GEOPRIV M. Thomson Internet-Draft Andrew Corporation Intended status: Standards Track B. Rosen Expires: January 6, 2011 Neustar D. Stanley Aruba Networks G. Bajko Nokia A. Thomson Cisco Systems, Inc. July 5, 2010 Relative Location Representation draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location-00 Abstract This document defines an extension to PIDF-LO (RFC4119) for the expression of location information that is defined relative to a reference point. The reference point may be expressed as a geodetic or civic location, and the relative offset may be one of several shapes. Optionally, a reference to a secondary document (such as a map image) can be included, along with the relationship of the map coordinate system to the reference/offset coordinate system to allow display of the map with the reference point and the relative offset. Also included in this document is a Type/Length/Value (TLV) representation of the relative location for use in other protocols that use TLVs. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 6, 2011. Copyright Notice Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Binary Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Relative Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5.1. Reference TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.2. Orientation of Relative Offset Coordinate Reference System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6. Shape Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6.1. Units of Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6.2. Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6.3. On Uncertainty and Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7. Shapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7.1. Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7.1.1. XML encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7.1.2. TLV encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7.2. Circle or Sphere Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7.2.1. XML encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7.2.2. TLV encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7.3. Ellipse or Ellipsoid Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7.3.1. XML encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7.3.2. TLV encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 7.4. Polygon or Prism Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 7.4.1. XML Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7.4.2. TLV Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.5. Arc-Band Shape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7.5.1. XML encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7.5.2. TLV Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8. Secondary Map Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8.1. Map URL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8.2. Map Coordinate Reference System . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8.2.1. Map Reference Point Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8.2.2. Map Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 8.2.3. Map Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 8.3. Map Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 9. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 9.1. Civic PIDF with Polygon Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 9.2. Geo PIDF with Circle Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 9.3. Civic TLV with Point Offset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 10. Schema Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12.1. Relative Location Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 12.3. XML Schema Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 12.4. CRS public identifier registration . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 13. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 14.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 14.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 1. Introduction This document describes a format for the expression of relative location information. The location is given relative to a reference, which is expressed with a civic or geodetic representation, with the relative offset as described in this document. The offset is expressed in meters, and a directional vector is either implied to be earth North/East or supplied explicitly. Also defined is an optional URI to a document that can contain a map/floorplan/illustration ('map') upon which the relative location can be plotted as well as an optional angle, offset and scale defining the Coordinate Reference System (CRS) of the map. Two formats are included: an XML form that is intended for use in PIDF-LO [RFC4119] and a TLV format for use in other protocols such as those that already convey binary representation of location information defined in [RFC4776]. 2. Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. Numeric values in this scheme are all represented using floating point values [IEEE.754]. Single precision values are 32-bit values with a sign bit, 8 exponent bits and 23 fractional bits. Double precision values are 64-bit values with a sign bit, 11 exponent bits and 52 fractional bits. 3. Overview This document describes an update to PIDF-LO [RFC4119] as updated by [RFC5139] and [RFC5491], to allow the expression of a location as an offset relative to a reference. This extension effectively allows the creator of a location object to include two location values plus an offset. The "baseline" location that is given outside of the element is what will be visible to a client that does not understand that extension (i.e., one that ignores the element). A client that does understand this extension will interpret the location within the relative element as a refinement of the baseline location, which gives the reference location for the relative offset. Creators of location objects with relative location thus have a choice of how much information to put into the "baseline" location Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 and how much to put into the "reference" location. For example, all location information could be put inside the element, so that clients that do not understand relative location would receive no location information at all. Alternatively, the baseline location value could be precise enough to specify a building that contains the relative location, and the reference location could specify a point within the building from which the offset is measured. In any case, it is RECOMMENDED that the baseline location be general enough to describe both the reference location and the relative location (reference plus offset). In particular, while it is possible to put all location information into the "reference" location (leaving an universally broad "baseline"), location objects SHOULD NOT have all location information in the baseline location. Doing this would cause clients that do not understand relative location to incorrectly interpret the baseline location (i.e., the reference point) as the actual, precise location of the client. Both the baseline and the reference location are defined either as a geodetic location [OGC.GeoShape] or a civic address [RFC4776]. If the baseline location was expressed as a geodetic location, the reference MUST be geodetic. If the baseline location was expressed as a civic address, the reference MUST be a civic. The relative location can be expressed using a point (2- or 3-dimensional), or a shape that includes uncertainty: circle, sphere, ellipse, ellipsoid, polygon, prism or arc-band. Descriptions of these shapes can be found in [RFC5491]. Optionally, a reference to a 'map' document can be provided. The reference is a URI. The document could be an image or dataset that represents a map, floorplan or other form. The type of document the URI points to is described as a MIME media type. Metadata in the relative location can include the location of the reference point in the map as well as an orientation (angle from North) and scale to align the document CRS with the WGS-84 CRS. The document is assumed to be useable by the application receiving the PIDF with the relative location to locate the reference point in the map. This document does not describe any mechanisms for displaying or manipulating the document other than providing the reference location, orientation and scale. As an example, consider a relative location expressed as a point, relative to a civic location: AU NSW Wollongong North Wollongong Flinders Street 123 Front 100 50 GPS http://example.com/location/map.png 20. 120. 29. 20. -20. mac:1234567890ab 2007-06-22T20:57:29Z Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 4. Binary Format This document describes a way to encode the relative location in a binary TLV form for use in other protocols that use TLVs to represent location. A type-length-value encoding is used. +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Type | Length | Value ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | X | N | Value label ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Figure 1: TLV-tuple format Type field (X) is defined as a single byte. The type codes used are registered an IANA managed 'RLtypes' registry defined by this document, and restricted to not include the values defined by the CAtypes registry. This restriction permits a location reference and offset to be coded with unique TLVs. The Length field (N) is defined as an unsigned integer that is two bytes in length. This field can encode values from 0 to 65535. The length field describes the number of bytes in the Value. Length does not count the bytes used for the Type or Length. Note that the length field of a TLVs using the CAtypes registry (such as those defined in [RFC5139] are one byte. Since the type codes defined here are restricted to be different from the CAtypes, the difference in the length field can be accommodated. The value field is defined explicitly for each shape in this document. 5. Relative Location Relative location is a shape (point, circle, ellipse...). The shape is defined with a CRS that has a datum defined as the reference (which appears as a civic address or geodetic location in the tuple), and the shape coordinates as meter offsets North/East of the datum measured in meters (with an optional Z offset relative to datum altitude). An optional angle allows the reference CRS be to rotated with respect to North. The CRS for 2-D is denoted with an SRSname of urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d, while the 3-D CRS is urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d. A 2D offset MUST NOT be used with a 3D reference, and a 3D offset MUST NOT be used with a 2D Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 reference The baseline of the reference location is represented as like a normal PIDF-LO. Relative location adds a new element to Within and elements are described. Within are shape elements described below. The individual elements of the relative location have unique TLV assignments. A relative location encoded in TLV would have the baseline location reference TLDs followed by an outer reference TLD which contains within it the reference refinement TLVs. The reference TLD is followed by the relative offset, and optional map TLDs described in this document. More than one relative shape MUST NOT be included in either a PIDF-LO or TLV encoding of location for a given reference point. Any error in the reference point transfers to the location described by the relative location. Any errors arising from an implementation not supporting or understanding elements of the reference point directly increases the error (or uncertainty) in the resulting location. 5.1. Reference TLV When a reference is encoded in TLV, the refinement of the baseline location is represented in a reference TLV, inside of which are civic CAtype TLVs (if the baseline was a civic) or geo TLVs (if the baseline was a geo). +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 111 | Length | Reference TLVs | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Reference TLV 5.2. Orientation of Relative Offset Coordinate Reference System The relative location element may contain an optional angle relative to North that defines the CRS of the offset. The offset CRS scale is always meters, and the datum is the reference. The angle is encoded as a single precision floating point degrees, with 0.0 representing North. In xml, the angle is contained in an element, example 50.0. In TLV encoding: +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 112 | Length | Angle | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 Relative Offset Orientation TLV 6. Shape Encoding Shape data is used to represent regions of uncertainty in the relative CRS. The description of each shape type includes a description of how that type is encoded in Geography Markup Language (GML) [OGC.GML-3.1.1], consistent with the rules in [RFC5491], but with a relative CRS. The CRS is identified by a distinguished urn --tbd-- defined by this document. 6.1. Units of Measure All distance measures used in shapes are expressed in meters using single precision floating point values. All orientation angles used in shapes are expressed in degrees using single precision floating point values. Orientation angles are measured from WGS84 Northing to Easting with zero at Northing. Orientation angles in the relative coordinate system start from the second coordinate axis (y or Northing) and increase toward the first axis (x or Easting). 6.2. Coordinates Coordinates are a sequence of numeric values. These are encoded as a sequence of double precision floating point numbers. Coordinates are represented using a single precision floating point value as described in IEEE 754 [IEEE.754]. Every CRS MUST define how many values are present in each set of coordinates, the axes that each value applies to, the order of axes, and the units that are used for each axis. For the two-dimensional CRS, coordinates are made of two values. The first value corresponds to latitude (Easting). The second value corresponds to longitude (Northing). Both axis are rotated relative to North by the ro-angle, if present. For the three-dimensional CRS, coordinates are made of three values, the first two of which are the same as for the two-dimensional CRS. The third value corresponds to the altitude above the plane of the horizontal at the reference location and is measured in meters. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 6.3. On Uncertainty and Encoding Binary-encoded coordinate values are considered to be a single value without uncertainty. When encoding a value that cannot be exactly represented, the best approximation is chosen according to [Clinger1990]. 7. Shapes Nine shape type codes are defined. 7.1. Point A point "shape" describes a single point with unknown uncertainty. It consists of a single set of coordinates. In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values; in a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values. 7.1.1. XML encoding A point is represented in GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$ GML Point Template Where "$CRS-URN$" is replaced by a urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d or urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d and "$Coordinate-3$" is omitted if the CRS is two-dimensional. 7.1.2. TLV encoding The point shape is introduced by a TLV of 113 for a 2D point and 114 for a 3D point. +------+-------------+ | 113/4| Length | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 +------+------+------+------+ Point Encoding 7.2. Circle or Sphere Shape A circle or sphere describes a single point with a single uncertainty value in meters. In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values and the resulting shape forms a circle. In a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values and the resulting shape forms a sphere. The uncertainty radius is specified as a single precision floating point value (32 bits: 1 sign bit, 8 exponent bits, 23 fractional bits in binary). The circle size is defined as a radius in meters encoded as single precision floating point value 7.2.1. XML encoding A circle is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Radius$ GML Circle Template A sphere is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$ $Radius$ GML Sphere Template Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 7.2.2. TLV encoding A circular shape is introduced by a type code of 115. A spherical shape is introduced by a type code of 116. +------+-------------+ | 115/6| Length | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+ | Radius | +------+------+------+------+ Circle or Sphere Encoding 7.3. Ellipse or Ellipsoid Shape A ellipse or ellipsoid describes a point with an elliptical or ellipsoidal uncertainty region. In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values, plus a semi-major axis, a semi-minor axis, a semi-major axis orientation (clockwise from North). In a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values and in addition to the two-dimensional values, an altitude uncertainty (semi-vertical) is added. Distance and angular measures are defined in meters and degrees respectively. Both are encoded as single precision floating point values. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 7.3.1. XML encoding An ellipse is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Semi-Major$ $Semi-Minor$ $Orientation$ GML Ellipse Template An ellipsoid is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$ $Semi-Major$ $Semi-Minor$ $Semi-Vertical$ $Orientation$ GML Ellipsoid Template Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 7.3.2. TLV encoding An ellipse is introduced by a type code of 117 and an ellipsoid is introduced by a type code of 118. +------+-------------+ | 117/8| Length | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Semi-Major Axis | Semi-Minor Axis | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Orientation | (3D) Semi-Vertical Axis | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Ellipse or Ellipsoid Encoding 7.4. Polygon or Prism Shape A polygon or prism include a number of points that describe the outer boundary of an uncertainty region. A prism also includes an altitude and prism height. At least 3 points MUST be included in a polygon. In order to interoperate with existing systems, an encoding SHOULD include 15 or fewer points, unless the recipient is known to support larger numbers. The height of the prism is encoded as a single precision floating point value. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 7.4.1. XML Encoding A polygon is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate2-1$ $Coordinate2-2$ $Coordinate3-1$ ... ... $CoordinateN-1$ $CoordinateN-2$ $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ GML Polygon Template Alternatively, a series of "pos" elements can be used in place of the single "posList". Each "pos" element contains two coordinate values. Note that the first point is repeated at the end of the sequence of coordinates and no explicit count of the number of points is provided. A GML polygon that includes altitude cannot be represented completely in binary. When converting to the binary representation, a two dimensional CRS is used and altitude is removed from each coordinate. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 A prism is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate1-3$ $Coordinate2-1$ $Coordinate2-2$ $Coordinate2-3$ $Coordinate2-1$ ... ... ... $CoordinateN-1$ $CoordinateN-2$ $CoordinateN-3$ $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate1-3$ $Height$ GML Prism Template Alternatively, a series of "pos" elements can be used in place of the single "posList". Each "pos" element contains three coordinate values. 7.4.2. TLV Encoding A polygon is introduced with a type code of 119. A prism is introduced with a type code of 120. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 +------+-------------+ |119/20| Length | +------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Count | (3D-only) Height | +------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate1-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate1-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate1-3 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate2-1 | +------+------+------+------+ ... +------+------+------+------+ | CoordinateN-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | CoordinateN-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) CoordinateN-3 | +------+------+------+------+ Polygon or Prism Encoding Note that unlike the polygon representation in GML, the first and last points are not required to be the same in the TLV representation. an explicit count of the number of points is provided in 'Count'. 7.5. Arc-Band Shape A arc-band describes a region constrained by a range of angles and distances from a predetermined point. This shape can only be provided for a two-dimensional CRS. Distance and angular measures are defined in meters and degrees respectively. Both are encoded as single precision floating point values. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 7.5.1. XML encoding An arc-band is represented in and converted from GML using the following template: $Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Inner-Radius$ $Inner-Radius$ $Start-Angle$ $Opening-Angle$ GML Arc-Band Template 7.5.2. TLV Encoding An arc-band is introduced by a type code of 122. +------+-------------+ | 121 | Length | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Inner Radius | Outer Radius | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | Start Angle | Opening Angle | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Arc-Band Encoding 8. Secondary Map Metadata The optional "map" URL can be used to provide a user of relative location with a visual reference for the location information. This document does not describe how the recipient uses the map nor how it Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 locates the reference or offset within the map. Maps can be simple images, vector files, 2-D or 3-D geospatial databases, or any other form of representation understood by both the sender and recipient. 8.1. Map URL In XML, the map is a element defined within and contains the URL. The URL is encoded as a UTF-8 encoded string. An "http:" or "https:" URL MUST be used unless the entity creating the PIDF-LO is able to ensure that authorized recipients of this data are able to use other URI schemes. A "map-type" attribute MUST be present and specifies the kind of map the URL points to. Map types are specified as mime media types as recorded in the IANA Media Types registry. For example https:// www.example.com/floorplans/123South/floor-2. In binary, the maptype is a separate TLV from the map URL: +------+------+------+------+------+------+-- --+------+ | 122 | Length | maptype ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+-- --+------+ | 123 | Length | Map Image URL ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+-- --+------+ Map URL TLVs 8.2. Map Coordinate Reference System The CRS used by the map depends on the type of map. For example, a map described by a 3-D geometric model of the building may contain a complete CRS description in it. For some kinds of maps, typically described as images, the CRS used within the map must define the following: o The CRS origin o The CRS axes used and their orientation o The unit of measure used This document provides elements that allow for a mapping between the local coordinate reference system used for the relative location and the coordinate reference system used for the map where they are not the same. 8.2.1. Map Reference Point Offset This optional element identifies the coordinates of the reference point as it appears in the map. This value is measured in a map-type Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 dependent manner, using the coordinate system of the map. For image maps, coordinates start from the upper left corner and coordinates are first counted by column with positive values to the right; then rows are counted with positive values toward the bottom of the image. For such an image, the first item is columns, the second rows and any third value applies to any third dimension used in the image coordinate space. The element contains 2 (or 3) coordinates similar to a GML "pos", For example: 2670.0 1124.0 1022.0 Map Reference Point Example XML +------+-------------+ | 124 | Length | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-1 | +------+------+------+------+ | Coordinate-2 | +------+------+------+------+ | (3D-only) Coordinate-3 | +------+------+------+------+ Map Reference Point Coordinates TLV The encoding for coordinates is described in Section 6.2. If omitted, a value containing all zeros is assumed. If the coordinates provided contain fewer values than are needed, the first value from the set is applied in place of any missing values. 8.2.2. Map Orientation The map orientation includes the orientation of the map direction ('UP') in relation to the Earth. Map orientation is expressed relative to the orientation of the relative coordinate system. This means that map orientation with respect to WGS84 North is the sum of the two orientation fields. Both values default to zero if no value is specified. This type uses a single precision floating point value of degrees relative to North. In XML, the element contains a single floating point Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 value, example 67.00. In TLV form: +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 125 | Length | Angle | +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ Map Orientation TLV 8.2.3. Map Scale The optional map scale describes the relationship between the units of measure used in the map, relative to the meters unit used in the relative coordinate system. This type uses a sequence of IEEE 754 [IEEE.754] single precision floating point values to represent scale as a sequence of numeric values. The units of these values is map-type dependent, and could for example be pixels per meter in image map-types. A scaling factor is provided for each axis in the coordinate system. For a two-dimensional coordinate system, two values are included to allow for different scaling along the x and y axes independently. For a three-dimensional coordinate system, three values are specified for the x, y and z axes. Alternatively, a single scaling value MAY be used to apply the same scaling factor to all coordinate components. Images that use a rows/columns coordinate system often use a left- handed coordinate system. A negative value for the y/rows-axis scaling value can be used to account for any change in direction between the y-axis used in the relative coordinate system and the rows axis of the image coordinate system. In XML, the element may contain the single scale value, or may contain 2 (or 3) values similar to a GML "pos" with separate scale values. In TLV form: +------+------+------+------+------+------+ | 126 | Length | Scales ... +------+------+------+------+------+------+ Map Scale TLV Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 8.3. Map Example An example of expressing a map is: http://example.com/map.jpg 200 210 68 2.90 -2.90 Map Example 9. Examples 9.1. Civic PIDF with Polygon Offset AU NSW Wollongong North Wollongong Flinders Street 123 A I 113 Front Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 433.0 -734.0 431.0 -733.0 431.0 -732.0 433.0 -731.0 434.0 -732.0 434.0 -733.0 433.0 -734.0 GPS mac:1234567890ab 2007-06-22T20:57:29Z 9.2. Geo PIDF with Circle Offset -34.407 150.883 50.0 -34.407 150.883 Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 500.0 750.0 5.0 https://www.example.com/flrpln/123South/flr-2 2670.0 1124.0 1022.0 67.00 10 Wiremap mac:1234567890ab 2007-06-22T20:57:29Z 2003-06-22T20:57:29Z Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 9.3. Civic TLV with Point Offset +--------+-------------------------------------------------+ | Type | Value | +--------+-------------------------------------------------+ | 0 | en | | | | | 1 | IL | | | | | 3 | Chicago | | | | | 34 | Wacker | | | | | 18 | Drive | | | | | 19 | 3400 | | | | | 112 | Reference | | | | | 40 | BBuilding|A | | | | | 40 | AFloor|6th | | | | | 40 | BSuite|213 | | | | | 40 | ADoor|Front | | | | | 115 | 100 70 | | | | | 122 | image/png | | | | | 123 | http://maps.example.com/3400Wacker/A6 | | | | | 124 | 0.0 4120.0 | | | | | 125 | 113.0 | | | | | 126 | 10.6 | +--------+-------------------------------------------------+ 10. Schema Definition Relative Location for PIDF-LO This schema defines a location representation that allows for the description of locations that are relative to another. An optional map reference is also defined. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 xml schema relative-location 11. Security Considerations This document describes a data format. To a large extent, security properties of this depend on how this data is used. Privacy for location data is typically important. Adding relative location may increase the precision of the location, but does not otherwise alter its privacy considerations, which are discussed in [RFC4119] [[Not that interesting, but it could be relevant ?]] The fractional bits in IEEE 754 [IEEE.754] floating point values can be used as a covert channel. For values of either zero or infinity, non-zero fraction bits could be used to convey information. If the presence of covert channels is not desired then the fractional bits MUST be set to zero. There is no need to represent NaN (not a number) in this encoding. 12. IANA Considerations 12.1. Relative Location Registry This document creates a new registry called 'RLtypes'. As defined in [RFC5226], this registry operates under "IETF Consensus" rules. The content of this registry includes: RLtype: Numeric identifier, assigned by IANA. Brief description: Short description identifying the meaning of the element. Reference to published specification: A stable reference to an RFC which describes the value in sufficient detail so that interoperability between independent implementations is possible. IANA is requested to not permit values to be assigned into this registry which conflict with values assigned in the CAtypes registry or to permit values to be assigned into the CAtypes registry which conflict with values assigned to to this registry unless the IANA Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 considerations section for the new value explicitly overrides this prohibition, and the document defining the value describes how conflicting TLV codes will be interpreted by implementations The values defined are: +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+ | RLtype | description | Reference | +--------+-------+--------------------------------+-----------+ | 111 | relative location reference | this RFC | | 112 | relative location angle | this RFC | | 113 | relative location shape 2D point | this RFC | | 114 | relative location shape 3D point | this RFC | | 115 | relative location shape circlular | this RFC | | 116 | relative location shape spherical | this RFC | | 117 | relative location shape elliptical | this RFC | | 118 | relative location shape ellipsoid | this RFC | | 119 | relative location shape arc-band | this RFC | | 120 | relative location shape polygon | this RFC | | 121 | relative location shape prism | this RFC | | 122 | relative location map type | this RFC | | 123 | relative location map URI | this RFC | | 124 | relative location map coordinates | this RFC | | 125 | relative location map angle | this RFC | | 126 | relative location map scale | this RFC | +--------+-------+--------------------------------+-----------+ 12.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration This document registers a new XML namespace, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688]) that has been registered with IANA. Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com). XML: BEGIN GEOPRIV Relative Location

Format for representing relative location in GEOPRIV

urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative

See RFCXXXX.

END 12.3. XML Schema Registration This section registers an XML schema as per the procedures in [RFC3688]. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:pidf:geopriv10:relativeLocation Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com). The XML for this schema can be found as the entirety of Section 7 of this document. 12.4. CRS public identifier registration This section registers two public identifiers as per the procedures in [RFC3688]. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative:2d Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com). XML: BEGIN GEOPRIV Relative Location 2d CRS

Identifier for a 2D CRS in GEOPRIV relative location

urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative:2d

See RFCXXXX.

END URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative:3d Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com). XML: BEGIN GEOPRIV Relative Location 3d CRS

Identifier for a 3D CRS in GEOPRIV relative location

urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative:3d

See RFCXXXX.

END 13. Acknowledgements This is the product of a design team on relative location. Besides the authors, this team included: Marc Linsner, James Polk, and James Winterbottom. 14. References 14.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC4119] Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format", RFC 4119, December 2005. [RFC4776] Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information", RFC 4776, November 2006. [RFC5139] Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, "Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5139, February 2008. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008. [RFC5491] Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and H. Tschofenig, "GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations", RFC 5491, March 2009. [OGC.GML-3.1.1] Cox, S., Daisey, P., Lake, R., Portele, C., and A. Whiteside, "Geographic information - Geography Markup Language (GML)", OpenGIS 03-105r1, April 2004, . [OGC.GeoShape] Thomson, M. and C. Reed, "GML 3.1.1 PIDF-LO Shape Application Schema for use by the Internet Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 Engineering Task Force (IETF)", OGC Best Practice 06-142r1, Version: 1.0, April 2007. [IEEE.754] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic", IEEE Standard 754-1985, January 2003. [Clinger1990] Clinger, W., "How to Read Floating Point Numbers Accurately", Proceedings of Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation pp. 92-101, 1990, . 14.2. Informative References [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005. Authors' Addresses Martin Thomson Andrew Corporation Andrew Building (39) Wollongong University Campus Northfields Avenue Wollongong, NSW 2522 AU EMail: martin.thomson@andrew.com Brian Rosen Neustar 470 Conrad Dr Mars, PA 16046 US EMail: br@brianrosen.net Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Relative Location July 2010 Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave Sunnyvale, CA 94089 US EMail: dstanley@arubanetworks.com Gabor Bajko Nokia 323 Fairchild Drive Mountain View, CA 94043 US EMail: gabor.bajko@nokia.com Allan Thomson Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 US EMail: althomso@cisco.com Thomson, et al. Expires January 6, 2011 [Page 34]