Internet Engineering Task Force G.Galimberti, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco
Intended status: Standards Track R.Kunze, Ed.
Expires: April 27, 2015 Deutsche Telekom
K. Lam, Ed.
Alcatel-Lucent
D. Hiremagalur, Ed.
G.Grammel, Ed.
Juniper
October 24, 2014
A YANG model to manage the optical interface parameters of "G.698.2
single channel" in DWDM applications
draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01
Abstract
This memo defines a yang model that translates the SNMP mib module
defined in draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib for managing single
channel optical interface parameters of DWDM applications, using the
approach specified in G.698.2. This model is to support the optical
parameters specified in ITU-T G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] and application
identifiers specified in ITU-T G.874.1 [ITU.G874.1] . Note that
G.874.1 encompasses vendor-specific codes, which if used would make
the interface a single vendor IaDI and could still be managed.
The Yang model defined in this memo can be used for Optical
Parameters monitoring and/or configuration of the endpoints of the
multi-vendor IaDI based on the Black Link approach.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 27, 2015.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Optical Parameters Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1.1. Rs-Ss Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1.2. Table of Application Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1.3. Table of Vendor Application Codes . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. Optical Interface for G.698.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Structure of the Yang Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. Yang Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Appendix B. Open Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1. Introduction
This memo defines a yang model that translates the SNMP mib module
defined in draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib for managing single
channel optical interface parameters of DWDM applications, using the
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
approach specified in G.698.2. This model is to support the optical
parameters specified in ITU-T G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] and application
identifiers specified in ITU-T G.874.1 [ITU.G874.1] . Note that
G.874.1 encompasses vendor-specific codes, which if used would make
the interface a single vendor IaDI and could still be managed.`
The Black Link approach allows supporting an optical transmitter/
receiver pair of one vendor to inject an optical tributary signal and
run it over an optical network composed of amplifiers, filters, add-
drop multiplexers from a different vendor. In the OTN architecture,
the 'black-link' represents a pre-certified network media channel
conforming to G.698.2 specifications at the S and R reference points.
[Editor's note: In G.698.2 this corresponds to the optical path from
point S to R; network media channel is also used and explained in
draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02]
Management will be performed at the edges of the network media
channel (i.e., at the transmitters and receivers attached to the S
and R reference points respectively) for the relevant parameters
specified in G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2], G.798 [ITU.G798], G.874
[ITU.G874], and the performance parameters specified in G.7710/Y.1701
[ITU-T G.7710] and G.874.1 [ITU.G874.1].
G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] is primarily intended for metro applications
that include optical amplifiers. Applications are defined in G.698.2
[ITU.G698.2] using optical interface parameters at the single-channel
connection points between optical transmitters and the optical
multiplexer, as well as between optical receivers and the optical
demultiplexer in the DWDM system. This Recommendation uses a
methodology which does not explicitly specify the details of the
optical network between reference point Ss and Rs, e.g., the passive
and active elements or details of the design. The Recommendation
currently includes unidirectional DWDM applications at 2.5 and 10
Gbit/s (with 100 GHz and 50 GHz channel frequency spacing). Work is
still under way for 40 and 100 Gbit/s interfaces. There is
possibility for extensions to a lower channel frequency spacing.
This document specifically refers to the "application code" defined
in the G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] and included in the Application
Identifier defined in G.874.1 [ITU.G874.1] and G.872 [ITU.G872], plus
a few optical parameters not included in the G.698.2 application code
specification.
This draft refers and supports the draft-kunze-g-698-2-management-
control-framework
The building of a yang model describing the optical parameters
defined in G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2], and reflected in G.874.1
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
[ITU.G874.1], allows the different vendors and operator to retrieve,
provision and exchange information across the G.698.2 multi-vendor
IaDI in a standardized way.
The Yang Model, reporting the Optical parameters and their values,
characterizes the features and the performances of the optical
components and allow a reliable black link design in case of multi
vendor optical networks.
Although RFC 3591 [RFC3591], which draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-
snmp-mib is extending, describes and defines the SNMP MIB of a number
of key optical parameters, alarms and Performance Monitoring, as this
RFC is over a decade old, it is primarily pre-OTN, and a more
complete and up-to-date description of optical parameters and
processes can be found in the relevant ITU-T Recommendations. The
same considerations can be applied to the RFC 4054 [RFC4054].
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
This memo specifies a Yang model for optical interfaces.
3. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] In
the description of OIDs the convention: Set (S) Get (G) and Trap (T)
conventions will describe the action allowed by the parameter.
4. Overview
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
Figure 1 shows a set of reference points, for the linear "black link"
approach, for single-channel connection (Ss and Rs) between
transmitters (Tx) and receivers (Rx). Here the DWDM network elements
include an OM and an OD (which are used as a pair with the opposing
element), one or more optical amplifiers and may also include one or
more OADMs.
+-------------------------------------------------+
Ss | DWDM Network Elements | Rs
+---+ | | | \ / | | | +--+
Tx L1----|->| \ +------+ +------+ / |--|-->Rx L1
+---+ | | | | | +------+ | | | | | +--+
+---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | +--+
Tx L2----|->| OM |-->|------|->| OADM |--|------|->| OD |--|-->Rx L2
+---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | +--+
+---+ | | | | | +------+ | | | | | +--+
Tx L3----|->| / | DWDM | | ^ | DWDM | \ |--|-->Rx L3
+---+ | | / | Link +----|--|----+ Link | \ | | +--+
+-----------+ | | +----------+
+--+ +--+
| |
Rs v | Ss
+-----+ +-----+
|RxLx | |TxLx |
+-----+ +-----+
Ss = reference point at the DWDM network element tributary output
Rs = reference point at the DWDM network element tributary input
Lx = Lambda x
OM = Optical Mux
OD = Optical Demux
OADM = Optical Add Drop Mux
from Fig. 5.1/G.698.2
Figure 1: Linear Black Link approach
G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] defines also Ring "Black Link" approach
configurations [Fig. 5.2/G.698.2] and Linear "black link" approach
for Bidirectional applications[Fig. 5.3/G.698.2]
4.1. Optical Parameters Description
The G.698.2 pre-certified network media channels are managed at the
edges, i.e. at the transmitters (Tx) and receivers (Rx) attached to
the S and R reference points respectively. The set of parameters
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
that could be managed are specified in G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] section
5.3 referring the "application code" notation
The definitions of the optical parameters are provided below to
increase the readability of the document, where the definition is
ended by (R) the parameter can be retrieve with a read, when (W) it
can be provisioned by a write, (R,W) can be either read or written.
4.1.1. Rs-Ss Configuration
The Rs-Ss configuration table allows configuration of Wavelength,
Power and Application codes as described in [ITU.G698.2] and G.694.1
[ITU.G694.1]
This parameter report the current Transceiver Output power, it can be
either a setting and measured value (G, S).
Wavelength Value (see G.694.1 Table 1):
This parameter indicates the wavelength value that Ss and Rs will
be set to work (in THz). See the details in Section 6/G.694.1 (G,
S).
Number of Vendor Transceiver Class Supported
This parameter indicates the number of Vendor Transceiver codes
supported by this interface (G).
Single-channel application codes(see G.698.2):
This parameter indicates the transceiver application code at Ss
and Rs as defined in [ITU.G698.2] Chapter 5.4 - this parameter can
be called Optical Interface Identifier OII as per [draft-
martinelli-wson-interface-class](G).
Number of Single-channel application codes Supported
This parameter indicates the number of Single-channel application
codes supported by this interface (G).
Current Laser Output power:
This parameter report the current Transceiver Output power, it can
be either a setting and measured value (G, S).
Current Laser Input power:
This parameter report the current Transceiver Input power (G).
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
+---------------------------------------------+---------+-----------+
| PARAMETERS | Get/Set | Reference |
+---------------------------------------------+---------+-----------+
| Wavelength Value | G,S | G.694.1 |
| | | S.6 |
| Vendor Transceiver Class | G | N.A. |
| Number of Vendor Transceiver Class | G | N.A. |
| Supported | | |
| Single-channel application codes | G | G.698.2 |
| | | S.5.3 |
| Number of Single-channel application codes | G | N.A. |
| Supported | | |
| Current Output Power | G,S | N.A. |
| Current Input Power | G | N.A. |
+---------------------------------------------+---------+-----------+
Table 1: Rs-Ss Configuration
4.1.2. Table of Application Codes
This table has a list of Application codes supported by this
interface at point R are defined in G.698.2.
Application code Identifier:
The Identifier for the Application code.
Application code:
This is the application code that is defined in G.698.2.
4.1.3. Table of Vendor Application Codes
This table has a list of Application codes supported by this
interface at point R are defined in G.698.2.
Vendor Transceiver Class Identifier::
The Identifier for the vendor transceiver class.
Vendor Transceiver Class:
Other than specifying all the Transceiver parameter, it might be
convenient for the vendors to summarize a set of parameters in a
single proprietary parameter: the Class of transceiver. The
Transceiver classification will be based on the Vendor Name and
the main TX and RX parameters (i.e. Trunk Mode, Framing, Bit
rate, Trunk Type, Channel Band, Channel Grid, Modulation Format,
Channel Modulation Format, FEC Coding, Electrical Signal Framing
at Tx, Minimum maximum Chromatic Dispersion (CD) at Rx, Maximum
Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD) at Rx, Maximum differential
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
group delay at Rx, Loopbacks, TDC, Pre-FEC BER, Q-factor,
Q-margin,etc.). If this parameter is used, the vendor will be
responsible to specify the Class contents and values. The Vendor
can publish the parameters of its Classes or declare to be
compatible with published Classes.(G) Optional for compliance.
(not mentioned in G.698.2)
4.2. Optical Interface for G.698.2
The ietf-opt-if-g698-2 is an augment to the ietf-interface. It
allows the user to set the application code/vedor transceiver class/
wavelength and the output power. The module can also be used to get
the list of supported application codes/ transceiver class and also
the wavelength/output power/input power of the interface.
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
module: ietf-opt-if-g698-2
augment /ietf-interfaces
+.... rw optIfOChRsSs
+... rw ifCurrentApplicationCode
| + .... rw applicationCodeId
| + .... rw applicationCode
+... rw ifCurrentVendorTransceiverClass
| + .... rw vendorTransceiverClassId
| + .... rw vendorTransceiverClass
+... r ifSupportedApplicationCodes
| + .... r numberApplicationCodesSupported
| + .... r applicationCodesList * [applicationCodeId]
| | + .... r applicationCodeId
| | + .... r applicationCode
+... r ifSupportedVendorTransceiverClasses
| + .... r numberVendorTransceiverClassesSupported
| + .... r vendorTransceiverClassList *
[vendorTransceiverClassId]
| | + .... r vendorTransceiverClassId
| | + .... r vendorTransceiverClass
+... rw wavelength
+... rw optIfOChOutputPower
| + .... rw outputPower
| + .... r inputPower
notifications:
+---n optIfOChWavelengthChange
| +--ro if-name? leafref
| +--ro wavelength
| +--ro wavelength? uint32
+---n optIfOChApplicationCodeChange
| +--ro if-name? leafref
| +--ro newApplicationCode
| +--ro applicationCodeId? uint8
| +--ro applicationCode? string
+---n optIfOChVendorTransceiverCodeChange
+--ro if-name? leafref
+--ro newVendorTransceiverClass
+--ro vendorTransceiverClassId? uint8
+--ro vendorTransceiverClass? string
5. Structure of the Yang Module
ietf-opt-if-g698-2 is a top level model for the support of this
feature.
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
6. Yang Module
The ietf-opt-if-g698-2 is defined as an extension to ietf interfaces.
module ietf-opt-if-g698-2 {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-opt-if";
prefix ietf-opt-if-g698-2
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix if;
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modelling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web:
WG List:
WG Chair: Thomas Nadeau
WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder
Editor: Dharini Hiremagalur
";
description
"This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for
configuring Optical interfaces.
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
revision 2014-10-25 {
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Optical Management of
an Interface for g.698.2 support";
}
revision 2014-02-14 {
description
"Revision 1.0";
}
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
grouping optIfOChVendorTransceiverClass {
description " A unique Vendor transceiver class supported by
this interface";
leaf vendorTransceiverClassId {
description
"Id for the Vendor transceiver class";
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
}
leaf vendorTransceiverClass {
type string {
length "1..256";
}
description "This defines the transceiver class that
is/should be used by this interface.
Vendors can summarize a set of parameters in a
single proprietary parameter: the Class of
transceiver. The Transceiver classification will
be based on the Vendor Name and the main TX and RX
parameters i.e. Trunk Mode, Framing, Bit rate,
Trunk Type etc).";
}
}
grouping vendorTransceiverClassList {
description " List of vendor transceiver codes group"
leaf numberVendorTransceiverClassSupported {
type uint32;
description " Number of Vendor classes supported by this
interface";
}
list vendorTransceiverClassList {
key "vendorTransceiverClassId";
uses optIfOCh-VendorTransceiverClass;
}
}
grouping optIfOChApplicationCode {
description " Application code entity"
leaf applicationCodeId {
description
" Id for the Application code";
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
}
leaf applicationCode {
description "This parameter indicates the transceiver
application code at Ss and Rs as defined in
[ITU.G698.2] Chapter 5.3, that is/should be used by
this interface.
The optIfOChApplicationsCodeList has all the
application codes supported by this interface. ";
}
type string {
length "1..256";
}
}
}
grouping optIfOChApplicationCodeList {
description " List of Application codes group"
leaf numberApplicationCodesSupported {
type uint32;
description " Number of Application codes supported by
this interface";
}
list applicationCodeList {
key "applicationCodeId";
uses optIfApplicationCode;
}
}
grouping optIfOChPower {
leaf outputPower {
type int32;
units ".01dbm"
description " The output power for this interface in .01
dbm "
}
leaf inputPower {
type int32;
units ".01dbm";
description " The current input power of this interface";
}
}
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
grouping optIfOChWavelength {
leaf wavelengthn {
type uint32;
description " This parameter indicate minimum wavelength
spectrum - n, in a definite wavelength Band (L, C and S)
as represented in[RFC6205] by the formula -
Wavelength (nm ) = 1471nm + n* Channel Spacing
(converted to nm)
Eg - Channel Spacing in nm
'Wavelength (nm ) = 1471nm + n* 20nm (20nm is the
spacing for CWDM)' ";
}
}
notification optIfOChWavelengthChange {
leaf "if-name" {
type leafref {
path "/if:interface/name";
}
}
container wavelength {
uses optIfOChWavelength;
}
}
notification optIfOChApplicationCodeChange {
leaf "if-name" {
type leafref {
path "/if:interface/name";
}
}
container newApplicationCode {
uses optIfApplicationCode;
}
}
notification optIfOChVendorTransceiverCodeChange {
leaf "if-name" {
type leafref {
path "/if:interface/name";
}
}
container newVendorTransceiverClass {
uses optIfVendorTransceiverClass;
}
}
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {
container optIfOChRsSs {
description " RsSs path configuration for an interface";
container ifCurrentApplicationCode {
uses optIfOChApplicationCode;
}
container ifCurrentVendorTransceiverClass {
uses optIfOChVendorTransceiverClasses;
}
container ifSupportedApplicationCodes {
uses optIfOChApplicationCodesList;
}
container ifSupportedVendorTransceiverClass {
uses optIfOChVendorTransceiverClassList;
}
uses optIfOChPower;
uses optIfOChWavelength;
}
}
}
7. Security Considerations
The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via
the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. he lowest NETCONF layer is the secure
transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is
SSH [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides
the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF users to a pre-
configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol operation and
content.
8. IANA Considerations
This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688].
Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration is
requested to be made:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces:ietf-opt-if-g698-2
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
prefix: ietf-opt-if-g698-2 reference: RFC XXXX
9. Contributors
Dean Bogdanovic
Juniper Networks
Westford
U.S.A.
email deanb@juniper.net
Bernd Zeuner
Deutsche Telekom
Darmstadt
Germany
email B.Zeuner@telekom.de
Arnold Mattheus
Deutsche Telekom
Darmstadt
Germany
email a.mattheus@telekom.de
Manuel Paul
Deutsche Telekom
Berlin
Germany
email Manuel.Paul@telekom.de
Walid Wakim
Cisco
9501 Technology Blvd
ROSEMONT, ILLINOIS 60018
UNITED STATES
email wwakim@cisco.com
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD
58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,
"Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580,
April 1999.
[RFC3591] Lam, H-K., Stewart, M., and A. Huynh, "Definitions of
Managed Objects for the Optical Interface Type", RFC 3591,
September 2003.
[RFC6205] Otani, T. and D. Li, "Generalized Labels for Lambda-
Switch-Capable (LSC) Label Switching Routers", RFC 6205,
March 2011.
[ITU.G698.2]
International Telecommunications Union, "Amplified
multichannel dense wavelength division multiplexing
applications with single channel optical interfaces",
ITU-T Recommendation G.698.2, November 2009.
[ITU.G709]
International Telecommunications Union, "Interface for the
Optical Transport Network (OTN)", ITU-T Recommendation
G.709, March 2003.
[ITU.G872]
International Telecommunications Union, "Architecture of
optical transport networks", ITU-T Recommendation G.872,
November 2001.
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
[ITU.G798]
International Telecommunications Union, "Characteristics
of optical transport network hierarchy equipment
functional blocks", ITU-T Recommendation G.798, October
2010.
[ITU.G874]
International Telecommunications Union, "Management
aspects of optical transport network elements", ITU-T
Recommendation G.874, July 2010.
[ITU.G874.1]
International Telecommunications Union, "Optical transport
network (OTN): Protocol-neutral management information
model for the network element view", ITU-T Recommendation
G.874.1, January 2002.
[ITU.G959.1]
International Telecommunications Union, "Optical transport
network physical layer interfaces", ITU-T Recommendation
G.959.1, November 2009.
[ITU.G826]
International Telecommunications Union, "End-to-end error
performance parameters and objectives for international,
constant bit-rate digital paths and connections", ITU-T
Recommendation G.826, November 2009.
[ITU.G8201]
International Telecommunications Union, "Error performance
parameters and objectives for multi-operator international
paths within the Optical Transport Network (OTN)", ITU-T
Recommendation G.8201, April 2011.
[ITU.G694.1]
International Telecommunications Union, "Spectral grids
for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid", ITU-T
Recommendation G.694.1, June 2002.
[ITU.G7710]
International Telecommunications Union, "Common equipment
management function requirements", ITU-T Recommendation
G.7710, May 2008.
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
10.2. Informative References
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.
[RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629,
June 1999.
[RFC4181] Heard, C., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB
Documents", BCP 111, RFC 4181, September 2005.
[I-D.kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework]
Kunze, R., "A framework for Management and Control of
optical interfaces supporting G.698.2", draft-kunze-
g-698-2-management-control-framework-00 (work in
progress), July 2011.
[RFC4054] Strand, J. and A. Chiu, "Impairments and Other Constraints
on Optical Layer Routing", RFC 4054, May 2005.
Appendix A. Change Log
This optional section should be removed before the internet draft is
submitted to the IESG for publication as an RFC.
Note to RFC Editor: please remove this appendix before publication as
an RFC.
Appendix B. Open Issues
Note to RFC Editor: please remove this appendix before publication as
an RFC.
Authors' Addresses
Gabriele Galimberti (editor)
Cisco
Via Philips,12
20052 - Monza
Italy
Phone: +390392091462
Email: ggalimbe@cisco.com
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 October 2014
Ruediger Kunze (editor)
Deutsche Telekom
Dddd, xx
Berlin
Germany
Phone: +49xxxxxxxxxx
Email: RKunze@telekom.de
Kam Lam (editor)
Alcatel-Lucent
USA
Phone: +1 732 331 3476
Email: kam.lam@alcatel-lucent.com
Dharini Hiremagalur (editor)
Juniper
1194 N Mathilda Avenue
Sunnyvale - 94089 California
USA
Phone: +1408
Email: dharinih@juniper.net
Gert Grammel (editor)
Juniper
1194 N Mathilda Avenue
Sunnyvale - 94089 California
USA
Phone: +1408
Email: ggrammel@juniper.net
G.Galimberti, et al. Expires April 27, 2015 [Page 20]