encode the relative location in a binary TLV form for use in other protocols that use TLVs to represent location. A type-length-value encoding is used. +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Type |Length| Value ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | T | N | Value ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Figure 1: TLV-tuple format Type field (T) is an 8-bit unsigned integer. The type codes used are registered an IANA-managed "Relative Location Parameters" registry defined by this document, and restricted to not include the values defined by the "CAtypes" registry. This restriction permits a location reference and offset to be coded within the same object without type collisions. The Length field (N) is defined as an 8-bit unsigned integer. This field can encode values from 0 to 255. The length field describes the number of bytes in the Value. Length does not count the bytes used for the Type or Length. The Value field is defined separately for each type. Each element of the relative location has a unique TLV assignment. A relative location encoded in TLV form includes both baseline and reference location TLVs and a reference location TLVs. The reference TLVs are followed by the relative offset, and optional map TLDs described in this document. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 4.4. Distances and Angles All distance measures used in shapes are expressed in meters. All orientation angles used in shapes are expressed in degrees. Orientation angles are measured from WGS84 Northing to Easting with zero at Northing. Orientation angles in the relative coordinate system start from the second coordinate axis (y or Northing) and increase toward the first axis (x or Easting). 4.5. Value Encoding The binary form uses single-precision floating point values IEEE 754 [IEEE.754] to represent coordinates, distance and angle measures. Single precision values are 32-bit values with a sign bit, 8 exponent bits and 23 fractional bits. This uses the interchange format defined in [IEEE.754] and Section 3.6 of [RFC1014], that is: sign, biased exponent and significand, with the most significant bit first. Binary-encoded coordinate values are considered to be a single value without uncertainty. When encoding a value that cannot be exactly represented, the best approximation MUST be selected according to [Clinger1990]. 4.6. Relative Location Restrictions More than one relative shape MUST NOT be included in either a PIDF-LO or TLV encoding of location for a given reference point. Any error in the reference point transfers to the location described by the relative location. Any errors arising from an implementation not supporting or understanding elements of the reference point directly increases the error (or uncertainty) in the resulting location. 4.7. Baseline TLVs Baseline locations are described using the formats defined in [RFC4776] or [RFC6225]. 4.8. Reference TLV When a reference is encoded in binary form, the baseline and reference locations are combined in a reference TLV. This TLV is identified with the code 111 and contains civic address TLVs (if the baseline was a civic) or geo TLVs (if the baseline was a geo). Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 +------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 111 |Length| Reference TLVs | +------+------+------+------+------+------+ Reference TLV 4.9. Shapes Shape data is used to represent regions of uncertainty for the reference and relative locations. Shape data in the reference location uses a WGS84 [WGS84] CRS. Shape data in the relative location uses a relative CRS. The XML form for shapes uses Geography Markup Language (GML) [OGC.GML-3.1.1], consistent with the rules in [RFC5491]. Reference locations use the CRS URNs specified in [RFC5491]; relative locations use either a 2D CRS (urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d), or a 3D (urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d), depending on the shape type. The binary form of each shape uses a different shape type for 2d and 3d shapes. Nine shape type codes are defined. 4.9.1. Point A point "shape" describes a single point with unknown uncertainty. It consists of a single set of coordinates. In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values; in a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values. 4.9.1.1. XML encoding A point is represented in GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$ GML Point Template Where "$CRS-URN$" is replaced by a urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d or urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d and "$Coordinate-3$" is omitted if the CRS is two-dimensional. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 4.9.1.2. TLV encoding The point shape is introduced by a TLV of 113 for a 2D point and 114 for a 3D point. +------+------+ | 113/4|Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+ Point Encoding 4.9.2. Circle or Sphere Shape A circle or sphere describes a single point with a single uncertainty value in meters. In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values and the resulting shape forms a circle. In a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values and the resulting shape forms a sphere. 4.9.2.1. XML encoding A circle is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Radius$ GML Circle Template A sphere is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$ $Radius$ GML Sphere Template 4.9.2.2. TLV encoding A circular shape is introduced by a type code of 115. A spherical shape is introduced by a type code of 116. +------+------+ | 115/6|Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+ | Radius | +------+------+------+------+ Circle or Sphere Encoding 4.9.3. Ellipse or Ellipsoid Shape A ellipse or ellipsoid describes a point with an elliptical or ellipsoidal uncertainty region. In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values, plus a semi-major axis, a semi-minor axis, a semi-major axis orientation (clockwise from North). In a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values and in addition to the two-dimensional values, an altitude uncertainty (semi-vertical) is added. 4.9.3.1. XML encoding An ellipse is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Semi-Major$ $Semi-Minor$ $Orientation$ GML Ellipse Template An ellipsoid is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$ $Semi-Major$ $Semi-Minor$ $Semi-Vertical$ $Orientation$ GML Ellipsoid Template 4.9.3.2. TLV encoding An ellipse is introduced by a type code of 117 and an ellipsoid is introduced by a type code of 118. +------+------+ | 117/8|Length| +------+------+------+------+ Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Semi-Major Axis | Semi-Minor Axis | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Orientation | (3D) Semi-Vertical Axis | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Ellipse or Ellipsoid Encoding 4.9.4. Polygon or Prism Shape A polygon or prism include a number of points that describe the outer boundary of an uncertainty region. A prism also includes an altitude for each point and prism height. At least 3 points MUST be included in a polygon. In order to interoperate with existing systems, an encoding SHOULD include 15 or fewer points, unless the recipient is known to support larger numbers. 4.9.4.1. XML Encoding A polygon is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate2-1$ $Coordinate2-2$ $Coordinate3-1$ ... ... $CoordinateN-1$ $CoordinateN-2$ $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ GML Polygon Template Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Alternatively, a series of "pos" elements can be used in place of the single "posList". Each "pos" element contains two or three coordinate values. Note that the first point is repeated at the end of the sequence of coordinates and no explicit count of the number of points is provided. A GML polygon that includes altitude cannot be represented perfectly in TLV form. When converting to the binary representation, a two dimensional CRS is used and altitude is removed from each coordinate. A prism is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate1-3$ $Coordinate2-1$ $Coordinate2-2$ $Coordinate2-3$ $Coordinate2-1$ ... ... ... $CoordinateN-1$ $CoordinateN-2$ $CoordinateN-3$ $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate1-3$ $Height$ GML Prism Template Alternatively, a series of "pos" elements can be used in place of the single "posList". Each "pos" element contains three coordinate values. 4.9.4.2. TLV Encoding Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 A polygon containing 2D points uses a type code of 119. A polygon with 3D points uses a type code of 120. A prism uses a type code of 121. The number of points can be inferred from the length of the TLV. +------+------+ |119-21|Length| +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Height | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate1-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate1-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate1-3 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate2-1 | +------+------+------+------+ ... +------+------+------+------+ | CoordinateN-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | CoordinateN-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) CoordinateN-3 | +------+------+------+------+ Polygon or Prism Encoding Note that unlike the polygon representation in GML, the first and last points are not the same point in the TLV representation. The duplicated point is removed from the binary form. 4.9.5. Arc-Band Shape A arc-band describes a region constrained by a range of angles and distances from a predetermined point. This shape can only be provided for a two-dimensional CRS. Distance and angular measures are defined in meters and degrees respectively. Both are encoded as single precision floating point values. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 4.9.5.1. XML encoding An arc-band is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1$ $Coordinate-2$ $Inner-Radius$ $Outer-Radius$ $Start-Angle$ $Opening-Angle$ GML Arc-Band Template 4.9.5.2. TLV Encoding An arc-band is introduced by a type code of 122. +------+------+ | 122 |Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Inner Radius | Outer Radius | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Start Angle | Opening Angle | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Arc-Band Encoding Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 4.10. Dynamic Location TLVs Dynamic location elements use the definitions in [RFC5962]. 4.10.1. Orientation The orientation of the target is described using one or two angles. Orientation uses a type code of 123. +------+------+ | 123 |Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Angle | +------+------+------+------+ | (Optional) Angle | +------+------+------+------+ Dynamic Orientation TLVs 4.10.2. Speed The speed of the target is a scalar value in meters per second. Speed uses a type code of 124. +------+------+ | 124 |Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Speed | +------+------+------+------+ Dynamic Speed TLVs 4.10.3. Heading The heading, or direction of travel, is described using one or two angles. Heading uses a type code of 125. +------+------+ | 125 |Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Angle | +------+------+------+------+ | (Optional) Angle | +------+------+------+------+ Dynamic Heading TLVs Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 4.11. Secondary Map Metadata The optional "map" URL can be used to provide a user of relative location with a visual reference for the location information. This document does not describe how the recipient uses the map nor how it locates the reference or offset within the map. Maps can be simple images, vector files, 2-D or 3-D geospatial databases, or any other form of representation understood by both the sender and recipient. 4.11.1. Map URL In XML, the map is a element defined within and contains the URL. The URL is encoded as a UTF-8 encoded string. An "http:" ([RFC2616]) or "https:" ([RFC2818]) URL MUST be used unless the entity creating the PIDF-LO is able to ensure that authorized recipients of this data are able to use other URI schemes. A "type" attribute MUST be present and specifies the kind of map the URL points to. Map types are specified as MIME media types as recorded in the IANA Media Types registry. For example https://www.example.com/floorplans/123South/floor-2< /map>. In binary, the map type is a separate TLV from the map URL. The media type uses a type code of 126; the URL uses a type code of 127. +------+------+------+------+------+-- --+------+ | 126 |Length| Map Media Type ... +------+------+------+------+------+-- --+------+ | 127 |Length| Map Image URL ... +------+------+------+------+------+-- --+------+ Map URL TLVs Note that the binary form restricts data to 255 octets. This restriction could be problematic for URLs in particular. Applications that use the XML form, but cannot guarantee that a binary form won't be used, are encouraged to limit the size of the URL to fit within this restriction. 4.11.2. Map Coordinate Reference System The CRS used by the map depends on the type of map. For example, a map described by a 3-D geometric model of the building may contain a complete CRS description in it. For some kinds of maps, typically described as images, the CRS used within the map must define the following: o The CRS origin Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 o The CRS axes used and their orientation o The unit of measure used This document provides elements that allow for a mapping between the local coordinate reference system used for the relative location and the coordinate reference system used for the map where they are not the same. 4.11.2.1. Map Reference Point Offset This optional element identifies the coordinates of the reference point as it appears in the map. This value is measured in a map-type dependent manner, using the coordinate system of the map. For image maps, coordinates start from the upper left corner and coordinates are first counted by column with positive values to the right; then rows are counted with positive values toward the bottom of the image. For such an image, the first item is columns, the second rows and any third value applies to any third dimension used in the image coordinate space. The element contains 2 (or 3) coordinates similar to a GML "pos". For example: 2670.0 1124.0 1022.0 Map Reference Point Example XML The map reference point uses a type code of 129. +------+------+ | 129 |Length| +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+ Map Reference Point Coordinates TLV If omitted, a value containing all zeros is assumed. If the coordinates provided contain fewer values than are needed, the first value from the set is applied in place of any absent values. Thus, if a single value is provided, that value is used for Coordinate-2 and Coordinate-3 (if required). If two values are provided and three Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 are required, the value of Coordinate-1 is used in place of Coordinate-3. 4.11.2.2. Map Orientation The map orientation includes the orientation of the map direction in relation to the Earth. Map orientation is expressed relative to the orientation of the relative coordinate system. This means that map orientation with respect to WGS84 North is the sum of the orientation field, plus any orientation included in a dynamic portion of the reference location. Both values default to zero if no value is specified. This type uses a single precision floating point value of degrees relative to North. In XML, the element contains a single floating point value, example 67.00. In TLV form map orientation uses the code 130: +------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 130 |Length| Angle | +------+------+------+------+------+------+ Map Orientation TLV 4.11.2.3. Map Scale The optional map scale describes the relationship between the units of measure used in the map, relative to the meters unit used in the relative coordinate system. This type uses a sequence of IEEE 754 [IEEE.754] single precision floating point values to represent scale as a sequence of numeric values. The units of these values are dependent on the type of map, and could for example be pixels per meter for an image. A scaling factor is provided for each axis in the coordinate system. For a two-dimensional coordinate system, two values are included to allow for different scaling along the x and y axes independently. For a three-dimensional coordinate system, three values are specified for the x, y and z axes. Decoders can determine the number of scaling factors by examining the length field. Alternatively, a single scaling value MAY be used to apply the same scaling factor to all coordinate components. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Images that use a rows/columns coordinate system often use a left- handed coordinate system. A negative value for the y/rows-axis scaling value can be used to account for any change in direction between the y-axis used in the relative coordinate system and the rows axis of the image coordinate system. In XML, the element MAY contain a single scale value, or MAY contain 2 (or 3) values in XML list form. In TLV form, scale uses a type code of 131. The length of the TLV determines how many scale values are present: +------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 131 |Length| Scale(s) ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+ Map Scale TLV 4.11.3. Map Example An example of expressing a map is: http://example.com/map.jpg 200 210 68 2.90 -2.90 Map Example 5. Examples The examples in this section combine elements from [RFC3863], [RFC4119], [RFC4479], [RFC5139], and [OGC.GeoShape]. 5.1. Civic PIDF with Polygon Offset Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 AU NSW Wollongong North Wollongong Flinders Street 123 Front Door A I 113 433.0 -734.0 431.0 -733.0 431.0 -732.0 433.0 -731.0 434.0 -732.0 434.0 -733.0 433.0 -734.0 GPS mac:1234567890ab 2007-06-22T20:57:29Z Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 5.2. Geo PIDF with Circle Offset -34.407 150.883 50.0 -34.407 150.883 500.0 750.0 5.0 https://www.example.com/flrpln/123South/flr-2 2670.0 1124.0 1022.0 67.00 10 -10 Wiremap mac:1234567890ab Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 2007-06-22T20:57:29Z 5.3. Civic TLV with Point Offset +--------+-------------------------------------------------+ | Type | Value | +--------+-------------------------------------------------+ | 0 | en | | | | | 1 | IL | | | | | 3 | Chicago | | | | | 34 | Wacker | | | | | 18 | Drive | | | | | 19 | 3400 | | | | | 112 | Reference | | | | | 25 | Building A | | | | | 27 | Floor 6 | | | | | 26 | Suite 213 | | | | | 28 | Reception Area | | | | | 115 | 100 70 | | | | | 126 | image/png | | | | | 127 | http://maps.example.com/3400Wacker/A6 | | | | | 129 | 0.0 4120.0 | | | | | 130 | 113.0 | | | | | 131 | 10.6 | +--------+-------------------------------------------------+ 6. Schema Definition Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Note: The pattern value for "mimeType" has been folded onto multiple lines. Whitespace has been added to conform to comply with document formatting restrictions. Extra whitespace around the line endings MUST be removed before using this schema. Relative Location for PIDF-LO This schema defines a location representation that allows for the description of locations that are relative to another. An optional map reference is also defined. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 xml schema relative-location 7. Security Considerations This document describes a data format. To a large extent, security properties of this depend on how this data is used. Privacy for location data is typically important. Adding relative location may increase the precision of the location, but does not otherwise alter its privacy considerations, which are discussed in [RFC4119]. The map URL provided in a relative location could accidentally reveal information if a Location Recipient uses the URL to acquire the map. The coverage area of a map, or parameters of the URL itself, could provide information about the location of a Target. In combination with other information that could reveal the set of potential Targets that the Location Recipient has location information for, acquiring a map could leak significant information. In particular, it is important to note that the Target and Location Recipient are often the same entity. Access to map URLs MUST be secured with TLS [RFC5246] (that is, restricting the map URL to be an https URI), unless the map URL cannot leak information about the Target's location. This restricts information about the map URL to the entity serving the map request. If the map URL conveys more information about a target than a map server is authorized to receive, that URL MUST NOT be included in the PIDF-LO. 8. IANA Considerations Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 8.1. Relative Location Registry This document creates a new registry called "Relative Location Parameters". This shares a page, entitled "Civic and Relative Location Parameters" with the existing "Civic Address Types Registry (CAtypes)" registry. As defined in [RFC5226], this new registry operates under "IETF Review" rules. The content of this registry includes: Relative Location Code: Numeric identifier, assigned by IANA. Brief description: Short description identifying the meaning of the element. Reference to published specification: A stable reference to an RFC which describes the value in sufficient detail so that interoperability between independent implementations is possible. Values requested to be assigned into this registry MUST NOT conflict with values assigned in the "Civic Address Types Registry (CAtypes)" registry or vice versa, unless the IANA considerations section for the new value explicitly overrides this prohibition and the document defining the value describes how conflicting TLV codes will be interpreted by implementations. To ensure this, the CAtypes entries are explicitly reserved in the initial values table below. Those reserved entries can be changed, but only with caution as explained here. The values defined are: +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+ | RLtype | description | Reference | +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+ | 0-40 | RESERVED by CAtypes registry | this RFC | | 128 | | & RFC4776 | +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+ | 111 | relative location reference | this RFC | | 113 | relative location shape 2D point | this RFC | | 114 | relative location shape 3D point | this RFC | | 115 | relative location shape circular | this RFC | | 116 | relative location shape spherical | this RFC | | 117 | relative location shape elliptical | this RFC | | 118 | relative location shape ellipsoid | this RFC | | 119 | relative location shape 2D polygon | this RFC | | 120 | relative location shape 3D polygon | this RFC | | 121 | relative location shape prism | this RFC | | 122 | relative location shape arc-band | this RFC | Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 | 123 | relative location dynamic orientation | this RFC | | 124 | relative location dynamic speed | this RFC | | 125 | relative location dynamic heading | this RFC | | 126 | relative location map type | this RFC | | 127 | relative location map URI | this RFC | | 129 | relative location map coordinates | this RFC | | 130 | relative location map angle | this RFC | | 131 | relative location map scale | this RFC | +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+ 8.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration This document registers a new XML namespace, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688]). URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative Registrant Contact:IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net). XML: BEGIN GEOPRIV Relative Location

Format for representing relative location

urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative

See RFCXXXX.

END 8.3. XML Schema Registration Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 This section registers an XML schema as per the procedures in [RFC3688]. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:pidf:geopriv10:relativeLocation Registratant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net). Schema The XML for this schema is found in Section 6 of this document. 8.4. Geopriv Identifiers Registry This section registers two URNs for use in identifying relative coordinate reference systems. These are added to a new "Geopriv Identifiers" registry according to the procedures in Section 4 of [RFC3553]. The "Geopriv Identifiers" registry is entered under the "Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for IETF Use" category. Registrations in this registry follow the IETF Review [RFC5226] policy. Registry name: Geopriv Identifiers URN Prefix: urn:ietf:params:geopriv: Specification: RFCXXXX (this document) Respository: [Editor/IANA note: please include a link to the registry location.] Index value: Values in this registry are URNs or URN prefixes that start with the prefix "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:". Each is registered independently. Each registration in the "Geopriv Identifiers" registry requires the following information: URN The complete URN that is used, or the prefix for that URN. Description: A summary description for the URN or URN prefix. Specification: A reference to a specification describing the URN or URN prefix. Contact: Email for the person or groups making the registration. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Index value: As described in [RFC3553], URN prefixes that are registered include a description of how the URN is constructed. This is not applicable for specific URNs. The "Geopriv Identifiers" registry has two initial registrations, included in the following sections. 8.4.1. Registration of Two-Dimentional Relative Coordinate Reference System URN This section registers the "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d" URN in the "Geopriv Identifiers" registry. URN urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d Description: A two-dimensional relative coordinate reference system Specification: RFCXXXX (this document) Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net). Index value: N/A. 8.4.2. Registration of Three-Dimentional Relative Coordinate Reference System URN This section registers the "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d" URN in the "Geopriv Identifiers" registry. URN urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d Description: A three-dimensional relative coordinate reference system Specification: RFCXXXX (this document) Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net). Index value: N/A. 9. Acknowledgements This is the product of a design team on relative location. Besides the authors, this team included: Marc Linsner, James Polk, and James Winterbottom. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 10. References 10.1. Normative References [RFC1014] Sun Microsystems, Inc., "XDR: External Data Representation standard", RFC 1014, June 1987. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2046] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046, November 1996. [RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999. [RFC2818] Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000. [RFC3553] Mealling, M., Masinter, L., Hardie, T., and G. Klyne, "An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters", BCP 73, RFC 3553, June 2003. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005. [RFC4119] Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format", RFC 4119, December 2005. [RFC4776] Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information", RFC 4776, November 2006. [RFC5139] Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, "Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5139, February 2008. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008. [RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008. Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 [RFC5491] Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and H. Tschofenig, "GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations", RFC 5491, March 2009. [RFC5962] Schulzrinne, H., Singh, V., Tschofenig, H., and M. Thomson, "Dynamic Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5962, September 2010. [RFC6225] Polk, J., Linsner, M., Thomson, M., and B. Aboba, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options for Coordinate-Based Location Configuration Information", RFC 6225, July 2011. [RFC6848] Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., Barnes, R., Rosen, B., and R. George, "Specifying Civic Address Extensions in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF- LO)", RFC 6848, January 2013. [OGC.GML-3.1.1] Cox, S., Daisey, P., Lake, R., Portele, C., and A. Whiteside, "Geographic information - Geography Markup Language (GML)", OpenGIS 03-105r1, April 2004, . [OGC.GeoShape] Thomson, M. and C. Reed, "GML 3.1.1 PIDF-LO Shape Application Schema for use by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)", OGC Best Practice 06-142r1, Version: 1.0, April 2007. [IEEE.754] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic", IEEE Standard 754-1985, January 2003. [Clinger1990] Clinger, W., "How to Read Floating Point Numbers Accurately", Proceedings of Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation pp. 92-101, 1990, . [WGS84] US National Imagery and Mapping Agency, "Department of Defense (DoD) World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), Third Edition ", NIMA TR8350.2, January 2000. 10.2. Informative References Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 34] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 [RFC3863] Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr, W., and J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)", RFC 3863, August 2004. [RFC4479] Rosenberg, J., "A Data Model for Presence", RFC 4479, July 2006. Authors' Addresses Martin Thomson Microsoft 3210 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 US Phone: +1 650-353-1925 EMail: martin.thomson@skype.net Brian Rosen Neustar 470 Conrad Dr Mars, PA 16046 US EMail: br@brianrosen.net Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave Sunnyvale, CA 94089 US EMail: dstanley@arubanetworks.com Gabor Bajko Nokia 323 Fairchild Drive Mountain View, CA 94043 US EMail: gabor.bajko@nokia.com Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 35] Internet-Draft Relative Location August 2013 Allan Thomson Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 US EMail: althomso@cisco.com Thomson, et al. Expires February 16, 2014 [Page 36]