TOC 
Network Working GroupR. Huang
Internet-DraftQ. Wu
Intended status: Standards TrackHuawei
Expires: April 19, 2011October 16, 2010


RTCP XR Report Block for TS Decodability Statistics Metric reporting
draft-huang-avt-rtcp-xr-decodability-00

Abstract

This document defines an RTCP XR Report Block that allows the reporting of Decodability Statistics Metric used for Transport Stream.

Status of this Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

This Internet-Draft will expire on April 19, 2011.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.



Table of Contents

1.  Introduction
2.  Terminology
    2.1.  Standards Language
    2.2.  Acronyms
3.  TR 101 290 Decodability Statistics Metric Report Block
4.  SDP Signaling
5.  IANA Considerations
6.  Security Considerations
7.  References
    7.1.  Normative References
    7.2.  Informative References
§  Authors' Addresses




 TOC 

1.  Introduction

This draft defines a new block type to augment those defined in [RFC3611] (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.) for use in Transport Stream. The new block type supports the reporting of consistency of Transport Stream [ETSI] (ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Measurement guidelines for DVB systems,” 2001.). This new block type can be useful for identifying the existence, and characterising the severity, of a packet transport problem which may affect users' perception of a service delivered over RTP, also useful for Verifying the continued correct operation of an existing system management and providing accurate measures of Transport Stream quality for operators.

The metric is applicable to any other types of RTP application that use TS standard format for transmission and storage of audio, video, and data.



 TOC 

2.  Terminology



 TOC 

2.1.  Standards Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.) [RFC2119].

In addition, the following terms are defined:



 TOC 

2.2.  Acronyms

SSRC
Synchronization Source (Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, “RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications,” July 2003.) [RFC3550]

TS
Transport Stream (International Organization for Standardization, “Information technology - Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems,” October 2007.) [ISO‑IEC.13818‑1.2007]


 TOC 

3.  TR 101 290 Decodability Statistics Metric Report Block

This block reports decodability statistics metric beyond the information carried in the standard RTCP packet format. Information is recorded about the number of Transport Stream Synchronization Losses, Sync byte errors, Continuity count errors, Transport errors, Program Clock Reference (PCR) errors, PCR repetition errors, PCR discontinuity indicator errors, and Presentation Time Stamp (PTS) errors [ETSI] (ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Measurement guidelines for DVB systems,” 2001.). Such information can be useful for network management and video quality monitoring.

Note that this is not only applicable to MPEG-2 RTP streams [RFC2250] (Hoffman, D., Fernando, G., Goyal, V., and M. Civanlar, “RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video,” January 1998.),but also applicable to any other video codec using Transport Stream as input.

The report block contents are dependent upon a series of flag bits carried in the first part of the header. Not all parameters need to be reported in each block. Flags indicate which are and which are not reported. The fields corresponding to unreported parameters MUST be present, but are set to zero. The receiver MUST ignore any Decodability Metrics Block with a non-zero value in any field flagged as unreported.

The Decodability Metrics Block has the following format:

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|     BT=TBD    |L|B|C|T|P|S|rvd|         block length          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                        SSRC of source                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          begin_seq            |             end_seq           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|       Number of packets       |         Number of TSs         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Transport Stream Synchronization Losses           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                      Sync byte errors                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Continuity count errors                      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                      Transport errors                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         PCR errors                            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   PCR repetition errors                       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|            PCR discontinuity indicator errors                 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         PTS errors                            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

block type (BT): 8 bits
A TR 101 290 decodability metrics report block is identified by the constant <TDM>.

Transport Stream Synchronization Loss flag (L): 1 bit
Bit set to 1 if the Transport Stream Synchronization Loss field contains a report, 0 otherwise.

Sync byte error flag (B): 1 bit
Bit set to 1 if the Sync byte error field contains a report, 0 otherwise.

Continuity count error flag (C): 1 bit
Bit set to 1 if the Continuity count error field contains a report, 0 otherwise.

Transport error flag (T): 1 bit
Bit set to 1 if the Transport error field contains a report, 0 otherwise.

PCR related error flag (P): 1 bit
Bit set to 1 if the PCR error field, PCR repetition error field and PCR discontinuity indicator error fields contain a report, 0 otherwise.

PTS error flag (S): 1 bit
Bit set to 1 if the PTS error field contains a report, 0 otherwise.

rvd: 2 bits
This field is reserved for future definition. In the absence of such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and MUST be ignored by the receiver.

block length: 16 bits
The constant 10, in accordance with the definition of this field in Section 3 of RFC 3611 (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.) [RFC3611].

SSRC of source: 32 bits
As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611] (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.).

begin_seq: 16 bits
As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611] (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.).

end_seq: 16 bits
As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611] (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.).

Number of Packets: 16 bits
Number of RTP packets in the above sequence number interval.

Number of TSs: 16 bits
Number of Transport Streams in the above sequence number interval.

Transport Stream Synchronization Losses: 32 bits
Number of Transport Stream Synchronization Losses in the above sequence number interval.

Sync byte errors: 32 bits
Number of Transport sync byte errors in the above sequence number interval.
Continuity count error: 32 bits
Number of Transport Continuity count errors in the above sequence number interval.

Transport errors: 32 bits
Number of Transport errors in the above sequence number interval.

PCR errors: 32 bits
Number of PCR errors in the above sequence number interval.

PCR repetition errors: 32 bits
Number of Transport PCR repetition errors in the above sequence number interval.

PCR discontinuity indicator errors: 32 bits
Number of PCR discontinuity indicator errors in the above sequence number interval.

PTS errors: 32 bits
Number of PTS errors in the above sequence number interval.



 TOC 

4.  SDP Signaling

One new parameters are defined for the one report blocks defined in this document to be used with Session Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566] (Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” July 2006.) using the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC5234] (Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” January 2008.). They have the following syntax within the "rtcp-xr" attribute [RFC3611] (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.):

rtcp-xr-attrib =  "a=rtcp-xr:"
                  [xr-format *(SP xr-format)] CRLF

   xr-format = decodability-metrics

      decodability-metrics = "decodability-metrics"
                            ["=" stat-flag *("," stat-flag)]
         stat-flag = "TS Synchronization Loss "
                   / "Sync byte error "
                   / "Continuity count error "
                  / "Transport error"
                  / "PCR related error"
                  / "PTS error"

Refer to Section 5.1 of RFC 3611 (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.) [RFC3611] for a detailed description and the full syntax of the "rtcp-xr" attribute.



 TOC 

5.  IANA Considerations

New report block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For general guidelines on IANA allocations for RTCP XR, refer to Section 6.2 of (Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” November 2003.) [RFC3611].

This document assigns one new block type values in the RTCP XR Block Type Registry:

Name:
TDM
Long Name:
TR 101 290 Decodability Metrics
Value
<TDM>
Reference:
section 3

This document also registers one SDP [RFC4566] (Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” July 2006.) parameters for the "rtcp-xr" attribute in the RTCP XR SDP Parameters Registry:



The contact information for the registrations is:

Rachel Huang
Rachel@huawei.com
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, JiangSu 210012 China



 TOC 

6.  Security Considerations

TBC



 TOC 

7.  References



 TOC 

7.1. Normative References

[ETSI] ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Measurement guidelines for DVB systems,” Technical Report TR 101 290, 2001.
[ISO-IEC.13818-1.2007] International Organization for Standardization, “Information technology - Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems,” ISO International Standard 13818-1, October 2007.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC2250] Hoffman, D., Fernando, G., Goyal, V., and M. Civanlar, “RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video,” RFC 2250, January 1998 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, “RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications,” STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003 (TXT, PS, PDF).
[RFC3611] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, “RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR),” RFC 3611, November 2003 (TXT).
[RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” RFC 4566, July 2006 (TXT).
[RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008 (TXT).


 TOC 

7.2. Informative References

[DSLF] Rahrer, T., Ed., Fiandra, Ed., and Wright, Ed., “Triple-play Services Quality of Experience (QoE) Requirements,” DSL Forum Technical Report TR-126, December 2006.
[G.1082] ITU-T, “Measurement-based methods for improving the robustness of IPTV performance,” ITU-T Recommendation G.1082, April 2009.
[IEEE] IEEE, “Human Perception of Jitter and Media Synchronization,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications Vol. 14, No. 1, January 1996.
[P.NAMS] ITU-T, “Non-intrusive parametric model for the Assessment of performance of Multimedia Streaming,” ITU-T Recommendation P.NAMS, November 2009.


 TOC 

Authors' Addresses

  Rachel Huang
  Huawei
  101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
  Nanjing 210012
  China
Email:  Rachel@huawei.com
  
  Qin Wu
  Huawei
  101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
  Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
  China
Email:  sunseawq@huawei.com