Kitten T. Hansen
Internet-Draft AT&T Laboratories
Updates: 5802 (if approved) July 24, 2014
Intended status: Informational
Expires: January 25, 2015

SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS SASL Mechanisms
draft-hansen-scram-sha256-01

Abstract

This document registers the SASL mechanisms SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS. It also updates RFC 5802 in minor ways.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on January 25, 2015.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This document registers the SASL mechanisms SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS.

The registration form for the SCRAM family of algorithms is also updated.

Note: this paragraph may be removed before publication.
This document was written because [RFC5802] requires that new SASL mechanisms in the SCRAM family be subject to IETF review. This document is being discussed in the KITTEN working group (see the kitten@ietf.org mailing list). It was pursued further because of a desire for its use within a document being discussed in the HTTP-AUTH working group (see the httpauth@ietf.org mailing list).

2. SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS

The SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS SASL mechanism are defined in the same way that SCRAM-SHA-1 and SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS are defined in [RFC5802], except that the hash function for HMAC() and H() uses SHA-256 instead of SHA-1 [RFC6234].

For the SCRAM-SHA-256/SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS SASL mechanisms, servers SHOULD announce a hash iteration-count of at least 4096.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Note that the appropriate value to specify here needs to be discussed further. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The GSS-API mechanism OID for SCRAM-SHA-256 is TBD1 (see Section 4).

This is a simple example of a SCRAM-SHA-256 authentication exchange when the client doesn't support channel bindings (username 'user' and password 'pencil' are used):

C:
n,,n=user,r=rOprNGfwEbeRWgbNEkqO
S:
r=rOprNGfwEbeRWgbNEkqO%hvYDpWUa2RaTCAfuxFIlj)hNlF$k0,
s=W22ZaJ0SNY7soEsUEjb6gQ==,i=4096
C:
c=biws,r=rOprNGfwEbeRWgbNEkqO%hvYDpWUa2RaTCAfuxFIlj)hNlF$k0,
p=dHzbZapWIk4jUhN+Ute9ytag9zjfMHgsqmmiz7AndVQ=
S:
v=6rriTRBi23WpRR/wtup+mMhUZUn/dB5nLTJRsjl95G4=

3. Security Considerations

The security considerations from [RFC5802] still apply.

4. IANA Considerations

The IANA registry for the SCRAM family of SASL mechanisms is updated as follows. This revised form adds two new fields: Minimum iteration-count and Associated OID. In addition, the email address for reviews has been updated.

The following values are to be added to the existing registries for SASL SCRAM-SHA-1 and SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS:

The following new SASL SCRAM mechanisms are added:

[This note may be removed on publication.] IANA needs to assign the GSS-API mechanism OID TBD1 listed above from the iso.org.dod.internet.security.mechanisms prefix (see the "SMI Security for Mechanism Codes" registry).

5. Acknowledgements

This document benefited from discussions on the KITTEN WG mailing list. The author would like to specially thank Russ Albery, Dave Cridland, Shawn Emery, Simon Josefsson, and Alexey Melnikov for their comments on this topic.

6. References

6.1. Normative References

[RFC5802] Newman, C., Menon-Sen, A., Melnikov, A. and N. Williams, "Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) SASL and GSS-API Mechanisms", RFC 5802, July 2010.
[RFC6234] Eastlake, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234, May 2011.

6.2. Informative References

[RFC4422] Melnikov, A. and K. Zeilenga, "Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)", RFC 4422, June 2006.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008.

Author's Address

Tony Hansen AT&T Laboratories 200 Laurel Ave. South Middletown, NJ 07748 USA EMail: tony+scramsha256@maillennium.att.com